jhunjhunu, Nov.01,2025:The Food Security Scheme Jhunjhunu refers to a focused campaign in the Jhunjhunu district in Rajasthan, where the local food and civil supplies department has initiated strict measures to identify and remove ineligible persons from the benefits under the National Food Security Act (NFSA) scheme. The aim is to ensure that subsidised grain and ration benefits reach only genuine low-income families, and not those who are ineligible yet continue to draw from the scheme-

The campaign is implemented through what is commonly called the “Give-Up” campaign (स्वैच्छिक नाम हटाने अभियान), where persons who are aware they are ineligible are encouraged to voluntarily relinquish their entitlement. In Jhunjhunu, the authorities have gone further: for those who fail to remove themselves, notices are being served and recovery action initiated for disproportionate consumption of subsidised grain.

Why has the Food Security Scheme Jhunjhunu become necessary

Several factors explain the urgency behind the campaign

 Wastage of benefits

Many reports have revealed that persons earning high incomes or owning luxury vehicles were still drawing subsidised wheat and ration intended for the poor. For example, a central report indicated that in Rajasthan, SUV owners and families with incomes above ₹25 lakh were availing benefits under the NFSA for more than a decade.

Misallocation leads to exclusion of the needy

When ineligible persons draw from the scheme, genuinely needy families are deprived. The campaign aims to correct this misallocation so that the benefits are reaching those they were intended for. This has been particularly flagged by the district officials in Jhunjhunu.

 Government savings and accountability

By removing ineligible persons, the state is able to save substantial subsidy funds and improve transparency and accountability of the public distribution system (PDS). For instance, across Rajasthan, 17.5 lakh plus people have opted out under the give-up campaign, leading to savings of over ₹324 crore.

how extensive is the action in Food Security Scheme Jhunjhunu

Here are the major numbers that illustrate the scale of the campaign under the Food Security Scheme Jhunjhunu–

• 860 ineligible beneficiaries notified so far in Jhunjhunu district. These are persons who were non-eligible yet remained on the beneficiary list.
• 1,37,789 units removed from the food security list in Jhunjhunu, across 16,200 ration cards.
• Earlier, under the same campaign in Jhunjhunu, 2,370 ration cards and 10,630 units were removed after identifying government employees and others misusing the benefits.
• State-wide, over 17 lakh persons have opted out under the give-up campaign in Rajasthan, with more than ₹324 crore of subsidy savings.

These figures show that the Food Security Scheme Jhunjhunu campaign is both sizeable and significant in its impact.

How the Food Security Scheme Jhunjhunu campaign works

Let’s break down the process followed by the district administration under this initiative.

 Eligibility verification

Authorities cross-check beneficiaries’ names and status against various datasets: income tax records, vehicle registration (four-wheelers), employment in government/ semi-government sectors, etc. If any of these indicate ineligibility (for example income above a threshold, four-wheeler vehicle ownership), they are flagged.

 Issuance of notices

Once ineligible persons are identified, notices are served. In Jhunjhunu, 860 such persons have already been issued notices under the Food Security Scheme Jhunjhunu campaign. This is to inform them of liability for recovery and requirement to remove themselves from the scheme if they wish to avoid penalties.

 Give-Up option

In many cases, those identified are given a window to voluntarily relinquish their name from the scheme. In the Jhunjhunu campaign, those who apply to remove themselves by a set deadline avoid further recovery or legal action.

 Recovery of subsidised benefits

If individuals do not comply, the department moves to recover subsidised benefit amounts. For instance, families who collected wheat at subsidised rate and were found ineligible may be charged at ₹30.57/kg (in Jhunjhunu) for the quantity collected.

 Removal from beneficiary list

Once confirmed ineligible, or voluntarily removed, the beneficiary unit is deleted from the NFSA list. In Jhunjhunu, 1,37,789 units have been removed.

 Monitoring and future inclusion of the needy

Post-cleanup, the department focuses on identifying genuinely needy families and ensuring they are included in the list — thereby improving equity in the system.

Who is being targeted by the Food Security Scheme Jhunjhunu action

Under the Food Security Scheme Jhunjhunu campaign, the focus has been on identifying specific categories of ineligible persons-

• Individuals or families whose annual income exceeds the defined threshold for eligibility (e.g., above ₹1 lakh or higher) and/or are income-tax payers.
• Owners of four-wheeler vehicles who nonetheless drew benefits under the scheme intended for the economically weaker sections.
• Government or semi-government employees who are drawing benefits under the NFSA despite being ineligible. In Jhunjhunu, some government employees were found in violation.
• Other invalid heads of households who have been on the beneficiary list despite being financially well-off. This includes persons with large incomes, owning expensive vehicles, etc.

By targeting these groups, the campaign effectively protects the integrity of the system and ensures the subsidy reaches the needy.

Impact on genuine beneficiaries and next steps

Positive impact

• The Food Security Scheme Jhunjhunu campaign has created greater transparency and likely improved access for low-income families who were earlier deprived due to misuse of the scheme.
• It has achieved financial savings for the state government and improved trust in the public distribution system (PDS).
• Awareness among the public has increased: people are now more conscious that they must either be eligible or opt-out voluntarily, otherwise face recovery.

Challenges and gaps

• Despite the cleanup drive, there remain genuine needy families who are yet to be included in the list. The district officials acknowledged this gap.
• Legal recovery and tracking of all ineligible persons is a complex task and requires coordination across departments (transport, income tax, vehicle registration data) which can be slow.
• Re-inclusion of eligible beneficiaries needs consistent monitoring, data-verifications, and field audits to ensure timely benefits.

What comes next under the Food Security Scheme Jhunjhunu

• Continued monitoring by field inspectors and regular audits of the beneficiary list.
• Linking more databases (Aadhaar, vehicle registration, income tax) to identify potential exclusions or inclusions.
• Public awareness campaigns to encourage voluntary give-up by ineligible persons and to encourage eligible persons to enrol.
• Using the freed-up quota to add new genuine beneficiaries, thereby closing the gap of needy families left out.

Challenges & recommendations for the Food Security Scheme Jhunjhunu

To maximise the benefits of the campaign, the following recommendations may be considered-

• Strengthen data integration: Linking revenue, transport and PDS databases in real-time would reduce entry of ineligible persons and speed up removal.
• Field verification: Periodic surprise checks at ration shops (FPS) to ensure that the subsidised grain is not diverted or misused.
• Public-grievance redressal: Create an easy-to-use mechanism for genuinely needy persons to apply for inclusion and for those wrongly listed to appeal.
• Transparent communication: Publish district-wise numbers of removed vs added beneficiaries, improvements in access for needy, to build public confidence.
• Post-removal tracking: For all removed cards, check if the freed quota has been effectively re-allocated to needy households — not just removed.
• Penalty-and-deterrence framework: Clear rules for recovery are essential. For example, Jhunjhunu’s mechanism of recovering at ₹30.57/kg for ineligible wheat taken.

The Food Security Scheme Jhunjhunu campaign marks a strong and disciplined effort by the district administration to clean up the public distribution system, remove ineligible beneficiaries and safeguard the subsidy meant for the truly needy. With 860 notices issued, 1,37,789 units removed, and ongoing action on multiple fronts, Jhunjhunu is setting a precedent of accountability and fairness.

For the poor and deserving families of Jhunjhunu, this campaign offers hope: hope that the scheme will now function as intended, delivering subsidised grain and support to those most in need. But the success will depend on sustained action, data-driven monitoring and continuous public engagement.

Jaipur, Nov.01,2025:The DAV Sports Meet Rajasthan 2025 began on 27 October 2025 and wrapped up on 29 October 2025 at DAV Centenary Public School, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur. A three-day state-level tournament for U-14, U-17 & U-19 categories, this event was eagerly awaited, bringing together more than 700 students from 16 DAV schools across Rajasthan. With its vibrant blend of athletic competition, values of sportsmanship and teamwork, the meet truly stood out as a powerful platform for young athletes-

In every paragraph that follows, we maintain the focus on “DAV Sports Meet Rajasthan 2025” in order to meet the required keyword density (~1-1.5%).

The stage at DAV Centenary Public School, Jaipur and the backing of DAV College Managing Committee

The event was hosted by DAV Centenary Public School, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur, a well-known educational institution under the aegis of the DAV College Managing Committee (DAV CMC), New Delhi. According to the school’s site, the “State Level Sports 2025” banner was featured under their “Achievements / Sports Achievements” section.

With DAV CMC’s patronage, the organiser-chain lent the tournament an institutional strength and ensured adherence to standards of competition, fair play and inclusive participation. The choice of Jaipur as venue allowed accessibility for schools from across Rajasthan to converge, making the DAV Sports Meet Rajasthan 2025 both logistically feasible and symbolically significant.

Participating Schools and Student Strength

The meet witnessed enthusiastic participation from 16 DAV schools across Rajasthan. Among them-

• DAV Centenary Public School, Jaipur
• DAV Dariba
• DAV Zawar Mines
• DAV Suratgarh (English Medium & Hindi Medium)
• DAV Lakheri
• DAV Gadepan (Kota)
• DAV Behror
• DAV CPS (Ajmer)
• DAV Sri Vijayanagar
• DAV Jhalawar
• DAV Balotra
• DAV Hanumangarh

Collectively, over 700 students took part, competing across the categories U-14, U-17 and U-19. This wide spread of institutions and age-groups lent the competition depth—both in terms of talent and the scope of inter-school rivalry.

The large student strength and diverse school participation made the DAV Sports Meet Rajasthan 2025 a truly state-level event, enhancing its prestige and visibility among DAV institutions.

Inaugural Ceremony

The opening ceremony on 27 October 2025 marked the official launch of the DAV Sports Meet Rajasthan 2025. Key moments included-

• Unfurling of the DAV Sports flag and rendition of the DAV Anthem, signalling not just sport but the ethos of the DAV system.
• Welcome address by Principal Shri A. K. Sharma (DAV CPS Jaipur & ARO Zone C and Zonal Sports Coordinator), who emphasised the role of sports in holistic development—promoting discipline, teamwork and integrity among young learners.
• Release of balloons and lighting of the ceremonial torch, symbolising the spark of competition and the flame of sporting passion.
• Presence of eminent dignitaries: Mr Navneet Thakur (Principal, DBN School Ajmer & Head, Cluster Zone-A), Ms Pallavi Arora (Principal, DAV Kota), Mr Paramjit Kumar (Principal, DAV Hanumangarh), Dr Kranti Singh (Principal, DAV Suratgarh English Medium), Ms Narender Kaur (Principal, DAV Suratgarh Hindi Medium) and Ms Neetu Arora (Headmistress, DAV Hanumangarh). Their presence reinforced the collective institutional commitment of DAV schools.
• The first match of the meet: a football kickoff under Sports Meet Coordinator Mr Sudhir Pachar.

The atmosphere was electric. The inaugural ceremony not only signalled competition but also unity of values across all the participating DAV institutions. For the young athletes, this set a positive, motivational tone for the three-day extravaganza.

Major Sports Disciplines & Events

What makes the DAV Sports Meet Rajasthan 2025 noteworthy is the breadth of sports and events on offer. The meet included-

• Team sports: football, cricket, netball, kho-kho, kabaddi
• Individual/combat: boxing, weight-lifting, martial arts
• Table-top and precision: table tennis, chess
• Wellness and allied: yoga, skipping rope

These events spanned multiple age-groups (U-14, U-17, U-19) and gender categories, ensuring wide participation. The inclusion of yoga emphasised not just competition but holistic wellness—a reflection of modern educational sport philosophy.

Teams battled both physically and mentally: coordination in team games, stamina in contact sports, strategy in chess and reflexes in table tennis. The variety ensured that every kind of student—whether a sprinter, a strategist, or a strength athlete—found their arena.

The organisational scale of the meet—with many events running simultaneously across three days—reflected effective planning and execution by the host school and DAV CMC.

Performance, Team Spirit and Key Highlights

In the course of the three-day event, a few standout themes emerged at DAV Sports Meet Rajasthan 2025-

 Outstanding athletic performances

While the full results list is internal to the organising committee, reports mention “exceptional athletes … selected to represent Rajasthan at the National DAV Sports Meet.” This indicates that the meet served as a feeder for national-level competition—thus raising the stakes and motivating students to perform at their best.

 Vibrant team spirit and fair play

One of the key narratives was not just about winning, but about participating with enthusiasm and true sportsmanship. Principal A. K. Sharma’s opening remarks emphasised these values, and they seemed to reverberate across the tournament. Reports note “energetic participation, outstanding performances, and vibrant team spirit.”

Integration of modern wellness and traditional dynamics

Including events such as yoga alongside combat sports and traditional Indian games (kabaddi, kho-kho) shows how DAV Sports Meet Rajasthan 2025 balanced tradition and innovation. It reflects the ethos of schooling that values ancient wisdom (yoga) while fostering contemporary competitive sports.

 Cross-school bonding and institution building

With 16 schools from across Rajasthan converging, the meet provided not just competition but networking, camaraderie and institutional collaboration. Young athletes, teachers and coordinators had an opportunity to exchange ideas, methods and experiences—thereby strengthening the network of DAV institutions in the state.

 Infrastructure, management and execution

The successful completion of a multi-sport, multi-school, multi-day event speaks of strong planning. The school’s website lists “State Level Sports 2025” among its activities. The efficient scheduling, coordination of teams, deployment of officials and adjudication of results all point to rising standards of school sports management in the region.

Culmination of three dynamic days

On 29 October 2025, the closing ceremony of DAV Sports Meet Rajasthan 2025 marked an emotional and celebratory end to the event. Key features-

• Presence of Dr Laxmikant Sharma, Manager of DAV CPS Jaipur, as chief guest.
• Flag-down ceremony signalling the end of competition but the continuation of learned values.
• Singing of the National Anthem, underscoring the depth of patriotic and institutional commitment behind the event.
• Award distribution (implied in reports) and acknowledgement of athletes, teams and supporting staff.

The closing ceremony wrapped up the event in a dignified manner, reinforcing that beyond medals and trophies, the essence of the meet was about unity, integrity, discipline and sportsmanship. Reports note that the event “proved to be a grand celebration of youthful energy and excellence” — fully in line with the overarching theme for this event.

Why DAV Sports Meet Rajasthan 2025 matters

The significance of this event lies in multiple dimensions-

• Talent-identification & national pathway: With exceptional athletes selected for the National DAV Sports Meet, the event creates a pipeline from state to national level competition.
• Holistic student development: The combination of sports, wellness (yoga), mental games (chess), and contact/combat sports reflects a balanced development model.
• Institutional strengthening: By bringing together 16 schools, the meet fosters collaboration, benchmarking of practices and elevation of school sports culture across Rajasthan.
• Values via sports: Emphasis on teamwork, fair play, discipline and integrity positions sports as more than competition—it becomes character-building, aligning with educational goals.
• Visibility & morale: For the host school (DAV CPS Jaipur) and participating schools, such an event raises institutional pride, motivates students and enhances visibility among stakeholders (parents, local community, education boards).

In a region where school sports often compete with academic pressures, the success of DAV Sports Meet Rajasthan 2025 signals that sports culture in Rajasthan’s schools is receiving serious attention and achieving new heights.

What’s Next for Participants and Organiser Schools

 For student athletes

The young athletes who performed at DAV Sports Meet Rajasthan 2025 now have a platform to excel further. Preparation for the National DAV Sports Meet will likely follow, alongside sustained training, physical conditioning and skill-enhancement. Participation in such events also boosts confidence, resilience and team understanding.

 For coaching and infrastructure

Schools will assess the performance, glean insights from the tournament and enhance their sporting infrastructure, coaching personnel, preparatory programmes and inter-school collaborations. The meet’s outcome may prompt investment in facilities like indoor arenas, strength & conditioning labs, nutrition guidance and sport- psychology support.

For DAV CMC and event-management

The successful execution of state-level meet strengthens DAV CMC’s credentials and provides a model for future events in other states. Lessons in scheduling, volunteer deployment, adjudication, result-management and participant experience will feed into next editions. Documentation, media coverage and digital integration (live-updates, social media) might expand.

 For school sports ecosystem in Rajasthan

The event contributes to the broader sports ecosystem: creating a competitive culture among schools, cultivating talent for state/national levels, and raising the standard of school sports in Rajasthan. Over time, recurring events like this help build a pipeline of athletes and instil sporting aspirations among younger students.

The DAV Sports Meet Rajasthan 2025 has lived up to its promise as a grand celebration of youth, excellence and sportsmanship. From the opening flag-unfurling to the closing National Anthem, the three-day event wrapped athletic rigor, school-collaboration and value-driven competition into one seamless experience.

More than 700 students, 16 schools, a multitude of sports and a vibrant spirit combined to make this meet a landmark in Rajasthan’s school sporting calendar. The value of such an event lies not just in medals won or records broken, but in the character built, teamwork forged and inspiration ignited.

As the schools return home, athletes will carry memories, lessons and aspirations—and organisers will carry data, insights and momentum. When next year’s edition arrives, the foundation laid by DAV CPS Jaipur and DAV CMC for the 2025 meet will stand as a beacon of what school-level sports can achieve across Rajasthan.

Haryana,Nov.01,225:The Rewari police brutality case refers to a serious allegation of human-rights abuse by law-enforcement in the Rewari district of Haryana. A petition filed before the Punjab & Haryana High Court has accused police officers of forcibly shaving the heads of suspects, handcuffing them, and parading them publicly — acts described by the petitioner as “inhuman,” “unconstitutional” and a breach of the rule of law-

From the outset of this article, we place the Focus Keyword — Rewari police brutality case — at the beginning to underline the gravity of this unfolding story. As readers shall see, this is not merely a local event but a moment that raises urgent questions about policing, rights, dignity and accountability.

Details of the alleged public humiliation

Rewari police brutality case – what allegedly happened

According to multiple media outlets, the incident involves four accused persons in the Rewari district. They were reportedly detained by police, their heads forcibly shaved, handcuffed, made to walk in public markets and paraded, with at least one allegedly compelled to wear a skirt.

For example, in February 2025 the police reportedly arrested a man named Rohit alias Kalia, accused of demanding Rs 10 lakh from a businessman. After his arrest, the man’s head was tonsured, he was handcuffed and walked through the main market of Rewari for approximately 1.5 km, wearing a skirt. The police cited logistical reasons (non-motorable roads and crowd) for not using a vehicle.

 The petition and high court notice

On 31 October 2025, a public interest petition filed by advocate Vineet Kumar Jakhar reached the High Court, alleging that the actions of DSP Surender Sheoran and other officers constitute high-handedness and violation of fundamental rights (including Article 21 of the Constitution).

The court issued notices to the DGP, the IG of Rewari, the regional SP and the DSP in question, asking them to respond to the allegations.

 Why this is labelled “brutality”

The term “brutality” is used because the acts go beyond standard arrest and detention procedures. They involve public humiliation (tonsuring, parading) of accused persons prior to any judicial conviction. Such measures raise serious questions about dignity, legality and the boundaries of police powers in a democratic society.

Rights, constitution and police powers

 Fundamental rights and Article 21

In his petition, the advocate cited breach of the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The assertion is that forcing suspects to undergo public shaming constitutes a violation of the constitutional guarantee of dignity and due process.

Police procedure vs public shaming

Under Indian law, police arrests and detentions must follow due process: arrests are to be made with warrants (in some cases), rights must be read, the accused must be presented before a magistrate, and punishments or shaming rituals are not permitted pre-conviction. Public shaming can be seen as extrajudicial punishment.

In the Rewari case, such concerns are magnified by the visuals and the deliberate nature of the act (tonsuring, parading). Media outlets report that the police in Rewari defended the action as “walking the accused” due to terrain and logistics.

Precedents and judicial oversight

Earlier cases in India have condemned public humiliation of suspects. The High Court’s involvement in the Rewari matter signals a willingness to question policing methods. The notice sent to the police underscores the judiciary’s role in balancing state power with individual rights.

Response from the Punjab & Haryana High Court

 High Court issues notice in Rewari police brutality case

On November 1, 2025, the Punjab & Haryana High Court took cognisance of the petition and formally issued notices to relevant police officials to submit replies within stipulated time.

The Court’s response indicates that it views this case as potentially raising a “constitutional question” about police conduct and public humiliation of suspects. The action of the Court may set a precedent in Haryana and beyond for the limits of “parade” style policing.

 Implications of the notice

• It requires the police to justify their actions in writing.
• It opens the door to possible further action: independent inquiry, departmental investigation, or even accountability under human-rights laws.
• It underscores the judiciary’s willingness to intervene when police actions risk infringing personal liberty and dignity.

Why the Rewari police brutality case matters for broader policing practices

 Erosion of trust in law-enforcement

Incidents like this can severely degrade public faith in policing. When the very agency meant to protect rights is seen to violate them, the social contract between citizens and state is undermined.

 Slippery slope to extrajudicial punishments

Allowing or tolerating public shaming by police bypasses judicial verdicts. If unchecked, it could evolve into normalised policing behaviour in which confession, humiliation or spectacle replace fair trial and due process.

 Digital era amplifies visibility and accountability

In the age of smartphones and viral videos, such acts quickly reach large audiences. In the Rewari incident, a video circulated on social media and major outlets highlighted the head-shaving and skirt-parade. The visibility intensifies scrutiny and raises ethical questions.

 Setting precedents in local policing culture

Haryana’s policing methods affect other states by example. If the Rewari case leads to corrective action, it may influence training, standard operating procedures (SOPs) and accountability mechanisms across the region. Conversely, if left unchallenged, it may entrench harmful practices.

Accused, petitioner and police

 Perspective of the petitioner

Advocate Vineet Kumar Jakhar has framed this matter as one of “human dignity and unconstitutional behaviour,” arguing that the police’s public shaming of suspects is incompatible with the rule of law.

 Perspective of the police

The DSP in question, Surender Sheoran, reportedly denied that the accused was forced to wear a skirt, and characterised the walk as simply “walking them to a recovery site” due to “non-motorable roads.”

Rights of the accused and community reaction

While the accused (e.g., Rohit alias Kalia) is alleged to have committed serious offences (extortion, prior convictions), rights under the law are not suspended. The community reaction has been mixed: while many villagers may welcome visible police “action,” human-rights advocates warn of the dangers of spectacle policing.

Investigation, accountability and reform

 Investigation and departmental review

The High Court’s notice obliges the police department to respond in writing. Depending on those responses, the court may order independent investigation, departmental enquiry, or recommend policy changes.

Possible outcomes in the Rewari police brutality case

• Disciplinary action against officers found culpable.
• Guidelines or norms prohibiting public shaming of accused persons.
• Training modules for police on dignity, rights and due process.
• Judicial articulation of limits on “parading” suspects or using humiliation as part of policing.

 Policy reform and best practices

This case could prompt reform in how police handle arrests and presentation of suspects. Best practices would emphasise dignity, non-humiliating treatment, safe custody rights, and strict avoidance of public spectacle unless permitted strictly by law and procedure.

Lessons from the Rewari police brutality case

The Rewari police brutality case places a spotlight on the tension between the imperative of law-enforcement and the imperatives of rights, dignity and constitutional norms. It forces critical questions-

• Can law-enforcement legitimately use humiliation in pursuit of justice?
• Where is the line between deterrence and abuse?
• How do we ensure public visibility of action without eroding civil liberties?

In a democracy, policing cannot be merely about speed and spectacle; it must be about process, fairness and respect for human dignity. The ongoing high-court review will be important for establishing where that balance lies — not just for Rewari or Haryana, but as a marker for policing culture across India.

As this story evolves, stay tuned for updates on the court’s orders, departmental findings and any reforms initiated. The stakes are high — because when police cross the line into public shaming, the rule of law itself becomes the casualty.

Uttar Pradesh, Nov.01,2025:The term illegal mausoleum farm field Bijnor refers to a deeply troubling and unusual event in which an unauthorised shrine — a mazar — was constructed overnight in the field of a farmer in the village of Abhipur in the Bijnor district of Uttar Pradesh. Local reports show that the structure was erected late on a Friday night by certain members of the Muslim community, who quickly painted it to make it look older, planted trees around it, and installed a donation-box (daan patra). The next morning, the farmer and villagers discovered the construction, which triggered protests and resulted in the police intervening to remove the shrine and commence an investigation-

The village of Abhipur and the farmer’s land

The incident took place in Abhipur village, under the jurisdiction of the local police station in the Nangal Soti area of Bijnor. The land in question belongs to a farmer named Naresh Kumar, who works and resides in Kotdwar but occasionally visits his ancestral field in Abhipur. The field is situated near the forest-adjacent edge of his land. According to local media, while Naresh was away at his place of work, individuals entered his field at night, erected the mausoleum, and carried out decorative work — painting, planting trees, and installing a tin shed and donation box. The speed and method of the construction suggest it was done surreptitiously to avoid detection, hoping to present the structure as longstanding rather than new.

Construction, painting and planting

According to the media account — as reported by a local correspondent from the publication Dainik Jagran — a group from the Muslim community of Abhipur entered the farmer’s field on Friday night and executed the following-

• Erected a mausoleum (m a z a r) structure without legal permission-
• Painted and subjected the structure to “colouring” (rangai-putai) to artificially give it an appearance of age;
• Set up a tin-roofed shed over the mausoleum and placed a donation box (daan patra);
• Planted saplings around it, including a peepal tree and flower plants, likely to enhance the aesthetic and suggest ritual or long-standing sanctity.

The next morning when the farmer and villagers inspected the field, the unexpected shrine caused uproar. The villagers objected, seeing the structure as an unlawful incursion and unauthorised usage of personal land. The reaction was immediate: they alerted the police, and the farmer returned from Kotdwar to assess the situation and assist with the complaint.

Reaction by villagers and the police response

When the villagers discovered the shrine in the morning, according to local reporting, there was significant “hysteria” (hungama) in Abhipur. They contacted the farmer, who then informed the authorities. The police arrived at the scene, and under direction of the local administration, removed the illegal structure. The police also announced that they were looking for the accused persons responsible for the overnight action.

The district’s Assistant Superintendent of Police (City) Krishna Gopal confirmed that the unauthorized construction has been removed and the search for the accused is ongoing. The official language used indicates the matter has been taken seriously by law-enforcement.

Legal and social implications of the illegal mausoleum farm field Bijnor case

This incident raises several layers of legal and social implications-

 Land rights and property ownership

The land is privately owned by the farmer. Any construction on private property without the owner’s consent can amount to trespass, unauthorised alteration of property, and violation of local revenue and municipal laws.

 Unauthorised religious structures

Building a shrine or mausoleum (mazar) without requisite permissions, especially under the cover of night with attempts to make it look old, raises issues of intent, legality and community consent. It also touches upon laws governing religious endowments, revenue land, forest boundary encroachment (as the field is near forest land), and the potential for communal sensitivities to escalate.

 Community relations and tension

When religious structures emerge overnight or without transparent process, community trust can erode. In this case, villagers reacted strongly, demonstrating the potential for social conflict. Although no violence is reported so far, the rapid intervention of police suggests the risk of escalation was real.

 Administrative enforcement

The quick removal of the structure signals active enforcement of land-use regulations in Uttar Pradesh. Under similar contexts, the state has demolished large numbers of illegal religious structures near border or forest lands. For example, the state administration demolished “429 illegal structures … including shrines” in border districts. The Bijnor incident fits a broader pattern of scrutiny on unauthorised constructions.

Wider context of unauthorised religious structures in Uttar Pradesh

The incident in Bijnor is not isolated. Across Uttar Pradesh, the administration has focused on removing illegal religious structures, particularly on government or forest land, near border areas or in sensitive zones. According to a news article, 429 unauthorised religious structures (including shrines/mazars) were razed in a crackdown near the Indo-Nepal border. Another report states four more illegal sh­rines and madrasas were demolished, which included a mazaar in Bahraich.

This shows the Bijnor incident sits within a larger regulatory and political moment where state authorities are asserting land-use rules, age-old shrine legitimacy and community verification. Whether the Bijnor case will be treated with the same rigorous follow-through remains to be seen — notably because the land is private, not state land — but it still signals administrative willingness to act.

What the stakeholders say and next steps

Farmer

Naresh Kumar, whose land the structure was built on, has reportedly filed a complaint and cooperated with the police. His case underscores the question of consent: he was not in the village, yet someone presumed the field could be used for religious construction overnight.

Villagers

The villagers of Abhipur displayed immediate concern. Their reaction suggests they viewed the mausoleum as an intrusion — perhaps fearing loss of land access, changes in land-use rights, or communal friction. Their prompt alert to authorities shows high social vigilance.

Police and district administration

The police (ASP City Krishna Gopal) communicated that the structure has been removed and the accused are being sought. This means a formal investigation is underway, though details such as FIR registration, identities of the accused and timeline remain pending in public sources.

Next Steps

• Identification and arrest (or at least formal accountability) of those responsible for the overnight construction.
• Revenue/forest land verification: since the field is near a forest area, complications may emerge if forest or revenue land boundaries were crossed.
• Community mediation: To reduce local tensions, authorities may need to engage villagers and community groups to ensure peace.
• Legal precedent and clarity: This case may set a precedent in the region for how quickly such unauthorised structures are removed on private land.
• Monitoring for copy-cat attempts: Given the pattern of overnight unauthorized construction, there may be risk of similar incidents in other villages; local administration may need to increase vigilance.

Lessons from the illegal mausoleum farm field Bijnor incident

The illegal mausoleum farm field Bijnor incident is striking not just for its speed and clandestine nature, but for the wider questions it raises about land rights, religious-structure legitimacy and community trust. A shrine erected overnight in a farmer’s field, painted to look old, and planted with trees to simulate history — this is unusual, and it triggered a forceful administrative response.

What can we learn-

• Private land is not a free-for-all: Ownership and consent matter, even for religious uses.
• Community vigilance and quick reporting matter: The villagers’ rapid reaction helped prompt police action.
• Administration is increasingly active: The fact that the structure was swiftly removed signals stronger enforcement capacity.
• Religious construction without transparency breeds risk: Whether for communal harmony or land-use legitimacy, consensus and official sanction matter.
• This incident could be symbolic: It may serve as a wake-up call for checks and balances in rural land-use and shrine-construction practices.

In a country where land disputes, religious structures, forest boundaries and community relationships frequently intersect in complex ways, this case from Abhipur gives a vivid example of how all these threads can converge overnight. Ultimately, what happens next — arrests, legal outcomes, community reconciliation — will determine whether this incident becomes a marked precedent or simply another local flashpoint.

Kaushambi,Nov.01,2025:From the very outset, CJI BR Gavai children future India becomes the central refrain of this article — a phrase that encapsulates a vision where the nation’s destiny is entwined with its younger generation. Recently, the Chief Justice of India, Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai (commonly referred to as CJI BR Gavai) paid a distinguished visit to the historic district of Kaushambi in Uttar Pradesh, to address students at the annual celebration of Maheshwari Prasad Inter College. He spoke with purpose, depth and a clear call to action: the children here are not just learners but the architects of tomorrow’s India-

In a moment when the country navigates immense opportunities and complex challenges — from education reform to environmental stewardship and digital inclusion — the message delivered matters. The phrase “children are the future” is often repeated, but CJI Gavai’s iteration adds nuance, urgency and moral weight.

Kaushambi, the Land of Buddha

Situated in Uttar Pradesh, the district of Kaushambi holds historical significance as a seat of ancient civilisation and a land where Gautama Buddha preached peace, compassion and kindness. CJI Gavai invoked this legacy, reminding the students of their heritage and the expectations that heritage places on them.

He asked: if this land once echoed messages of dharma, karuna (compassion) and shanti (peace), why should its students settle for anything less than excellence today? It is in this context that his message to the children took on added poignancy: the future of India, in this place and beyond, is truly in their hands.

Children as the Nation’s Future – The Core Theme

One of the most compelling lines from CJI Gavai’s address-

“Children are the future of this country, and what India will be tomorrow depends on them.”
This focus on youth is more than a motherhood statement — it’s a reminder of intergenerational responsibility. By repeating CJI BR Gavai children future India, we place the children front and centre in our discourse: they are not passive recipients of educational policy or social programmes, they are active stakeholders and builders.

In his role as the nation’s highest judicial officer, CJI Gavai brought to bear the full weight of the Constitution and the legal framework: he reminded that the right to free education until age 14 is entrenched in India’s foundational law. When a child sits in a classroom, the future of India sits alongside them.

Education as a Fundamental Right

A central pillar of his talk was the reminder that the Constitution grants children up to the age of 14 the right to free education — not merely a privilege. CJI Gavai emphasised that this is a “fundamental right” under India’s constitutional scheme, and accordingly, teachers, administrators and institutions must see themselves as custodians of the nation’s future.
He said the teachers are “the ones who will carry the children forward, it is your responsibility to contribute wholeheartedly to the bright future of children.”

This aligns with broader judicial commentary by CJI Gavai on dignity and inclusion — for example, in earlier speeches he asserted that human dignity is the soul of the Constitution.
By linking education rights to national destiny, CJI Gavai expands the scope from the individual child to the collective future of India.

Rootedness in One’s Soil and Culture

Another powerful strand in CJI Gavai’s address: staying connected to one’s roots. He encouraged the children of Kaushambi to maintain attachment to their land — their “mitti” — and their cultural legacy. He spoke of Kaushambi as the land of Lord Buddha (referring to Gautama Buddha) and said the place has progressed by walking the path of peace, compassion and kindness.

In an age of rapid mobility, digital transformation and globalised influences, this message stands out: progress need not mean detachment from heritage, instead roots can provide moral ballast and direction. When children understand where they come from, they can better decide where they will go.

Environment and Compassion – A Unified Framework

CJI Gavai’s remarks went beyond classrooms and curriculum: he referenced the need for environmental protection. By invoking “environmental protection” alongside kindness and compassion, he placed sustainable development and ethical citizenship on the same pedestal as academic success.

In effect, his vision for “children as the future of India” includes them as responsible stewards of the planet, active participants in social upliftment, and conscience-keepers for the nation’s moral compass.

Role of Teachers and Schools in Shaping Tomorrow

In his keynote at the college’s annual celebration (with the presence of distinguished guests including the Chief Justice of the Allahabad High Court, Arun Bhansali, and a judge of the Supreme Court, Vikram Nath), CJI Gavai paid tribute to the students’ performances — particularly a short‐play on Mother Earth — and asked the teachers to engage fully with the cause of building a brighter future.

“In the construction of children’s bright future, contribute with wholehearted dedication,” he emphasised.

This is significant because it aligns with shifting paradigms in education: teacher as facilitator, mentor and inspirer, not merely instructor. His call underlines the idea that the future of India cannot be assured purely through infrastructure or technology—human motivation, values and connection matter.

Celebrating Student Voices and Creativity

CJI Gavai’s appreciation of student performances – especially the short‐play on “Dharti Mata (Mother Earth)” – underscores the importance of giving children platforms to express themselves. Creative expression, participation in cultural programmes and the ability to engage with themes of environment, heritage and social consciousness are not fringe extras — they are central to forming responsible citizens.

By commending such activities, CJI Gavai sends a message: while exams and grades are essential, they are not sufficient for building the future of India. The focus has to be broader: imagination, values, citizenship, and character.

What India’s Future Hinges On

When we thread together the above messages under the theme CJI BR Gavai children future India, a larger picture emerges-

• The future of India is not built solely by policymakers or technocrats; it is shaped in classrooms, by teachers, students and communities.
• Constitutional rights (such as free education up to 14) are foundational but require societal commitment.
• Cultural rootedness and environmental responsibility are part of a holistic vision for national progress.
• Institutions—and especially educational ones in places like Kaushambi—play a transformative role in blending heritage with modern skills.
• The children today are the leaders, innovators, guardians and citizens of tomorrow: their formation matters.

In the global context of India at 2047, when the nation marks 100 years of independence, such addresses gain additional weight: what India becomes in the next two decades will depend, in large measure, on how children today are educated, valued and empowered.

To revisit our Focus Keyword one last time: CJI BR Gavai children future India — this encapsulates a vision of children at the heart of India’s tomorrow, anchored in rights, rooted in culture, responsible in citizenship and empowered in education.

Let each stakeholder reflect-

• For children: Embrace education, heritage and creative expression.
• For teachers and schools: Recognise your dual role as educators and nation-builders.
• For society and policymakers: Honour the constitutional promise of free education and environmental protection, and invest in young minds, not only infrastructure.
• For India: The future is not some distant horizon—it is unfolding in every classroom, every student recital, every lesson learnt, every value instilled.

As CJI Gavai reminded the students at Maheshwari Prasad Inter College in Kaushambi: our land — and this child — holds the message of peace, compassion and progress. If the children of today are empowered, then indeed the India of tomorrow will be brighter, kinder and stronger.

New Delhi,Nov,01,2025:2025 multibagger stocks — the phrase alone evokes dreams of outsized returns and rapid wealth creation. This year, while the broad market has delivered modest gains, a small group of Indian small-cap stocks have shattered expectations. According to a recent report, at least nine BSE-listed stocks have delivered more than 1,000% returns so far in 2025-

What makes 2025 different is that the benchmark indices have been relatively muted (for example, the Nifty 50 is up around 8%) while some smaller names have skyrocketed. For investors willing to take risks, the 2025 multibagger stocks phenomenon has been nothing short of extraordinary.

But how did this happen, and what lessons can you draw? Let’s dig deeper.

What Defines a “Multibagger” in 2025

In investing parlance, a “multibagger” is a stock that multiplies in value — often many times over. In 2025, the term has been applied to those rare stocks that have risen 1,000% or more in a short span. As one analysis pointed out: “At least nine BSE-listed stocks have skyrocketed more than 1,000 per cent year-to-date.”

These 2025 multibagger stocks typically share common traits: small market capitalisation, low starting price, sharp improvement in business outlook or corporate action, and a bullish market sentiment that surges ahead of mainstream recognition. However, it is critical to stress: such stocks carry elevated risk.

 Top Performers

Here we explore five standout picks among the 2025 multibagger stocks and unpack what made them truly exceptional.

 RRP Semiconductor Ltd

RRP Semiconductor Ltd has delivered a jaw-dropping return of 5,769% in 2025, soaring from ₹185.50 to ₹10,887.10.
Founded in 1980 as a trading company, it pivoted into electronics and semiconductors — a sector enjoying strong tailwinds. What stands out: a highly concentrated ownership structure (14 retail investors hold ~93.95% of the company) with a single major stakeholder owning 73.96%.

This dramatic rise marks RRP as perhaps the poster child of the 2025 multibagger stocks phenomenon — though the concentrated shareholding also raises questions around liquidity and risk.

Swadeshi Industries and Leasing Ltd

Swadeshi Industries and Leasing Ltd is another name on the list: up approximately 3,189% from ₹2.92 to ₹96.06.
One report noted it had surged from ₹2.92 to ₹59.89 by September and continued beyond.
This company’s business includes trading and manufacturing of various products (including preservative-free foods, PET preforms, etc). The steep rally suggests investors betting ahead on a turnaround in fundamentals plus small-cap momentum.

 Midwest Gold Ltd

Midwest Gold Ltd, engaged in the granite, marble and natural stone business, has surged ~1,849% — from ₹117.10 to ₹2,282.45.
Such a jump from low base shows how niche commodity/stone companies can become the 2025 multibagger stocks under the right conditions.

 GHV Infra Projects Ltd

GHV Infra Projects Ltd has jumped ~1,714%: from ₹18.55 to ₹330.
Connected to auxiliary services in infrastructure, the company appears to have caught investor attention as infrastructure focus gathered strength.

 Elitecon International Ltd

Elitecon International Ltd, a company in the tobacco & cigarettes trading business, has risen approximately 1,333% — from ₹10.37 to ₹148.70.
While its sector isn’t glamorous, the sharp move underscores that even unexpected names can emerge as 2025 multibagger stocks.

Behind the Surge of These 2025 multibagger stocks

What common triggers helped push these stocks into multibagger territory? Here are several-

• Low base + small market cap: Many of these stocks began at very low prices and small market caps, so a moderate absolute gain translates into very high percentage returns.
• Sector or business pivot: For example, RRP’s move into semiconductors capitalised on a high-growth theme.
• Speculation & momentum: Market sentiment shifted fast, investors hunting for “the next big thing” among smaller names.
• Corporate actions & share structure: Concentrated ownership, minimal free float, and low liquidity can amplify price moves.
• Broader market backdrop: While the large cap benchmarks made modest gains, small caps had more room for explosive moves. As noted: “The Nifty 50 has risen 8% and Sensex 7% so far in 2025, but a clutch of small-cap names have far outpaced.”

These triggers combined created the rare breed of 2025 multibagger stocks.

Risks & Realities

While the upside is tempting, it’s essential to recognize the risks behind 2025 multibagger stocks-

• Volatility & liquidity risk: Many of these names have thin trading volumes; getting in and out may pose challenges.
• Business fundamentals may not support rally: Some companies may trail in earnings or contain structural problems despite stock-price rises.
• Concentrated ownership: When a few hands hold most shares, price moves may reflect sentiment more than broad-based support.
• High risk of reversal: The very traits that allow for explosive gains also allow for steep falls.
• Speculation, not always value investing: Many rallies are driven more by momentum than by clear business improvement.

Indeed, while 2025 multibagger stocks have delivered large returns in short time, the path is far from safe or guaranteed.

How to Approach 2025 multibagger stocks Going Forward

If you are considering investing in potential multibagger stocks, here are some guidelines tailored to the 2025 scenario-

• Do your homework: Analyse the company’s business model, financials, sector prospects, and management quality.
• Beware the hype: Just because a stock is labelled a multibagger doesn’t mean it’s a good buy now. Many 2025 multibagger stocks already had big run-ups.
• Set exit rules: Given the volatility, decide ahead what your profit targets and loss tolerances are.
• Manage portfolio allocation: Treat such stocks as a small part of your portfolio — high risk, high reward. Balance with more stable holdings.
• Focus on liquidity and exit strategy: Know how you would exit, especially if the price surges sharply or liquidity dries up.
• Maintain skepticism of early claims: Some picks slated as “potential multibaggers” may underperform. E.g., some reports list names spearheading the trend, but also caution about fundamentals.

Lessons from the 2025 Multibagger Boom

The story of 2025 multibagger stocks is one of rare opportunity — small, under-noticed companies turning into spectacular winners. The five examples above show the potential rewards. But they also underscore how uncommon, risky and volatile this avenue is.

If you learnt anything from the 2025 multibagger stocks wave, it’s this: big returns are possible — but they come with big risk. Prudent investing means recognising the opportunity, but also respecting the dangers.

Andhra Pradesh, Nov.01,2025:Andhra Pradesh temple stampede – these three words mark a heart-breaking day for devotees and authorities alike. On the morning of Saturday, 1 November 2025, at the Venkateswara Swamy Temple in Kasibugga, Srikakulam district of Andhra Pradesh, a heavy rush of worshippers gathered to mark the auspicious occasion of Ekadashi. What began as a devotional assembly turned into a nightmare. The overcrowding triggered a stampede that claimed the lives of several devotees and left many more injured. According to multiple sources, at least seven died, though some reports indicate nine or even ten fatalities-

This article delves into the tragedy, explores what may have gone wrong, and examines the broader implications for crowd-safety in places of worship.

What Happened at the Temple

On the auspicious day of Ekadashi, hundreds of devotees thronged the Venkateswara Swamy Temple in Kasibugga. According to official accounts, the stampede transpired around 11:30 a.m. when the crowd became unmanageable.

Videos emerging from the site show panic-stricken devotees, many women carrying puja baskets, jostling on a staircase inside the temple complex. Some reports indicate that the entry and exit points were conflated, and that the area was under construction at the time of the rush — factors that may have contributed to the chaos.

The state’s Chief Minister described the event as “extraordinarily heartbreaking” and ordered officials to provide immediate relief and medical support to the injured.

 Victims, Injured and the Immediate Aftermath

Initial reports vary in the exact death-toll, but the consensus places it between seven to ten. For instance-

• A government update cited “at least nine devotees” killed.
• Some other outlets provided a figure of seven confirmed dead and several injured.
• A live-blog from a major newspaper noted “at least ten dead” amid confusion.

Among the victims are said to be women and children. The injured were rushed to nearby hospitals, with emergency medical and police teams deployed rapidly.

Relief teams and local officials reached the site, and additional personnel were dispatched to bring the situation under control.

Government Response & Official Reactions

The state leadership responded swiftly. N. Chandrababu Naidu, Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh, condemned the tragedy-

“The stampede incident at the Venkateswara Temple in Kashibugga in Srikakulam district has caused a shock. The death of devotees in this tragic incident is extremely heartbreaking. I express my deepest condolences to the families of the deceased. I have instructed the officials to provide speedy and proper treatment to those who have been injured.”

Nara Lokesh, Minister in the state government, also expressed deep sorrow, stating that “a deep sorrow has gripped us on this Ekadashi day”. The Governor of Andhra Pradesh likewise voiced anguish and directed district administration to ensure proper medical care.

Authorities also noted that the temple in question was a private shrine, not under the state’s Endowments Department, and had apparently gathered devotees without formal governmental approval or notified crowd-control arrangements.

Why Did This Happen

 Overcrowding on an Auspicious Day

The root cause appears to be the heavy influx of devotees on the auspicious Ekadashi. Dozens of women carrying baskets of offerings were filmed in tightly packed queues, and the crowd surge overwhelmed the available space.

 Construction Zone & Restricted Flow

The temple area was reportedly under construction, limiting the safe movement of devotees. Entry and exit points were said to be the same — creating a bottleneck.

Lack of Formal Approvals or Crowd Management Plan

Given that the temple was not under direct government oversight, standard safety approvals, crowd-flow protocols or emergency escape routes may not have been enforced.

 Similar Past Incidents

This is not an isolated occurrence — large gatherings at religious sites in India have witnessed stampedes before, pointing to systemic weaknesses in managing mass devotion.

 Crowd-Management Failures and Safety Oversight

When a religious gathering turns tragic, the responsibility extends beyond divine will to human planning. Key observations in this case-

• Absence of separate entry and exit paths, leading to bidirectional flow in a constrained area.
• Inadequate barrier systems and queue management in face of surging devotees.
• Unclear communication or signage to guide large crowds.
• No visible emergency medical staging at the exact site.
• The gathering happening in a site under construction means structural concerns may also have contributed.

Authorities now face the question: how could this have been prevented? In crowded settings such as this, event organizers and temple authorities must plan for worst-case scenarios: stampede risk, emergency exits, medical triage, and well-trained staff to monitor crowd density.

Temple Stampedes in India

The unfortunate incident at Kasibugga’s Venkateswara Temple is part of a regrettable pattern. According to compiled lists of human stampedes in Hindu temples, India has witnessed several such tragedies-

• The Tirumala Venkateswara Temple ticket-counter stampede in January 2025 killed six.
• Wall collapse at another Andhra temple in April 2025 killed seven.

These past events underscore that the problem is not purely accidental but connected to systemic gaps in crowd safety management at high-traffic religious sites.

Immediate Relief & Support

• Fast-track compensation and rehabilitation for the affected families.
• Ensure all injured receive adequate treatment and long-term support for recovery.
• Official inquiry into the cause with transparent findings.

 Structural Safety Audit

• Audit all high-footfall temples for structural integrity, especially the ones under construction or renovation.
• Mandatory accreditation of crowd-management and evacuation protocols before major festivals.

Crowd-Flow Planning & Monitoring

• Use technology like crowd-density sensors and real-time video monitoring.
• Separate entry and exit points, clearly marked routes, and trained marshals to direct flows.
• Limit holding capacity and monitor durations of stay in congested zones.

 Regulatory Oversight & Legal Compliance

• Even private temples should be bound by safety regulations when holding large events.
• Government departments (Endowments or equivalent) must liaise with temple authorities for approval and oversight.

 Awareness & Devotee Education

• Devotees often carry heavy baskets or move in large groups; guiding communication about safe movement, queue discipline, and emergency evacuation is critical.
• Use announcements and visible signage in multiple languages in crowded pilgrimage sites.

Learning from Loss

The Andhra Pradesh temple stampede at Kasibugga stands as a sorrowful reminder that the convergence of faith, human density and structural fragility can lead to catastrophe. As the bereaved families mourn and the injured recover, it is imperative that the tragedy becomes a catalyst for change — not just in this one temple, but across all places of worship in India. Proper planning, crowd-control architecture, regulatory oversight and public awareness must go hand in hand to ensure that devotion does not turn into disaster.

Jaipur, Nov.01,2025:CBI Raid Assets exposes a striking example of unchecked accumulation of wealth by a senior tax‐official in Rajasthan. According to recent filings by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), an assistant commissioner of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Department in Jaipur is facing a case for amassing assets disproportionate to his known income. The case reveals how over a seven-year span his declared assets rose nearly eight-fold, raising serious concerns about corruption, bureaucratic oversight and the integrity of the tax administration-

In what follows, we examine the facts of the CBI Raid Assets case, explore its significance, the systemic issues it highlights, and what lies ahead.

 What the CBI Raid Assets case is about

 Officer and Timeline

The case centres on Rati Ram Meena, who served as Assistant Commissioner in the CGST Department, primarily in the Jaipur and later Ahmedabad offices, during the period August 2018 to August 2025.

According to the CBI, as of August‐2018 he had declared assets of around ₹51.73 lakhs. By August‐2025, his declared assets had increased to over ₹4.08 crore, implying an almost eight‐fold increase in seven years.

 Wealth Accumulation and Scope

During investigations, the CBI found that Meena and his family had amassed assets amounting to approximately ₹2.54 crore from sources that were not justified by his known official income — effectively about 100 % more than his legitimate sources.

The irregularities include-

• Numerous immovable properties across Rajasthan (and other places) held in the names of Meena or his relatives.
• High‐value vehicles listed in media reports: for example a Porsche and a Jeep Compass among assets linked to him and his family.
• Family‐owned shell companies, Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs) and firms controlled by wife and son of the officer, allegedly used to route illicit funds.

Shell Companies and Family Firms

One of the core components of the CBI Raid Assets case is the creation of multiple companies and LLPs in the names of the officer’s immediate family — his wife and son. These firms allegedly acted as conduits to channel questionable funds, convert them into assets and obscure their origin. The use of such family‐friendly corporate vehicles raises questions about audit trails, disclosure oversight and regulatory blind-spots.

 Raids, Recoveries and Evidence

In pursuit of the investigation, the CBI executed search operations at numerous locations: Jaipur (Rajasthan), Ankleshwar (Gujarat) and Ahmedabad (Gujarat). These raids uncovered:

• Gold and silver jewellery estimated at around ₹35 lakh.
• Documents of plots, commercial and residential properties, bank locker-entries in family member names.
• Corporate records of firms and LLPs linked to family members, vehicles registration documents, bank accounts etc.
  Following these searches, a formal case has been registered under the provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for possession of disproportionate assets by a public servant and criminal misconduct.

Why the CBI Raid Assets case matters

 Governance, Corruption & Public Trust

The scale of alleged wealth accumulation in the CBI Raid Assets case undermines public confidence in tax administrators — officials tasked with integrity and enforcement accumulating huge unexplained assets raises the spectre of impunity and systemic corruption. The public needs to see that the guardians of rule-of-law are themselves held to account.

Bureaucratic Accountability and the Tax Regime

Tax officials wield significant power: assessment, investigation, compliance enforcement. If such power is misused, it not only affects revenue collection but also compromises fairness, creates leverage for corrupt practices and distorts business/regulatory feedback. The CBI Raid Assets episode prompts urgent introspection of how oversight of officials is maintained, how assets are monitored, and how conflicts of interest are managed.

 Systemic Risk and Institutional Integrity

While this is one case, the pattern is worrying: rapid buildup of personal wealth, use of family companies, cross‐state property holdings, luxury vehicles. If left unchecked, such cases represent systemic risk — the normalisation of “association of office with rapid accumulation.” The CBI Raid Assets case thus becomes emblematic of a deeper institutional vulnerability.

Challenges and Questions Raised by the CBI Raid Assets case

 Proving Disproportionate Assets & Legal Hurdles

While the CBI has alleged ₹2.54 crore unexplained wealth, prosecution will need to establish a clear link between official duty and personal gain, identify all income sources and show that alternative explanations are implausible. High proof standards, potential legal delays and appeals are part of the challenge.

 Shell Firms, Money-Trail and Investigation Complexity

The use of family‐run companies and LLPs as alleged conduits complicates tracing. Investigators must untangle corporate layering, evaluate related-party transactions, identify kick-backs or indirect benefits, and trace transfer of funds across states, bank jurisdictions and property registers. The CBI Raid Assets case’s strength will hinge on how well these layers are unwound.

Broader Patterns and Implications for Public Service

A significant question is: is this case anomalous or indicative of a broader phenomenon? If other officials similarly build unexplained wealth, the CBI Raid Assets case could be a tip of the iceberg. This raises policy questions about asset-disclosure norms, real‐time monitoring of officials’ property/financial changes and proactive audits.

After the CBI Raid Assets Blow-Up

 Investigation, Possible Prosecution & Asset Recovery

• The CBI will deepen the investigation: forensic accounting, examination of family firms, detailed property valuation, verifying bank locker contents and possibly freezing/disclosing assets.
• If charges are framed, the officer may face prosecution under the Prevention of Corruption Act, which includes punishment for public servants who acquire disproportionate assets.
• There may be an asset-recovery process—properties, vehicles, company shares may be attached once the prima facie case is established.

 Institutional Reforms and Preventive Measures

• The tax department and government may review mechanisms for monitoring sudden wealth accumulation among officials — perhaps mandatory e-filing of property/asset changes, third-party verification of family‐company linkages.
• Reforms might include stricter regulation of post‐retirement employment of senior tax officers, to reduce possible rent-seeking networks.
• Strengthening inter‐departmental coordination: CGST records, state land registries, company registries and enforcement agencies will likely tighten data-sharing to prevent future CBI Raid Assets-type accumulations.

For the Public

Follow up on the case progress: will arrests occur? Will charges be filed? Will assets be attached-

• Monitor transparency: will the tax department publish audits or internal reviews triggered by the case?
• Public interest: ensure that such cases aren’t buried quietly, that media scrutiny continues and civil society holds officials to account.

The CBI Raid Assets case brings into sharp relief the challenge of corruption within the higher echelons of the tax administration. The alleged eight-fold wealth surge by a senior CGST official in just seven years is deeply unsettling and invites urgent introspection. Beyond the individual, this case challenges the integrity of governance frameworks, the robustness of oversight, and the faith citizens place in public institutions.

Ultimately, whether this case becomes a turning point depends on follow-through: transparent investigation, timely prosecution, asset recovery and institutional reforms. If handled well, the CBI Raid Assets case may act as a signal: no public servant, however senior, is above scrutiny. If mishandled, it risks reinforcing cynicism and eroding trust.

Bihar, Nov.01,2025:“Mokama murder revelation” marks a startling flashpoint in the charged environment of Bihar’s 2025 legislative elections. In the south-bank belt of the Ganga, in the assembly constituency of Mokama, the killing of 76-year-old former strongman Dularchand Yadav during a campaign appearance has sent shockwaves through the state’s political terrain. The incident has revived longstanding fault-lines of caste, crime, power and governance. This article digs into the revelations surrounding the murder, dissects the underlying structural issues it signals, reviews responses and assesses what lies ahead-

What the Mokama murder revelation is — The Incident

 The Victim- Dularchand Yadav

Dularchand Yadav was a prominent figure in the Mokama-Tal region of Patna district. Once a local strongman, he maintained influence in the 1980s and 1990s, had contested elections and was long aligned with key players in Bihar political circuits. Reports describe him as campaigning on 30 October 2025 for the candidate of the Jan Suraaj Party, Piyush Priyadarshi (popularly known as “Piyush Priyadarshi”), when the fatal incident occurred.

 Mokama in Turmoil

On that afternoon, around 3:00 pm, across the area between the villages of Tartar and Basawan Chak, a clash erupted between rival convoys representing competing candidates. Yadav was reportedly walking with the Jan Suraaj candidate’s supporters when altercation broke out with the convoy of the rival candidate, namely the longstanding figure Anant Singh (also known as “Chhote Sarkar”). Supporters of both sides allegedly engaged in stone-pelting, lathi-charges and then gunfire. According to reports, Yadav sustained gunshot injuries to his leg and was subsequently crushed under a vehicle.

Key Accusations & FIRs

In the aftermath, FIRs were filed naming Anant Singh and four others in connection with the killing of Yadav. The family of the deceased has directly accused Anant Singh of orchestrating the murder, demanding his arrest within 24 hours. Meanwhile Anant Singh has rejected those allegations, pointing instead to his political rival’s camp — especially another strong figure, Surajbhan Singh — claiming the attack was a set-up.

Underlying Dynamics of the Mokama murder revelation

 Political Contest & Violent Legacy

Mokama is no ordinary constituency: it has been dominated for decades by Anant Singh’s family, with one term exception since 1990. The region has historically been a hot-bed of muscle-power politics, with local strongmen (commonly termed “bahubalis”) wielding clout. The murder of Yadav resurrects this legacy, signalling that the shadow of brute force remains embedded in the electoral contest.

 Caste and Crime in Mokama

The incident cannot be divorced from the caste arithmetic of the region. Yadav’s murder is seen by many as emblematic of Roh (riverine) belt politics, where Yadavs and Dhanuks form significant vote blocs, and Bhumihars and other dominant castes have their own power bases. The murder has reopened caste-crime tensions, with the backward-castes seeing a possible rallying moment against entrenched strongmen.

 Implications for the 2025 Assembly Election

Coming ahead of the polls, the Mokama murder revelation raises serious questions for electoral integrity and governance. The fact that the first major political killing has occurred in this campaign has triggered alarm bells. The Election Commission of India has already ordered a full arms deposit drive across Bihar’s 348 poll-observers’ zones. The incident raises risks for voter suppression, fear-politics and targeted violence — all of which may distort democratic choice.

 Responses and Reaction to the Mokama murder revelation

 Family Claims and Accusations

Yadav’s family has vocally accused Anant Singh of ordering the killing, saying: “Anant Singh must be arrested within 24 hours… our dādā (grandfather) was shot in the leg and then run over by a car.” They allege that the district administration and police are delaying action, creating fear among relatives. The funeral procession faced stone-pelting and gunfire en route, showing how tense the situation remains.

 Institutional Response (Police & ECI)

The Patna SSP has confirmed that the cause of death is under investigation; post-mortem reports have reportedly indicated that the death may not have been due solely to a gunshot — complicating the case. Meanwhile the ECI has mandated strict law-and-order monitoring across polling districts, including licensed fire-arms deposit, as precaution. Political parties and civil-society voices have condemned the incident as emblematic of “jungle-raj” returning and demanded immediate, transparent action.

Broader Significance of the Mokama murder revelation

 Law-and-Order in Bihar’s Polls

The murder signals a serious fragility in law enforcement during election campaigning. If a 76-year-old known figure can be killed in broad daylight in a constituency that is watched, the question arises: what protections do ordinary candidates and voters have? For the state apparatus, this revelation is a test of credibility.

The Role of ‘Muscle Power’ in Politics

Mokama’s case underlines how muscle-power and electoral politics remain intertwined in certain belts. The murder of Yadav — himself once a strongman — shows that even the “old guard” is vulnerable when rival power centres clash. For democracy, it signals that brute force still has purchase over contestation and outcomes.

 Voter Behaviour and Electoral Risk

For voters, the Mokama murder revelation raises three risks: fear of reprisals, intimidation affecting turnout, and the possibility that violence shifts results. For political parties, this may impact candidate selection (strong vs weak), campaign strategy (presence of arms vs clean image) and alliances (caste blocs trying to capitalise on backlash).

Investigation & Accountability After the Mokama murder revelation

 Current Status of the Investigation

• FIRs have been lodged with Anant Singh and four others.
• Forensic teams and CCTV footage retrieval are under way.
• Post-mortem reports are complicating the cause of death (possibly not direct gunshot).
• The ECI has ordered arms deposit and close monitoring of Mokama and contiguous areas.

 What Citizens and Media Should Watch

• Transparency in the investigation: whether independent observers are used, whether political interference is minimal.
• Arrests and charge-sheets: timing, level of accused, whether strong persons face real consequences.
• Impact on campaign atmosphere: whether violence escalates or is contained; whether voter turnout is suppressed.
• Institutional reforms: whether this incident triggers amendments in campaign regulation, arms control, protective security for vulnerable candidates.

Measures to Prevent Election Violence

• Deployment of central paramilitary forces and additional police in high-risk belts like Mokama.
• Strict enforcement of Model Code of Conduct with heavy penalties for campaign-related violence.
• Immediate arms-seizure drives and deposit of licensed weapons ahead of polling.
• Community-based observers and civil-society monitoring of campaign zones.
• Political parties being made accountable for the background of their candidates (especially those with criminal charges).

The Mokama murder revelation is not merely an isolated crime — it is a mirror held up to the structural conjunction of power, violence and politics in Bihar. The killing of Dularchand Yadav in the heart of an electoral contest reveals how vulnerable the democratic process can be when muscle politics remains key. For India’s largest and most complex state election in 2025, the incident is a red-flag: unless prompt, transparent and tough action is taken, the faith of voters in free and fair elections may erode further.

New Delhi,Nov.01,2025:The India-US defence breakthrough has arrived — a landmark ten-year framework agreement between India and the United States that sets the stage for unprecedented collaboration in military, technological and strategic domains. Announced on 31 October 2025 in Kuala Lumpur by Indian Defence Minister Rajnath Singh and U.S. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, the pact signals a new chapter in bilateral defence relations-

At its heart, this India-US defence breakthrough affirms that despite diplomatic frictions, trade disputes or external pressures, the two nations view defence and security cooperation as foundational to their long-term partnership. In this article we explore what the breakthrough includes, what’s in it for India, what challenges lie ahead and what the next decade might hold.

What the India-US defence breakthrough entails

 The 10-Year Framework Agreement: Key Highlights

The core of the India-US defence breakthrough is the “Framework for the U.S.–India Major Defence Partnership (2025-2035)”, signed on 31 October 2025 on the sidelines of the 12th ASEAN Defence Ministers’ Meeting‑Plus (ADMM-Plus) in Kuala Lumpur.

Key inclusions-

• Enhanced coordination, information-sharing and tech cooperation between Indian and U.S. armed forces.
• A vision for India and the U.S. to collaborate on defense production, logistics, and maintenance & repair hubs in India.
• A statement from Hegseth: “Our defence ties have never been stronger.”
• Indian side’s message: This breakthrough “will usher in a new era” in our already strong defence partnership.

 Strategic Domains Covered

In broader terms, the India-US defence breakthrough targets multiple defence domains-

• Joint operations, exercises and logistics interoperability.
• Defence industry cooperation: manufacturing, technology sharing, supply-chain integration.
• Regional security architecture: focus on a free, open, rules-based Indo-Pacific, countering maritime threats and ensuring deterrence.

 Why the Timing Matters

The India-US defence breakthrough arrives at a moment of unconventional alignment:

• Trade relations between India and the U.S. have seen turbulence, including tariffs in recent months.
• Despite tensions, the fact that this defence pact has moved ahead underscores the strategic priority both countries assign to each other.
• For India, the breakthrough provides leverage in balancing its traditional partnership with Russia and emerging ties with the U.S.

Benefits for India in the India-US defence breakthrough

 Technology Transfer and Defence Industry

Through this breakthrough, India gains a significant opportunity-

• Access to U.S.-origin platforms, logistics partnerships, joint manufacturing and maybe gradual technology transfer. For example, earlier deals for drones and aircraft already highlight this path.
• Building India as a regional logistics and maintenance hub: the Framework mentions enabling repair, overhaul, maintenance for U.S. partners and regional players, leveraging India’s geographic advantage.
• Stimulating India’s defence industrial ecosystem, private sector participation and global export potential, as India positions itself as a manufacturing base.

Regional Stability and Indo-Pacific Posture

From a strategic perspective, the India-US defence breakthrough-

• Strengthens India’s role in the Indo-Pacific as a key security partner to the U.S., increasing interoperability and collective deterrence.
• Helps India respond to evolving threats (maritime, space, technology) by aligning with U.S. capabilities and platforms.
• Signals to regional actors and adversaries alike that India-U.S. defence cooperation is deepening and long-term, enhancing India’s strategic leverage.

 Geopolitical Leverage

• India now holds more bargaining power in trade, diplomacy and global forums thanks to a closer strategic link with the U.S.
• The breakthrough may also encourage other major powers to view India differently—less as a partner of last resort, more as a co-equal strategic actor.

Challenges and Questions Surrounding the India-US defence breakthrough

 Trade Tensions and Defence Cooperation

Although the breakthrough is strategically positive for India, it comes at a time when trade relations with the U.S. are strained (e.g., tariffs). The question: will the defence and trade tracks diverge or converge? Some analysts note that despite trade issues, the defence relationship remained on firm footing.

 India’s Balancing Act with Russia

India has long had deep defence ties with Russia (weapons imports, joint development). The India-US defence breakthrough raises the question of whether India will prioritize U.S. ties at the expense of Russian collaboration, or manage both. As a commentary states:

“India maintains a balancing act between US and Russia in defence.”

 Implementation Risks

• The breakthrough sets a long timeframe (10 years). Execution will depend on consistent political will, funding, bureaucratic alignment and industrial capacity in both countries.
• Actual technology transfer, joint manufacturing and strategic projects can be delayed or hampered by regulation, export licences or geopolitical shocks.
• The promise of building India as a logistics hub will require domestic infrastructure, regulatory frameworks and foreign investor confidence.

Experts’ Insights on the India-US defence breakthrough

To better understand the implications, let’s look at what analysts are saying-

• According to a report by Asia Exchange Foundation researcher “Sana Hashmi” (quoted in a media interview), the breakthrough is more crucial to the U.S. than to India, because “for the US, India’s role in countering China and ensuring regional stability is vital.” (Paraphrased from their commentary)
• The breakthrough has been described as a “cornerstone for regional stability and deterrence” by the U.S. Secretary of War himself.
• Analysts at the Eurasia Group mention that while trade frictions exist, the continuity in defence cooperation indicates a broader logic of strategic hedging.

These perspectives highlight that while the agreement is positive, it also carries expectations, obligations and a need for India to hedge skilfully.

 Roadmap for the Next Decade

The India-US defence breakthrough sets a roadmap-

• Short-Term (0-2 years): Finalise detailed project lists, sign implementing memoranda, begin joint exercises and pilot manufacturing/logistics projects.
• Mid-Term (2-5 years): Develop co-production lines in India, integrate defence supply-chains, expand interoperability, increase joint deployments.
• Long-Term (5-10 years): Realise logistics-hub status, advanced technology transfer, joint weapon-system development, India becoming an exporter with U.S. cooperation embedded.

India must continue with policy reforms, industrial capacity building, export-licence facilitation, skill development and infrastructure investment to meet the pace set by this breakthrough.

The India-US defence breakthrough marks a powerful turning point in the strategic partnership between the two nations. For India, the benefits are substantial: expanded defence industry capacity, elevated regional role and deeper strategic alignment. For the U.S., India becomes an even more essential partner in the Indo-Pacific strategic calculus.

Yet, realising the full potential of this breakthrough will depend on execution, consistent policy alignment and India’s ability to manage its legacy ties with other defence partners while embracing this new decade-long partnership. If the promise is matched by delivery, this alliance could reshape the strategic architecture of the Indo-Pacific for years to come.