New Delhi,Sep.25,2025:The rejection of the Tahir Hussain bail plea by the Delhi High Court has once again drawn national attention to the tragic 2020 Delhi riots. Former Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) councillor Tahir Hussain has been in custody for more than five years in connection with the murder of Intelligence Bureau (IB) officer Ankit Sharma, who was killed during the riots in northeast Delhi-

The case has remained one of the most politically charged trials in recent history, with Hussain at the center of controversy. His repeated attempts for bail highlight the complexity of riot-related cases and the judiciary’s role in balancing individual rights with the gravity of allegations.

 Background of the 2020 Delhi Riots Case

The Delhi riots of February 2020 broke out amid protests over the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). Clashes between communities led to violence that claimed over 50 lives and left hundreds injured.

Among the most shocking incidents was the murder of IB officer Ankit Sharma, whose body was found in a drain in Chand Bagh, Delhi. The post-mortem revealed multiple stab wounds, sparking nationwide outrage.

The FIR filed on the basis of Sharma’s father’s complaint named Tahir Hussain as a key accused.

 Who Was Ankit Sharma and Why His Murder Shook India

Ankit Sharma, a young Intelligence Bureau officer, had gone missing on February 25, 2020. His body was later recovered near Hussain’s residence.

His death became a symbol of the brutality of the riots, leading to widespread demands for justice. The case against Tahir Hussain has largely revolved around Sharma’s killing, making it one of the most closely watched trials.

Timeline of Tahir Hussain’s Bail Applications

Hussain has made multiple bail attempts since his arrest in 2020:

• December 2023: Filed a regular bail plea.
• February 2024: Withdrew it, citing plans to reapply in trial court.
• March 12, 2024: Trial court rejected his bail plea.
• September 2025: Delhi High Court dismissed his fresh bail application.

Each rejection has kept Hussain behind bars, highlighting the court’s cautious approach in such a sensitive case.

Delhi High Court’s Latest Ruling on the Bail Plea

The High Court emphasized the seriousness of the charges and the potential threat to law and order if Hussain were released.

The court noted that the gravity of the crime and the evidence presented against him did not justify bail. This makes it clear that the judiciary is unwilling to take risks in riot-related cases where communal harmony and public trust are at stake.

Legal Grounds for Rejection of Bail

The rejection of the Tahir Hussain bail plea rests on several legal grounds:

• Section 302 IPC (Murder): Hussain faces direct allegations of involvement in Ankit Sharma’s killing.
• Conspiracy charges: Accused of coordinating attacks during the riots.
• Witness statements: Multiple testimonies link him to violent mobs.
• Threat to society: Court highlighted the possibility of unrest if released.

These factors made it nearly impossible for the court to grant him relief.

What the Defense Argued in Tahir Hussain Bail Plea

Hussain’s defense team has consistently argued that.

• He is being politically targeted due to his association with AAP.
• No direct evidence links him to Sharma’s murder.
• He has already spent more than five years in jail without trial conclusion.
• Prolonged incarceration without conviction violates fundamental rights.

However, the High Court found these arguments insufficient in the face of strong prosecution evidence.

Prosecution’s Strong Opposition to Bail

The prosecution opposed bail, stressing.

• The heinous nature of the crime.
• The possibility of Hussain tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses.
• The need to uphold public faith in the justice system.

This hardline stance ensured that Hussain’s bail plea was rejected once again.

From AAP Councillor to Accused

Tahir Hussain’s political journey took a dramatic turn.

• Once a rising star in the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), elected as councillor.
• Suspended from the party after his name surfaced in riot cases.
• Became a symbol of political controversy, with opposition parties attacking AAP for his role.

The Tahir Hussain bail plea thus carries not just legal but also political implications.

Reactions from Victim’s Family and Civil Society

The family of Ankit Sharma welcomed the High Court’s decision, stating that they have been waiting for justice for five years.

Civil society remains divided:

• Some see the prolonged detention without trial as unjustified.
• Others argue that serious riot crimes must be dealt with strictly.

Expert Opinions on the Bail Rejection

Legal experts highlight that bail in riot and terrorism-linked cases is often extremely difficult to secure.

According to senior advocates, courts tend to prioritize societal security over individual liberty when charges involve murder and conspiracy during riots.

This explains why the Tahir Hussain bail plea faced rejection yet again.

Broader Impact on Delhi Riot Cases

The outcome of Hussain’s bail plea could set a precedent for other pending Delhi riots cases. Many accused are still awaiting trial, and prolonged detentions raise questions about judicial delays.

This case underscores the tension between speedy justice and thorough investigation.

How Long Can Tahir Hussain Remain in Jail Without Conviction

Indian law does not allow indefinite pre-trial detention, but in cases involving grave charges like murder, courts are reluctant to release accused until trials conclude.

Unless his trial is fast-tracked, Hussain may remain in jail for years before a final verdict is reached.

Comparing With Other High-Profile Bail Cases in India

The Tahir Hussain bail plea has drawn comparisons with.

• The Umar Khalid case, where bail was denied in UAPA-related charges.
• The Rhea Chakraborty case, where bail was eventually granted after strong media attention.
• The Lalu Prasad Yadav fodder scam case, where repeated bail pleas were rejected before eventual relief.

These comparisons show how high-profile cases often become legal and political battlegrounds.

Lessons from the Tahir Hussain Bail Plea

The rejection of the Tahir Hussain bail plea marks yet another chapter in the long and controversial Delhi riots trial.

For Hussain, it means continued incarceration and an uncertain future. For the judiciary, it highlights the need to balance justice for victims with rights of the accused. And for society, it is a reminder of how deeply the 2020 riots scarred India’s social fabric.

New Delhi,Sep.25,2025:PM Modi connected self-reliance with the broader target of making India a developed nation by 2047–

The PM Modi India self-reliance statement carried several strong messages.

• India cannot afford to depend on external powers for growth.
• Despite global disruptions, India’s economic growth remains “attractive.”
• India is determined to strengthen its foundation for decades.
• From semiconductors to shipping, India wants to build everything domestically.
• Atmanirbhar Bharat is not just a slogan, but a national mission.

India’s Vision for 2047 A Developed Nation

PM Modi connected self-reliance with the broader target of making India a developed nation by 2047, when the country celebrates 100 years of independence.

According to him, every disruption in global trade or politics should be seen as an opportunity:

“Disruptions don’t divert us. Instead, we discover new directions.”

This reflects the government’s approach of turning crises into opportunities, especially during COVID-19 when India boosted domestic production of PPE kits, vaccines, and medical equipment.

Why Self-Reliance is Crucial in Today’s Global Landscape

The PM Modi India self-reliance statement comes at a time when:

• The Russia-Ukraine war has disrupted global energy and food supplies.
• Tensions in the Indo-Pacific are reshaping trade routes.
• Countries are prioritizing domestic manufacturing for resilience.

For India, reducing dependence on imports in critical areas like electronics, defence, and energy is key to maintaining strategic autonomy.

“Chip to Ship” – What PM Modi Means by Complete Value Chains

One of the most striking parts of the PM Modi India self-reliance statement was his call to produce everything “from chip to ship” in India.

This phrase emphasizes:

• Building a semiconductor ecosystem domestically.
• Expanding electronics manufacturing hubs.
• Strengthening the shipping and logistics industry.

It is not just about producing goods but also about owning the entire value chain, reducing vulnerabilities in global supply disruptions.

India vs. Global Trade Barriers – The 50% US Tariff Challenge

Currently, Indian exports face steep tariffs, with the United States imposing 50% duties on certain products.

This makes self-reliance even more critical. Instead of being restricted by foreign markets, India must strengthen domestic consumption and regional partnerships.

Atmanirbhar Bharat- Progress Made So Far

Since 2020, the Atmanirbhar Bharat mission has been driving India’s policies. Achievements include:

• Rise in defence exports (from ₹1,500 crore in 2016 to over ₹21,000 crore in 2023).
• PLI schemes boosting smartphone and electronics production.
• Green energy expansion, making India a global leader in renewables.
• Start-up ecosystem crossing 100 unicorns.

The PM Modi India self-reliance statement builds on these successes, projecting a confident roadmap for the next two decades.

Experts React to PM Modi India Self-Reliance Statement

Economic and defence experts largely welcomed the speech.

Dr. Arvind Virmani, member of NITI Aayog, told The Economic Times:

“Self-reliance doesn’t mean isolation. It means building capabilities while staying connected to global supply chains.”

Former Army Chief General V.P. Malik highlighted that a strong domestic industry also ensures strategic autonomy in defence.

How Self-Reliance Links to India’s Economic Growth

The PM Modi India self-reliance statement is not only about nationalism; it is also about economic logic:

• India imports goods worth over $600 billion annually.
• Reducing this dependency can save foreign exchange.
• Domestic production creates jobs for millions.
• A strong industrial base attracts global investors.

In essence, self-reliance strengthens both GDP growth and social stability.

Challenges India Must Overcome to Achieve the Vision

While the vision is bold, challenges remain.

• Dependence on foreign technology in semiconductors.
• Infrastructure bottlenecks in ports and logistics.
• Need for skilled workforce in advanced industries.
• Balancing environmental sustainability with industrial growth.

Without addressing these, the PM Modi India self-reliance statement risks becoming aspirational rather than achievable.

Global Comparisons of Self-Reliance Efforts

Other nations are also pursuing self-reliance:

• China has doubled down on domestic manufacturing under “Made in China 2025.”
• USA is reshoring industries under the CHIPS Act.
• Japan is investing heavily in supply chain resilience.

India’s efforts, as outlined in the PM Modi India self-reliance statement, put it in sync with global trends while maintaining its democratic and open-market character.

A Strong India in an Uncertain World

The PM Modi India self-reliance statement is more than just political rhetoric. It is a strategic declaration that India will not be held back by global disruptions or external dependencies.

By strengthening its domestic capabilities — from chip to ship — India is laying the groundwork for its Vision 2047.

In PM Modi’s words, self-reliance is both a mantra and a mission. The coming decades will reveal how effectively India can translate this philosophy into reality, shaping its destiny as a developed and resilient global power.

New Delhi,Sep.25,2025:General Anil Chauhan is a decorated officer with over four decades of service in the Indian Army. Born in 1961, he is currently 64 years old and was appointed as the Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) on September 30, 2022–

Apart from being the CDS, he also serves as the Secretary of the Department of Military Affairs (DMA), a crucial wing of the Ministry of Defence. His military career has been defined by leadership in counter-insurgency operations, strategic planning, and modernization of armed forces.

General Anil Chauhan CDS Tenure Extension Announcement

The General Anil Chauhan CDS tenure extension was confirmed by the Ministry of Defence on Wednesday. According to the statement, the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet (ACC) approved the extension.

The official release stated.

“General Anil Chauhan will continue as the Chief of Defence Staff and Secretary, Department of Military Affairs, until 30 May 2026 or until further orders.”

This means his tenure has effectively been extended by nearly 20 months, giving him ample time to oversee long-term reforms and operational preparedness.

Why the Extension Matters for India’s Defence Strategy

Continuity in military leadership is critical, especially at a time when India faces multiple security challenges.

• Border tensions with China along the Line of Actual Control (LAC).
• Counter-terror operations in Jammu and Kashmir.
• Enhancing defence preparedness in the Indo-Pacific region.
• Accelerating jointness among the Army, Navy, and Air Force.

The General Anil Chauhan CDS tenure extension provides stability to these processes and ensures that reforms initiated in the last two years continue without disruption.

Key Responsibilities of the Chief of Defence Staff (CDS)

The CDS is India’s top military officer and acts as the principal military advisor to the Defence Minister. His primary roles include:

• Promoting jointness among the three armed services.
• Driving theatre command reforms.
• Streamlining defence procurement.
• Overseeing training, logistics, and capability development.
• Representing India in strategic military dialogues globally.

With his tenure extended, General Chauhan is expected to accelerate progress in all these areas.

Cabinet Approval and Political Backing

The decision reflects the strong backing General Chauhan enjoys from the political leadership. The Appointments Committee of the Cabinet (ACC), chaired by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, gave its formal nod.

This political endorsement shows that the government wants long-term military reforms to be led by an experienced hand who has already built momentum since 2022.

General Chauhan’s Achievements Since 2022

Since taking charge in September 2022, General Chauhan has.

• Advanced work on theatre commands, aimed at integrated joint operations.
• Strengthened civil-military synergy through the Department of Military Affairs.
• Promoted indigenisation in defence procurement, aligned with the Atmanirbhar Bharat initiative.
• Enhanced cooperation with allies through international defence exercises.
• Oversaw critical counter-insurgency operations in the northeast.

Impact on India’s Military Reforms and Joint Operations

Military analysts believe the General Anil Chauhan CDS tenure extension gives India the rare opportunity to see through structural reforms without leadership disruption.

Some of the reforms General Chauhan is spearheading include.

• Establishing Integrated Theatre Commands.
• Restructuring forces for better resource optimisation.
• Modernising forces with a focus on cyber and space warfare.
• Coordinating joint training and logistics across services.

These reforms are complex and require time — something the extension now guarantees.

Reactions from Defence Experts and Veterans

Defence experts have largely welcomed the move. Retired Lt. Gen. D.S. Hooda commented in an interview with The Hindu.

“The extension ensures continuity at a critical juncture. The reforms underway are long-term, and this move prevents any disruption.”

Similarly, former Navy Chief Admiral Arun Prakash noted that stability in leadership is essential to maintain India’s deterrence against regional adversaries.

Comparing CDS Tenures Globally

Globally, the concept of a Chief of Defence Staff exists in several nations, including the United States (Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff) and the United Kingdom.

In many of these countries, CDS tenures are longer to ensure consistency in reforms. India extending General Chauhan’s tenure until 2026 aligns with global best practices.

What This Means for India’s National Security Until 2026

With the General Anil Chauhan CDS tenure extension, India’s national security strategy until 2026 is expected to focus on.

1. Theatre Command Rollout – ensuring integrated commands become operational.
2. Indigenisation Drive – boosting Made-in-India defence equipment.
3. Cyber & Space Capabilities – preparing for future warfare.
4. Border Security – continued vigilance along China and Pakistan borders.
5. Global Defence Diplomacy – stronger partnerships with the U.S., France, Japan, and QUAD allies.

The General Anil Chauhan CDS tenure extension is more than just a personnel decision — it is a strategic step to safeguard India’s defence reforms and national security in a volatile region.

UAE,Sep.25,2025:When India walked out to bat in their crucial Super-4 encounter against Bangladesh, all eyes were on young opener Abhishek Sharma. Having already impressed with a 74-run knock against Pakistan earlier, Abhishek once again produced a blistering innings-

His 75 runs from just 37 deliveries, studded with 5 towering sixes, gave India the perfect platform. Abhishek’s fearless intent against the new ball left Bangladesh reeling. Interestingly, he could have been dismissed early on when Zaker Ali dropped his catch at just 7 runs — a mistake that proved costly.

This innings also made him the leading run-scorer of the tournament, with 248 runs so far, ahead of stars from Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh.

Virender Sehwag Recalls Sunil Gavaskar’s Golden Advice

Cricketing greats were quick to hail Abhishek’s performance. Former India opener Virender Sehwag revealed that Sunil Gavaskar once told him:

“When you reach 70 or 80, never miss the hundred.”

While Abhishek once again fell short of a century, his back-to-back match-winning knocks are turning him into India’s biggest T20 asset. His family too expressed pride, with his sister Komal saying she believes a century is just around the corner. His mother, Manju Sharma, echoed the same sentiment, stating-

“He missed a hundred again, but the way he is batting, I am confident he will score one very soon.”

India’s Batting Journey- Explosive Start, Middle-Order Struggles

Opening alongside Shubman Gill, Abhishek Sharma stitched a blistering 77-run partnership in just 6.1 overs. Gill contributed 29 runs, while Abhishek dominated with boundaries all over the ground.

However, once Abhishek departed in the 12th over, India’s scoring rate slowed down dramatically. Over the next eight overs, the team could manage only 56 runs, as Bangladesh spinners tightened their grip.

It was Hardik Pandya’s cameo of 38 runs from 29 balls that pushed India to a respectable 168 runs — a total that eventually proved more than enough.

The Six Heroes of India’s Victory

India’s win wasn’t just about Abhishek Sharma’s 75 runs. Six heroes defined the match:

1. Abhishek Sharma – 75 runs
2. Shubman Gill – 29 runs
3. Hardik Pandya – 38 runs
4. Kuldeep Yadav – 3 wickets
5. Jasprit Bumrah – 2 wickets
6. Varun Chakravarthy – 2 wickets

Together, they ensured India’s dominance both with bat and ball.

Bangladesh’s Fight and Collapse

Chasing 169, Bangladesh faltered early but opener Saif Hassan kept hopes alive with a gritty 69 runs off 51 balls. Unfortunately, no other batter supported him, as the team collapsed to just 127 runs.

Kuldeep Yadav’s magical spell broke the backbone of Bangladesh’s middle order, while Bumrah and Varun sealed the win. Despite dropping as many as five catches, India’s bowling proved too strong.

Abhishek Sharma’s Record-Breaking Form in Asia Cup 2025

Abhishek’s 75 runs added to an already stellar tournament. Here are some of his standout records-

• Most runs in Asia Cup 2025 so far – 248 runs
• Fastest to 500 T20I runs in 2025 for India
• Highest strike rate among Indian openers – over 201 in 19 matches
• 58 sixes since July 2024 – most by any ICC full-member batsman

His consistency has sparked comparisons with Chris Gayle, Brendon McCullum, Travis Head, and mentor Yuvraj Singh.

Comparisons With T20 Legends and Mentors

Former cricketers have been quick to notice Abhishek’s fearless hitting. Irfan Pathan tweeted:

“Abhishek Sharma is currently the most dangerous T20 opener in world cricket.”

The left-hander’s ability to clear boundaries at will reminds fans of Yuvraj Singh, who has also mentored him closely. This mentorship seems to be paying off, with Abhishek evolving into India’s next T20 superstar.

Pakistan or Bangladesh in the Final

India’s spot in the Asia Cup 2025 Final is secured, but the big question is: who will they face?

• If Pakistan beats Bangladesh, cricket lovers could witness yet another high-voltage India vs Pakistan clash.
• If Bangladesh wins, it will be a chance for them to avenge their defeat in the Super-4 stage.

Regardless of the opponent, India enters the final as favorites, riding on their dominant form.

India vs Pakistan- The Rivalry Everyone Awaits

Should Pakistan qualify, it would mark the third India vs Pakistan clash in this tournament. India has already beaten Pakistan twice — once in the group stage and once in the Super-4 round.

Historically, India dominates this rivalry in T20Is, winning 12 out of 15 encounters. Pakistan, however, is desperate to turn the tables, making a potential final a blockbuster.

Fans around the world, from Dubai to Delhi, will be glued to their screens if the arch-rivals meet again.

The Asia Cup 2025 Super-4 clash against Bangladesh showcased India’s depth and dominance, but above all, it was Abhishek Sharma’s 75 runs that lit up the night. His consistency, fearless hitting, and record-breaking form make him India’s biggest hope heading into the final.

New Delhi. Sep.23,2025:Yuvraj Singh ED Interrogation has become one of the most talked-about legal developments in India this week. The former Indian cricketer, known for his match-winning performances in the 2007 T20 World Cup and 2011 ODI World Cup, was summoned by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection with an online betting app linked to a major money laundering case-

This interrogation is significant because it highlights the increasing scrutiny of celebrities who allegedly promote, endorse, or indirectly associate with platforms under investigation. According to reports, Yuvraj Singh appeared before the ED’s Delhi office around 12 noon on Tuesday, where he was questioned under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).

Online Betting App Controversy

The controversy began when the Enforcement Directorate started probing certain online betting platforms accused of violating Indian gambling laws and allegedly being used for laundering black money.

India has stringent laws against gambling, but loopholes in online gaming and betting regulations have often been exploited. Several platforms operating under the garb of “fantasy sports” or “online games” have come under the scanner for facilitating betting.

Yuvraj Singh’s connection came into focus after his name surfaced in promotional activities linked to one such platform. While it is not clear whether he had any direct involvement in money laundering, his role as a celebrity endorser has raised questions.

Yuvraj Singh’s Appearance Before ED

On Tuesday, Yuvraj Singh ED Interrogation began at around 12 pm when the cricketer arrived at the Delhi headquarters. Officials told PTI that Singh was cooperative during questioning, and his statement was recorded under PMLA.

According to agency sources, the focus of interrogation was:

• His association with the betting app.
• Financial transactions linked to promotional deals.
• Whether he was aware of the alleged money laundering activities.

So far, there is no official confirmation that Yuvraj Singh has been named as an accused. Instead, he has been called as a witness to provide clarity.

What Is PMLA and Why It Matters

The Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002 empowers the ED to investigate financial crimes involving illicit money. Under this law, any individual suspected of aiding or abetting money laundering can be summoned.

For Yuvraj Singh ED Interrogation, the PMLA framework allows investigators to scrutinize his financial records, contracts, and payments received from the online app in question.

Legal Experts on Yuvraj Singh ED Interrogation

Legal experts say that Yuvraj Singh ED Interrogation does not automatically imply guilt. Criminal lawyer Vikas Pahwa told media outlets that celebrities often unknowingly sign endorsements without conducting due diligence on the companies. However, under PMLA, even indirect connections are investigated thoroughly.

If evidence suggests that the app used Yuvraj Singh’s influence to gain legitimacy, further legal consequences could follow.

Impact on Indian Cricket Icons’ Image

Yuvraj Singh enjoys a legendary status in Indian cricket history, especially for his iconic six sixes against England in the 2007 T20 World Cup. However, his name being linked to an online betting app controversy has sparked debates over the responsibility of celebrities in endorsements.

This is not the first time a cricketer has been associated with betting scandals. From the 2000 match-fixing scandal to recent IPL betting cases, the shadow of illegal gambling has frequently haunted Indian cricket.

Public reaction on social media has been mixed. While many fans have defended Yuvraj Singh, saying he should not be judged before any evidence is established, others believe celebrities must be more careful about the brands they endorse.

What Happens Next in the Case

The Enforcement Directorate is expected to summon other individuals linked to the online betting app. Yuvraj Singh’s testimony will help investigators establish whether the cricketer had any knowledge of financial irregularities.

If ED finds credible evidence, charges could be framed under PMLA, which carries strict penalties including imprisonment and fines. For now, Singh’s cooperation with authorities may work in his Favor.

A Turning Point in Celebrity Accountability

The Yuvraj Singh ED Interrogation serves as a reminder of the growing legal accountability for celebrities endorsing online apps and platforms. While Singh’s involvement may turn out to be limited, the episode underscores the importance of due diligence in celebrity endorsements, especially in industries with blurred legal boundaries.

New Delhi, Sep.23,2025:The Afghan Boy Stowaway Story has stunned the world after a 13-year-old boy from Kunduz, Afghanistan, managed to survive an impossible journey. The child hid inside the landing gear compartment of a Kam Air flight from Kabul to Delhi-

According to PTI reports, the incident occurred on Sunday when the Kam Air flight (RQ-4401) landed at Indira Gandhi International Airport in Delhi. Security officials found the boy wandering near the aircraft. After questioning, he was identified as a resident of Kunduz province, who had secretly entered Kabul Airport and climbed into the plane’s landing gear system.

What makes this Afghan Boy Stowaway Story truly unbelievable is not just his courage but his survival in conditions considered fatal for humans at cruising altitude.

How the Boy Hid Inside the Plane

Investigations revealed that the boy managed to sneak into Kabul International Airport despite tight security. Somehow, he reached the central landing gear compartment at the back of the Kam Air aircraft.

This part of the plane is highly dangerous—extreme cold, lack of oxygen, and moving machinery make it nearly impossible to survive.

During routine post-flight checks, a red portable speaker was found in the compartment, suspected to have been carried by the boy. No signs of sabotage or damage were discovered, and the flight was declared safe.

Kabul Airport Security Under Scrutiny

The Afghan Boy Stowaway Story has raised sharp questions about security at Kabul Airport. Taliban officials claim the airport is under strict 24/7 surveillance, yet a teenager managed to breach the runway and hide inside a plane.

Security experts are now questioning whether international safety standards are being maintained.

Taliban border police spokesman Abeedullah Farooqi told BBC Pashto that the airport is “a high-security zone” where even officials are barred from unscheduled entry. He insisted that investigations are ongoing, but scepticism remains.

Reaction from Taliban Officials

So far, the Taliban government has not issued an official statement. However, Afghan border police confirmed to local media that they are reviewing security protocols.

Farooqi stressed that “no unauthorized person can board a plane,” yet the Afghan Boy Stowaway Story proves otherwise.

The incident could embarrass the Taliban internationally, as it highlights lapses in a critical infrastructure facility.

Why Survival in Landing Gear is Nearly Impossible

Aviation experts describe the boy’s survival as a miracle.

• At cruising altitude (30,000–40,000 feet), temperatures drop to -50°C or lower.
• The landing gear compartment has no oxygen supply, causing hypoxia.
• The mechanical structure itself poses risks of crushing during take-off and landing.

That’s why the Afghan Boy Stowaway Story is being called one of the rarest cases of survival in aviation history.

Previous Cases of Aircraft Stowaways

This is not the first time people have attempted to flee countries by hiding inside planes.

• In 2014, a 16-year-old boy survived a five-hour flight from California to Hawaii in a plane’s wheel well.
• In 2019, a man fell to his death in London after hiding in a Kenya Airways plane’s landing gear.
• Many similar cases have ended tragically due to suffocation, hypothermia, or falling from planes.

However, the Afghan Boy Stowaway Story stands out because of the boy’s young age and miraculous survival.

Expert Opinions on the Boy’s Survival

Aviation doctors suggest that survival could only be possible if the aircraft did not reach very high altitudes or if the boy’s body went into a hibernation-like state due to extreme cold.

Dr. Ramesh Chand, an aviation medicine specialist, told Indian media that “the human body cannot withstand such conditions beyond a few minutes. This survival is extraordinary.”

Such expert analysis adds weight to the uniqueness of the Afghan Boy Stowaway Story.

Humanitarian Concerns and Deportation

Despite the miraculous journey, the boy was sent back to Kabul on the same aircraft after interrogation at Delhi airport.

Human rights activists argue that the boy should have been given protection instead of deportation. Organizations like Human Rights Watch have previously criticized such deportations, especially when children are involved.

The Afghan Boy Stowaway Story raises ethical questions: Should survival seekers be treated as security threats or as desperate victims needing humanitarian aid?

International Response and Security Lessons

The incident has already sparked global discussions on:

1. Airport Security Gaps – If a child can breach airport defenses, what about terrorists?
2. Humanitarian Aspects – How should international laws treat child stowaways?
3. Airline Safety – Should airlines improve surveillance of hidden compartments?

Experts suggest that Kabul Airport must undergo international audits to restore confidence in its security protocols.

Afghan Boy Stowaway Story as a Wake-Up Call

The Afghan Boy Stowaway Story is more than just a shocking tale of survival—it is a mirror reflecting Afghanistan’s instability, security failures, and humanitarian crisis.

While the boy’s survival is being hailed as a miracle, the bigger questions remain unanswered:

New Delhi, Sep.22,2025:The Ahmedabad Plane Crash Initial Investigation Leak has triggered intense scrutiny and concern from the Supreme Court of India. The leak of the preliminary report led to widespread media narratives suggesting pilot error as the cause of the tragic crash-

The Supreme Court, while reviewing the matter, highlighted that selective and partial disclosure of early findings before the investigation concludes is deeply regrettable.

Supreme Court’s Concerns on Early Disclosure

On Monday, a bench comprising Justice Surya Kant and Justice N. Kotiswar Singh heard a public interest petition demanding an independent investigation into the crash. During proceedings, Justice Surya Kant emphasized that leaking selective information prematurely was highly inappropriate and undermined the investigation process.

“It is very unfortunate,” the bench remarked, urging the authorities to maintain confidentiality until the investigation reaches a logical conclusion.

The court underscored the importance of safeguarding the interests of pilots, victims’ families, and the aviation industry by preventing the dissemination of partial or unverified information.

Details from the Preliminary Investigation

The leaked preliminary report included alarming snippets that captured public attention. Among the details, it was reported that one pilot questioned another regarding the fuel switch shutdown just before the crash.

Such fragments, when published out of context, risked misleading the public and assigning undue blame prematurely. Experts argue that this selective disclosure could have serious legal and emotional consequences for the families of the 260 victims.

Impact of Leaked Report on Media Narratives

The leak of the Ahmedabad Plane Crash Initial Investigation created widespread speculation in the media, with many narratives incorrectly pointing to pilot error as the sole cause.

According to legal analysts, such reporting distorts facts before a thorough investigation concludes. The Supreme Court noted that media responsibility is crucial during sensitive periods to prevent misinformation and undue panic.

Court Proceedings and Public Interest Petition

The bench conducted the hearing under the context of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed for independent investigation. Senior advocate Prashant Bhushan represented the petitioners, arguing that early access to the preliminary report had raised serious concerns among pilots and victims’ families.

Justice Surya Kant remarked,

“Releasing information in fragments before the official conclusion of the probe is inappropriate. Confidentiality must be maintained.”

The court highlighted that adherence to procedural fairness is vital in preserving both public trust and the integrity of the investigation.

Advocates’ Arguments and Family Concerns

Senior lawyer Prashant Bhushan informed the court that victims’ families and pilots had expressed distress over the leak. The partial report created an impression that pilot negligence was the root cause, which may complicate legal proceedings and emotional closure for the families.

Judicial Recommendations for Confidentiality

The Supreme Court emphasized that-

• Preliminary reports must remain confidential until the full investigation is completed.
• Authorities should prevent selective leaks and ensure accurate communication with the public.
• Media outlets must exercise restraint and responsibility, particularly when reporting sensitive aviation incidents.

Timeline of the Ahmedabad Air India Crash

The crash occurred in June 2025, shortly after the Air India flight took off from Ahmedabad en route to London. The disaster claimed the lives of 260 passengers and crew.

The initial investigation was intended to identify causes methodically, but the leak disrupted the process and created premature conclusions in media narratives.

International Reactions and Aviation Safety Lessons

The Ahmedabad crash has drawn attention from international aviation authorities, highlighting the need for robust pilot training, fuel system checks, and emergency protocols. Aviation experts stress that early leaks of investigation data can impede international cooperation and technical assessments.

Ensuring Transparency While Maintaining Confidentiality

The Ahmedabad Plane Crash Initial Investigation Leak serves as a critical lesson on the importance of maintaining confidentiality during sensitive probes.

The Supreme Court’s comments underscore that truth, fairness, and procedural integrity must prevail over premature reporting. As the investigation continues, the authorities and media are urged to respect the confidentiality of findings until a comprehensive and verified report is released.

New Delhi,Sep.22,2025:The GST Rate Cut 2025 officially came into effect today, marking one of the most significant tax reforms since the introduction of the Goods and Services Tax in 2017-

Essential items such as milk, bread, life-saving medicines, and insurance premiums are now either tax-free or taxed at minimal rates. At the same time, consumer goods such as small cars, TVs, and ACs have seen tax reductions, while luxury cars and harmful products face higher levies.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi called this move an “Next-Gen Reform”, adding that it aligns with India’s journey toward becoming a self-reliant economy.

Why the GST Rate Cut 2025 Matters

GST impacts over 1.4 billion Indians, from urban professionals to rural households. The 2025 reform has two major goals:

• Boost household consumption: Domestic consumption forms over 55% of India’s GDP. Reduced taxes are expected to increase demand in essential and mid-range sectors.
• Simplify the GST structure: Earlier 12% and 28% slabs were abolished, leaving behind 5%, 18%, and 40% categories for clarity.

The move comes at a time when India’s tax revenues have slowed, but consumer spending remains crucial for economic growth.

Everyday Items That Became Cheaper

One of the biggest wins for common households is the fall in GST on daily essentials.

GST Rate Cut 2025 – Everyday Essentials Now at 5%

• Hair oil, shampoo, toothpaste, toilet soap
• Toothbrush, shaving cream, butter, ghee, cheese, dairy spreads
• Packaged snacks like namkeen and bhujia
• Utensils, feeding bottles, napkins, diapers
• Sewing machines and parts

This reduction directly lowers grocery bills for millions of families, especially the middle class.

Healthcare Sector Benefits

The healthcare sector sees one of the biggest reliefs from the GST Rate Cut 2025.

• Life insurance & health insurance: 18% → 0% (zero-rated)
• Thermometers, oxygen, diagnostic kits: 5%
• Glucometers, test strips: 5%

This move is expected to make healthcare more affordable and increase insurance penetration across India.

Education and Agriculture Relief

Education and agriculture—two critical pillars of the Indian economy—have also benefited.

Education Sector – Now Cheaper for Parents

• Maps, charts, globes, pencils, sharpeners, crayons
• Books and notebooks
• Erasers

All of the above are now tax-free, easing financial pressure on students and parents.

Agriculture Sector – Relief for Farmers

• Tractor tyres and parts: 18% → 5%
• Tractors, biopesticides, micro-nutrients: 12% → 5%
• Drip irrigation systems, sprinklers: 5%

This will reduce the input cost for farmers and encourage modern farming practices.

Electronics That Got Cheaper

Indian households are likely to cheer the cut in GST on electronics.

• Dishwashers, washing machines, motor-powered fans: 28% → 18%
• Air conditioners and humidity controllers: 28% → 18%
• Televisions, monitors, projectors, set-top boxes: 28% → 18%

This is expected to boost sales in the consumer electronics market ahead of the festive season.

Luxury Goods That Became Costlier

While common items got cheaper, luxury goods now attract higher taxes under the 40% GST slab.

• Pan masala, cigarettes, gutkha
• Aerated drinks and caffeinated beverages
• Luxury cars and SUVs

This move balances government revenue while discouraging harmful consumption.

Impact on Middle-Class Consumers

Rating agency CRISIL reported that the GST Rate Cut 2025 could reduce the average household expenditure by nearly one-third.

For a middle-class family, this means:

• Lower monthly grocery and personal care bills
• Affordable health and life insurance
• Reduced costs of educational supplies for children
• Easier access to consumer electronics

The increased savings are expected to boost consumer sentiment and spending.

Government Revenue Loss and Recovery Plan

According to government estimates:

• GST rate cut will cause a revenue loss of ₹93,000 crore annually.
• However, higher taxes on luxury items will generate around ₹45,000 crore in revenue.

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has argued that short-term revenue losses will be offset by higher consumption and compliance.

Expert Opinions on GST 2.0

Economists have mixed views on GST 2.0:

• Positive: Simplification of tax slabs, relief to the middle class, encouragement to agriculture and MSMEs.
• Concerns: Revenue gap may pressure government finances, especially with rising expenditure.

Impact on India’s Economy and Growth

India’s GDP growth has been under pressure due to weak domestic demand. The GST Rate Cut 2025 is designed to revive spending power.

• Boosts FMCG sector and retail sales
• Encourages insurance adoption and healthcare access
• Supports agriculture and education sectors
• Stimulates electronics and auto demand

If successful, GST 2.0 could add 0.3% to 0.5% to India’s GDP growth in FY 2025-26.

A Reform for the Future

The GST Rate Cut 2025 is more than just a tax change—it is a strategic reform aimed at empowering consumers, boosting demand, and supporting India’s growth journey.

For households, it means cheaper groceries, healthcare, and electronics. For farmers and students, it means reduced costs. For the government, it is a balancing act between revenue and consumption growth.

As India enters the festive season, the new GST structure could well be the push that the economy needs.

New Delhi,Sep.20,2025:The Political Parties and POSH Act debate intensified after the Supreme Court of India rejected a petition seeking to bring political parties under the Prevention of Sexual Harassment (POSH) Act, 2013. The court ruled that political parties cannot be considered “workplaces” or “offices,” since membership in a party does not equate to employment-

Chief Justice B.R. Gavai, leading the bench, said-

“Political parties do not employ workers in the traditional sense. Accepting this petition would open a Pandora’s box.”

This decision has sparked nationwide debates about whether women in politics are left vulnerable without the legal safety net of POSH.

Background of the Case

The case began in 2022, when a petition was filed in the Kerala High Court demanding that political parties be brought under the POSH Act. The court rejected it, clarifying that under Section 2(o) of the Act, political parties are not defined as workplaces, nor are their members considered employees.

Activist Yogamaya M.G. challenged this verdict in the Supreme Court. Senior advocate Shobha Gupta argued that political parties function in an organized manner and therefore should not be excluded from POSH protection. However, the Supreme Court upheld the Kerala High Court’s decision in September 2025.

Why Political Parties Are Excluded from POSH Act

The POSH Act mandates Internal Complaints Committees (ICCs) in institutions with more than 10 employees. However, the court observed that:

• Political parties are not employers.
• Workers and volunteers are not salaried employees.
• A party office cannot be equated with a workplace under existing definitions.

This strict interpretation leaves lakhs of women working in party offices, campaigns, and political events outside POSH’s ambit.

Read the POSH Act details here (Government of India official resource)

Impacts of the Verdict on Women in Politics

The Supreme Court verdict on Political Parties and POSH Act has several implications:

1. No Legal Protection – Women in political parties lose the right to file POSH complaints.
2. No ICCs in Parties – Unlike companies, NGOs, and universities, most parties have no mandatory complaint committees.
3. Risk of Silent Harassment – Fear of retaliation may stop women from reporting harassment.
4. Political Participation Affected – Women may hesitate to enter or continue in politics.
5. Unequal Treatment – Other workplaces follow POSH, but politics is exempt.
6. Rise of Unregulated Power Abuse – Party hierarchies may exploit the absence of accountability.
7. Demand for New Law – Activists may push for a separate legal framework.

Arguments in Favour of Including Political Parties

Advocates for reform argue that-

• The definition of “workplace” in POSH Act is wide, even covering transport facilities like buses when linked to employment.
• Women in politics work systematically in offices and campaigns.
• Other organizations in the unorganized sector are included in POSH, so excluding political parties is unjustified.

Voices from Women Leaders

Several political leaders expressed disappointment:

• Priyanka Bharti (RJD): Called the verdict “unfortunate,” stressing that party offices are de facto workplaces.
• Sushma Andhare (Shiv Sena – UBT): Demanded a national women’s safety committee cutting across party lines.
• Maryam Dhawale (CPI-M): Pointed out that CPI(M) voluntarily set up an ICC, urging other parties to follow.
• Hemlata (CPI-M): Shared that their committee independently handles complaints and cannot be overridden by party leadership.

Statistics on Harassment in Politics

• 45% of women politicians in India reported physical violence.
• 49% faced verbal abuse, according to surveys cited by UN Women (2013) and Inter-Parliamentary Union (2016).
• 82% of women MPs globally experienced mental harassment, including online abuse.
• India’s Lok Sabha has only 14% women MPs, showing the gender gap.

Cases such as JD(S) leader Prajwal Revanna’s conviction in 2024 and Congress MLA Rahul Mamakootathil’s suspension in 2025 highlight the persistent dangers.

Comparisons with Other Sectors Under POSH Act

• Private Companies – Strict ICC mandates.
• Universities & NGOs – Must comply with POSH rules.
• Media & Sports bodies – Also under its purview.
• Political Parties – Exempt, despite millions of women working actively.

International Perspective

Globally, women in politics face similar challenges. Studies in South Asia show harassment is often used to suppress women’s political voices. Many democracies, including the UK and Canada, have adopted internal harassment policies for political institutions. India, however, still lacks a mandatory nationwide mechanism.

Future of POSH Act and Political Parties

Experts suggest three possible solutions:

1. Parliamentary Amendment – Expand POSH’s “workplace” definition to include political parties.
2. Separate Legislation – A new law dedicated to women in politics.
3. Voluntary ICCs – Encouraging parties to create internal committees, as CPI(M) has done.

The debate will likely intensify, as activists consider filing fresh petitions or pushing for legislative reforms.

The Political Parties and POSH Act controversy is not over. While the Supreme Court has closed one door, it has opened a wider debate on women’s safety in politics. Excluding political parties from the POSH Act leaves women vulnerable, undermines equality, and risks discouraging their participation in public life.

New Delhi,Sep.20,2025:The CJI Gavai Judges Remarks at the Central Administrative Tribunal’s 10th All India Conference in 2025 have stirred intense debate across India’s legal and political circles-

Chief Justice of India (CJI) Justice B.R. Gavai pointed out a sensitive issue: judges from administrative service backgrounds often hesitate to pass orders against the government. His candid acknowledgment has reignited the long-standing discussion on judicial independence, executive influence, and the need for reform in India’s justice system.

What Did CJI Gavai Actually Say

Speaking at the prestigious conference, CJI Gavai remarked–

“Many members come from administrative services while some are from the judiciary. This diversity is considered a strength as it brings both judicial understanding and administrative experience. But as a judge, I have noticed that those who come from an administrative background do not forget that they belong to the administration. They hesitate to pass orders against the government. I think they need to reflect on this.”

This statement is being viewed as a bold admission that challenges faced by judicial officers are not merely theoretical but deeply rooted in institutional backgrounds.

Administrative vs Judicial Background of Judges

The Indian judiciary includes judges who come from-

• Judicial services (career judges who rise through district and high courts).
• Administrative services (officials with careers in civil services or tribunals before moving into judicial roles).

CJI Gavai’s remarks suggest that this administrative legacy sometimes affects judicial neutrality, especially in cases involving the government.

Why CJI Gavai Judges Remarks Matter Now

The timing of the CJI Gavai Judges Remarks is crucial. India is currently witnessing:

• Increased public scrutiny of the judiciary.
• Frequent clashes between the government and the courts on constitutional matters.
• Concerns about judicial overreach versus judicial restraint.

By highlighting that administrative judges hesitate to rule against the government, the CJI has opened a debate on impartiality at the highest level.

The Social Media Storm After His Comments

Soon after his remarks, social media platforms exploded with varied interpretations:

• Some hailed CJI Gavai for his honesty and transparency.
• Critics accused him of undermining faith in the judiciary.
• Memes and edited quotes circulated widely, prompting CJI Gavai to later clarify:

“Today, one never knows what comes out on social media. I respect all religions and believe in all faiths.”

This highlights how social media amplifies judicial comments, sometimes beyond their original intent.

Past Cases Highlighting Judicial Independence

The CJI Gavai Judges Remarks also come against the backdrop of sensitive cases:

• Recently, a bench led by CJI Gavai and Justice K. Vinod Chandran dismissed a plea about restoration of a damaged Vishnu idol in Khajuraho temple, calling it a publicity petition.
• Earlier, similar judicial comments have sparked national controversies, reminding citizens of the fine line judges must tread between humor, candor, and judicial restraint.

Expert Opinions on CJI Gavai Judges Remarks

Legal Scholars

Many legal scholars argue that the remarks are timely and shed light on a real problem. Judges with civil service experience may carry implicit loyalties or hesitation when dealing with state power.

Former Judges

Former Supreme Court judges have often raised concerns that executive pressure can dilute judicial independence.

International Perspective

Globally, judicial independence is a cornerstone of democracy. The UN Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary emphasize that judges must remain free from inappropriate influences.

Broader Implications for Indian Judiciary

The CJI Gavai Judges Remarks underline three critical issues-

1. Judicial Training: Need for reorientation of judges coming from administrative services.
2. Institutional Independence: Ensuring the judiciary remains insulated from executive influence.
3. Public Confidence: Citizens must trust that courts will deliver justice impartially, regardless of the government’s position.

Political and Public Reactions

The comments have naturally drawn political responses:

• Opposition parties praised the CJI for highlighting an uncomfortable truth.
• Ruling party members argued that such remarks risk weakening institutional credibility.
• Civil society groups have demanded stronger safeguards to maintain judicial independence.

Public opinion remains divided, but the conversation about judiciary-government dynamics has gained fresh momentum.

The CJI Gavai Judges Remarks are more than just a passing observation. They touch upon the core question of democracy: Can judges truly remain independent when their professional backgrounds tie them to the executive?

By speaking openly, CJI B.R. Gavai has sparked an important national dialogue. Whether this leads to structural reforms or remains a cautionary note depends on how the judiciary and government respond in the months ahead.