New Delhi, Sep.15,2025:The political debate around the Waqf Amendment Act 2025 intensified after the Supreme Court issued an interim order. Responding to the development, AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi expressed deep dissatisfaction-
According to him, the interim order fails to protect Waqf properties from the NDA government’s newly enacted law.
He said-
“This is an interim order. In my view and my party’s view, it does not safeguard Waqf properties or ensure their development.”
Owaisi on Waqf Amendment Act 2025 – The Focus Keyword Explained
When discussing the Supreme Court’s step, Owaisi on Waqf Amendment Act 2025 became one of the trending phrases across social and political platforms.
For Owaisi, the crux of the matter lies in the incomplete protection offered by the interim order. He has called for the Supreme Court to deliver a final verdict on the matter instead of temporary relief.
What the Supreme Court Interim Order Actually Says
On Monday, the Supreme Court refused to stay the entire Waqf Amendment Act 2025. However, it did impose restrictions on some specific provisions.
Key highlights of the interim order include:
- No blanket suspension of the law.
- Certain controversial provisions temporarily put on hold.
- Final hearing on constitutional validity still pending.
For full details, readers can check Supreme Court judgments archive.
Why Owaisi Believes Waqf Properties Are Still at Risk
According to Owaisi, the interim relief is inadequate. His concerns include:
- Protection Gap: Without halting the entire Act, loopholes may still threaten Waqf land.
- Development Block: He argues that the Act hinders long-term planning for Waqf institutions.
- Political Control: He fears the law enables excessive government interference.
Thus, Owaisi on Waqf Amendment Act 2025 highlights the disconnect between judicial steps and ground realities faced by Waqf boards.
Historical Background of Waqf Properties in India
To understand the debate, one must look at the history:
- Waqf refers to endowments made by Muslims for religious or charitable purposes.
- India has one of the largest Waqf estates in the world, covering thousands of properties.
- Previous governments struggled to balance autonomy vs. accountability in Waqf management.
The Waqf Amendment Act 2025 was pitched as a reform measure, but critics like Owaisi see it as an attempt to weaken minority institutions.
Political Reactions to the Interim Order
The Supreme Court’s decision has sparked political ripples:
- AIMIM: Owaisi openly criticized the order, demanding a full strike-down.
- NDA leaders: Defended the law as a tool for transparency.
- Opposition parties: Some echoed Owaisi’s concerns, while others remained cautious.
This shows the polarized nature of the debate around Waqf reform.
Legal Experts Weigh In on the Waqf Amendment Act 2025
Legal scholars argue that the Act touches sensitive constitutional issues:
- Minority Rights: Articles 25–30 of the Constitution provide special protections.
- Property Rights: Any government control over religious endowments invites judicial scrutiny.
- Balance of Power: Courts must decide if the Act oversteps executive authority.
Broader Implications for Minority Rights
For Owaisi, this is not just about Waqf property — it’s about minority rights at large.
- He argues that weakening Waqf boards undermines Muslim self-governance.
- The Act could set a precedent for controlling other minority-run institutions.
- This may fuel mistrust between minority communities and the government.
Thus, his comments reflect a larger ideological battle beyond just legal technicalities.
Public and Social Media Response
Owaisi’s sharp reaction went viral. On platforms like Twitter and Facebook:
- Supporters lauded him for standing up for Muslim rights.
- Critics accused him of politicizing the issue.
- Neutral voices highlighted the need for judicial clarity before passing judgment.
What Lies Ahead for Waqf Amendment Act 2025
The battle is far from over. The Supreme Court’s final decision will determine whether:
- The Waqf Amendment Act 2025 survives in its current form, or
- Major changes are mandated to protect minority rights.
