New Delhi, Aug.26,2025:Opposition figures have pointed to the unprecedented nature of this disappearance from public view. Former CM Ashok Gehlot termed his resignation “unprecedented,” highlighting the constitutional position Dhankhar occupied
The Mysterious Disappearance
Missing Vice-President Dhankhar has become a phrase echoing across political corridors following the silent, abrupt resignation of Jagdeep Dhankhar on July 21, 2025, citing health concerns. Since then, he has not appeared in public nor issued any statement—a fact that has stoked widespread concern and speculation.
Advertisement
From Resignation to Silence
July 21, 2025: Jagdeep Dhankhar resigns as Vice-President citing health reasons.
July 22 onward: Attempts by colleagues to reach him—including calls via his personal secretary—went unanswered. Initial response was that he was “resting,” but no further updates followed.
August 9, 2025: Kapil Sibal publicly raises the alarm, asking where Dhankhar is and whether a habeas corpus petition is.
Subsequent days: Additional leaders, including Supriya Sule, Ashok Gehlot, and parties like TMC and CPI, urge transparency and raise alarm over his absence.
Opposition Voices Alarm
Opposition figures have pointed to the unprecedented nature of this disappearance from public view. Former CM Ashok Gehlot termed his resignation “unprecedented,” highlighting the constitutional position Dhankhar occupied. Supriya Sule also voiced concern that no one—not family nor political peers—had heard a word from him. The TMC and CPI formally called for explanations over his silence and whereabouts.
Shah Speaks Out: “Don’t Make a Fuss”
Union Home Minister Amit Shah responded to the mounting speculation, affirming that Dhankhar resigned for health reasons and labeling the concerns—like claims of house arrest—as baseless. He advised against overanalyzing the matter.
Broader Speculation & Political Reactions
The unusual scenario has spurred deeper speculation—with some critics hinting at political coercion behind his exit, though no concrete evidence has surfaced. The silence and inaccessibility of a former constitutional figure have raised concerns about evolving democratic norms.
What This Means for India’s Constitutional Norms
A Vice-President vanishing from public view without explanation challenges expectations of transparency in governance. It raises pivotal questions around accountability, media scrutiny, and how political transitions are managed—especially during unforeseen medical or personal crises.
Advertisement
Key Questions That Demand Answers
Where is Jagdeep Dhankhar currently located?
What specific health issues prompted his resignation?
Has his family or medical caretaker released any confirmations?
Has the Home Ministry tracked his status?
If unwell, why hasn’t a formal medical statement been shared?
Were there any constitutional procedures overlooked during this transition?
What precedent does this silent exit set for high office-holders?
These questions aren’t rhetorical—they reflect legitimate public concern over democratic norms and respect for constitutional roles.
Calling for Transparency
The “Missing Vice-President Dhankhar” scenario underscores the need for clarity during sensitive political transitions. A comprehensive statement from relevant authorities—be it the Home Ministry, family, or a trusted institution—is necessary to allay public fear and uphold faith in democratic institutions.
