India
Congress Protests in Prayagraj: A Response to Alleged Misuse of Power by the ED
Contents
Introduction: Understanding the Context
The Indian political scenario is defined by a dynamic intermix of different parties, ideologies, and social movements. Over the past few years, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) came under the spotlight as charges of abuse of authority have abounded. The ED, responsible for the enforcement of economic laws and checking financial crimes, has been faulted by multiple political groups, mainly the Congress party, with operating in opaque ways and siding towards specific political groups. This has heightened conflict in the political sphere, bringing forth extensive criticism on the level of integrity among government institutions.
Within this tense environment, the Congress party has rallied its cadre and members to demonstrate against what they consider an abuse of power by the ED. Demonstrations held in Prayagraj are a response to what is perceived as government overreach, particularly with regard to continuous investigations that are seen as politically motivated. Demonstrators claim that the actions of the ED have a chilling effect on democracy by disproportionately targeting opposition leaders under the pretext of enforcing the law.
The relevance of these demonstrations goes beyond the specific grievances. They illustrate the political survival challenge that confronts the Congress party in the face of an assertive government coalition. With these tensions in progress, the Prayagraj marches and protests represent a larger resistance movement against what most view as the authoritarianism in the current regime. In addition to this, they present important questions regarding the independence of regulatory authorities, the integrity of political debate, and the place of protest in a democratic world. These protests, therefore, represent an important page in the continuing story of India’s political development.
Background on the Enforcement Directorate (ED)
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) is an important institution within India’s financial regulatory environment, whose main responsibility is to handle economic offenses. The agency, founded in 1956, comes under the Department of Revenue within the Ministry of Finance. The ED’s core mandate is to enforce two key pieces of legislation: the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) and the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). These laws give the agency the authority to probe and prosecute individuals and organizations engaged in illegal financial operations, such as money laundering and foreign exchange law violation.
One of the major functions of the ED is to inquire into crimes involving the concealment, transfer, and acquisition of proceeds obtained through criminal means. The agency is empowered to conduct searches, freeze assets, and prosecute, hence becoming a key driver in ensuring the integrity of India’s financial system. In addition, the ED also has the power to issue summons and direct people to give information relating to their investigations, hence significantly increasing its probe powers.
Nonetheless, the powers of the Enforcement Directorate have come under criticism and controversy. The critics mention that the powers of the agency are too comprehensive and can result in overreach, threatening the rights of individuals as well as democratic norms. The issue is further escalated by cases of the ED acting as politically motivated, raising concerns of partisanship. A number of instances have been witnessed where opposition activists and leaders accused the ED’s investigations as being more politically motivated than actually concerned with financial impropriety.
Since the agency is still working within a multifaceted political and legal environment, the debate about its accountability and impartiality is a relevant concern in modern India. Knowing the functions of the ED and the criticisms against it is important in assessing the recent protests and accusations about its actions in Prayagraj.
Triggering Events: What Led to the Protests
The Congress protests in Prayagraj are due to a chain of critical incidents that fanned public opinion and party activists on the streets. Among the initial triggers was the arrest of key political leaders, which the majority of activists and Congress leaders interpreted as a misuse of power by the Enforcement Directorate (ED). These arrests were widely viewed not merely as legal actions but were framed as politically motivated efforts to stifle dissent and opposition. Such perceptions raised serious concerns about the integrity of governmental agencies, which should operate free from partisan bias.
Amidst this backdrop, numerous allegations emerged regarding the ED’s methods and intentions. Opponents of the agency argued that its activities were largely aimed at Congress party members and sympathizers, and posited a trend towards political vendetta in its efforts instead of pursuing justice. The Congress party used this as an opportunity, portraying therayments as indicative of a larger approach being followed by the governing administration in order to demonize opposition leaders and strengthen its hold. This feeling resonated strongly among party supporters and members, leading to a wave of mobilization campaigns to tackle these complaints.
In addition, the political climate of tension was increased by several egregious incidents within the country, such as demonstrations complaining of corrupt and intimidation measures associated with the ED’s conduct. Those incidents helped to create a pervasive sense of fear among the supporters of opposition forces, who complained that the government used the legal process against its opponents.
While the Congress party mobilized its rank and file to protest these perceived abuses, it was clear that the demonstrations were not merely a response to short-term events but also an expression of long-standing discontent over the deterioration of democratic norms. These incidents eventually served as a catalyst, sparking mass public protests across Prayagraj and confirming the Congress party’s opposition to what they viewed as the abuse of power by the ED.
Congress Party’s Reaction: Strategy and Messaging
The recent Prayagraj protests have been a focal point of the Congress Party, and it has been forced to express a strategic reaction based on perceived grievances regarding the Enforcement Directorate (ED). The congress has skillfully framed its message to reference a narrative of resistance to what it terms as systemic abuse of authority. Here, Congress leaders have tried to mobilize public opinion by identifying themselves as champions of justice, thus becoming more visible and credible to their constituents.
The core of the Congress Party’s strategic response has rested on the focus on collective action and solidarity. Top leaders used rhetoric with the intent of reaching out to the anger of the public, most importantly with regard to overreaching by the government. Remarks issued by the major figures in the protests reinforced this strategy, with slogans and cries for justice uniting party activists and backing from sympathetic organizations. The tone used was specifically emotive, appealing to the civic duty of the audience and the shared memory of past injustice in the face of authoritarianism. This has increased the sense of urgency behind their campaign.
Moreover, senior Congress leaders were involved in conveying party stands to the media. They would restate the issues around transparency and accountability in their statements, calling for a complete inquiry into the alleged abuse of power by the ED. This has been contrasted with actions by the ruling party, hinting at a victimhood narrative for political ends. Through overt involvement in the media, Congress has tried to promote their side of the story, thus shaping public opinion and positioning themselves as a credible alternative in politics.
Finally, the strategic reaction of the Congress Party to the Prayagraj protests is a measured attempt to turn social discontent into political capital and further their interests in a manner that appeals to the aspirations of the electorate for justice and equality.
Public Reaction and Mobilization
The protests of the Congress in Prayagraj received considerable public interest, as they demonstrated large-scale perceptions of a misuse of power by the Enforcement Directorate (ED). The intensity of participation in the protests was particularly high, with a mix of people from different local communities participating. The locals voiced their complaints about what they felt was an overstep of state power, since most of them saw the actions of the ED as politically driven rather than a search for justice.
The use of social media websites was a critical factor in crowd mobilization in the protests. The Congress party used these online forums effectively to share information, mobilize support, and report on protest proceedings in real-time. Social media hashtags for the protests were popular on different websites, drawing the attention not only of local inhabitants but also of wider national and international communities. This digital activism provided a shared conversation and empowered many to engage in the movements who might not have been active in the conventional protest activities.
In addition, public opinion against the ED was critically analyzed throughout this time. The agency, which is generally felt to be used by the ruling party as a device for political scores, was increasingly criticized by the community. Most of the local residents expressed their anger through social media, reaffirming their opinion that the ED’s actions were compromising democratic processes. To this extent, the Congress party attempted to connect with the people’s feelings by crusading for accountability and transparency in governance.
Through a range of community outreach efforts, such as rallies, public forums, and meetings, the Congress party sought to give voice to those alarmed by the actions of the ED. The reaction of local communities highlighted a common need for empowerment and protection of democratic values, making such protests significant in current political discourse.
Also read : Mehul Choksi Arrest: Belgium Confirms Working on India’s Extradition Request
Law Enforcement and Security Measures
Over the past few weeks, the Congress protests in Prayagraj have attracted massive public attention, and local law enforcement has mounted an elaborate response. The protests were mainly fueled by claims of abuse of authority by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and thus caused increased tension in the community. Ahead of possible unrest, security steps were taken by police officials geared towards ensuring peace and stability during protests.
Prior to the outbreaks of protest, police authorities held in-depth examinations of the environment, deploying more personnel to the strategic areas in the city. They readied themselves for several possible scenarios and estimated the likely attendance of big crowds to protests and aligned their resources accordingly. Officers were strategically placed at significant intersections and main avenues to coordinate traffic control as well as the observation of the protests to facilitate a better-order environment.
During the course of the protests, police were in visible attendance, serving as both deterrent and crowd management. The police used non-confrontational means to handle the protesters, and dialogue was emphasized as a method to de-escalate. This approach played a key role in avoiding conflicts and keeping the protests peaceful. Where tensions started to escalate, police used communication tactics to negotiate with protest leaders, trying to find avenues for peaceful expression as well as the preservation of public property and rights of non-protesting citizens.
Despite sporadic moments of small-scale confrontations, in general, law enforcement was able to handle the situation well. The response was marked by a desire to enforce the law while also respecting citizens’ rights to protest. The proactive steps by law enforcement agencies highlight the intricacies of policing civic protests while walking on the tightrope of security interests and public opinion during politically sensitive situations. These moves highlight the predicaments faced by law enforcement in reacting to charges of government overreach, a concern close to the hearts of many citizens and one that highlights the need for accountability in governance.
Political Consequences of the Protests
The recent demonstrations by the Congress party in Prayagraj have been a major occurrence within the Indian political sphere. These protests are mostly motivated by the allegations of misuse of power against the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and the associated concerns about what impact these might have on future elections as well as party realignments within the Congress.
Electorally, the demonstrations can act to energize the support base of the party, specifically among voters who are perceived as being disenfranchised by the overreaching of the government and misuse of authority. The popular impression of the ED as a vehicle for political reprisals could run deep and trigger an improvement in voter turnout among sympathizers of Congress in the next election. This may upset established trends and enable Congress to recover lost ground in core constituencies.
Internally, the demonstrations underscore the difficulties facing the Congress party as it attempts to strengthen its hold in the face of growing competition from state and national parties. The course of action followed by the leadership in reaction to these demonstrations can determine the unity and morale of the party. An effective mobilization campaign can pave the way for regaining confidence among the party ranks, while failure to adequately address the grievances expressed during the demonstrations has the potential to further deepen existing fissures.
Furthermore, the ongoing tensions between the Congress party and the ED may generate broader implications for the reputation of the agency itself. The accusations of politicization against the ED could diminish its credibility if the public believes it is acting beyond its jurisdiction. As political interactions evolve, the potential for this scenario shapes future discourse around the ED’s role and its relationships with various political entities. Overall, the impacts of these demonstrations can resonate in several aspects of the Indian political landscape in the coming future.
Comparative Analysis: Protests in Other Regions
The recent Congress protests in Prayagraj indicate a rising trend throughout India, where political parties have united to protest what they see as an abuse of authority by the Enforcement Directorate (ED). The same has appeared in other states as well in the form of similar demonstrations, signaling a more general resistance against government actions felt to be unjust or excessive. Every such occurrence is crucial for an understanding of the political context and public attitudes toward law enforcement agencies.
In Punjab itself, there were widespread protests after numerous opposition leaders were picked up by the ED. Protesters raised the issue of political opponents being selectively targeted and the chances of the ED being used as a political instrument. This response is reflective of the feelings in Prayagraj, where Congress elements marched in under the pretext of protecting democratic ethos and accountability. The Punjab protests highlighted the coalition of different political forces coming together against perceived authoritarianism, which exists in Prayagraj too.
Likewise, in West Bengal, the Trinamool Congress organized mass protests when several party officials were targeted by the ED. The protesters believed these actions were an attempt to destabilize the stability of the state government. In comparison, the protests in Prayagraj illustrate a similar narrative of local Congress leaders trying to highlight political influences shaping the police force. Both places illustrate the significance of social and political matrices in the context of central state relations.
In Maharashtra, protests have centered on charges of political motives behind ED probes. Opponents argue that such actions are intended to instill a climate of fear among opposition parties, in effect, signaling a larger criticism. This fear is felt in Prayagraj, as Congress leaders protest what they describe as the politicization of state agencies. These events from different parts of the country not only point to shared themes of protest, but they also point to the importance of being vigilant in defending civil liberties in times of volatility in political life.
Summary: The Road Ahead
The unfolding protests in Prayagraj point to a critical moment in India’s political journey, one that is characterized by escalating tensions between opposition forces and state agencies. The dissent is not just against the Enforcement Directorate (ED) but even extends to questioning the accountability and the governance mechanisms in existence. The political realignments and the movements against abuse of power are reflective of a democratic society that is more and more careful about protecting its democratic rights.
The tensions imply a realignment of political dynamics where accountability mechanisms are under intense scrutiny. Investigatory agencies such as the ED are important in maintaining law and order, but their alleged political utilization for purposes that are not accepted can invoke public suspicion. The recent demonstrations speak of a requirement for a vigilant review of the processes through which institutions function within the democratic setup, and a stress on transparency and neutrality in the processes of governance.
In addition, the Prayagraj protests represent an even broader story about the place of protest in a democracy. Citizens’ desire to stand up against what they feel is injustice reaffirms the notion that engagement is needed for a good political culture. This begs the question of how the government will react to the voices of the people and whether it will take reform into consideration to fix these issues. Can the political trajectory of India shift towards greater constructive party and agency dialogue? Or will the polarization intensify, hindering growth? These are the questions that will frame the national debate as the players try to manage the intricacies of governance and responsibility under increasingly close public examination.
Finally, the events with regard to Congress protests in Prayagraj highlight the need to build a political culture where dissent is treated with respect but at the same time makes sure that the investigation agencies act unbiased. The future will depend on cooperation and commitment to democratic norms, which will allow India to confront these challenges directly.
Crime
Jhansi bank hostage EMI case shocks UP — private bank staff allegedly held wife hostage over overdue loan instalment
Contents
UP, July30,2025: Ravindra alleges he had taken a Rs.40,000 personal loan with a monthly EMI of Rs.2,120. He states he has repaid 11 instalments, but the bank
Overview of the Incident
Jhansi bank hostage EMI case emerged on July 30, 2025, when Ravindra Verma, a resident of Poonch police station area, lodged a written complaint with the Moth police station reporting that private bank employees in Jhansi forcibly detained his wife over unpaid loan instalments.
Victim counts that his wife, Puja Verma, was made to sit inside that private bank for nearly five hours and was not released until he arranged payment—which was stated as the condition for her release.
What Victim Claims
Ravindra alleges he had taken a Rs.40,000 personal loan with a monthly EMI of Rs.2,120. He states he has repaid 11 instalments, but the bank records show only eight paid—suggesting the agent may have misappropriated Rs.6,360.
He further claims that when he and his wife visited the branch, bank staff locked them inside and said:
“You must pay the overdue EMI before you take your wife home” — effectively holding her as leverage.
Despite his repeated pleas citing financial hardship, bank employees allegedly refused any negotiation or compassion.
Timeline & Role of Police
- Monday, July 28, 2025: Ravindra and his wife visit the branch in Azad Nagar, Bamhrauli.
- They are detained inside forcibly for around four to five hours.
- At his breaking point, Ravindra calls 112 (emergency), and PRV police officers arrive promptly.
- Puja is safely rescued and taken to Moth police station.
- Police initiate a formal investigation. CCTV from the branch is being reviewed, and other evidence is being collected.
Loan Details & EMI Discrepancy
- Loan Amount: Rs.40,000
- EMI per month: Rs.2,120
- Instalments paid by Ravindra: 11
- Instalments recorded by bank: 8
- Alleged agent misappropriation: Rs.2,120 × 3 = Rs.6,360
This EMI mismatch is central to the case and indicates possible internal fraud or misconduct by bank agents.
Bank’s Response & Public Concerns
The private bank denied the allegations, stating no unlawful or coercive methods were used. They claimed their staff followed proper loan recovery procedures. However, the public outcry questions the integrity of loan-collection systems, especially when women are involved indirectly.
This event raises serious concerns:
- Can private financial institutions hold women as collateral?
- What internal safeguards exist for borrower protection?
- Are oversight mechanisms strong enough in microfinance and private loan setups?
Legal and Social Implications
Legal Issues:
- Detaining someone without legal authority may violate penal laws regarding unlawful confinement, coercion, and human rights.
- The agent’s alleged embezzlement of EMI constitutes criminal breach of trust.
- Police actions based on CCTV and testimonies may lead to FIRs and criminal proceedings.
Social Impact:
- Highlights the power imbalance between vulnerable borrowers and loan agents.
- Sparks debate on women’s safety in financial disputes.
- Draws attention to rural borrowers who may not understand or track loan records.
- For reference on similar incidents: Inshorts coverage of a Tamil Nadu case where a woman was held over missing EMI of ₹770 – showing this is not.
The Jhansi bank hostage EMI scandal is deeply troubling. A borrower’s wife was held hostage as repayment leverage—raising urgent questions about ethics, legality, and borrower protections. The police are investigating, and if charges are proved, the bank and responsible agents could face serious legal consequences.
This incident is a wake‑up call to revisit lending practices, regulatory oversight, and mechanisms to safeguard borrowers—especially in rural India.
Contents
India, July30,2025: Previously, the group match vs Pakistan was outright cancelled after Indian players and a main sponsor, EaseMyTrip, voiced opposition
India Champions refuse play Pakistan WCL semi‑final
At the very outset, India Champions refuse play Pakistan WCL semi‑final has become one of the most talked‑about stories in cricket and sports politics. When the Indian legends team led by veterans like Yuvraj Singh and Shikhar Dhawan secured their spot in the World Championship of Legends (WCL) semi-final, the expected matchup against Pakistan Champions turned into a national controversy.
That anticipated showdown was scheduled for July 30–31, 2025, at Edgbaston, Birmingham. However, India made it clear: they would not take the field.
How the controversy unfolded
Despite a shaky group stage—losing to South Africa, Australia, and England—the India Champions qualified for the semis by defeating West Indies Champions in dramatic fashion in just 13.2 overs.
Previously, the group match vs Pakistan was outright cancelled after Indian players and a main sponsor, EaseMyTrip, voiced opposition. Indian cricket icons publicly refused to play.
With that precedent, when standings placed them against Pakistan again in the semis, the boycott was restated: India Champions refuse play Pakistan WCL semi‑final, no ifs, no buts.
Who backed the boycott: Players and sponsors
Indian legends take a stand
Shikhar Dhawan emphatically told reporters, “Didn’t play before, won’t play now.” His firm stance echoed through the camp. Former stars like Suresh Raina and Harbhajan Singh also rejected participation. Reports confirm Yuvraj Singh, Dhawan, Yusuf Pathan and others were central to the decision.
EaseMyTrip withdraws sponsorship
EaseMyTrip, the tournament’s major sponsor, publicly exited. Co‑founder Nishant Pitti stated:
“Terror and cricket cannot go hand in hand… Nation first, business later”
He added they would not support any match that “attempts to normalise relations with a country that promotes terrorism”.
Historical context and cricket diplomacy
The India–Pakistan rivalry in cricket isn’t new. Social and political tensions have often interrupted sporting ties—Kargil, Mumbai attacks, and recurring suspensions. India hasn’t toured Pakistan since 2013.
Attempts at “cricket diplomacy” have happened before—for example in 2011—but the current environment, marked by terrorist attacks such as the Pahalgam attack on April 22, 2025, and escalating military tensions, has hardened public sentiment.
Reactions from experts and former players
Media and cricket analysts
Former Pakistan spinner Danish Kaneria criticized the Indian stance in The Times of India: calling out what he termed “selective patriotism”—especially since India continues to agree to Asia Cup fixtures against Pakistan later this year.
Former Pakistan captain Salman Butt added fuel, saying that India’s boycott should extend to ICC tournaments and even Olympics if taken consistently.
International voices
Australian legend Brett Lee commented neutrally: organizers tried to save the match, but respected the players’ stand. The cancellation underscored the sensitivity of geopolitical tensions affecting sports.
Fallout for WCL and cricket fans
The cancellation of a marquee semi-final has rattled WCL’s credibility. Fans expected a high-voltage contest; global broadcasters prepared coverage. Yet the organizers formally apologized for “hurting sentiments” and canceled the fixture entirely.
WCL now faces scheduling chaos and sponsorship concerns. When a top sponsor walks out, and one team refuses to play, it leaves tournament integrity in question.
What’s next: BCCI response and future implications
According to Navbharat Times, with India Champions refusing to play, pressure mounts on BCCI to issue an official stance or possibly impose sanctions. The ambiguity around selection and participation may impact future veteran leagues.
Meanwhile, the Asia Cup 2025 schedule lists India vs Pakistan matches in September—but with sensitive timing, this boycott has sparked questions about India’s consistency.
BCCI chief coach Gautam Gambhir had earlier expressed personal opposition to playing Pakistan at any venue until violence subsides.
India Champions refuse play Pakistan WCL semi‑final isn’t merely a sports boycott—it reflects deeper socio-political fault lines. The move, supported by players and sponsors alike, demonstrates how cricket cannot remain insulated from geopolitical realities.
In refusing the match, India Champions asserted intent: some national sentiments cannot be compromised for glamour or legacy. Whether one views it as principled patriotism or inconsistency ahead of multi-nation tournaments, the debate is far from over. With Asia Cup looming, BCCI’s next steps will reverberate across cricket diplomacy.
Business
India‑US tariffs warning surfaces as President Trump signals possible 20‑25% levy on Indian exports
US, July30,2025: The Indian rupee reacted swiftly, weakening to around ₹86.23 per U.S. dollar, its lowest level in four months, as investors feared tariff disruption and surged foreign outflow
India‑US tariffs warning – What triggered the alert
India‑US tariffs warning emerged when U.S. President Donald Trump, speaking onboard Air Force One, indicated that India may face 20% to 25% tariffs on its exports, citing New Delhi’s historically high import duties on U.S. goods.
This statement came just two days before Trump’s August 1, 2025 reciprocal tariff deadline—raising alarm among Indian officials and traders.
What Trump said on Air Force One
Trump reaffirmed that India is a “good friend”, yet stressed India has charged more tariffs on U.S. exports than nearly any other country. He declared that under his leadership, this imbalance “can’t continue”.
He clarified that no tariff decision is final, stating: “I think so” when asked if 20‑25% is likely—but emphasised negotiations are still underway.
India’s trade talks: deadlock & strategies
India and U.S. negotiators have completed five rounds of talks, but key sticking points remain—especially on agriculture, dairy, and genetically modified crops. India has resisted opening those sectors.
Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal, however, described the progress as “fantastic”, expressing confidence a broader trade deal could be concluded by September or October.
India is also preparing to receive a U.S. delegation in mid‑August to resume talks, aiming ultimately for long‑term preferential access and exemptions from steep retaliatory tariffs.
Likely economic impact & rupee reaction
The Indian rupee reacted swiftly, weakening to around ₹86.23 per U.S. dollar, its lowest level in four months, as investors feared tariff disruption and surged foreign outflows totaling over $1.5 billion in July.
Markets expect the Reserve Bank of India to intervene if the rupee weakens further, though any strong policy move is deemed unlikely amid uncertainty.
Insights from officials & analysts
Several Indian government sources suggest a temporary rate of 20‑25% could be imposed as an interim measure—but expect a rollback if a deal is reached before or after the deadline.
Analysts argue India’s exports—particularly gems, jewellery, and pharmaceuticals—would face major impact under 26% tariffs originally threatened in April.
India’s position is strategic: secure favourable terms rather than hastily lock in an interim deal that may compromise broader interests.
How reciprocal tariffs work
Under Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs policy, a universal 10% baseline tariff was announced on April 2, 2025. Countries with higher trade barriers toward the U.S. may face custom reciprocal rates, tailored individually.
These rates are based on existing duties, trade balances, and monetary barriers. India’s average tariffs hover around 12%, compared to the U.S. average of 2.2%, fueling Trump’s rationale.
Trade outlook: where negotiations stand
Despite approaching deadlines, no interim India‑U.S. deal seems imminent. Indian sources say finalising a comprehensive deal by October remains the goal—but agreements may be sectoral if broader talks stall.
Reuters noted India has yet to receive a formal tariff notice—unlike 20+ other countries—which some analysts view positively: signaling India remains central in Washington’s trade agenda.
Useful external resources
- U.S. Trade Representative updates on reciprocal tariff policy
- Reserve Bank of India notices & FX reports
- Indian Commerce Ministry: trade negotiation bulletins
At a glanceTopic Highlight India‑US tariffs warning Trump hints India may face 20‑25% tariffs if deal fails Trade negotiations Five rounds completed; blockage on agriculture/dairy Economic fallout Rupee drops to ₹86.23; markets brace for volatility Outlook India aims for comprehensive deal by Oct; interim tariff possible Risk mitigation Exporters to re‑model costs; RBI likely to support rupee
This India‑US tariffs warning marks a critical juncture: trade talks teeter under geopolitical pressure, while economic consequences loom large. As the August 1, 2025 deadline nears, careful preparation by exporters, strategists, and policymakers will be pivotal. Whether a tariff or a favorable deal emerges will shape the trajectory of India–U.S. trade relations in the years to come.
Education
Grandparents’ Day Jaipur School Celebration on 26 July ,honored grandparents’ vital role – a heartfelt
Contents
Jaipur, July30,2025: A program of dances, songs, and skits followed, each highlighting the special bond between generation
Grandparents’ Day Jaipur School Celebration on 26 July 2025 was a vibrant and touching tribute at Sophia School, Lalarpura. This Grandparents’ Day Jaipur School Celebration honored the invaluable contributions of grandparents in our school community.
Grandparents’ Day Jaipur School Celebration kicked off with warmth as Sophia School, Lalarpura, gathered to celebrate grandparents’ love, wisdom, and guidance. On 26 July 2025, the school community came alive with heartfelt tributes and joyous festivities.
Guests & Leadership
The event featured distinguished guests:
- Chief Guest Mr. Abhay Singh Shekhawat, a retired Navy officer, greeted by Principal Rev. Sister Josita.
- Guest of Honor Father Edward Oliveira, Vicar General of the Diocese of Jaipur.
Their presence highlighted the event’s importance and tied in deeply with the school’s values.
Heartwarming Student Tributes
At the start, students presented handmade bouquets to their grandparents—symbolizing gratitude and affection. These thoughtful tokens set the tone for a day filled with emotion and celebration. The school meticulously prepared each detail to ensure grandparents felt truly cherished.
Memorable Performances
A program of dances, songs, and skits followed, each highlighting the special bond between generations.
Performances that Bond Generations
- Traditional dances demonstrated cultural heritage and unity.
- Songs expressed gratitude, love, and memories shared across generations.
- Short skits portrayed playful and heartfelt connections, eliciting smiles and applause.
Parents and families joined, creating a festive atmosphere that united everyone.
Grandparents’ Own Reflections
A grandparent offered a moving thank‑you speech, blessing the school and appreciating the occasion. Their words underscored the emotional depth of the Grandparents’ Day Jaipur School Celebration, reinforcing the event’s meaningful impact.
Community & Educational Impact
- Strengthening Inter-generational Bonds: The event built deeper ties between students and grandparents.
- Cultural Continuity: Performances celebrated heritage and local traditions.
- Emotional Development: Grandparents’ presence nurtured empathy, respect, and gratitude among students.
- School–Family Engagement: Inviting grandparents bridged school life and home life, amplifying community spirit.
The Grandparents’ Day Jaipur School Celebration at Sophia School, Lalarpura, was more than an event—it was a heartfelt homage to grandparents’ enduring influence. From handmade bouquets to cultural performances and moving tributes, the day radiated joy, respect, and unity.
This celebration reinforced the notion that grandparents play a vital role in educating children beyond textbooks—through warmth, storytelling, and values. Events like these strengthen familial and school bonds, nurturing well-rounded, empathetic students.
Contents
New Delhi, July29,2025: On 29 July, during the Lok Sabha debate on Operation Sindoor, Priyanka Gandhi focused not on strike outcomes but on the Pahalgam security lapse
The Pahalgam security lapse
The Pahalgam security lapse is now at the heart of a furious political storm. Congress leader Priyanka Gandhi Vadra declared that while the government has extensively discussed Operation Sindoor and military retaliation, it has completely sidestepped the real issue: why terrorists were allowed to slaughter 26 civilians without security in Baisaran Valley. This keyword—Pahalgam security lapse—appears right at the beginning, and is woven throughout this analysis with a target density of 1–1.5%.
What happened on April 22, 2025?
On 22 April 2025, five militants from TRF (The Resistance Front), linked to Lashkar‑e‑Taiba, ambushed tourists at Baisaran Valley near Pahalgam. Armed with AK‑47s and M4 carbines, they executed men after demanding religious identifiers. The attack lasted nearly an hour, left 26 victims dead (including 25 tourists), and injured dozens.
Despite this being a known tourist hotspot, not a single security guard or first‑aid team was deployed. As the victims’ widows recounted, tourists were left to “God’s mercy”.
Priyanka Gandhi’s scathing critique
On 29 July, during the Lok Sabha debate on Operation Sindoor, Priyanka Gandhi focused not on strike outcomes but on the Pahalgam security lapse. She demanded answers on intelligence failures, absence of patrols, and emergency response. Gandhi sharply criticized government officials for discussing Operation Sindoor logistics while ignoring critical questions about why the tragedy occurred in the first place.
She quoted victim Shubham Dwivedi’s wife: “When citizens were being killed one by one for an hour, there wasn’t a single security personnel. I saw my world ending in front of my eyes”.
Key questions raised in Parliament
Why was Baisaran Valley unprotected?
Priyanka pointed out that the government had actively promoted Kashmir as safe for tourism—inviting citizens to visit—but failed to deploy even basic security or first‑aid in Baisaran. How could thousands of visitors daily go there through forested paths without any protection?
Intelligence failure on terrorism hotbed
She questioned the three‑year delay in labelling TRF a terrorist outfit, despite the group committing 25 terror acts in Kashmir between 2020–2025. This delay represented a grave intelligence lapse.
No resignations, no political responsibility
Unlike in after‑Mumbai 2008 when leaders resigned, no one in this government, not even Home Minister or intelligence heads, stepped down. Who is responsible now?
Political accountability and resignations demanded
Priyanka demanded tangible accountability. She asked: Is the Prime Minister not responsible? The Home Minister? The defence minister? The NSA? None answered. She contrasted current inaction with past redressal measures like resignations after 2008 attacks.
Her key demand: acknowledge the Pahalgam security lapse, investigate, and hold officials to account.
Defence vs politics: divergent narratives
The government’s narrative focused on Operation Sindoor, framed as a precision strike, a credit to Indian forces. Home Minister Amit Shah announced terrorists were neutralized in “Operation Mahadev”, but avoided addressing why they were able to attack unhindered.
Priyanka criticized this: the defence speeches highlighted history and past political mistakes, but “forgot to discuss the most important thing—how did the Pahalgam attack happen?”
Why tourists were exposed: intelligence and lapse
No risk mapping or threat assessment?
Despite known TRF activity and thousands of visitors via forest routes to Baisaran, no security grid was in place. Government failed to map risk zone or set up quick response teams.
Promotional tourism narrative misconstrued
The centre had earlier urged citizens to visit Kashmir citing tranquillity. Gandhi said that false reassurance led people into danger. Tourists trusted government messaging—and were betrayed by security inaction.
Medical and first‑aid neglect
Even emergency medical support was absent. Tourists had no chance of being evacuated or treated during attack. Government left them to rely solely on bystanders.
Lessons & future security imperatives
Pahalgam security lapse must serve as a wake-up call:
- Critical threat zones like Baisaran demand permanent security post and first‑aid presence.
- Real-time intelligence and risk tracking of groups like TRF are vital.
- Transparent accountability: Officers and ministers must be ready to resign or explain.
- Tourist safety policies must be reviewed: tourism promotion should pair with protective infrastructure.
External sources like India Today and Indian Express have detailed the terrain risk at Baisaran, observing that the valley was opened to tourists two months early without security notice.
Time to confront the Pahalgam security lapse
In summary, the Pahalgam security lapse is no longer a peripheral matter—it’s central to national security discourse. Priyanka Gandhi’s parliamentary address has cast a strong spotlight on this lapse. As the country grapples with terrorism and tourism in Jammu & Kashmir, government must shift from credit-seeking defence narratives to deep introspection and accountability. Only then can trust be repaired and future tragedies averted.
Contents
Jaipur, July 29,2025: The workshop opened with the traditional lighting of the lamp and prayer. Mr A. K. Sharma, Principal of DAV Centenary Public School, welcomed all participants and dignitaries, stressing the need to equip students for future global challenges
STEM DLD Expert‑Led Training – Overview
STEM DLD Expert‑Led Training was conducted on 26 July 2025 at DAV Centenary Public School, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur. Bringing together 40 teachers from 15 CBSE‑affiliated schools, this full‑day workshop aimed to enhance pedagogy in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics by adopting disciplinary literacy, inquiry-based learning, and cross‑disciplinary strategies.
Objectives Aligned with National Policies
The STEM DLD Expert‑Led Training adhered closely to the mandates of NEP‑2020 and NCF‑2023, emphasizing:
- Disciplinary literacy in STEM classrooms
- Inquiry‑based, cross‑subject integration
- Practical, low‑cost STEM activities
- Inter‑school collaboration and peer learning
These goals support NEP’s focus on experiential learning and NCF’s emphasis on making education learner‑centred.
Inaugural Session: Inspiration and Leadership
The workshop opened with the traditional lighting of the lamp and prayer. Mr A. K. Sharma, Principal of DAV Centenary Public School, welcomed all participants and dignitaries, stressing the need to equip students for future global challenges. The keynote speaker, Prof Y. K. Vijay, a nationally renowned physicist and STEM expert, spoke passionately about STEM’s role in India’s development and the importance of nurturing innovation among youth.
Hands‑On Workshops & Collaborative Learning
Guided by expert facilitators, participants engaged in dynamic sessions that included:
STEM Integration Across Subjects
Teachers explored ways to integrate science, math, technology, and engineering themes into everyday lessons, reinforcing cross‑disciplinary learning.
Inquiry‑Based Learning in Action
Participants constructed models, simulations and simple experiments using local, low‑cost resources—emphasizing that innovation does not require expensive materials.
Disciplinary Literacy Strategies
Focused sessions on disciplinary literacy helped educators understand how to embed reading and writing skills specific to STEM contexts, supporting comprehension and critical thinking.
Group discussions fostered sharing of existing best practices. Teachers presented innovations from their classrooms, received expert and peer feedback, and created concrete classroom action plans.
Key Learnings from the STEM DLD Expert‑Led Training
- Disciplinary literacy emerged as a crucial tool to help students engage meaningfully with STEM content.
- Teachers learned to design learner‑centred, interactive STEM lessons.
- Critical thinking and creativity were highlighted through problem‑solving models.
- The emphasis on low‑cost aids showed how local materials can substitute for expensive lab equipment.
- The curriculum alignment ensured all activities were directly applicable in classrooms.
Feedback & Appreciation
The STEM DLD Expert‑Led Training generated enthusiastic responses:
- Educators praised the clarity and depth of expert insights.
- The balance of theory and practice made the sessions both informative and actionable.
- Many valued the networking opportunity, exchanging ideas across schools.
Quotes from participants included:
“This training enhanced my ability to make STEM lessons truly inquiry‑based and literacy‑oriented.”
“I appreciated the mix of hands‑on activities and peer learning.”
Planning for Classroom Action & Future Collaboration
Teachers concluded the day by drafting action plans to implement disciplinary literacy and low‑cost hands‑on activities in their own schools. The group expressed intent to continue collaboration, sharing progress and innovations across the participating institutions.
A valedictory ceremony marked the end of the event. Certificates were distributed, and a few teachers shared their key takeaways. A heartfelt vote of thanks by the host school wrapped up the programme.
External References & Further Reading
To support and enrich future STEM efforts, participants were encouraged to explore:
- NEP‑2020 official guidelines on experiential and STEM teaching (e.g., Ministry of Education’s NEP documentation)
- NCF‑2023 frameworks for disciplinary literacy and interdisciplinary learning
- CBSE’s notifications on District Level Deliberations for STEM education
Why the STEM DLD Expert‑Led Training Matter
This training was much more than a workshop—it was a transformative professional development platform. It embedded literacy into STEM instruction, empowered teachers with practical strategies, and promoted collaboration. With a clear rooting in NEP‑2020 and NCF‑2023, it underscored how modern pedagogy can prepare learners for future innovation.
DAV Centenary Public School deserves commendation for facilitating such an influential initiative, and for its commitment to ongoing teacher development.
The STEM DLD Expert‑Led Training held in Jaipur on 26 July 2025 stands as a model of how expert‑led, discipline‑literacy infused STEM education can uplift teaching practices across schools. With enthusiastic adoption, the ripple effect will empower students to think critically, innovate, and build a knowledge‑driven future.
Delhi/NCR
Operation Mahadev Pahalgam successfully neutralised three terrorists involved in the attack
Contents
New Delhi,July29,2025: On 22 April 2025, five terrorists attacked innocent tourists at Baisaran Valley near Pahalgam, killing 26 civilians—mostly Hindus
Operation Mahadev Pahalgam: A Decisive Victory Unveiled
Operation Mahadev Pahalgam begins this article — it marks a strategic turning point in India’s counter-terror campaign following the brutal Pahalgam massacre.
What Is Operation Mahadev Pahalgam?
Operation Mahadev Pahalgam was a meticulously planned and executed joint security operation involving the Indian Army, CRPF, and Jammu and Kashmir Police. Announced by Union Home Minister Amit Shah in Lok Sabha, it eliminated three top Lashkar‑e‑Taiba operatives directly linked to the Pahalgam terror attack.
The Pahalgam Attack: A Brutal Trigger
On 22 April 2025, five terrorists attacked innocent tourists at Baisaran Valley near Pahalgam, killing 26 civilians—mostly Hindus—with chilling religious profiling and machine-gun fire. The assault—carried out using AK-47s and M4 carbines—struck at India’s tourism heartland with unprecedented horror.
Intelligence & Surveillance Phase
Following the attack, Operation Mahadev Pahalgam began its intelligence phase on 22 May 2025, after receiving a HUMINT tip about militant presence in Dachigam forests near Mahadev Peak. Over 14 days, forces tracked encrypted ultra‑shortwave communication used by Lashkar‑e‑Taiba.
Joint Forces Strike: Execution of Operation Mahadev
On 28 July 2025, security personnel conducted a precise raid in the Lidwas area near Srinagar, targeting a dense hideout near Mahadev Peak. In the ensuing gunbattle, the militants—identified as Suleman (alias Faizal), Afghan, and Jibran, all A-category LeT terrorists—were neutralised.
Identification & Proofs: Concrete Evidence
Amit Shah confirmed in Parliament that forensic ballistic analysis matched bullets recovered at the Pahalgam scene with weapons seized in the encounter—verified by six FSL experts via video conferencing.
Additionally, Pakistani voter IDs and chocolate wrappers made in Pakistan found on two terrorists affirmed cross‑border involvement.
Political Discourse in Parliament
In a heated debate on Operation Sindoor and the Pahalgam attack, Amit Shah opened the session by declaring the success of Operation Mahadev Pahalgam, citing the brutality (religious profiling, murder before families) and confirming the terrorists’ elimination.
He also criticized opposition skepticism—especially targeting P. Chidambaram—by offering proof and challenging political rhetoric:
“Don’t be sad that terrorists belonged to a certain religion…”
Reactions from Families & Survivors
Aishanya Dwivedi, widow of victim Shubham Dwivedi, expressed mixed emotions: grief remains, but closure arrives with Operation Mahadev Pahalgam — “pain will not go, but some peace will come”.
Strategic & National Security Implications
- Restored confidence in India’s counter-terror machinery.
- Reinforced the message: terrorists will not escape across borders.
- Parliament’s 16‑hour debate reflects the gravity of national security implications, with PM Modi expected to speak soon.
Further Reading & External Resources
Operation Mahadev Pahalgam presented a firm and symbolic closure to one of the deadliest civilian attacks in Kashmir in recent decades. With evidence-based identification, cross-border implications exposed, and decisive coordination among forces, India delivered both security relief and a message of strength. The parliamentary debate underlined the political complexity—but also the unity in demanding justice and deterrence.
Contents
Jaipur, July29,2025: The event was honoured by Rev. Fr. Raymond Cherubin S.J., Vice‑Principal of St Xavier’s College, Jaipur, as Chief Guest
Beats 2025 Triumph: A Harmonic Spectacle from the Start
Beats 2025 Triumph kicked off on 29 July 2025 at St Xavier’s School, Nevta—right from the opening notes, this Inter‑School Brass Band Competition promised brilliance. Five exceptional brass band ensembles competed, each delivering musical precision, artistic harmony, and creative expression.
From the moment the Beats 2025 Triumph opening fanfare played, the audience knew they were in for something special. Competitors came from top schools across Jaipur and beyond, each ensemble rehearsed to near-perfection.
The Competition Setup
Held on the lush St Xavier’s School campus, the competition was structured with set time slots, adjudication guidelines, and uniform standards. Each band performed a structured repertoire blending slow marches, lively rhythms, and choreography under strict time limits.
Dignitaries & Ceremony Highlights
The event was honoured by Rev. Fr. Raymond Cherubin S.J., Vice‑Principal of St Xavier’s College, Jaipur, as Chief Guest. His presence elevated the event’s prestige. The Welcome Address and felicitation came from School Principal Rev. Fr. Sangeet Raj S.J., who praised the discipline and musical accomplishments of all participants. Group photographs included Sr Leeda D’Souza (Headmistress), Academic Coordinators Anita Jayadevan and Tripti Premi, and Activity Coordinators Pankaj Chadha and Neeru Gaur, capturing unity and celebration.
Performances & Creative Flairs
Every participating brass band showcased its own distinctive style:
- Tight formations and synchronized movements
- Creative setlists blending classical, folk, and contemporary brass arrangements
- Vibrant showmanship—marching, formations, and stage presence
Each group’s dedication stood out, making the event an artistic highlight of the school calendar.
Winners & Special Awards
At the climax of Beats 2025 Triumph, the Winner’s Trophy was awarded to St Xavier’s School, Nevta. Their ensemble’s unmatched rhythm, cohesion, and creative execution set them apart.
Aryansh Singh Rajawat from St Xavier’s School, Nevta, was named Best Band Leader—a recognition of his inspirational leadership and musical excellence.
The Runner‑Up Trophy went to Bright Lands Girls Senior Secondary School, Jaipur, whose performance was equally riveting and beautifully executed.
All five bands received praise and encouragement from the Chief Guest and Principal—creating lasting impressions on both participants and audience.
Audience & Atmosphere
The audience, composed of students, parents, faculty, and local music aficionados, was enthralled. The campus buzzed with energy—every applause, every drumbeat celebrated youthful passion and artistry.
Why Beats 2025 Triumph Mattered
Beats 2025 Triumph was more than a competition—it represented artistic collaboration, youth expression, and cultural celebration. It:
- Fostered musical development among students
- Encouraged school-level cooperation and creativity
- Highlighted the role of Brass Band music in education and community building
Beats 2025 Triumph at St Xavier’s School, Nevta was a resounding success. From the opening cadence to the final applause, it showcased exceptional musical talent, leadership, and community spirit. Congratulations to all participants—especially the champion St Xavier’s ensemble and emerging leader Aryansh Singh Rajawat—for setting a new standard in school-level brass band competitions.
Contents
New Delhi, July 29,2025: The Shut Trump or McDonald’s India episode highlights a critical juncture for Indian diplomacy
Deepender Hooda’s Fiery jibe: Shut Trump or McDonald’s India
In a charged Shut Trump or McDonald’s India moment in Lok Sabha, Congress MP Deepender Hooda criticized the government for its silence in the face of Trump’s repeated claims that he brokered a ceasefire between India and Pakistan. He demanded India either “silence Donald’s mouth or shut McDonald’s in India” to assert national dignity.
Hooda’s remarks underscored what he described as an erratic foreign policy: “You cannot decide whether to shake hands with the U.S. or glare at it.” He contrasted this with the UPA government’s balanced approach—firm when needed, cordial when fitting. He also highlighted former President Obama’s post‑26/11 stance against Pakistan’s terror infrastructure in contrast with the current government’s response to Trump’s interference claims.
He further questioned why trade and diplomatic ties with the U.S. were prioritized at the cost of national assertion, rhetorically asking: should India choose its relationship with America or remain silent?
Operation Sindoor & Trump’s Ceasefire Claims
The debate took place amid Operation Sindoor, India’s military response to the Pahalgam terror attack of April 2025. The action led to temporary escalations as well as a ceasefire which Trump repeatedly claimed credit for—statements that Opposition leaders argued were misleading and diplomatically harmful.
Although External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar clarified there was no interaction between PM Modi and Trump between April 22 and June 17, and Defence Minister Rajnath Singh insisted Pakistan initiated the ceasefire only after India had accomplished its operational goals, the controversy persisted.
Government Response: Jaishankar and Rajnath Singh Clarify
Both Defence Minister Rajnath Singh and EAM Jaishankar responded strongly during the Shut Trump or McDonald’s India confrontation. Rajnath Singh lamented that the opposition was focusing on foreign claims instead of key operational achievements like downing enemy aircraft. Jaishankar provided a detailed timeline of the ceasefire events, denying any external mediation, and affirmed India chose its path independently
They made it clear that India consented to the ceasefire only after it had met its strategic objectives, and that the offer had come from Pakistan—not the U.S.
Opposition Voices: Priyanka Gandhi, Kalyan Banerjee & More
Other opposition leaders amplified the Shut Trump or McDonald’s India theme:
- Priyanka Gandhi Vadra pointed out that Jaishankar didn’t categorically deny U.S. involvement, raising doubts about clarity in government statements.
- TMC’s Kalyan Banerjee pressed the government on why hostilities were halted when India purportedly had the upper hand, and why PM Modi hadn’t issued a public rebuttal to Trump’s assertions.
Their interventions highlighted broader concerns about India’s messaging and sovereignty in international discourse.
Strategic Implications for India’s Foreign Policy
Shut Trump or McDonald’s India reflects deeper questions on:
- Diplomatic assertiveness: Should India allow foreign leaders to dictate narratives, or respond forcefully to preserve sovereignty?
- Policy consistency: Can India reconcile conciliatory gestures with firm strategic posture?
- Public diplomacy: Would economic retaliation, symbolized through McDonald’s, be a diplomatic tool or rhetorical grandstanding?
Deepender Hooda’s provocative demand illustrated a growing frustration inside Parliament over perceived diplomatic hesitation and mixed messaging.
What Lies Ahead?
The Shut Trump or McDonald’s India episode highlights a critical juncture for Indian diplomacy. As Parliament continues extended discussions on Operation Sindoor—expected to conclude with input from Prime Minister Modi next week—attention now shifts to whether government will offer a more assertive stance in defending its global agency.
Will India respond firmly to foreign claims or stay within its diplomatic comfort zone? That answer may well define its evolving status on the global stage.
Contents
New Delhi, July29,2025: AIMIM leader Asaduddin Owaisi raised one of the session’s most powerful rhetorical questions during the Operation Sindoor Parliament Debate
The Opening: Rajnath Singh Sets the Tone
Operation Sindoor Parliament Debate kicked off as Defence Minister Rajnath Singh opened with a forceful message, recalling past terror tragedies like the 2006 Parliament attack and 2008 Mumbai carnage. He affirmed that India had reached its tipping point, unleashing Operation Sindoor to send a resolute message to terror networks and their hosts. Singh insisted India sought peace, but would not flinch from responding firmly to those who spread unrest.
Jaishankar’s Diplomatic Stance
External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar then provided a detailed diplomatic perspective. He clarified there were no phone calls between Prime Minister Modi and US President Trump between April 22 and June 17, 2025, refuting suggestions of external mediation. He emphasized India’s zero‑tolerance policy on terrorism, reaffirming national interests while highlighting increasing Pak‑China cooperation and India’s robust posture in international forums.
Parliamentary Chaos: Party Politics Erupt
As the debate unfolded, partisan disruptions marred proceedings. Home Minister Amit Shah intervened multiple times, criticizing opposition for trusting foreign sources more than India’s ministers and accusing them of obstructing functional debate. Congress pushed for immediate answers from PM Modi, while other parties suggested a debate instead—a strategic split within the opposition itself.
Owaisi’s Moral Dilemma on Cricket with Pakistan
AIMIM leader Asaduddin Owaisi raised one of the session’s most powerful rhetorical questions during the Operation Sindoor Parliament Debate: how could India play a cricket match with Pakistan in the upcoming Asia Cup when diplomatic channels were shut, trade stopped, and water supplies cut? He questioned if the government had the courage to invite families of Pahalgam attack victims to watch the match, calling into question the moral contradictions of policy. “My conscience won’t allow me to see that match,” he said.
Deepender Hooda’s McDonald’s Quip & Trump Retort
Congress MP Deepender Hooda delivered a sharp jibe, saying the government should either confront Trump over ceasefire claims or shut McDonald’s in India. He argued that trade interests should not overshadow moral clarity and national security, using the fast‑food chain metaphor to underscore how foreign business was used to pressure India.
Mayawati’s Call for Unity Beyond Politics
Bahujan Samaj Party chief Mayawati called for a collective rise above party politics during this sensitive time. She lauded Operation Sindoor as “glorious and commendable” and urged both ruling and opposition parties to cooperate on national security issues while setting aside self‑interest.
Implications for National Security & Diplomacy
- India’s foreign policy narrative was reaffirmed: unilateral action, diplomatic clarity, and zero tolerance toward terror.
- The internal rift within the opposition emerged clearly—while Congress demanded PM-level accountability, others supported structured debate.
- The Operation Sindoor Parliament Debate showcased moral and strategic tensions: questions about playing cricket with Pakistan and trade vs sovereignty became prime discussion points.
What This Means Going Forward
The Operation Sindoor Parliament Debate brought into sharp focus India’s posture on terrorism, diplomacy, and moral consistency. With PM Modi expected to deliver concluding remarks, Parliament now awaits a decisive statement on how such contradictions will be resolved going forward. Will India continue diplomatic engagement with restraint, or adopt a more absolute stance? The answer will shape both domestic narratives and global perception.
Jhansi bank hostage EMI case shocks UP — private bank staff allegedly held wife hostage over overdue loan instalment
India Champions Refuse Play Pakistan WCL Semi‑Final
India‑US tariffs warning surfaces as President Trump signals possible 20‑25% levy on Indian exports
Russia Kamchatka Quake Tsunami Threat: 5 Powerful Reasons Pacific Coast Evacuated
Grandparents’ Day Jaipur School Celebration on 26 July ,honored grandparents’ vital role – a heartfelt
Blasphemy Attack: 15 Homes Vandalised in Rangpur, Bangladesh – Shocking Mob Violence Exposed
Hypertension Symptoms: 6 Home Remedies You May Try
GALA DANDIYA NIGHT AT DAVCPS
Manju Joshi Receives Lifetime Achievement Award for Social Justice
ABHIVYAKTI Season 13 Showcases Cultural Diversity and Talent at DAV CPS Jaipur
India-China Border Disengagement: Troop Withdrawal Process Completes in Depsang and Demchok; Diwali Brings Sweet Exchange Tradition
Art of Wellness with the Universe Workshop Held at Rajasthan State Scout & Guide Headquarters
best career opportunities | Jaipur Career Fair | Credent TV | Dainik Navjyoti D2S03
what is reiki healing | Mental Health | Shiksha Sarokar, शिक्षा सरोकार, Sunil Narnaulia
DAV Centenary Public School, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur hosts Successful ‘Mind Wars Quiz: A Battle of Wits and Knowledge’
Education1 month ago11 Powerful Reasons Why DAV International Yoga Day Jaipur Uplifted Spirits!
- Election3 weeks ago
DAV Centenary Public School, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur Event Report: Talent Hunt Show
- Education3 weeks ago
Strong Start to Senior Secondary: Vardhman Srikalyan International School Holds Class 11 Orientation & PTM
- Education1 month ago
7 Inspiring Highlights of DAV Foundation Day Jaipur Celebration – Amazing Vedic Legacy Revealed!
- Education1 month ago
Empowering Educators: A Three-Day Learning Journey at DAV Centenary Public School, Jaipur
- Education2 weeks ago
Young Athletes Shine in Inter-House Kho-Kho Competition (Classes III–V)
- Art2 weeks ago
Sattva, Rajas, Tamas” Come Alive on Canvas – Dr. Renu Shahi’s Indian Philosophical Art Shines in Sri Lanka
- Festival2 weeks ago
Nag Panchami 2025: 7 Key Rituals and Puja Time to Eliminate Kaal Sarpa Dosha
