The External Affairs Minister also stated that the ongoing conflict with Canada has been for some time due to the government’s “permissiveness” towards terrorism, extremism, and violence in the country

Washington, D.C. : External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar stated that the extreme elements are a “small minority” and do not represent the overall Sikh community, emphasising that the Modi government has paid close attention to Sikh community issues.

When asked about the worries of the Sikh community in the midst of the ‘Khalistan’ crisis, Mr Jaishankar responded that the issue does not represent the opinions of the entire community.

“…Everyone is aware of the amount of attention that the Modi government has paid to the issues of the Sikh community in the last 10 years and the suggestions that it has made,” S Jaishankar said during a news conference in Washington DC on Friday.

I do not believe that the conversations that are currently taking place are typical of the entire community (Sikhs). Those who talk about terrorism, separatists whose arguments include violence…these are a small minority, and respective governments should act impartially. We should not treat this as an issue for the entire community.”

The External Affairs Minister also stated that the ongoing conflict with Canada has been for some time due to the government’s “permissiveness” towards terrorism, extremism, and violence in the country.

He claimed that Canada’s “permissiveness” towards terrorism, extremism, and violence is the root of the country’s continuous problems.

“The truth is that for a number of years now, we have had a persistent issue with Canada and the Canadian government. And the ongoing issue primarily centres on the tolerance of terrorism, extremism, and violence, according to Mr. Jaishankar.

He continued, “This permissiveness is also apparent in the absence of responses from their end to several significant extradition requests. In fact, it is not a secret that there are people and organisations in India who have openly admitted to being involved in violent and criminal activity.

Justin Trudeau, the prime minister of Canada, said last week that Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a Khalistani terrorist, was murdered by the Indian government.

India, however, has categorically denied the allegations, labelling them as “absurd” and “motivated.”

Notably, Canada has not yet made any public proof of the alleged murder of Hardeep Singh Nijjar available.

In response to suspicions of Indian complicity in the death made by Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, India has banned its visa services in Canada.

Only at JioSaavn.com can you listen to the most recent music.

India issued a warning to its nationals and those visiting Canada amid difficult relations, urging them to proceed with “utmost caution in view of growing anti-India activities and politically-condoned hate crimes and criminal violence” in the nation.

Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud headed a five-member Supreme Court bench that determined that Article 370 was a measure meant to facilitate Jammu and Kashmir’s unification with India, but only temporarily

Delhi, New: Today, the Supreme Court scheduled elections for the following year and supported the Center’s decision to remove Jammu and Kashmir’s special status under Article 370 of the Constitution.

Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud read out a majority ruling from the Supreme Court, stating that Article 370 was a temporary measure to facilitate Jammu and Kashmir’s unification with India.

The Supreme Court ordered state elections for September 30, 2024, and declared that Jammu and Kashmir should be treated on a same footing with other states “as soon as possible.”

The Supreme Court explained its ruling by stating that Jammu and Kashmir lost its sovereignty when it joined India and that its constituent parliament was dissolved at the time of the merger.

“It was not the intention for the J&K Constituent Assembly to exist indefinitely. All it was intended to do was draft the Constitution. Chief Justice Chandrachud stated that the President was not required to follow the Constituent Assembly’s recommendation.

On the other hand, the Supreme Court clarified why the state maintained its unique character even after merging with India, even if it lacked “internal sovereignty”.

“The unique circumstance that led to the introduction of Article 370 vanished together with the constituent assembly. However, the state’s circumstances persisted, and as a result, the Article was upheld by the Supreme Court.

“Legal and executive authority are available to every state in the union, though to varying extents. Some instances of specific agreements for various states are included in Articles 371A through 371J. An illustration of asymmetric federalism is this. The Supreme Court declared that Jammu and Kashmir shares no unique internal sovereignty with other states.

The bench rendered three distinct rulings: Chief Justice Chandrachud wrote the first on behalf of Justice BR Gavai, Justice Surya Kant, and himself; Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul concurred in the second verdict; and Justice Sanjiv Khanna concurred in the third.

Jammu and Kashmir was granted its own constitution and the authority to make decisions on all issues except foreign policy, communications, and defense under Article 370. The state’s unique status terminated when it was removed.

Article 35A, which was contained in Article 370, provided the former state the authority to determine who it recognized as permanent residents and granted them specific rights, such as the ability to work for the government and own property.

The Supreme Court declared that as the reorganization of Jammu and Kashmir into a Union Territory was only a temporary measure pending elections and the restoration of statehood, it was not essential to investigate whether it was legal.

A delegation from the Chinese Communist Party visited the Solomon Islands, highlighting the blooming cooperation and shared interests

The growing significance of cooperation between the two countries and their people has been brought to light by a recent visit to the Solomon Islands by a group from the Chinese Communist Party. The delegation met with Solomon Islands leaders at a high level while in the country, led by Guo Yezhou, the deputy chairman of China’s Communist Party central committee’s foreign department.

Diplomatic Cooperation

The Chinese group met with the foreign minister, energy minister, and prime minister of the Solomon Islands, Manasseh Sogavare, during their visit.

The significance of diplomatic relations between the two countries was emphasised by this series of meetings.

Strategic Alliances

Prior to this, in July, China and the Solomon Islands inked a policing accord that elevated their relationship to a “comprehensive strategic partnership.”

During the meeting between Chinese Premier Li Qiang and Prime Minister Sogavare in Beijing, this important decision was made. It signifies a strengthening of linkages across a range of collaborative fields.

Australia Will Soon Visit

It is significant that Australia’s Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is due in Beijing just one week after China’s visit to the Solomon Islands.

In light of regional dynamics and international ties, the timing of these visits is significant.

Examining the Security Treaty

In a significant move, Prime Minister Sogavare had requested in June a review of the security agreement between Australia and the Solomon Islands.

Australia has always assisted the Solomon Islands with law enforcement, thus this request for a review indicated a possible change in the security environment in the area.

Concern on a Global Scale

The security agreement between the Solomon Islands and China has received international attention.

The US underlined its concerns while also reiterating its commitment to preserving good partnerships with the region and the people of the Solomon Islands.

This reaction emphasises the Solomon Islands’ strategic importance in the larger geopolitical context.

More information on the Solomon Islands

Geographical Area

It is situated in the South Pacific Ocean.

It is made up of a diverse set of islands, the largest of which being Guadalcanal.

Population and Capital

Honiara is the capital city.

Around 700,000 people live there.

Cultural Variation

Various ethnic groups live here, including the indigenous Melanesian people.

A broad cultural legacy, including many languages and traditions.

Natural Grace

It is well-known for its beautiful coral reefs and lush rainforests.

Provides excellent diving and ecotourism options.

Recent Geopolitical Changes

Increased diplomatic connections with China, including a policing agreement.

The security treaty with Australia’s traditional partner is being reviewed.