New Delhi, Jan.05,2026:The US Venezuela Airstrike Crisis unfolded when President Donald Trump publicly confirmed that US forces had conducted a direct military operation in Venezuela. The attack reportedly targeted strategic locations in Caracas, culminating in the capture of President Nicolás Maduro.
While Washington framed the move as a security necessity, critics across continents argue that the action bypasses the United Nations, undermines sovereignty, and risks destabilising an already fragile region.
International legal experts have pointed out that such unilateral military action challenges Article 2(4) of the UN Charter, which prohibits the use or threat of force against sovereign nations.
India’s Cautious but Serious Response
India reacted to the US Venezuela Airstrike Crisis with measured diplomacy but unmistakable concern. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) issued an official statement acknowledging the seriousness of the developments.
“The recent developments in Venezuela are a matter of deep concern. India is closely monitoring the evolving situation,” the MEA said.
India emphasised the safety and well-being of Venezuelan citizens, reiterating its long-standing position that global conflicts must be resolved peacefully through dialogue.
Travel Advisory Issued for Indian Citizens
Amid rising tensions linked to the US Venezuela Airstrike Crisis, India issued a late-night travel advisory urging its citizens to avoid all non-essential travel to Venezuela.
The advisory underscores New Delhi’s concern that the situation could deteriorate rapidly, putting foreign nationals at risk.
Political Reactions Inside India
The crisis also triggered domestic political reactions. Senior Congress leader Jairam Ramesh voiced sharp criticism of Washington’s actions.
“The Congress party expresses deep concern over the US action in Venezuela. International law cannot be unilaterally violated,” he posted on X (formerly Twitter).
Such statements reflect a broader political consensus in India that unilateral military interventions threaten global stability.
Why the US Justified Its Venezuela Action
President Trump has repeatedly accused Venezuela of being responsible for a surge in illegal migration into the United States. He claims that criminal organisations operating from Venezuela pose a direct threat to US national security.
Two Venezuelan groups—Tren de Aragua and Cartel de los Soles—have been designated as foreign terrorist organisations by Washington. Trump has alleged that Maduro himself leads one of these groups, a claim strongly denied by Venezuela and its allies.
Iran’s Fierce Condemnation of the US Venezuela Airstrike Crisis
Iran issued one of the strongest reactions to the US Venezuela Airstrike Crisis. The Iranian Foreign Ministry described the attack as an “open act of aggression”.
According to Tehran, the US military strike constitutes a clear violation of the UN Charter, warning that such actions weaken the foundations of global order.
Iran urged the UN Security Council to act immediately to halt what it called America’s illegal aggression.
Malaysia Calls the Crisis ‘Dangerously Precedent-Setting’
Malaysia’s response added another critical voice to global opposition. President Anwar Ibrahim openly condemned the US action, calling it a dangerous precedent.
“Forcibly removing a sitting head of government through external intervention undermines international law,” he wrote.
Malaysia stressed that the people of Venezuela alone have the right to decide their political future.
Qatar Urges Dialogue Amid Rising Tensions
Qatar’s Foreign Ministry also expressed deep concern over the US Venezuela Airstrike Crisis, urging restraint from all sides.
The Gulf nation reaffirmed its commitment to peaceful dispute resolution, emphasising dialogue as the only sustainable solution.
Turkey’s Diplomatic Warning
Turkey said it was closely monitoring developments and called on all parties to avoid actions that could endanger regional or international security.
Ankara offered to contribute constructively to resolving the crisis within the framework of international law.
Hezbollah Rejects US Allegations
Lebanon-based group Hezbollah strongly condemned the US operation, calling American claims against President Maduro “false and fabricated.”
In a statement broadcast on Al-Manar TV, Hezbollah accused Washington of promoting “the law of the jungle” and weakening global security norms.
China’s Strong Opposition to US Military Action
China also reacted sharply to the US Venezuela Airstrike Crisis. The spokesperson for China’s embassy in India condemned what Beijing described as blatant use of force.
China warned that US actions threaten peace not only in Latin America but across the global system.
Japan’s G7-Aligned Position on Venezuela
Japan, speaking as a G7 nation, adopted a more diplomatic tone. While refraining from outright condemnation, Tokyo reiterated its support for restoring democracy and stability in Venezuela.
Japan offered assistance toward peaceful solutions, aligning with broader G7 priorities.
Global Implications of the US Venezuela Airstrike Crisis
The US Venezuela Airstrike Crisis is now widely seen as a test case for international norms. Analysts warn that if such actions go unchecked, they may encourage similar interventions elsewhere.
Countries in Africa, Asia, and Latin America fear that sovereignty could become increasingly fragile in a world of selective enforcement.
What This Means for International Law and the UN
Legal experts argue that the crisis has exposed weaknesses in the UN’s enforcement mechanisms. Repeated calls for Security Council action highlight growing frustration over the inability to prevent unilateral military interventions.
A World Watching Closely
The US Venezuela Airstrike Crisis has reshaped global diplomatic conversations almost overnight. India’s cautious diplomacy, the Muslim world’s strong opposition, and reactions from global powers underline one message: the world is deeply uneasy.
As tensions continue to evolve, the international community faces a critical question—will dialogue prevail, or will force redefine global order
