Bihar,Oct.15,225:Prashant Kishor Decision to opt out of contesting the Bihar legislative elections has reverberated across political circles. In a move that many saw as unexpected, Kishor—the founder of Jan Suraaj Party and a prominent election strategist—has declared he will not file his nomination from any seat. Instead, he pledges to devote his energy to organizational building. His announcement, delivered via a pointed interview with PTI and widely covered by media, has set off speculation, praise, skepticism, and tactical recalibration-

In this article, we deeply analyse the Prashant Kishor Decision, exploring its reasoning, consequences, and what it signals for Bihar’s high-stake election in 2025.

Why the “Prashant Kishor Decision” Matters Now

The Prashant Kishor Decision isn’t just about one man stepping aside—it’s a potential pivot point in Bihar’s volatile political landscape. Here’s why-

• Kishor is widely recognized as a brilliant poll strategist whose interventions have reshaped state-level politics.
• His party, Jan Suraaj, is contesting for the first time, and his presence on the ground would have been a symbolic anchor.
• By refusing to contest, he frees himself from constituency-level liabilities and allows a narrative shift from individual ambitions to systemic transformation.
• It reframes evaluation: Jan Suraaj’s success is no longer tied to his personal seat, but to the broader electoral impact.

Thus, the Prashant Kishor Decision is more than withdrawal—it’s a redefinition of how his party wants to be judged.

The Official Announcement & Its Wording

In a candid interview with PTI, Kishor made these points crystal clear-

• “The party has decided that I should not contest the assembly polls.”
• He added that contesting would have distracted him from crucial organizational work.
• Jan Suraaj has already named another candidate from Raghopur, the seat Kishor was speculated to fight.
• On his party’s electoral target: “A tally less than 150—even 120 or 130—shall be a defeat.”
• Predicting broader trends, Kishor also forecasted that Nitish Kumar will not return as CM, and the ruling NDA faces serious challenges. His tone, firm but measured, underlines that this is a deliberate, strategic step rather than a retreat.

Five Key Reasons Behind the Prashant Kishor Decision

Why did Kishor choose this path? Here are five compelling reasons, grounded in his own statements and media analysis-

(i) Organizational Focus over Candidature

Kishor has repeatedly emphasized that his skills are best utilized in structuring, strategy, and ground mobilization rather than direct contests. He believes contesting would tether him to one constituency and curtail his ability to supervise campaigns statewide.

By staying out of the electoral fray, he aims to preserve his flexibility and maintain oversight across all Jan Suraaj efforts.

(ii) Avoiding Distraction in a High-Stakes Fight

The 2025 Bihar election is shaping up to be contentious, with every party pouring resources, narratives, and personalities into the ring. Kishor’s concern: that being a candidate would distract from the “macro battlefield” — managing alliances, messaging, campaign logistics, and crisis responses.

Thus, the Prashant Kishor Decision can be seen as a decision to stay strategically unencumbered.

(iii) The 150-Seat Benchmark Ultimatum

Kishor has drawn a sharp line: Jan Suraaj must cross 150 seats, or he considers anything less a failure—even if it’s 120 or 130.

By making such a bold benchmark, he aligns the party’s fate with scale, not survival — and stakes his credibility on the aggregate performance, not on his own personal election.

(iv) Strategic Messaging & Long-Term Vision

With the Prashant Kishor Decision, the narrative switches from “Kishor runs and wins” to “Kishor builds a movement.” It’s a message of institutional maturity: that the party does not rest on one personality but on depth, teamwork, and systems.

This shift is particularly relevant for new parties, which often flounder when founders tie themselves too strongly to individual seats.

(v) Avoiding Vulnerability in Raghopur

Raghopur, represented by Tejashwi Yadav (RJD) for years, is a political fortress with high expectations. If Kishor contested and lost, the symbolic damage would be severe. By contesting elsewhere or not contesting at all, he circumvents the risk of a direct defeat that could overshadow successes elsewhere.

His party has instead fielded Chanchal Singh from Raghopur.

In short: the Prashant Kishor Decision dilutes vulnerability while maintaining stakes at the macro level.

Allies, Rivals, and Analysts

From Political Parties

• RJD, BJP, and JD(U) have pounced, accusing Kishor of conceding defeat before the battle even begins. RJD spokesperson Mrityunjay Tiwary said Kishor “accepted defeat” early.
• BJP called it a sign of his “bubble bursting” and questioned his resolve.
• On the other hand, some analysts view it as a mature recognition of political realities — that expansion, structure, and long-term brand building must precede personal electoral fights.

Among Supporters & Observers

• Among his base, reactions are mixed — admiration for clarity of vision, disappointment for lack of personal candidacy.
• Some commentators see this as Kishor staking his political legacy on a large-scale success rather than a personal win.
• Analysts see implications for campaign dynamics: without his personal contest, Jan Suraaj can maintain flexibility in message and alliances.

Media & Expert Interpretation

• Hindustan Times headlines: “Prashant Kishor explains why he won’t contest …” underscores that his reasoning is central to news coverage.
• India Today: frames decision as for the “greater good,” elevating the narrative of sacrifice and foresight.
• NDTV: stresses that he “will work to strengthen Jan Suraaj Party” instead of running. Overall, the Prashant Kishor Decision is being portrayed as strategic rather than passive.

What This Means for Jan Suraaj’s Electoral Strategy

The party’s blueprint will likely adapt in several ways-

• Decentralized Leadership: No overdependence on a single candidate means that regional faces must carry weight.
• Messaging Focus Shift: From “Kishor wins” to “Jan Suraaj wins together.”
• Resource Allocation: Freed resources (time, money, campaign travel) can be distributed across key battlegrounds.
• Brand Building: Emphasis can shift to ideology, policy, and narrative consistency over charisma.
• Candidate Vetting & Performance: Local candidates’ performance gains outsized significance, since Kishor won’t cushion them by his personal contest.

In effect, the Prashant Kishor Decision forces the party’s foot soldiers and district-level leaders to step up or be exposed.

Implications for NDA, INDIA Bloc & State Politics

For NDA (BJP + JD(U) et al.)

• With Kishor out of direct contests, NDA can recalibrate resource deployment — they need not defend against a high-profile challenge from him.
• His forecast that Nitish Kumar will not return as CM adds pressure within the NDA ranks.
• Internal rifts in NDA (seat sharing, candidate allocation) may gain sharper edges now that a wildcard factor is partially neutralized.

For INDIA Bloc & RJD

• RJD’s Tejashwi may face a slightly easier battlefield in Raghopur, though Chanchal Singh is posing a symbolic challenge.
• The INDIA alliance loses a potential disruptor in Kishor’s direct candidacy but must still contend with Jan Suraaj’s influence in narrative space.
• The calculus of alliances may shift: Jan Suraaj is now less a competitor for seats and more a wildcard in vote share and messaging.

State Political Dynamics

• Since Kishor liberates himself from constituency fights, the Prashant Kishor Decision grants him freedom to critique, campaign, and influence across all districts.
• This could make him more potent as a kingmaker figure — not as a legislator, but as a strategist with sway.
• The benchmark of 150 seats imposes a high bar for success; Jan Suraaj’s performance will now serve as a proxy for his political capital.

Risks, Criticisms & Potential Pitfalls

No strategy is without downside. The Prashant Kishor Decision carries risks-

• Perception of Weakness: Critics will say opting out is avoidance rather than courage. Already, BJP and RJD have framed it as early defeat.
• Lack of Anchoring: Without his own candidacy, there’s no fallback symbol to rally around if many candidates falter.
• Underestimation of Local Ground Battles: Local-level politics often need visible faces; not contesting may reduce legitimacy in some pockets.
• Benchmark Backfire: If JSP fails to cross 150 seats, the bold benchmark becomes a source of reputational damage.
• Charge of Overconfidence: Some may say he’s over betting on message controlling over electoral fundamentals.

Thus, the Prashant Kishor Decision is high-risk — but perhaps with high reward if executed well.

What Comes After the Prashant Kishor Decision

To understand how this decision plays out, monitor-

• Candidate Performance: Whether local candidates absorb the burden successfully.
• Narrative Warfare: How Jan Suraaj uses media, messaging, and AI campaigns to fill the void of his non-candidacy — Bihar’s 2025 campaign already sees digital warfare.
• Alliance Dynamics: Whether NDA or INDIA parties try to woo Jan Suraaj or neutralize it.
• Post-Poll Role: If Jan Suraaj emerges as a kingmaker in a hung assembly, Kishor’s influence could surge even without a seat.
• Organizational Strength: Whether the party infrastructure holds and scales under his leadership.
• Public Reception: Whether voters accept the narrative “he’s working behind the scenes” or demand to see him in the field.

Time will tell whether the Prashant Kishor Decision becomes a turning point or a missed gamble.

A Gamble or a Masterstroke

The Prashant Kishor Decision is audacious. In sidestepping the electoral ring, he invites scrutiny, challenges, and higher expectations. Yet it may also liberate his vision: for a party not defined by its founder’s seat but by its scale, structure, and ideas.

Bihar, Oct.14,2025:In a significant political development ahead of the 2025 Bihar Assembly elections, Janata Dal (United) [JD(U)] Member of Parliament (MP) from Bhagalpur, Ajay Kumar Mandal, has offered to resign from his position. This move has sent ripples through the state’s political landscape, highlighting internal conflicts within the ruling party-

Ajay Kumar Mandal’s Resignation Offer

On October 14, 2025, Ajay Kumar Mandal addressed a letter to Bihar Chief Minister and JD(U) President Nitish Kumar, seeking permission to resign from his MP post. In his communication, Mandal expressed his dissatisfaction with the party’s internal functioning and the recent ticket distribution process for the upcoming assembly elections. He stated that despite being the local MP, his advice was not sought during the selection of candidates, rendering his position untenable.

Exclusion from Ticket Distribution

Mandal’s letter highlighted several key concerns-

• Lack of Consultation: He was not consulted regarding the selection of candidates for the assembly elections, despite his long-standing association with the party and his position as the local MP.
• Neglect of Local Leadership: The opinions of district presidents and local leaders were reportedly ignored in the ticket distribution process.
• Preference for Outsiders: Individuals who had not contributed significantly to the party’s growth were allegedly being considered for tickets over seasoned local leaders.

These allegations point to a deeper issue of internal discord within JD(U), potentially affecting its unity and performance in the upcoming elections.

Bihar Assembly Elections 2025

The Bihar Assembly elections are scheduled for November 6 and 11, 2025, with results to be declared on November 14. The National Democratic Alliance (NDA), comprising JD(U), Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), Lok Janshakti Party (Ram Vilas), Hindustani Awam Morcha (Secular), and Rashtriya Lok Morcha, has agreed on a seat-sharing formula. Under this arrangement, JD(U) and BJP will contest 101 seats each, while other allies will contest fewer seats. However, the allocation of seats has led to dissatisfaction among some party members, as evidenced by Mandal’s resignation offer.

Internal Strife Within JD(U)

Mandal’s resignation offer is not an isolated incident. JD(U) MLA Gopal Mandal staged a sit-in protest outside Chief Minister Nitish Kumar’s residence, demanding a ticket for the upcoming elections. He expressed his frustration over being overlooked despite his contributions to the party. Additionally, former MLA Jay Kumar Singh resigned from JD(U), citing dissatisfaction with the seat-sharing arrangement and the allocation of the Dinara constituency seat to Rashtriya Lok Morcha. These events underscore the growing discontent within the party ranks.

Reactions from Party Leadership

The JD(U) leadership has yet to officially respond to Mandal’s resignation offer. However, Chief Minister Nitish Kumar has been reportedly upset over the seat-sharing arrangements within the NDA, indicating potential challenges in maintaining party cohesion. The party’s ability to address these internal issues will be crucial in determining its performance in the upcoming elections.

The Broader Implications for Bihar Politics

Mandal’s resignation offer and the subsequent protests by other party members highlight a significant challenge for JD(U) ahead of the Bihar Assembly elections. Internal conflicts and dissatisfaction with ticket distribution could undermine the party’s prospects, especially in a politically competitive state like Bihar. The outcome of these developments will not only impact JD(U)’s standing but also influence the broader political dynamics in the state.

A Test for JD(U)’s Unity

As Bihar approaches its assembly elections, the internal strife within JD(U) presents a critical test for the party’s unity and leadership. The party must address the concerns raised by its members and work towards resolving internal conflicts to present a united front to the electorate. Failure to do so could have significant repercussions for JD(U)’s performance in the upcoming elections and its future in Bihar’s political landscape.

Rajasthan, Oct.11,2025:Anta Bypoll Rajasthan has swiftly become the focus of political strategists across Jaipur, Jhalawar, Baran, and even Delhi. The November 11 by-election sees a rare three-cornered contest: Congress, BJP, and a formidable independent challenger, Naresh Meena. This dynamic could rewrite local alliances and test party strength ahead of bigger electoral battles-

From the moment the seat was vacated by disqualified BJP MLA Kanwarlal Meena, political attention turned to how the Anta Bypoll Rajasthan would proceed—and whether it could be more than a mere local contest.

Background & Stakes

The Anta Bypoll Rajasthan came into being after the disqualification of the sitting BJP legislator, Kanwarlal Meena. In May 2025, Meena was sentenced to three years’ imprisonment in a 20-year-old criminal case in which he had allegedly threatened a sub-divisional magistrate using a pistol.

Following wise legal processes and court rulings—High Court, Supreme Court—his membership was cancelled.

The Election Commission of India (ECI) has scheduled polling on 11 November 2025, with results to be declared on 14 November 2025.

With 227,563 registered voters in the Anta constituency—1,16,000+ men, 1,10,000+ women, and 4 others—the electorate is significant.

Now, every vote, every margin matters, because Anta Bypoll Rajasthan may be seen as a microcosm of larger state trends and a test for both main parties.

Key Players in the Anta Bypoll Rajasthan Triangular Race

Congress and Pramod Jain Bhaya

In a swift move, Congress has fielded Pramod Jain Bhaya as its candidate for Anta Bypoll Rajasthan.

Bhaya is no political lightweight: a three-time MLA, he served as a minister in the Ashok Gehlot government from 2018 to 2023.

In the 2023 Assembly Elections, he lost narrowly to Kanwarlal Meena by 5,861 votes, which means he has both name recognition and core supporters.

Congress is banking on Bhaya’s established networks, party machinery, and clean image to consolidate non-BJP and anti-incumbent votes.

BJP’s Dilemma & Internal Struggle

Unlike Congress, BJP has not yet finalized its candidate for Anta Bypoll Rajasthan.

Two prominent names being circulated include Prabhulal Saini and a possible family member of Kanwarlal Meena.

Interestingly, senior leaders CM Bhajan Lal Sharma, former CM Vasundhara Raje, and state BJP president Madan Rathore held a strategic meeting at Raje’s residence to deliberate candidate selection and election tactics.

Raje’s influence in Jhalawar-Baran is unparalleled. Her word carries weight, and BJP’s delay seems partly aimed at securing her approval before announcing the final nominee.

Thus, BJP must balance local loyalties, caste equations, and Raje’s positioning as it moves to lock in a candidate.

Independent Challenger Naresh Meena

Completing the triangle is Naresh Meena, a rebel who had sought a Congress ticket but, after being spurned, declared his candidacy as an independent.

Naresh has contested elections before as an independent, performing strongly in past contests (e.g., at Chhabra, Devli).

He also seems to command support from community groups, local networks, and possibly smaller parties. His entry in Anta Bypoll Rajasthan compels both major parties to rethink vote arithmetic.

Critically, Naresh’s presence could split the vote from Congress or sway leaners toward BJP, depending on how BJP positions itself.

Voter Landscape & Demographics in Anta

The electorate is socially layered. The Anta Bypoll Rajasthan constituency has approximately:

• 50,000 Mala (Dhakad)
• 45,000 Meena
• 30,000 Scheduled Castes
• 18,000 ST/SC
• 15,000 Muslims
• Smaller numbers of Jats, Gurjars, Brahmins, Mahajans, etc.

Traditional allegiances: Meena community largely leaned to Congress, but BJP has made inroads in recent contests. The Mala (Dhakad) community is often decisive.

If Naresh Meena draws 20,000–30,000 Meena votes, that could derail Congress’s base, and BJP may benefit if it retains core support and makes gains among non-Meena groups.

Youth, first-time voters, and issue-based voters might swing the contest. Local issues—development, water, infrastructure—will matter.

Strategic Impact of Naresh Meena in Anta Bypoll Rajasthan

Naresh’s candidacy transforms what could have been a straight fight into a triangular contest. Key strategic implications:

• Vote Splitting Risk: The biggest threat to Congress is vote-splitting—Naresh could siphon off Meena community votes, weakening Bhaya’s margin.
• Kingmaker Role: If Naresh draws close, his support or exit (hypothetically) could decide tight margins.
• Brokered Alliances: BJP might quietly court Naresh’s supporters or position candidates to attract those votes.
• Neutralizing Congress Bloc: For Congress, holding the Meena vote solidly is paramount; any leak could cost.

Hence, Anta Bypoll Rajasthan is no throwaway; its outcome may reflect savvy candidate strategy, grassroots mobilization, and caste arithmetic.

Electoral Mechanics, Rules & Voter Access

The ECI has taken steps to make the Anta Bypoll Rajasthan accessible:

• Voters without EPIC (Electoral Photo Identity Card) may vote using any one of 12 alternative photo IDs (Aadhaar, driving license, PAN, etc.).
• 15 IAS + 3 IPS observers have been appointed to ensure fair elections and monitor expenditure.
• The Model Code of Conduct is in force.
• Polling booths and staff will cater to persons with disabilities, veiled voters, and others requiring special facilitation.

These mechanisms aim to maximize participation, reduce disenfranchisement, and prevent misuse of authority.

Political Significance of Anta Bypoll Rajasthan in State Politics

Though a single seat, Anta Bypoll Rajasthan carries symbolic weight:

• It becomes a political litmus test: for BJP’s internal coherence, Congress’s revival, and independent viability.
• For Vasundhara Raje, it’s a chance to reaffirm influence in her stronghold area.
• For CM Bhajan Lal Sharma, success or failure in Anta may reflect his handling of state issues and public trust.
• Parties may project this as a prelude to the 2028 Assembly elections, testing strategies, alliances, and voter mood.

A win by Congress could boost morale; a win by BJP could reaffirm dominance; a near upset or strong showing by Naresh could reshape future alliances.

Risks, Wild Cards & Prediction Scenarios

Risks & Wild Cards

• Major swing due to local issue (water, roads, jobs) overshadowing caste patterns.
• Alliances or secret deals late in the game—say, a tacit pact between BJP and Naresh’s supporters.
• Voter turnout surprise: if base turnout differs from projections, margins shift sharply.
• Election day disruption or complaint escalation could tilt perceptions.

Prediction Scenarios

1. Congress Victory: If Bhaya retains the Meena community and consolidates SC/ST/Mala votes, he wins, but margin likely narrow.
2. BJP Upset: If the BJP picks a strong candidate, uses Raje’s clout effectively, and draws non-Meena votes, they may overcome the split.
3. Near-win or Independent Surge: Naresh finishes strong but fails to win—his vote tally may embarrass establishment parties and shape next moves.

Given current dynamics, the race looks tight between Congress and BJP, with Naresh as a spoiler whose votes will be crucial.

Will Anta Bypoll Rajasthan Reshape Local Power

Anta Bypoll Rajasthan is fast becoming more than a routine by-election. It is a stage where local identities, party dynamics, and candidate personalities converge.

Congress’s smart early nomination of Bhaya, BJP’s strategic deliberations involving Raje, and Naresh Meena’s independent ambition—together they create a high-stakes triangular fight. The seat’s result will echo beyond Baran: it may validate strategies, reshape calculations, and set precedents for coalition management in Rajasthan.

New Delhi, Sep.09,2025:Although official numbers gave NDA the edge (approximately 425 MPs), cross-voting and secret ballots meant surprises were possible. YSR Congress’s 11 MPs backed NDA, further consolidating their lead-

Vice President Election 2025 Result- A Grand Reveal

Vice President Election 2025 Result was nothing short of dramatic. Voting began at 10 a.m. on 9 September 2025 and concluded at 5 p.m., followed by counting from 6 p.m. onward, with results expected around 8 p.m.

Record Voter Turnout and Timing

A total of 781 MPs cast their votes, including members from both the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha. The prompt start and efficient completion of the voting process set the stage for a high-stakes evening of counting and anticipation.

Cast of Candidates and Political Dynamics

The contest featured two prominent contenders:

• NDA’s nominee: Maharashtra Governor C P Radhakrishnan
• INDIA bloc’s pick: Former Supreme Court Judge B Sudershan Reddy Jagdeep Dhankhar’s mid-term resignation triggered this election, creating an unexpectedly open contest.

Abstentions- BRS, BJD & Akali Dal

Several regional parties abstained from voting:

• Biju Janata Dal (BJD) and Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) opted out, weakening the opposition bloc.
• Shiromani Akali Dal did not participate, citing floods in Punjab.

Cross-Voting- The Wild Card

Although official numbers gave NDA the edge (approximately 425 MPs), cross-voting and secret ballots meant surprises were possible. YSR Congress’s 11 MPs backed NDA, further consolidating their lead. Opposition hoped some dissenting MPs might vote across party lines, keeping tension alive.

Mock Poll Drama and Party Unity

The INDIA bloc staged a mock poll on Monday to rehearse unity and strategy—a symbolic gesture ahead of the real vote.. Meanwhile, NDA arranged last-minute huddles to secure loyalty, though two MPs skipped breakfast meetups, fuelling speculation of internal dissent.

Legal Highlights- Voting from Jail

Notably, undertrial prisoner Amritpal Singh, incarcerated in Dibrugarh jail, cast his vote—emphasizing legal provisions that allow voting under custody with proper permissions.

Behind-the-Scenes Strategies — Why the Result Surprised Us

1. Regional abstentions shifted numbers unexpectedly.
2. Cross-voting potential added uncertainty despite NDA’s numerical advantage.
3. Mock poll unity showcased opposition resolve—but counting night would tell.
4. Legal and symbolic flashpoints (e.g., jail voting) shaped public narrative and perception dramatically.

What the Numbers Say- Math of Victory

• Total electors: 781 MPs
• Majority needed: 391 votes
• NDA Strength: ~425 MPs
• With YSRCP support: ~436 guaranteed votes

Thus, NDA was favored, but secret ballots meant suspense lingered.

What This Means for India’s Democracy

• The Vice President Election 2025 Result reaffirms voting rights—even for those under incarceration.
• Abstentions by regional parties highlight growing strategic neutrality in Indian politics.
• Cross-voting and secret ballots remain key democratic unpredictables.
• This election sets the stage for tightening alliances ahead of future national polls.

The Vice President Election 2025 Result is a compelling mix of numbers, strategy, last-minute shifts, and democratic drama—making it one of the most riveting political spectacles of 2025.

Let me know if you’d like me to expand any section, provide graphical data, or prepare a follow-up coverage post!

New Delhi, Sep.09,2025:The Vice President is elected by an Electoral College of MPs from both Houses, including nominated Rajya Sabha members-

96% Voting Till 3 pm Vice President Election: Why Turnout Skyrocketed

96% voting till 3pm vice president election saw an extraordinary surge of participation in record time, with close to full voting accomplished by early afternoon. According to PTI, official sources confirm that 96% of MPs had cast their ballots by 3 pm.

A Race Born from Health Crisis and Sudden Resignation

This early election was necessitated by the abrupt resignation of Jagdeep Dhankhar, who stepped down in July due to health concerns, although his term was expected to run until August 2027.

Under Article 63(2) of the Constitution, an election must be held “as soon as possible” when a Vice President’s office becomes vacant.

The contenders:

• NDA’s candidate: C. P. Radhakrishnan, Governor of Maharashtra and former BJP lawmaker.
• Opposition’s nominee (INDIA bloc): Justice B. Suder­s­han Reddy, retired Supreme Court judge.

Who’s Voting—and Who’s Sitting Out

Akali Dal, BRS & BJD Pitfalls

Several parties, citing various reasons, abstained from voting:

• BRS: Cited farmer distress and urea shortages in Telangana. Despite respecting both candidates, the party refrained from voting.
• BJD and Shiromani Akali Dal also abstained—BJD due to political distancing, and Akali Dal due to severe flooding in Punjab.

AIMIM and YSRCP Alignments

• AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi confirmed support for the INDIA bloc’s candidate.
• YSRCP’s 11 MPs decided to back the NDA candidate, shifting the expected vote margins.

Election Mechanics- How India Chooses Its Vice President

• The Vice President is elected by an Electoral College of MPs from both Houses, including nominated Rajya Sabha members.
• Current strength: 781 members (6 Rajya Sabha seats and 1 Lok Sabha seat vacant), majority mark is 391.
• The process uses proportional representation via single transferable vote, conducted by secret ballot, and MPs must use the special pen provided.

What’s Next? Counting, Predictions, and Political Ripples

• Voting continues until 5 pm, with results expected after 6 pm or by around 7:45 pm.
• NDA holds a numerical advantage: 425 MPs versus 324 for the Opposition bloc.
• Political strategists foresee a clear win for Radhakrishnan, given the NDA’s strength and cross-voting from some Opposition MPs.

Yet, murmurs of “cross-voting” and ideological tensions within ranks may inject tensions into the outcome.

The 96% voting till 3pm vice president election stands as a remarkable display of parliamentary engagement. The stage is set for an outcome that will affirm NDA’s parliamentary clout—but the evening’s count may reveal nuanced cross-party loyalties or shifts. Stay tuned as the nation awaits the 15th Vice President of India.

New Delhi,Sep.09,2025:Vice Presidential Election 2025 is underway, marking a significant milestone in Indian politics. Following Jagdeep Dhankhar’s unexpected resignation in July, prompted by health concerns, a new election—via secret ballot among MPs—is being held to fill the nation’s second-highest constitutional office. This contest not only determines the successor but could also shape Parliament’s tone and constitutional symbolism for years to come.

Voting Begins—Modi Casts First Vote

Voting for the Vice Presidential Election 2025 commenced on September 9, 2025, at 10 a.m. in the new Parliament building. Prime Minister Narendra Modi made headlines by being the first to cast his vote.

Candidates in the Ring- Radhakrishnan vs. Sudershan Reddy

The ruling NDA has nominated C P Radhakrishnan, the Governor of Maharashtra and a seasoned BJP leader. The INDIA bloc countered with Justice (Retd.) B Sudershan Reddy, a former Supreme Court judge representing a constitutional and principled vision.

Political Abstentions That Could Shift Margins

Three parties—BRS, BJD, and Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD)—have chosen to abstain from voting. Collectively, they account for 14 MPs (4 BRS, 7 BJD, and 3 SAD). BRS cited farmers’ distress, especially a urea shortage in Telangana, for their decision. BJD emphasized Odisha’s development as their priority, distancing themselves from both alliances.

These abstentions may dent the NDA’s potential vote margin—it reduces the total voter base and lowers the majority threshold.

Tactical Dynamics- Strategy, Criticism & Controversies

Strategic Positioning

• NDA insiders are confident—multiple BJP leaders foresee a “thumping majority” victory for Radhakrishnan.
• The Opposition rehearsed a mock vote to maintain unity and reduce voting errors.

Controversial Exchanges

• BJP attacked Reddy for meeting RJD’s Lalu Prasad Yadav, a convicted leader, labeling it “hypocrisy” and drawing legal censure.
• Reddy responded, arguing MPs should vote according to conscience—“there cannot be a party whip” for this election.

Why Radhakrishnan Has the Edge

In a Parliament of 781 MPs (with vacancies), the magic number to win is 391. NDA reportedly has support from 425 MPs, bolstered by YSRCP’s 11-member backing, raising their tally to 436. In contrast, Reddy must consolidate support from INDIA bloc and sympathetic parties—yet, even with full opposition backing, the margin looks narrow.

Abstentions and potential cross-voting could narrow this gap, but Radhakrishnan remains the clear favorite.

Why This Election Is More Than Just a Result

Beyond numbers, the Vice Presidential Election 2025 symbolizes deeper ideological and institutional undercurrents:

• The vice president also serves as Rajya Sabha Chair and acting president when needed.
• Reddy portrays the contest as a battle for constitutional conscience, pledging institutional sanctity and democratic reflection.
• Radhakrishnan positions his victory as a triumph of Indian nationalism and unity, signaling ideological consolidation.

What to Watch, and What Comes Next

As voting proceeds until 5 p.m., the counting is slated to begin at 6 p.m. with results due later today. Though NDA’s numerical dominance suggests victory for Radhakrishnan, the precise margin and any surprises (from cross-voting or abstainers) will be telling.

The outcome will impact Rajya Sabha leadership, institutional balance, and set the tone for India’s evolving political contours.

New Delhi, Aug.19,2025: On August 18–19, 2025, far-reaching tensions surfaced when INDIA bloc leaders convened to strategize over a potential impeachment motion against CEC Gyanesh Kumar. The spark? Allegations of irregularities in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voter lists in Bihar

A Political Flashpoint

Impeach CEC Gyanesh Kumar looms as a rallying cry among opposition voices, signaling their intent to launch impeachment proceedings against the Chief Election Commissioner. This phrase—used here to maintain a keyword density of approximately 1–1.5%—captures the heart of a whirlwind political battle over electoral trust and the integrity of India’s democratic machinery.

What Sparked the Opposition’s Move

On August 18–19, 2025, far-reaching tensions surfaced when INDIA bloc leaders convened to strategize over a potential impeachment motion against CEC Gyanesh Kumar. The spark? Allegations of irregularities in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voter lists in Bihar, which the opposition insists was a tool for “vote theft”.

These developments followed Rahul Gandhi’s “Voter Adhikar Yatra,” where he accused the Election Commission of systemic electoral tampering.

Allegations Against the CEC

• Leaders from the INDIA bloc accused the CEC of acting like a “BJP spokesman”, compromising the neutrality of the office.
• The Samajwadi Party, through Akhilesh Yadav, went further—producing affidavits to counter the CEC’s denial and claiming targeted deletion of backward-class voters.
• Trinamool Congress’s Abhishek Banerjee vowed to challenge the EC both legally and in Parliament, underscoring the depth of distrust.

CEC’s Response: Ultimatum and Defense

In a decisive press conference, CEC Gyanesh Kumar labelled the opposition’s claims as baseless. He issued an ultimatum: submit a signed affidavit within seven days or apologize to the nation—otherwise, the allegations of “vote theft” would be dismissed as invalid.

Further, Kumar argued that using phrases like ‘vote theft’ undermine the integrity of millions of voters and election workers.

How to Impeach CEC Gyanesh Kumar

Constitutional & Legal Pathway

The removal of the Chief Election Commissioner is strictly guided by Article 324(5) of the Constitution and Section 11(2) of the 2023 Appointment Act. It mandates:

• Grounds for Removal: Only on proven misbehaviour or incapacity, equivalent to those for removing a Supreme Court judge.
• Initiation: Motion introduced in either Parliament house, backed by at least 50 MPs in Rajya Sabha or 100 MPs in Lok Sabha.
• Investigation: A judicial inquiry committee examines the validity of allegations.
• Parliament Vote: Must secure a two-thirds majority of members present and voting in both houses.
• Final Step: President issues removal order based on the passed motion; no discretion remains

Further protections include legal immunity under Clause 16 of the 2023 Act—shielding the CEC from court proceedings for official actions.

Why It’s an Uphill Task

• Rigid Constitutional Threshold: The exceptionally high bar—two-thirds majority—is difficult, particularly while the ruling alliance commands a comfortable majority in both houses.
• Lack of Precedent: No CEC has ever been removed since India’s independence, reflecting the formidable safeguard built into the system.
• Political Realities: Although the INDIA bloc is mobilizing support, achieving the numerical strength needed for impeachment remains a daunting task.

Political Implications Ahead

• The opposition’s move amplifies existing mistrust towards the Election Commission and questions its ability to ensure fair processes.
• It raises broader concerns about executive overreach and challenges to institutional autonomy.
• As parliamentary sessions progress, public demonstrations like the ‘Voter Adhikar Yatra’ and legal challenges will intensify political pressure.
• The unfolding developments could have long-term impact on public faith in electoral governance and shape future reforms.

The call to Impeach CEC Gyanesh Kumar reflects the crescendoing political confrontation enveloping India’s electoral framework—a struggle as much about numbers in Parliament as it is about preserving democratic credibility. While the opposition is serious in its intent, fulfilling the constitutional prerequisites remains a towering challenge.

Stay tuned as this constitutional-legal-political drama unfolds in Parliament and beyond.

New Delhi, Aug.18,2025: These Vote Chori Allegations triggered a forceful response from the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC), shifting the national conversation toward electoral integrity

Vote Chori Allegations, A Political Firestorm Begins

Vote Chori Allegations ignited when Rahul Gandhi, the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, accused the Election Commission of India (ECI) of systematic vote theft—a claim that dramatically escalated political tensions.

These Vote Chori Allegations triggered a forceful response from the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC), shifting the national conversation toward electoral integrity and accountability.

Rahul Gandhi’s Accusations and Presentation

On August 7, 2025, Rahul Gandhi delivered a detailed PowerPoint-backed presentation, alleging fraudulent voter registrations in the Mahadevapura segment of Bengaluru—claiming more than 100,000 fake voters were added to sway election outcomes.

He dubbed the ongoing Bihar SIR (Special Intensive Revision) as another manipulative strategy, labeling it a “conspiracy to steal” votes.

Affidavit or Apology Demand

In a rare press conference, CEC Gyanesh Kumar refuted the Vote Chori Allegations as “baseless,” demanding that Rahul Gandhi either submit a sworn affidavit with evidence within seven days or publicly apologize, warning that failure to do so would result in the claims being deemed invalid.

The Commission defended the SIR process in Bihar as transparent and constitutionally mandated. It dismissed alleged data anomalies—such as duplicate EPIC IDs or those with “house number zero”—as administrative artifacts rather than proof of foul play.

Legal & Supreme Court Backdrop

The Supreme Court intervened amid growing scrutiny, directing the ECI to publish booth-level lists of over 6.5 million deleted voters, with reasons, by August 19, as part of a transparency drive.

This judicial step adds legal weight to the ongoing political standoff over the Vote Chori Allegations.

Opposition’s Defiant Strategy and Yatra Momentum

Rahul Gandhi’s launch of the “Voter Adhikar Yatra” from Bihar’s Sasaram became an electrifying demonstration of opposition solidarity, with key INDIA bloc leaders denouncing the Vote Chori Allegations and accusing the ECI of being complicit with the ruling party.

In a pointed critique, Gandhi also questioned why similar affidavits were not requested from BJP leaders like Anurag Thakur, suggesting selective accountability.

Analysts Weigh In: Democracy at Stake

Political analysts have deeply scrutinized the press conference. BBC’s Hemant Atri noted that the CEC seemed to mirror a political rather than constitutional tone—deflecting rather than addressing core concerns.

Observers warn that unresolved Vote Chori Allegations could corrode public trust in democratic institutions.

Meanwhile, some voices in media argued procedural fairness: if making such serious allegations, Gandhi should legally formalize them via affidavit.

Impeachment Talk and Wider Fallout

Opposition leaders are now considering a bold constitutional recourse—impeachment of the CEC—arguing he evaded responsibility as a symbol of democratic failure.

 Under Article 324(5), removing the CEC would require a motion in Parliament, equivalent to removing a Supreme Court judge.

As the seven-day deadline approaches, the nation is waiting: will Gandhi produce sworn evidence or retract his claims? These pending developments will shape India’s electoral narrative leading up to the next polls.

Bihar, Aug.18,2025: Prominent political analyst and activist Yogendra Yadav sharply criticized the EC’s recent Delhi press conference as a “sham”. He accused the commission of

What Is SIR and Why It Matters

The Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar has become a flashpoint. Conducted ahead of the 2025 Assembly elections, it aimed at correcting electoral discrepancies. However, critics argue that it risked mass voter exclusion by demanding documentation amid floods and time constraints. Political tensions have soared, with accusations of “vote theft” and democratic sabotage becoming widespread.

Yogendra Yadav Sets the Tone

Prominent political analyst and activist Yogendra Yadav sharply criticized the EC’s recent Delhi press conference as a “sham”. He accused the commission of evasive answers and failing to address core concerns raised by opposition leaders.

The 10 Unanswered Questions, Exposed

Yadav publicly shared ten pointed questions—vital to electoral fairness—that the EC sidestepped:

• Why were political parties not consulted before undertaking SIR?
• Why bypass the EC’s own rule against intensive revision during election years?
• Why rush SIR amid monsoon floods?
• How many voters were added during SIR (June–July)?
• How many forms lacked documentation?
• How many forms did Booth Level Officers (BLOs) mark as “not recommended”—and why?
• How many foreign nationals were identified in the existing voter list during SIR?
• Why was the format changed after Rahul Gandhi’s press conference?
• Why wasn’t an affidavit requested from Anurag Thakur?
• Why wasn’t the affidavit from SP scrutinized?

These questions cut to the heart of process transparency, procedural fairness, and political neutrality.

Why EC’s Silence Signals Trouble

Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar defended the EC’s neutrality, asserting it treats all political parties equally. Yet, he largely declined to address many of the key issues journalists and opposition figures raised.

Opposition has decried the press conference as insufficient, calling for clear, direct answers—rather than dismissive statements.

Political Turmoil Surrounding SIR

The SIR controversy has spurred intense political mobilization:

• The “Voter Adhikar Yatra”, led by Rahul Gandhi and consisting of INDIA bloc allies, protests alleged disenfranchisement and calls for electoral justice.
  
  
• RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav accused the EC of deleting his name from voter rolls despite valid credentials, claiming a conspiracy.
  
  
• Former UP CM Akhilesh Yadav criticized the exercise as politically timed to undermine voters.
  
  
• In state assembly, CM Nitish Kumar dismissed Tejashwi’s concerns, calling him “still a kid.”
  
  

Implications and Next Steps

Yadav’s list underscores a growing demand for electoral transparency. The next move lies with the EC—will it respond substantively or evade further? The unfolding “Voter Adhikar Yatra” carries weight across 1,300 km of Bihar, signaling mounting public pressure. Legal scrutiny and protests are expected to escalate as stakes rise.

Bihar, Aug.18,2025: Reacting to legal challenges, a Supreme Court bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi on August 14, 2025, issued an interim order demanding the EC publish the

What Sparked the Controversy

The Bihar 65 lakh voters deleted list controversy stems from the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls conducted before the 2025 Bihar Assembly elections. Under SIR, the Election Commission required extensive documentation—excluding widely held IDs like Aadhaar and Voter ID—for inclusion in the draft list. As a result, nearly 65 lakh voters were omitted, prompting allegations of voter disenfranchisement and procedural opacity.

Supreme Court’s Firm Directive

Reacting to legal challenges, a Supreme Court bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi on August 14, 2025, issued an interim order demanding the EC publish the deleted names with reasons, in a booth-wise, district-wise manner—searchable by EPIC number—and widely publicize the lists. These lists were to be accessible physically at booth-level offices and through media channels. Aadhaar and EPIC were also permitted as valid ID proofs for raising objections.

EC’s Rapid Compliance: 56 Hours Later

In a visibly swift response, the EC published the Bihar 65 lakh voters deleted list within 56 hours of the court’s directive. Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar confirmed that the list is available on district magistrates’ websites and the Bihar CEO portal.

What’s in the Deleted List? Reasons Revealed

According to the CEO of Bihar, Vinod Singh Gunjiyal, the 65 lakh removed names were accompanied by removal reasons—categorized as “Deceased,” “Permanently Shifted,” “Absent,” or “Repeated Entry.” Of the total 7.89 crore voters, the first draft included 7.24 crore; the deleted subset thus marks a significant drop. Reports detail that around 36 lakh were marked as migrated and 22 lakh as deceased.

How Voters Can Check

Voters can check their inclusion status using their EPIC number on the Bihar CEO’s website or district portals, which redirect to the ECI’s voter service portal. Booth-wise downloadable lists include vital details—name, EPIC number, age, gender, and removal reason—to ensure transparency and enable timely claims

Political and Public Backlash

The publication has triggered political backlash:

• Opposition leaders call it an attack on democracy. CPI(ML) labeled it as the “biggest attack” on India’s Constitution, citing mass disenfranchisement—especially of marginalized communities and migrants.
• Congress mobilized protests nationwide under the ‘vote chori’ campaign, demanding trusteeship over election integrity. Rahul Gandhi and others led rallies and threatened legal action.
• Public figures and watchdogs, like the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), pushed for transparency and cautioned about systemic voter exclusion.

With the final electoral roll due by September 1, Bihar enters a crucial review window where affected voters can submit claims using Aadhaar or EPIC as proof. Political parties and civil society are closely watching the process. The Supreme Court has slated the next hearing for August 22, where the EC’s compliance report will be assessed.