Delhi/NCR
Chidambaram Pahalgam controversy Erupts in Political Firestorm

- He questioned why the government was certain the attackers were Pakistani nationals when “there’s no evidence” to that effect, and suggested “homegrown terrorists could be involved.
- Chidambaram accused the government of hiding tactical mistakes made during Operation Sindoor and refusing to disclose details of NIA’s investigation into the identities and origin of the terrorists.
- He urged acknowledgment of casualties on India’s side during Operation Sindoor, comparing it to wartime transparency seen in WWII under Winston Churchill.
- The BJP strongly condemned Chidambaram’s remarks, with IT Cell chief Amit Malviya accusing the Congress of giving a “clean chit to Pakistan” and undermining national security.
- BJP spokespersons described the statements as congressional attempts to question our forces and stand with Pakistan rather than India.
- Chidambaram retaliated, calling out “trolls” who had taken selective quotes from his interview. He called them the “worst kind of troll” for suppressing the full context to defame him.
- He urged people to view the full The Quint interview to understand his statements in context and said the opposition alliance (INDIA bloc) would raise these critical questions in Parliament debates.
- A 16-hour long Rajya Sabha debate is scheduled next Tuesday on the Pahalgam attack and Operation Sindoor, created amid pressure from the opposition to thoroughly examine the government’s actions
- Chidambaram and other Congress MPs, including Imran Masood and Manickam Tagore, warned that the government is avoiding substantive questioning by stalling or diverting attention.
- This Chidambaram Pahalgam controversy has become a flashpoint in Parliament, with the BJP aiming to use it to portray the opposition as weak on terrorism while the Congress pushes for greater transparency.
- The issue also revives old debates over the role of U.S. diplomacy—particularly former President Donald Trump’s claim of brokering the ceasefire—and whether India’s decisions are influenced externally. Chidambaram called for full disclosure of that involvement.
- The Pahalgam terror attack, committed by TRF (proxy of Lashkar-e-Taiba), killed 26 civilians and triggered aggressive Indian retaliation via Operation Sindoor. India maintains the attackers were Pakistani nationals, while dropping of bombs across border escalated tensions with Pakistan.
- Chidambaram’s assertions challenge the security establishment narrative and demand clarity on how terrorists crossed the border without detection, if they were indeed foreign nationals.
Contents
New Delhi, July28,2025: He questioned why the government was certain the attackers were Pakistani nationals when “there’s no evidence” to that effect
Chidambaram Pahalgam controversy emerges
On 27 July 2025, in an interview with The Quint, P. Chidambaram raised critical questions about the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack that killed 26 tourists in Jammu and Kashmir, triggering what is now known as the Chidambaram Pahalgam controversy
Allegations by Chidambaram
Government Response and BJP’s Sharp Rebuttal
Chidambaram’s Defense and Troll Allegations
Parliamentary Fallout: Operation Sindoor Debate
Wider Political Implications
International & Security Analysis
Breaking News
क्या रात में वाई-फ़ाई बंद करना चाहिए- विशेषज्ञों की राय और स्वास्थ्य पर प्रभाव-

Contents
New Delhi. Sep16,2025:हमारे दिमाग़ में सूचनाओं का आदान-प्रदान न्यूरॉन्स के बीच इलेक्ट्रोकेमिकल सिग्नल्स से होता है।रात के समय शरीर “स्लीप वेव्स” पर काम करता है। ऐसे में कोई भी इलेक्ट्रोमैग्नेटिक फील्ड नींद की-
वाई-फ़ाई और मोबाइल इंटरनेट की आदत
“सो जा बेटे, रात के 12 बज रहे हैं, कब तक मोबाइल फ़ोन देखते रहोगे?”
“बस मम्मी, एक फ़िल्म ख़त्म कर रहा हूँ, दिन में वाई-फ़ाई नहीं मिलता ना!”
नोएडा में रहने वाली सरिता और उनके बेटे अक्षर के बीच ऐसी बातचीत अक्सर होती है। यह केवल एक परिवार की कहानी नहीं है, बल्कि हर घर में मोबाइल और वाई-फ़ाई की लत अब एक सामान्य बात बन चुकी है।
वाई-फ़ाई क्या है और कैसे काम करता है
कई लोग मानते हैं कि वाई-फ़ाई का मतलब Wireless Fidelity है, लेकिन असल में इसका कोई पूरा नाम नहीं है।
यह एक तकनीक है जो हमें बिना तारों के इंटरनेट से जोड़ती है। वाई-फ़ाई राउटर से निकलने वाले रेडियो वेव्स कंप्यूटर, मोबाइल, टैबलेट और स्मार्ट डिवाइस को इंटरनेट एक्सेस देते हैं।
वाई-फ़ाई और स्वास्थ्य पर सवाल
अब बड़ा सवाल यह है कि क्या रात में वाई-फ़ाई ऑन रखने से हमारी नींद या स्वास्थ्य पर असर पड़ता है?
क्या रात को इसे बंद करने से दिमाग़ को आराम मिलता है और नींद बेहतर हो सकती है?
विशेषज्ञों की राय – डॉक्टरों का कहना
दिल्ली-एनसीआर स्थित यशोदा मेडिसिटी में न्यूरो सर्जरी विशेषज्ञ डॉक्टर दिव्य ज्योति के अनुसार:
- अभी तक कोई वैज्ञानिक प्रमाण यह नहीं कहता कि वाई-फ़ाई सेहत के लिए सीधा नुकसान करता है।
- लेकिन तर्क के हिसाब से यह दिमाग़ की इलेक्ट्रिकल इम्पल्स पर असर डाल सकता है।
- इसलिए सावधानी बरतना बेहतर है और रात में वाई-फ़ाई बंद कर देना सेहत के लिए फायदेमंद हो सकता है।
दिमाग़ के इलेक्ट्रिकल इम्पल्स और नींद पर असर
हमारे दिमाग़ में सूचनाओं का आदान-प्रदान न्यूरॉन्स के बीच इलेक्ट्रोकेमिकल सिग्नल्स से होता है।
रात के समय शरीर “स्लीप वेव्स” पर काम करता है। ऐसे में कोई भी इलेक्ट्रोमैग्नेटिक फील्ड नींद की क्वालिटी को प्रभावित कर सकता है।
रात में वाई-फ़ाई बंद करने के फ़ायदे
डॉक्टरों का मानना है कि-
- रात को वाई-फ़ाई बंद करने से गहरी नींद मिल सकती है।
- दिमाग़ को पूरा आराम मिलता है और अगले दिन काम करने की क्षमता बढ़ती है।
- लंबे समय तक रेडिएशन एक्सपोज़र से बचाव होता है।
मोबाइल फ़ोन और रेडिएशन का सच
केवल वाई-फ़ाई ही नहीं, बल्कि मोबाइल फ़ोन भी माइक्रोवेव फ्रीक्वेंसी पर काम करते हैं।
भले ही इनसे निकलने वाली रेडिएशन बहुत कम हो, लेकिन सिरहाने मोबाइल रखकर सोना दिमाग़ और नींद पर असर डाल सकता है।
WHO और अन्य हेल्थ एजेंसियों के अनुसार, बैकग्राउंड रेडिएशन हमारे आसपास पहले से मौजूद है, लेकिन अनावश्यक एक्सपोज़र को कम करना बेहतर होता है।
टेक्नोलॉजी एक्सपर्ट्स की राय
टेक्नोलॉजी विशेषज्ञ मोहम्मद फै़सल अली के अनुसार:
- अभी तक कोई रिसर्च यह साबित नहीं करती कि रात में वाई-फ़ाई बंद करना ज़रूरी है।
- लेकिन लंबे समय तक रेडियो वेव्स के ओवरएक्सपोज़र से नुकसान हो सकता है।
- भारत में पिछले 10 सालों में वाई-फ़ाई और मोबाइल का इस्तेमाल तेजी से बढ़ा है, इसलिए आगे और स्टडी की ज़रूरत है।
संभावित स्वास्थ्य जोखिम
डॉक्टरों और एक्सपर्ट्स के अनुसार, वाई-फ़ाई और मोबाइल रेडिएशन से संभावित खतरे हो सकते हैं:
- गहरी नींद में दखल
- कॉन्सेंट्रेशन और फोकस पर असर
- लंबे समय तक ट्यूमर के खतरे से जोड़कर देखा जाता है
सावधानियां और समाधान
- रात में वाई-फ़ाई राउटर बंद कर दें।
- बेडरूम में राउटर लगाने से बचें।
- मोबाइल को सिरहाने रखकर न सोएं।
- ज़रूरत पड़ने पर Airplane Mode ऑन करें।
- इलेक्ट्रॉनिक डिवाइस का उपयोग लिमिट में करें।
वाई-फ़ाई आधुनिक जीवन का अहम हिस्सा है और इसके बिना जीवन की कल्पना मुश्किल है।
लेकिन स्वास्थ्य विशेषज्ञ सलाह देते हैं कि जितना संभव हो, रात के समय वाई-फ़ाई और मोबाइल रेडिएशन से दूरी बनाकर रखें।
यह ज़रूरी नहीं कि यह सीधा नुकसान करे, लेकिन अच्छी नींद और दिमाग़ की सेहत के लिए सावधानी बरतना हमेशा बेहतर है।
Breaking News
Wi-Fi at night health effects are raising global concerns- Doctors and tech experts reveal how leaving Wi-Fi on while sleeping-

Contents
New Delhi, Sep.16,2025: Wi-Fi at night health effects have become one of the most searched health and technology questions in 2025. Families across India and the world are increasingly debating whether keeping Wi-Fi routers on during sleep hours is safe or harmful.
For example, Sarita, a Noida resident, often argues with her eighth-grade son Akshar late at night:
“Switch off the phone, it’s midnight already.”
“But mom, the Wi-Fi works best at night!”
This playful debate has now turned into a global health conversation. Could Wi-Fi signals, silently filling our bedrooms, be affecting our sleep cycles, brain functions, or even long-term health?
What Exactly Is Wi-Fi and How It Works
Wi-Fi, contrary to popular belief, is not short for Wireless Fidelity. According to the Wi-Fi Alliance, the global industry group, Wi-Fi is simply a brand name for wireless networking technology.
In simple terms, Wi-Fi allows devices like laptops, smartphones, and tablets to connect to the internet without cables. A wireless router creates a WLAN (Wireless Local Area Network) using radio frequency waves.
While the convenience is undeniable, the health impact of prolonged exposure to these electromagnetic fields (EMF) is still under scientific debate.
What Doctors Say
At Yashoda Medisity, Delhi NCR, Dr. Divya Jyoti, Consultant for Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery, explained:
“There is no conclusive scientific proof that Wi-Fi at night directly damages the brain. But logically, since brain impulses are electrical signals, and Wi-Fi depends on electromagnetic fields, there may be interference.”
She emphasized that while no direct evidence exists, caution is wise. Limiting exposure, especially during rest, is considered a good preventive measure.
Brain Impulses and Wi-Fi Radiation Explained
The human brain communicates through neural impulses, also called action potentials. These are tiny electrochemical signals that allow us to sense, think, and move.
Electromagnetic fields (EMFs) from Wi-Fi routers may theoretically interfere with these signals. Though studies remain inconclusive, the concern is that nighttime exposure could:
- Interrupt sleep waves (deep sleep cycles)
- Affect concentration and focus levels
- Lead to long-term neurological risks
Should You Turn Off Wi-Fi at Night
Doctors recommend switching off Wi-Fi at night because:
- Sleep is critical for brain recovery.
- Exposure to constant EMFs may disturb sleep patterns.
- Even if the risk is small, limiting exposure is a safe step.
Dr. Jyoti added-
“At night, our body waves differ—they’re sleep waves. Disruptions could reduce sleep quality, which directly affects daytime performance.”
Wi-Fi vs Mobile Phones- Which Is Worse at Night
Wi-Fi is not the only concern. Mobile phones emit microwave-based radiation, which may pose higher risks due to proximity to the body—especially when kept under pillows or near the head.
While Wi-Fi routers are usually a few feet away, mobile phones often stay within inches, increasing exposure intensity.
Experts warn: Avoid sleeping with mobile phones near your head, even if Wi-Fi is off.
What Technology Experts Think
Technology analyst Mohammad Faisal Ali explained:
“There is no definitive study proving Wi-Fi harms the brain at night. However, overexposure to radio waves in general may have long-term health implications.”
Ali pointed out that:
- Mobile and Wi-Fi usage surged dramatically in the last 10 years.
- Research is still catching up with long-term exposure effects.
- Responsible usage, like switching off at night, is advisable.
Tumors, Sleep, and Focus
Some studies link excessive EMF exposure to-
- Sleep disorders (difficulty falling or staying asleep)
- Reduced concentration and memory issues
- Potential tumor risks (though unproven, still debated)
A report classifies radiofrequency EMFs as “possibly carcinogenic.” This does not mean they cause cancer, but it flags the need for further study.
Practical Tips to Reduce Wi-Fi at Night Health Effects
Here are doctor-approved safety measures:
- Switch off Wi-Fi routers at bedtime.
- Keep routers at least 2-3 meters away from the bed.
- Avoid keeping mobile phones under the pillow.
- Use airplane mode while sleeping.
- Opt for wired internet if possible, for late-night work.
- Balance screen time to protect both eyes and brain.
Myth or Reality
So, are Wi-Fi at night health effects real? The truth is somewhere in between.
- No solid evidence proves serious harm.
- But logical concerns about sleep disturbance and long-term radiation exposure exist.
- Doctors and tech experts agree: better safe than sorry.
Until more definitive research emerges, switching off Wi-Fi at night is a simple, no-cost precaution for better sleep and peace of mind.
Bihar
Bihar Double Loot Allegations- Congress Accuses BJP of Giving 1,050 Acres to Adani at Rs.1-

Contents
New Delhi,Sep.16,2025:Bihar Double Loot has become the latest political flashpoint after Congress alleged that the ruling BJP has given away 1,050 acres of land in Bhagalpur to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s close associate, Gautam Adani, at a token rent of just Re 1 per year for 33 years-
Congress spokesperson Pawan Khera made these claims during a press conference in New Delhi, calling the deal a “shocking example of crony capitalism” that hurts both Bihar’s farmers and its citizens.
Why Congress Calls It a Double Loot
Congress argues that the deal amounts to a “double loot” of Bihar’s people:
- Land Grab at Throwaway Price – Farmers are losing their fertile land, and nearly 10 lakh trees are to be cut down.
- Expensive Electricity – The same people whose land and resources are used will have to buy electricity at ₹6.75 per unit.
Khera alleged-
“This is not development; this is Bihar Double Loot. Farmers lose land, forests vanish, and in the end, ordinary citizens are forced to pay more for electricity.”
Details of Bhagalpur Adani Power Project
The controversial project involves setting up a 2,400 MW power plant in Bhagalpur district.
Key Details as Alleged by Congress–
- Land Allocated: 1,050 acres
- Lease Period: 33 years
- Annual Rent: Re 1
- Trees Affected: Nearly 10 lakh
- Project Budget: ₹21,400 crore
- Power Tariff: ₹6.75 per unit
Initially, the plant was announced in the Budget as a government initiative. Later, Congress claims, it was handed over to Adani Group without transparency.
Election Timing and Political Accusations
The timing of the deal has raised eyebrows. Bihar is heading for Assembly elections, and opposition parties allege that this “sweetheart deal” is meant to secure corporate backing.
Khera further claimed similar patterns in other states:
- Maharashtra: Dharavi redevelopment handed to Adani before polls.
- Jharkhand & Chhattisgarh: Big projects awarded to Adani before elections.
Congress is projecting this as a nationwide strategy of “loot before vote.”
Crony Capitalism vs Development Debate
This controversy reignites the old debate on crony capitalism. Opposition parties have long accused the Modi government of favoring select industrialists like Adani and Ambani.
BJP, on the other hand, defends private participation, arguing that it brings investment, jobs, and growth.
For reference: The Hindu report on crony capitalism accusations outlines similar debates.
Impact on Farmers and Environment
The most direct impact of this alleged Bihar Double Loot will be felt by:
- Farmers: Losing ancestral land without fair compensation.
- Environment: Nearly 10 lakh trees cut, worsening Bihar’s already fragile ecosystem.
- Villagers: Displacement and loss of livelihoods.
Environmental activists warn that such projects may cause long-term ecological damage.
How Similar Deals Happened Before Elections
Congress highlighted a trend:
- In Maharashtra, Adani bagged the Dharavi project before state elections.
- In Jharkhand, coal blocks were allotted to Adani-linked firms just before polls.
- In Chhattisgarh, energy projects were cleared weeks before elections.
This repetition strengthens the opposition’s claim that “corporate deals” are linked with political calendars.
What BJP and Adani Say
So far, BJP has not officially responded to these fresh allegations.
In earlier cases, BJP leaders have argued that:
- Large-scale projects boost infrastructure.
- Private companies create jobs.
- Power generation helps tackle Bihar’s energy crisis.
The Adani Group has also previously dismissed such allegations, saying all projects are won through a fair bidding process.
Public Reactions in Bihar
On the ground, reactions are mixed:
- Farmers & activists oppose land acquisition, calling it exploitation.
- Urban middle class worry about rising electricity bills.
- Some traders support the project, expecting better power supply and jobs.
This divide could shape the 2025 Bihar Assembly elections narrative.
Expert Opinions on the Alleged Double Loot
Political experts say the “Bihar Double Loot” slogan could become a major weapon for Congress in rural areas.
- Economists argue that selling electricity at ₹6.75 per unit from land given almost free raises questions of fairness.
- Political analysts note that if BJP fails to counter the narrative, it may dent their pro-development image.
Bihar Politics at Crossroads
The Bihar Double Loot controversy highlights the clash between development promises and accusations of crony capitalism.
While BJP projects itself as the driver of growth, Congress and the opposition are painting it as corporate favouritism at the cost of common people.
With elections looming, this issue may dominate Bihar’s political stage. Whether it changes voter behaviour or gets lost in larger narratives remains to be seen.
Breaking News
Is Too Much Protein Dangerous-Shocking Health Risks You Should Know-

Contents
New Delhi, Sep.16,2025: Is too much protein dangerous? This question has become a trending health debate across social media, fitness circles, and nutrition forums. From protein shakes and powders to protein-rich bars, even everyday foods like cereals and coffee now come in “high-protein” versions.
While protein is indeed an essential nutrient—vital for muscle repair, hormone regulation, and overall health—nutritionists are increasingly worried that our obsession with it may be going too far.
According to, experts warn that excessive protein intake could stress the kidneys, increase the risk of kidney stones, weaken bones, and even displace other important nutrients like fibre from our diet.
So, let’s break it down—is too much protein dangerous, or is it just another diet fad blown out of proportion?
What Exactly Is Protein and Why Do We Need It
Protein is a macronutrient composed of amino acids—often referred to as the “building blocks of life.” It helps repair tissues, build muscles, and plays a role in making enzymes and hormones.
Dr. Emma Beckett, a nutrition expert at South Wales University, explains that proteins are involved in everything from transporting oxygen in the blood (via haemoglobin) to producing keratin in skin and hair.
Without adequate protein, the body is forced to break down muscle tissue to meet its needs.
Common sources of protein include:
- Lean meats (chicken, fish, turkey)
- Eggs
- Beans and legumes
- Nuts and seeds
- Dairy products like milk, yogurt, and cheese
How Much Protein Is Actually Recommended
The British Heart Foundation suggests that adults should consume about 0.75 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight per day.
- For women: ~45 grams/day
- For men: ~55 grams/day
Athletes or people with heavy workout routines may require slightly more, but experts emphasize that more is not always better.
The Rise of High-Protein Diets and Supplements
The global protein supplement industry was valued at $4.4 billion in 2021 and is expected to reach $19.3 billion by 2030.
This explosive growth is fuelled by-
- Fitness influencers promoting “protein maxing” diets on TikTok and Instagram
- Supermarkets pushing “high-protein” versions of snacks and drinks
- The perception that protein equals strength, muscle, and beauty
But here’s the catch: not all protein-rich products are healthy. Many contain artificial sweeteners, excess sugar, and additives.
Fiber vs Protein- Are We Ignoring the Real Superfood
One major concern is that the protein craze has made people neglect fibre, an equally essential nutrient.
Fiber improves digestion, prevents constipation, supports healthy gut bacteria, and lowers the risk of heart disease and type-2 diabetes.
The UK government recommends 30 grams of fibre per day, yet most adults fall far short of this goal.
Dr. Karan Rajan from the NHS highlights that while people are obsessed with protein shakes, fibre is the silent hero of long-term health.
Why Is Protein So Popular Among Fitness Enthusiasts
Protein is attractive because its effects are visible and fast. It helps build muscles, gives a fuller look, and aids in weight loss by increasing satiety.
As Men’s Health magazine editor Paul Kita explains-
“You can’t see your heart getting healthier from eating fibre, but you can see muscles growing from protein. That’s why protein has a vanity factor.”
For women, protein also helps reduce sarcopenia (age-related muscle loss), which becomes more severe after menopause due to hormonal changes.
Is Too Much Protein Dangerous for Your Kidneys
Yes—excessive protein can be dangerous. Research shows that too much protein stresses the kidneys, especially when derived from animal sources.
Risks include:
- Kidney stones
- Worsening of pre-existing kidney disease
- Increased urinary calcium loss, which may affect bones
According to the British Dietetic Association, individuals with kidney problems should strictly monitor protein intake.
The Hidden Side Effects of Excessive Protein Intake
Aside from kidney damage, is too much protein dangerous in other ways? Yes, here are some lesser-known risks:
- Digestive Issues: Bloating, constipation, and nausea
- Nutrient Imbalance: Excess protein may displace fruits, vegetables, and whole grains
- Bone Health Risks: High protein diets may increase calcium excretion
- Weight Gain: Extra protein, especially from processed foods, still adds calories
- Liver Stress: Overburdening the liver with nitrogen waste from protein metabolism
A Health Trap
Many so-called “healthy” protein products are highly processed. From protein cookies to protein chips, companies market them as guilt-free snacks.
But as nutritionists warn:
“Adding protein powder to junk food doesn’t magically make it healthy.”
In fact, many of these products contain hidden sugars, sodium, and artificial Flavors, making them closer to junk food than real nutrition.
Expert Warnings- Balanced Nutrition Over Protein Obsession
Experts stress that the answer to “Is too much protein dangerous?” lies in balance.
- Don’t rely only on protein powders or processed snacks.
- Prioritize natural sources like eggs, beans, nuts, and fish.
- Ensure your diet also has fibre, vitamins, and healthy fats.
Dr. Beckett concludes-
“Our bodies are not engines that run on one type of fuel. We need a balance of macronutrients for true health.”
Is Too Much Protein Dangerous or Just Overhyped
So, is too much protein dangerous? The answer is yes, if consumed in excess or from the wrong sources.
While protein is vital for muscle health, hormones, and immunity, overconsumption can harm the kidneys, bones, and overall nutritional balance.
Breaking News
Chess Champion Vaishali Rameshbabu wins the FIDE Women’s Grand Swiss 2025-

Contents
New Delhi, Sep.16,2025:Chess Champion Vaishali Rameshbabu has once again etched her name in the annals of chess history by winning the FIDE Women’s Grand Swiss 2025 title for the second consecutive year. The young Indian star displayed remarkable strategic brilliance and mental resilience to dominate her opponents and lift the prestigious trophy.
This back-to-back victory not only reinforces her growing reputation in the global chess community but also secures her a much-coveted spot in the 2026 Women’s Candidates Tournament, where the best players in the world compete for a chance to challenge the reigning World Champion.
A Look Back at Her Journey to the Top
Born in Chennai, Vaishali Rameshbabu has been passionate about chess since childhood. She rose through the ranks steadily, winning multiple junior championships before making her mark at the international level.
Her dedication to the sport has been evident since her early teens. With countless hours of training, sharp opening preparation, and relentless practice, she has transformed into one of the strongest women chess players India has ever produced.
Her journey has not been easy—competing at the highest level requires immense sacrifice, including long training sessions, traveling across the globe for tournaments, and managing the mental strain of elite competition.
What Makes This Win Special
Winning the FIDE Women’s Grand Swiss once is an outstanding achievement, but winning it twice in a row places Vaishali among an elite category of players.
- It proves her consistency at the highest level.
- It establishes her as a genuine contender for the Women’s World Chess Championship.
- It highlights India’s growing strength in women’s chess, traditionally dominated by players from Russia, China, and Eastern Europe.
Vaishali Rameshbabu and India’s Rise in World Chess
The victory of Chess Champion Vaishali Rameshbabu is not just a personal milestone but also a symbol of India’s emergence as a global chess powerhouse.
India has produced legendary players like Viswanathan Anand, who was World Champion for many years, and a new generation of prodigies including Rameshbabu Praggnanandhaa, Vaishali’s younger brother.
With players like Vaishali, Praggnanandhaa, D. Gukesh, and Arjun Erigaisi consistently performing on the international stage, India is rapidly becoming the new epicenter of world chess.
Prime Minister Modi and Amit Shah Praise the Champion
After her historic victory, Prime Minister Narendra Modi congratulated Vaishali on X (formerly Twitter), calling it a “remarkable achievement.” He praised her passion, commitment, and inspiration for aspiring athletes across the nation.
Union Home Minister Amit Shah also lauded her performance, describing it as evidence of India’s growing dominance in global chess.
Such recognition from top leaders not only boosts the morale of players but also brings much-needed attention and support to the sport.
What is the FIDE Women’s Grand Swiss Tournament
The FIDE Women’s Grand Swiss is one of the most prestigious tournaments in women’s chess. It brings together the world’s top-ranked players in a Swiss-system format, testing their consistency and endurance over multiple rounds.
Winning this tournament guarantees a direct entry into the Candidates Tournament, making it a career-defining milestone for players.
For Vaishali, winning it twice consecutively confirms her position as one of the strongest challengers for the world title.
Path to the 2026 Candidates Tournament
By winning the Grand Swiss, Vaishali Rameshbabu has secured her spot in the 2026 Women’s Candidates Tournament.
This competition is the gateway to the Women’s World Chess Championship, where the winner gets to challenge the reigning champion.
If Vaishali maintains her current form, she could very well be India’s next world chess champion, following in the footsteps of Viswanathan Anand.
Family of Chess Champions- Vaishali and Praggnanandhaa
Vaishali’s younger brother, Rameshbabu Praggnanandhaa, is already a global chess sensation, known for defeating world champion Magnus Carlsen on multiple occasions.
The Rameshbabu siblings are redefining Indian chess on the global stage. While Praggnanandhaa dominates the men’s circuit, Vaishali’s victories highlight the equal rise of women in the sport.
Global Reactions to Vaishali’s Triumph
International chess analysts, coaches, and fans have praised Vaishali Rameshbabu’s composure and tactical sharpness.
Her performance in the Grand Swiss is being seen as a clear indication that she could be among the favorites for the World Championship title in the near future.
Chess commentators noted her excellent time management, deep opening preparation, and fearless attacking play as the standout features of her game.
Breaking Barriers
The success of Chess Champion Vaishali Rameshbabu is not just an individual triumph but also a step forward in breaking gender barriers in chess.
Historically, women’s chess has had fewer opportunities and less recognition compared to men’s events. However, stars like Judit Polgár, Hou Yifan, and now Vaishali are showing that women can compete and dominate at the very highest levels.
Vaishali’s Playing Style
Vaishali is known for her-
- Aggressive opening repertoire
- Dynamic middle-game play
- Precise endgame skills
Her adaptability against different styles of opponents makes her one of the most versatile players in the circuit today. Experts believe her calm under pressure is what sets her apart in high-stakes tournaments like the Grand Swiss.
Can She Become World Champion
With her qualification for the 2026 Candidates Tournament, the next logical step for Vaishali Rameshbabu is the Women’s World Championship match.
Given her current trajectory, chess experts believe she has the potential to become India’s first women’s world champion. If achieved, this would mark a monumental moment in Indian sporting history.
Chess Champion Vaishali Rameshbabu has achieved a feat that very few in the chess world can boast of—winning the FIDE Women’s Grand Swiss two years in a row. Her journey is a testament to hard work, passion, and determination.
As she sets her sights on the 2026 Candidates Tournament, the entire chess community, not just in India but across the world, will be watching closely.
Breaking News
Owaisi on Waqf Amendment Act 2025-five Strong Reactions to Supreme Court Interim Order-

Contents
New Delhi, Sep.15,2025:The political debate around the Waqf Amendment Act 2025 intensified after the Supreme Court issued an interim order. Responding to the development, AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi expressed deep dissatisfaction-
According to him, the interim order fails to protect Waqf properties from the NDA government’s newly enacted law.
He said-
“This is an interim order. In my view and my party’s view, it does not safeguard Waqf properties or ensure their development.”
Owaisi on Waqf Amendment Act 2025 – The Focus Keyword Explained
When discussing the Supreme Court’s step, Owaisi on Waqf Amendment Act 2025 became one of the trending phrases across social and political platforms.
For Owaisi, the crux of the matter lies in the incomplete protection offered by the interim order. He has called for the Supreme Court to deliver a final verdict on the matter instead of temporary relief.
What the Supreme Court Interim Order Actually Says
On Monday, the Supreme Court refused to stay the entire Waqf Amendment Act 2025. However, it did impose restrictions on some specific provisions.
Key highlights of the interim order include:
- No blanket suspension of the law.
- Certain controversial provisions temporarily put on hold.
- Final hearing on constitutional validity still pending.
For full details, readers can check Supreme Court judgments archive.
Why Owaisi Believes Waqf Properties Are Still at Risk
According to Owaisi, the interim relief is inadequate. His concerns include:
- Protection Gap: Without halting the entire Act, loopholes may still threaten Waqf land.
- Development Block: He argues that the Act hinders long-term planning for Waqf institutions.
- Political Control: He fears the law enables excessive government interference.
Thus, Owaisi on Waqf Amendment Act 2025 highlights the disconnect between judicial steps and ground realities faced by Waqf boards.
Historical Background of Waqf Properties in India
To understand the debate, one must look at the history:
- Waqf refers to endowments made by Muslims for religious or charitable purposes.
- India has one of the largest Waqf estates in the world, covering thousands of properties.
- Previous governments struggled to balance autonomy vs. accountability in Waqf management.
The Waqf Amendment Act 2025 was pitched as a reform measure, but critics like Owaisi see it as an attempt to weaken minority institutions.
Political Reactions to the Interim Order
The Supreme Court’s decision has sparked political ripples:
- AIMIM: Owaisi openly criticized the order, demanding a full strike-down.
- NDA leaders: Defended the law as a tool for transparency.
- Opposition parties: Some echoed Owaisi’s concerns, while others remained cautious.
This shows the polarized nature of the debate around Waqf reform.
Legal Experts Weigh In on the Waqf Amendment Act 2025
Legal scholars argue that the Act touches sensitive constitutional issues:
- Minority Rights: Articles 25–30 of the Constitution provide special protections.
- Property Rights: Any government control over religious endowments invites judicial scrutiny.
- Balance of Power: Courts must decide if the Act oversteps executive authority.
Broader Implications for Minority Rights
For Owaisi, this is not just about Waqf property — it’s about minority rights at large.
- He argues that weakening Waqf boards undermines Muslim self-governance.
- The Act could set a precedent for controlling other minority-run institutions.
- This may fuel mistrust between minority communities and the government.
Thus, his comments reflect a larger ideological battle beyond just legal technicalities.
Public and Social Media Response
Owaisi’s sharp reaction went viral. On platforms like Twitter and Facebook:
- Supporters lauded him for standing up for Muslim rights.
- Critics accused him of politicizing the issue.
- Neutral voices highlighted the need for judicial clarity before passing judgment.
What Lies Ahead for Waqf Amendment Act 2025
The battle is far from over. The Supreme Court’s final decision will determine whether:
- The Waqf Amendment Act 2025 survives in its current form, or
- Major changes are mandated to protect minority rights.
Breaking News
Sourav Ganguly on India vs Pakistan Asia Cup match – Former Indian captain speaks on terrorism, sportsmanship, and controversies after the big clash-

Contents
New Delhi, Sep.15,2025:The India-Pakistan cricket rivalry is among the most intense in the world. Every match between the two nations goes beyond cricket —
Sourav Ganguly’s Strong Statement
The cricketing world once again witnessed heated debates after the much-anticipated India vs Pakistan Asia Cup match. Former Indian captain and BCCI president Sourav Ganguly broke his silence, addressing both political and sporting aspects.
His words carried a strong sentiment:
“Terrorism must stop, that is the most important thing, but sports cannot stop.”
This statement set social media abuzz, with fans, critics, and political analysts dissecting his perspective.
Sourav Ganguly on India vs Pakistan Asia Cup Match – The Focus Keyword Explained
When media asked whether India should have played against Pakistan in the Asia Cup, Sourav Ganguly responded with clarity. According to him, stopping cricket will not end terrorism. Instead, the responsibility lies with global leaders to ensure peace.
By stating this, Ganguly highlighted a crucial balance between national security concerns and the spirit of sports.
Why Terrorism and Cricket Should Be Viewed Separately
Ganguly’s comments underline an important thought: cricket is not the root cause of terrorism.
- Terrorism is a global issue and needs a united international response.
- Cricket, on the other hand, is a bridge of culture and sportsmanship.
- Ending cricket ties does not automatically reduce cross-border conflicts.
He emphasized that terrorism should end not just between India and Pakistan, but across the world.
Ganguly’s Stand on Sportsmanship After India’s Win
One major controversy after the India vs Pakistan Asia Cup clash was that Indian players did not shake hands with their Pakistani counterparts.
When asked about this, Ganguly cleverly replied:
“I will first speak to Suryakumar Yadav, and then I can answer this question.”
This witty yet diplomatic answer shows his leadership style — addressing sensitive matters without sparking unnecessary tension.
India vs Pakistan- The Rivalry Beyond Cricket
The India-Pakistan cricket rivalry is among the most intense in the world. Every match between the two nations goes beyond cricket — it symbolizes political tensions, cultural pride, and national sentiments.
- The Asia Cup match saw record-breaking viewership across platforms.
- Fans often perceive it as more than just a game.
- Politicians, media, and even celebrities add layers of pressure.
But as Ganguly reminded, “sports cannot stop.”
Sourav Ganguly’s History With Indo-Pak Encounters
As captain, Ganguly has had memorable encounters against Pakistan.
- His fearless attitude in the 2003 World Cup against Pakistan remains iconic.
- Under his leadership, India defeated Pakistan in Karachi during the 2004 series.
- He always emphasized playing hard on the field but respecting the game.
This history makes his words on the current Asia Cup even more impactful.
Political Tensions and the Future of Cricketing Ties
The India-Pakistan cricketing relationship has often suffered due to political unrest. Bilateral series have been rare since 2012.
Ganguly’s remarks suggest that while governments can take political stands, sports bodies and players should focus on the game.
This is similar to the stance taken by International Cricket Council (ICC) that emphasizes cricket as a global unifier.
How Fans Reacted to Ganguly’s Comments
Reactions on social media were divided-
- Supporters praised Ganguly’s balanced view, agreeing that cricket should continue despite political tensions.
- Critics argued that playing against Pakistan indirectly normalizes cross-border issues.
- Neutral fans appreciated his diplomatic yet bold tone.
The keyword “Sourav Ganguly on India vs Pakistan Asia Cup match” even started trending on Twitter.
Expert Opinions Backing Ganguly’s View
Several analysts backed Ganguly:
- Harsha Bhogle once stated that cricket can “transcend boundaries where politics cannot.”
- Former Pakistan captain Wasim Akram has also spoken about how India vs Pakistan cricket keeps hope alive for peace.
- Sports psychologists argue that cutting off cricket ties only increases hostility among fans.
These expert opinions align with Ganguly’s emphasis on separating terrorism from sports.
Can Cricket Truly Bridge Borders
Sourav Ganguly’s words may not resolve political conflicts, but they serve as a reminder:
- Cricket is more than a sport — it is a symbol of unity.
- Matches like India vs Pakistan Asia Cup keep millions engaged worldwide.
- Dialogue, diplomacy, and peace are the real answers to terrorism, not banning cricket.
Breaking News
Retail Inflation in India rose to 2.07% in August, driven by rising vegetable and fuel prices-

Contents
New Delhi, Sep.12,2025:Retail Inflation in India has once again made headlines, with the government releasing fresh data for August 2025. The figures reveal that consumer prices have risen slightly, sparking debates on whether Indian households will continue to feel the pinch in the coming months.
According to official data, the Consumer Price Index (CPI)-based retail inflation rose to 2.07% in August, compared to 1.55% in July. While this increase remains within the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) comfort zone of 2–6%, it highlights worrying trends in food and fuel prices.
What Is Retail Inflation in India
Retail inflation in India is measured by the Consumer Price Index (CPI). It tracks the change in prices of essential goods and services such as food, fuel, clothing, and housing.
- A moderate inflation rate indicates a stable economy.
- Higher inflation, however, reduces purchasing power and impacts household savings.
For a deeper understanding of CPI, you can check the RBI’s official CPI definition.
Official Data for August 2025
The government’s data shows:
- CPI Inflation in August 2025: 2.07%
- CPI Inflation in July 2025: 1.55%
- Food Inflation: from -1.76% in July to -0.69% in August
The data confirms that the rise in vegetable and pulse prices played a major role in pushing up retail inflation in India.
Why Did Retail Inflation in India Rise
Food Price Surge
Vegetables and pulses saw a sharp price rise due to:
- Excess rainfall damaging crops
- Lower-than-expected agricultural output
- Higher demand during the festive season
Fuel and Oil Prices
Global crude oil prices have risen significantly, raising transportation and energy costs. This has had a cascading effect on essential commodities.
Impact of Monsoon and Supply Chains
Heavy rains disrupted supply chains, especially in states like Maharashtra, Karnataka, and Uttar Pradesh. This created shortages in local markets, pushing retail prices upward.
The Numbers Explained
The Consumer Price Index (CPI) basket is made up of several components:Category Weight in CPI July Inflation August Inflation Food & Beverages 45.9% -1.76% -0.69% Fuel & Light 6.8% 3.12% 3.98% Clothing & Footwear 6.5% 2.7% 2.9% Housing 10.1% 4.1% 4.2%
(Source: Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation – MOSPI)
Impact on Households and Daily Expenses
The slight rise in retail inflation in India has already been felt by middle-class families:
- Household budgets stretched due to higher vegetable and cooking oil prices.
- Transportation and LPG cylinder costs increased.
- Dining out and packaged food prices saw small hikes.
For many households, even a 0.5% increase in food inflation significantly affects monthly expenses.
RBI’s Reaction and Monetary Policy Outlook
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has kept its inflation target between 2% and 6%.
- With inflation at 2.07%, RBI is unlikely to change interest rates in the short term.
- However, policymakers are keeping a close watch on global oil prices and domestic food supply trends.
For more updates, visit the RBI monetary policy page.
Expert Opinions on Inflation Trends
Economists believe-
- Short-term inflation will remain moderate but volatile.
- If rainfall continues to disrupt supply, food inflation may rise further.
- Global oil prices are the biggest risk factor for India’s inflation stability.
Global Factors Influencing Retail Inflation in India
Several global trends are shaping India’s inflation outlook:
- Oil Prices: Brent crude recently crossed $90 per barrel.
- Geopolitical tensions: Conflicts and trade restrictions affect global supply chains.
- Currency fluctuations: A weaker rupee makes imports more expensive.
Will Inflation Ease or Rise Further
The road ahead for retail inflation in India depends on:
- The impact of the ongoing monsoon season.
- Global energy markets.
- Domestic demand during the festival season.
If food supply stabilizes and oil prices ease, inflation may remain under control. But any shock to global oil or agriculture could push inflation back above 3–4%.
The latest data confirms that retail inflation in India rose slightly to 2.07% in August 2025. While still within the RBI’s comfort zone, the rise in food and fuel prices is a reminder of how vulnerable the Indian economy remains to external shocks and climate-related disruptions.
For Indian households, this means carefully planning budgets and preparing for possible price hikes in essentials. Policymakers, on the other hand, must stay alert to ensure inflation remains under control without stalling economic growth.
Breaking News
Vote theft proof by Rahul Gandhi explosive-revelations-

Contents
New Delhi, Sep.11,2025:Vote theft proof by Rahul Gandhi came into the spotlight again on 11 September 2025, when Rahul Gandhi, Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, announced that he has “dynamic, explosive proof” of widespread electoral fraud. He claimed that the slogan “vote chor, gaddi chhod” is now echoing throughout India, indicating public sentiment that votes are being stolen.
Gandhi says governments were formed via stolen votes in states such as Maharashtra, Haryana, and Karnataka, and he guarantees more evidence will be presented soon. He also used a striking metaphor: that a “hydrogen bomb” will “clear everything,” meaning his evidence will leave no shadows.
What led to the Vote Theft allegations
Previous claims and examples
Rahul Gandhi’s vote theft narrative began earlier, asserting irregularities in the preparation and revision of electoral rolls. He pointed particularly to Mahadevapura Assembly constituency in Karnataka, alleging duplicate entries, invalid father names, house numbers missing, etc.
He also highlighted cases in Bihar, where during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voter rolls, there were claims of names being removed. One case involved a person named Subodh Kumar, allegedly removed from draft rolls; the Election Commission of India (ECI) clarified that Kumar was never a voter but a booth-level agent.
Another case involved Ranju Devi, claimed by Gandhi to have been removed from the voter list, but ECI said her name was intact.
The Election Commission’s response so far
The ECI has repeatedly dismissed many of the claims as baseless or lacking formal structure. In several cases it has requested written declarations under oath per rule provisions, and asked Rahul Gandhi to submit documentary evidence or apologies where claims were made.
In one significant legal instance, the Madras High Court dismissed a PIL seeking directions for the ECI to investigate Rahul’s “vote chori” allegations, calling the plea vague and without material particulars. A cost of Rs 1 lakh was imposed on the petitioner.
Regions, evidence & slogans
States cited
Rahul Gandhi has specifically named Maharashtra, Haryana, and Karnataka as states where elections were allegedly stolen through manipulation of electoral rolls or other means.
Types of evidence claimed
- He says Congress has already provided “black-and-white proof” of wrongdoings.
- Complaints of duplicate voter entries, irregular father-names, missing or invalid house numbers in voter list drafts.
- Video or social media content where voters claim they were either removed or misled about their voter-registration status.
Slogans & metaphors
- The slogan “Vote Chor, Gaddi Chhod” (which means “Vote thief, vacate your seat”) is being widely used by Rahul Gandhi and his supporters. He says it is “spreading like fire.”
- He uses strong metaphors like “hydrogen bomb” to emphasize the scale and impact of the evidence to come.
ECI, BJP and legal pushback
Election Commission of India (ECI)
- The ECI has demanded formal, sworn declarations or evidence when accusations are made. It has said without such formal proof the claims are not actionable.
- The ECI clarified in specific cases (like Subodh Kumar) that some persons are not registered voters, or no names were ever on the roll.
BJP’s counter
- BJP leaders have accused Rahul Gandhi and Congress of spreading misinformation and using these allegations to mobilize political support.
- They argue that such claims muddy public trust in democratic institutions.
Judicial / legal observations
- As noted, Madras High Court dismissed a PIL seeking ECI to clarify “vote theft” that lacked specific evidence. The court criticised the vagueness.
- There have been legal notices demanding Rahul Gandhi produce affidavits or evidence.
Protests, media, and public reaction
Protests & campaigns
- Congress has launched protests in states such as Rajasthan, with slogans “Vote Chor, Gaddi Chhod,” demanding transparency from the ECI.
- The “Vote Adhikar Yatra” and various public meetings are being organized, both to raise awareness and to press for evidence.
Media & public sentiment
- Media coverage is intense, with wide reporting on Rahul’s promise of “explosive proof,” speculation on what that evidence might be, and whether it will hold up legally.
- Some public discussion is supportive—people who feel disenfranchised or suspicious of electoral rolls are rallying behind the claims. Others are skeptical, calling for formal disclosures.
Political risk & strategy
- Rahul Gandhi’s strategy seems aimed at shifting public discourse, especially in states where elections were controversial or margins were thin.
- BJP and ECI’s responses reflect high stakes: dismissing too lightly could alienate voters; acknowledging could open legal or procedural scrutiny.
Implications for Indian democracy and elections
Trust in the electoral system
If the vote theft proof by Rahul Gandhi is substantiated, it could severely impact public trust in the Election Commission of India and the legitimacy of election outcomes.
Legal precedents
This could lead to more PILs, court cases, possibly revisiting results if irregularities are proven. The demand for evidence under oath suggests legal thresholds are important.
Electoral reforms & procedural changes
- There may be increased calls for use of paper ballots or stronger audit mechanisms, as already seen in some states pushing for paper ballots.
- Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voter rolls may come under stricter oversight.
Political polarization and stability
- These claims contribute to political polarization—opposition vs ruling party, public vs establishment.
- The impact on voter morale, especially among youth, marginalized, or those who believe their votes don’t count, could be significant.
Timeline of promised disclosures
Time Frame | What Rahul Gandhi Promised | Likely Outcome / Watchpoints |
Short term (days-weeks) | “More explosive proof” to be released, possibly specific complaints or data from Maharashtra, Karnataka, Haryana. | Scrutiny of the evidence: whether it is documentary, voter roll data, affidavits, or witness statements. |
Medium term (weeks-months) | Intensification of public campaigns, possible legal action or PILs, demands to ECI. | ECI responses, court judgments, possibly political fallout in key constituencies. |
Long term | Possible reforms in electoral roll revision, audit or verification of claimed irregularities. | Legislative or ECI mandated changes, shifts in political messaging or election strategies. |
Vote theft proof by Rahul Gandhi is no longer just a political slogan—it has become a promise of major revelations. Whether those revelations will change the electoral landscape depends on the credibility, detail, and transparency of the evidence he presents.
For now, the allegations have stirred controversy, heightened scrutiny of the ECI and the ruling party, and raised profound questions of fairness in India’s democratic process.
Breaking News
India hits back at Switzerland

Contents
New Delhi, Sep.11,2025:Alongside its reply to Switzerland, India also sharply criticized Pakistan. Tyagi labelled Pakistan as a “failed state” dependent on political propaganda, accusing it of harboring terror networks-
The opening salvo
India hits back at Switzerland with a stern, assertive response after Swiss remarks at the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) concerning minority rights, freedom of expression, and media freedom. What began as a diplomatic recommendation turned into a heated exchange, with India calling the comments “surprising, shallow and ill-informed.”
This response reflects India’s evolving posture on the global stage—a country no longer content to quietly absorb criticism, especially from foreign governments, but commanding attention and pushing back when it deems narratives misaligned with its self-image and its record.
What Switzerland said at the UNHRC
The Swiss delegate, Michael Meier, in his capacity during the 60th Session of the UNHRC, called on India to:
- “Take effective measures to protect minorities in India”;
- “Uphold freedom of expression and media rights.” These remarks formed part of a broader review in which Switzerland also expressed concern about human rights issues in other countries like Syria, Turkiye, and Serbia.
India’s rebuttal
India’s counter-response, delivered by Kshitij Tyagi, Counsellor in Permanent Mission of India at Geneva, was strong, multifaceted, and aimed at redirecting the narrative.
Racism, discrimination, xenophobia allegations against Switzerland
- India hit back by saying that Switzerland should focus on its own challenges, including racism, systematic discrimination, and xenophobia within its borders.
- Tyagi described the Swiss remarks as “surprising, shallow and ill-informed.” He suggested that, given Switzerland’s role as UNHRC president, the country should avoid narratives that misrepresent India’s reality.
- India’s image: Pluralism, democracy, ready to assist
- India emphasized that it is the world’s largest, most diverse and vibrant democracy, with a strong civilisational tradition of pluralism.
- In a somewhat unusual diplomatic move, India offered to assist Switzerland in addressing its own issues of racism, xenophobia and discrimination.
Response to Pakistan -“failed state” claims
- Alongside its reply to Switzerland, India also sharply criticized Pakistan. Tyagi labelled Pakistan as a “failed state” dependent on political propaganda, accusing it of harboring terror networks.
- India referenced past terror attacks (Pahalgam, Uri, Pathankot, Mumbai) and Bin Laden’s presence in Pakistan to underline its accusations.
netizens & media
- Social media in India responded loudly. Many praised India’s firm stance, calling it dignified, confident, and emblematic of what some are terming a more assertive “New India.”
- Indian media described the exchange as a diplomatic “clapback” or “slap of truths.” Some analysts see this as part of India’s pattern of resisting what it sees as biased criticism from the West or international forums.
Wider diplomatic implications
- Diplomatic tone and norms: This incident raises questions about how much critique from one democratic nation to another is acceptable, especially within bodies like the UNHRC. India’s response suggests that it expects mutual respect rather than one-sided moral lectures.
- Soft power and global image: By calling out Switzerland, India not only defended its reputation internally, but also projected soft power—asserting itself as a democracy unapologetic of its practices and proud of its diversity.
- Future UNHRC debates: Such exchanges may tighten the boundaries of what countries are willing to accept in terms of external criticism, especially from nations that themselves have human rights challenges.
Stakes & what lies ahead
India hits back at Switzerland wasn’t just about a single statement; it was about a changing diplomatic posture. India seems less willing to be lectured by others—particularly when it believes those others have their own issues of prejudice and systemic discrimination.
- Breaking News7 days ago
Balen Shah, Kathmandu’s independent mayor, from rapper to political leader. Explore his rise amidst Nepal’s youth-led revolution-
- Breaking News2 weeks ago
Mumbai Ganesh Visarjan Security is elevated with AI, drones, 10,000+ CCTVs, over 21,000 police personnel and
- Education2 months ago
Grandparents’ Day Jaipur School Celebration on 26 July ,honored grandparents’ vital role – a heartfelt
- Festival3 weeks ago
Ganesh Chaturthi 2025 unfolds with rare planetary yogas—brings an especially powerful, auspicious start to the festival
- Breaking News1 week ago
Pitru Paksha 2025-Seven Powerful Rituals and Sacred Places to Free Five Generations
- Accident1 month ago
uttarkashi‑cloudburst‑flash‑flood‑devastation‑4‑dead
- Breaking News1 week ago
Nepal Gen Z Revolution Is Shaking the Nation
- Art3 weeks ago
Discover the Mewar Gavari Dance Festival’s mesmerizing 40-day performances, rich folklore, and tribal devotion—an awe-inspiring cultural phenomenon of Mewar