New Delhi, Sep.29,2025:The India vs Pakistan Asia Cup Final has always been more than just cricket. The 2025 edition, played in Dubai, added another golden chapter to this legendary rivalry. India defeated Pakistan by 5 wickets to claim their 9th Asia Cup title, but it was Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s statement that grabbed headlines-

He compared the victory to “Operation Sindoor”, a past military operation against Pakistan, symbolizing how India emerged victorious both on the battlefield and on the cricket pitch.

This blend of sports, politics, and national pride has sparked debates, celebrations, and emotional reactions across both nations.

PM Modi’s Bold Statement “Operation Sindoor on the Cricket Field”

Prime Minister Narendra Modi took to X (formerly Twitter) to celebrate the win. He wrote:

“खेल के मैदान में ऑपरेशन सिंदूर. नतीजा वही, भारत की जीत. हमारे खिलाड़ियों को बधाई.”

(Translation: “Operation Sindoor on the cricket field. The result remains the same – India’s victory. Congratulations to our players.”)

His post quickly went viral, trending across India and Pakistan, making the India vs Pakistan Asia Cup Final not just a sporting event but a political talking point.

How India Outplayed Pakistan

The match lived up to the hype. Pakistan, batting first, struggled against India’s disciplined bowling attack and were restricted to 146 runs in 19.1 overs.

• Kuldeep Yadav was the star with the ball, taking 4 wickets and breaking Pakistan’s backbone.
• India chased the target of 147 with 2 balls to spare, finishing at 147/5 in 19.4 overs.

Despite losing early wickets, India’s middle order held strong, led by a sensational knock from Tilak Varma.

Tilak Varma, Shivam Dube, and Kuldeep Yadav

• Tilak Varma: The 22-year-old left-hander played a mature innings of 69 not out from 53 balls, guiding India home.
• Shivam Dube: Contributed a quick 33 runs, adding stability in the middle order.
• Kuldeep Yadav: His 4 for 27 dismantled Pakistan’s hopes early on.

Their performances not only sealed the match but also highlighted India’s emerging young talent, setting the tone for future dominance.

Weak Middle Order and Tactical Errors

Pakistan once again failed to handle pressure in the India vs Pakistan Asia Cup Final. Despite a decent start, their middle order collapsed, showing lack of planning and adaptability.

• Poor shot selection
• No effective partnerships
• Weak captaincy decisions

These issues mirror Pakistan’s long-standing struggles in high-stakes matches against India.

Amit Shah’s Reaction “India’s Victory is Certain Anywhere”

Home Minister Amit Shah also joined the celebrations. On X, he wrote.

“Shandaar jeet! Our players’ energy once again demolished the opposition. India’s victory is certain, no matter the ground.”

This reflected the government’s confidence in India’s cricketing supremacy over Pakistan, echoing the symbolic power of Modi’s “Operation Sindoor” remark.

Symbolism of Operation Sindoor- From Battlefield to Cricket Ground

Operation Sindoor was a military action by India against Pakistan after the Pahalgam terror attack. By using this phrase, PM Modi drew a direct parallel between India’s military strength and its cricketing dominance.

The symbolism resonated with fans, blending national security pride with sports glory, though it also stirred controversy in Pakistan.

Fan Reactions Across India and Pakistan

• In India: Streets, cafes, and social media platforms exploded with joy. Fans hailed Tilak Varma as the new match-winner.
• In Pakistan: Disappointment dominated discussions, with fans blaming poor strategy and captaincy.

Interestingly, some Pakistani fans admired India’s resilience, calling the victory “well-deserved.”

What Analysts and Former Players Said

• Sunil Gavaskar praised India’s new generation for handling pressure.
• Rameez Raja criticized Pakistan’s inability to finish strong despite good starts.
• Shoaib Akhtar highlighted poor captaincy and lack of tactical awareness.

Their insights underline how India vs Pakistan Asia Cup Final matches always redefine cricketing narratives in Asia.

A Look at Past Titles

With this win, India extended its record to 9 Asia Cup titles, far ahead of its rivals.

This consistent success shows why India remains Asia’s cricketing powerhouse.

Why India vs Pakistan Asia Cup Final Matters Beyond Cricket

The India vs Pakistan Asia Cup Final of 2025 was more than just a sporting event. It became a reflection of national pride, political symbolism, and cricketing excellence.

PM Modi’s “Operation Sindoor” remark ensured the match will be remembered not only for Tilak Varma’s heroics but also for its cultural and political impact.

UAE, Sep.29,2025:The Asia Cup Final 2025 Controversy has dominated cricket discussions after India defeated Pakistan in a thrilling match in Dubai. While India celebrated a five-wicket win to secure the championship, the post-match events involving the trophy presentation overshadowed the cricketing brilliance on display-

Former Pakistan cricketers, including Kamran Akmal, Shoaib Malik, Shoaib Akhtar, and Ramiz Raja, have voiced strong criticism of both Pakistan’s performance and India’s refusal to accept the trophy from Mohsin Naqvi, Pakistan’s Home Minister and ACC President.

India’s Victory and the Trophy Refusal That Sparked Debate

India chased down 147 runs in 19.4 overs, thanks to a stellar 69 not out by Tilak Varma and 33 runs by Shivam Dube. Despite this emphatic win, the moment turned controversial when Team India refused to accept the trophy.

According to BCCI officials, the decision was taken collectively by the players in advance, citing political sensitivities. But for Pakistani cricketers and fans, the refusal felt like an insult to the spirit of the game.

Kamran Akmal Slams Batting Failures

Former wicketkeeper Kamran Akmal did not hold back. He called Pakistan’s batting the biggest weakness of the tournament.

“You don’t become a good team by chanting modern cricket slogans. Preparation and selection matter. Batting struggled throughout the Asia Cup. Constant experiments with the batting order hurt us badly,” Akmal said on The Game Plan YouTube channel.

He urged the management to play players in their natural positions instead of unnecessary experiments, warning that otherwise Pakistan would continue to collapse against stronger teams.

Shoaib Malik Points Out Lack of Awareness

Ex-captain Shoaib Malik criticized the team’s lack of game awareness. Speaking on Tapmad, Malik highlighted that both batting and bowling strategies failed.

“When three wickets had fallen, Pakistan needed to change gears. Instead, they repeated mistakes. Game awareness was zero. In-form batsmen should have been sent up the order,” Malik said.

He emphasized that conditions were misread, and Pakistan failed to adapt with either batting or field placements.

Shoaib Akhtar Blames Management and Captaincy

Former speedster Shoaib Akhtar was even more direct, pointing fingers at the team management and captaincy.

“This is not just about players. It’s poor decision-making by management. I call it senseless coaching. We needed 175 runs; 147 was never enough against India,” Akhtar said on Tapmad.

He further criticized bowling changes, questioning why pacer Haris Rauf was introduced when spin wasn’t working, instead of exploring alternatives.

Ramiz Raja Questions Pakistan’s Mental Strength

Former PCB Chairman Ramiz Raja acknowledged that Pakistan had India under pressure in the powerplay, but the team failed to capitalize.

“Once again, Pakistan handed over a winning game to India. Mental toughness is lacking. Bowlers like Kuldeep Yadav and Jasprit Bumrah showed how to fight back, but Pakistan doesn’t have such resilience,” Ramiz said on his YouTube channel.

Ramiz concluded that India’s technique, mental strength, and adaptability were far superior in this tournament.

Reactions on India’s Trophy Decision

The trophy controversy turned out to be the biggest headline.

• Kamran Akmal: “Not accepting the trophy goes against the spirit of cricket. If you had issues, raise them in meetings, not on the ground.”
• Pakistan captain Salman Agha: “Refusing the trophy was an insult to cricket itself.”

BCCI Secretary Devajit Saikia clarified that the refusal was a collective decision by the players, supported by captain Suryakumar Yadav.

Fans in Islamabad Express Anger and Hope

In Islamabad, fans gathered at parks, restaurants, and homes to watch the high-voltage clash. Their reactions were mixed:

• Some praised Pakistan’s early bowling.
• Many criticized the middle-order collapse.
• Several felt captaincy errors cost the game.

Yet, fans expressed hope that the team would learn from mistakes and return stronger.

India vs Pakistan Rivalry

The India-Pakistan rivalry has always been more than just cricket. With trophy refusals, heated statements, and back-to-back matches, this rivalry often transcends sports, fuelling political and emotional narratives on both sides.

The Asia Cup Final 2025 Controversy only added another layer to this storied rivalry, making it one of the most talked-about sporting events of the year.

Lessons from Asia Cup Final 2025 Controversy

The Asia Cup Final 2025 Controversy will be remembered not only for India’s brilliant win but also for the heated aftermath. Former cricketers from Pakistan have raised valid concerns about batting failures, leadership flaws, and lack of awareness.

At the same time, the trophy refusal by India has sparked a debate on sportsmanship vs politics in cricket.

New Delhi, Sep.29,2025:The first passenger train in India started in 1853, and since then, the railway network has become the backbone of Indian connectivity. Beyond transport, it has been a massive employment generator–

Between 2014 and 2024, Railways recruited 5 lakh+ candidates, surpassing the 4.11 lakh recruitments made between 2004–2014.

For aspirants looking for secure, well-paying government jobs, Railways continues to be one of the top career choices.

Types of Railway Jobs Available After 12th Pass

Indian Railways provides jobs across technical and non-technical fields. After passing Class 12, candidates can apply for positions such as.

• Ticket Collector (TC)
• Commercial Clerk
• Station Master (non-technical posts)
• Goods Guard
• Junior Clerk cum Typist
• Railway Protection Force (RPF) Constable
• Time Keeper
• Account Clerk cum Typist
• Assistant Loco Pilot (Science/ITI background)
• Technician

These roles provide a stable career path, promotions, and additional benefits.

12th Pass Railway Jobs 2025 Eligibility Criteria

To apply for 12th Pass Railway Jobs 2025, candidates must meet certain conditions:

• Education: 12th Pass from a recognized board (50%+ marks).
• Age Limit: 18–30 years (relaxation for SC/ST/OBC/PwD).
• Additional Requirements: For technical posts, ITI or diploma may be needed.

Selection Process for 12th Pass Railway Jobs 2025

The recruitment process is transparent and merit-based.

1. Online Application via RRB or RRC.
2. Computer-Based Test (CBT) covering GK, Maths, Reasoning, Science, Current Affairs.
3. Skill Test / PET (Physical Efficiency Test) depending on the post.
4. Document Verification.
5. Medical Examination.

Candidates must clear all stages to secure a spot in the merit list.

Salary, Benefits & Perks of Railway Jobs

12th Pass Railway Jobs 2025 not only offer financial stability but also several perks:

• Starting Salary: ₹25,000 – ₹45,000 per month.
• Annual Package: ₹3.5–5.5 lakh.
• Benefits Include:
  • Free/discounted railway passes.
  • Residential quarters.
  • Medical facilities.
  • Pension benefits.

These jobs are lifetime secure opportunities, making them highly attractive for freshers.

Railway Job Groups: A, B, C & D Explained

Indian Railways classifies jobs into four groups.

• Group A: UPSC exams (Indian Railway Traffic Service, Accounts Service).
• Group B: Promotions from Group C.
• Group C: RRB exams (TC, Clerk, Loco Pilot).
• Group D: RRC exams (10th/12th pass eligible).

Most 12th Pass Railway Jobs 2025 fall under Group C and D categories.

Top 10 Posts Available for 12th Pass Candidates Junior Clerk cum Typist

1. Account Clerk cum Typist
2. Commercial Clerk cum Ticket Clerk
3. Time Keeper
4. Ticket Collector (TC)
5. Goods Guard
6. RPF Constable
7. Station Master (non-technical)
8. Assistant Loco Pilot (for science/ITI)
9. Technician

These posts provide direct entry opportunities for Class 12 students.

How to Apply for 12th Pass Railway Jobs 2025

The application process is simple and completely online.

1. Visit RRB official site.
2. Register with valid email & mobile number.
3. Fill in the online form with accurate details.
4. Upload documents (certificates, ID, photos).
5. Pay the fee: ₹500 (₹400 refunded after CBT-1).
6. Download the confirmation page.

Preparation Tips for Railway Exams

Experts recommend these steps to crack 12th Pass Railway Jobs 2025 exams:

• Study previous years’ papers.
• Complete the syllabus systematically.
• Focus heavily on Mathematics & Reasoning.
• Attempt at least 100 mock tests before exams.
• Revise GK and current affairs daily.

Career Growth Opportunities in Indian Railways

One of the biggest advantages of railway jobs is promotion:

• Clerk → Station Master.
• Assistant Loco Pilot → Loco Pilot → Senior Loco Pilot.
• RPF Constable → Inspector.

Thus, 12th Pass Railway Jobs 2025 ensure long-term career stability and growth.

Secure Your Future with 12th Pass Railway Jobs 2025

With 2.74 lakh vacancies, 12th Pass Railway Jobs 2025 are a once-in-a-decade opportunity. Offering salary, perks, stability, and promotions, these jobs remain the dream of millions of Indian students.

New Delhi, Sep.27,2025:The Adani Power Plant Bihar Land Deal has erupted as one of the most controversial political and economic debates in recent times. The Bihar government has leased nearly 1000 acres of land in Bhagalpur’s Pirpainti area to Adani Power Limited for a mere ₹1 annual rent. The lease, valid for 25 years, is meant for setting up a massive 2400 MW thermal power plant–

While the government insists the move follows due process under tariff-based competitive bidding, opposition parties including the Congress, RJD, and CPI(ML) have accused the ruling government of handing over public land at throwaway rates to billionaire Gautam Adani’s group. The controversy has not only raised political tempers but also triggered environmental and social concerns across the state.

How the Controversial Lease Came Into Existence

In February 2025, the Bihar government announced plans to establish a 2400 MW thermal power plant in Bhagalpur’s Pirpainti block. To ensure transparency, the state opted for tariff-based competitive bidding.

On July 16, 2025, Adani Power Limited emerged victorious in the online auction with a lowest tariff bid of ₹6.075 per unit of electricity. Competitors such as Torrent Power, Lalitpur Power, and JSW Energy had quoted higher tariffs, ranging between ₹6.145 and ₹6.205.

Just weeks later, on August 5, 2025, the Bihar state cabinet approved the decision to lease nearly 1000 acres of fertile land to Adani Power at a symbolic rent of ₹1 per year for 25 years. This decision, however, immediately became a flashpoint in Bihar’s already polarized political climate.

Political Backlash Over the Adani Land Deal

The Adani Power Plant Bihar Land Deal has been fiercely opposed by opposition parties. Leaders from the Congress, RJD, and CPI(ML) have labelled it as an example of “corporate favouritism” and “land grab under the guise of development.”

They argue that while farmers and small businesses struggle to access land at affordable rates, a billionaire industrialist has been granted thousands of acres for virtually free. Opposition leaders are demanding a rollback of the decision, citing that public assets should not be transferred at token amounts.

The ruling BJP-JD(U) alliance, however, defends the move, stating it is a strategic investment for Bihar’s power security and will bring employment opportunities and infrastructure growth to Bhagalpur district.

Environmental Concerns and Tree Felling Issue

Apart from the political storm, environmentalists have raised alarms about the large-scale felling of mango orchards and other trees in Pirpainti to make way for the project. The lush green mango belts of Bhagalpur are considered part of the region’s ecological heritage and a source of livelihood for many farmers.

Experts warn that clearing nearly 1000 acres of fertile and green land could have long-term environmental impacts, including:

• Loss of biodiversity
• Impact on soil fertility
• Potential rise in local temperatures
• Reduced carbon sequestration

These concerns remain unaddressed, as the government continues to push forward with the project citing power shortage concerns in Bihar.

What the Government Says About the Lease

The Bihar government has clarified that the Adani Power Plant Bihar Land Deal followed standard competitive bidding procedures. Officials argue that since Adani Power quoted the lowest tariff, it was natural for the company to win the project.

They also emphasize that leasing land at a nominal rate is a common practice in mega infrastructure projects where governments seek private investment to boost state capacity.

A senior state official said, “The lease is not a land sale. Ownership remains with the state, and the project is expected to generate employment, local development, and improved electricity supply.”

Adani Group’s Silence and Media Queries

Interestingly, the Adani Group has so far remained silent on the matter. Multiple attempts by media organizations to seek a response have not yielded any official comment.

This silence has further fuelled speculation, with critics alleging that the company is avoiding public scrutiny over the controversial lease terms.

Voices of Locals in Pirpainti, Bhagalpur

Ground reports from Pirpainti reveal a mixed sentiment among locals. While some villagers welcome the possibility of jobs and better infrastructure, others are worried about:

• Losing access to fertile agricultural land
• Displacement and relocation issues
• Environmental degradation
• Disruption of traditional livelihoods like mango farming

One farmer was quoted saying, “We don’t know if jobs will actually come to us. What we do know is that our land and trees are being taken away.”

Legal and Policy Aspects of the Land Transfer

The Adani Power Plant Bihar Land Deal also brings into question the legal framework of land leases in India. While states have the right to lease public land for industrial projects, the token rent clause often attracts criticism.

Experts highlight that such leases should come with strict environmental safeguards, employment guarantees, and local benefit-sharing mechanisms. Without these, they risk being seen as corporate handouts rather than genuine development policies.

Opposition Demands and National Impact

The controversy has now spilled onto the national political stage. Leaders from across India are citing this as another example of alleged “crony capitalism” benefiting large business houses.

The opposition has demanded:

• A judicial inquiry into the land deal
• Transparency in bidding and lease terms
• Environmental impact assessment reports to be made public
• Job guarantees for local residents

If the agitation grows, the Adani Power Plant Bihar Land Deal could become a major electoral issue in upcoming state and national polls.

The Road Ahead for Adani Power Plant Bihar Land Deal

The Adani Power Plant Bihar Land Deal encapsulates the deep tension between development and accountability in India’s governance model. On one hand, Bihar urgently needs additional power capacity to fuel its growth. On the other, granting fertile land at ₹1 lease for 25 years to a corporate giant raises genuine concerns about fairness, transparency, and environmental sustainability.

UN, Sep.27.2025:India’s reply to Shehbaz Sharif at UN has once again exposed Islamabad’s double standards on terrorism and peace. After the Pakistani Prime Minister’s speech at the UN General Assembly (UNGA), India’s First Secretary at its Permanent Mission to the UN, Petal Gahlot, strongly rebutted Sharif’s claims-

Gahlot accused Pakistan of glorifying terrorism and reminded the world that it was Islamabad that had sheltered Osama bin Laden for a decade while pretending to be a U.S. ally in the war on terror.

Shehbaz Sharif’s Speech at the UN General Assembly

Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif addressed the UNGA with familiar rhetoric, accusing India of using the Pahalgam terror attack for political mileage and reiterating Islamabad’s desire for peace talks.

Sharif controversially credited former U.S. President Donald Trump for preventing war between India and Pakistan, a claim India has repeatedly dismissed in the past.

He insisted that Pakistan had “won the war” with India and was now ready for peace talks on all outstanding issues.

India’s Strong Counterattack

India’s reply to Shehbaz Sharif at UN was sharp and uncompromising. Petal Gahlot described Sharif’s speech as “ridiculous theatrics” and condemned Pakistan’s glorification of terrorism.

She reminded the global community that no amount of lies or propaganda could hide the truth: Pakistan continues to nurture terror groups responsible for attacks on innocent civilians in India.

Pakistan’s History of Shielding Terrorists

India’s representative cited Pakistan’s track record of protecting terrorists. The most striking example was Osama bin Laden, who was found hiding in Abbottabad, Pakistan, in 2011.

This fact continues to haunt Islamabad’s credibility whenever it tries to portray itself as a victim of terrorism rather than a sponsor.

The Brutal Incident India Highlighted

Petal Gahlot also referred to the Pahalgam massacre of April 25, 2025, when terrorists targeted Indian tourists in Jammu and Kashmir. The attack was claimed by The Resistance Front, an extremist outfit believed to have links with Pakistan.

Gahlot accused Islamabad of shielding the perpetrators from accountability at the UN Security Council, undermining global counterterrorism efforts.

The Osama bin Laden Connection Exposed Again

Revisiting the Osama bin Laden episode, India’s reply to Shehbaz Sharif at UN reminded delegates how Pakistan harbored the world’s most wanted terrorist for years.

Gahlot said, “This was the same Pakistan that sheltered Osama bin Laden for over a decade, while pretending to be a partner in the war on terror.”

This stark reminder reinforced India’s argument that Pakistan cannot be trusted when it speaks about peace.

India’s Message on Peace Talks

Shehbaz Sharif’s call for peace talks was met with skepticism in New Delhi’s response. Gahlot said that if Pakistan was truly sincere, it should immediately shut down terror camps operating on its soil and hand over terrorists wanted in India.

She added that genuine peace can only come when Pakistan stops exporting terrorism across the border.

Why India Calls Pakistan’s Claims Hypocritical

India has consistently accused Pakistan of hypocrisy: talking about peace in international forums while backing terror groups domestically.

This duality was once again evident in Sharif’s UN speech and the firm Indian reply that followed.

The Trump Factor in Shehbaz Sharif’s Speech

Sharif’s reference to Donald Trump’s supposed role in averting war between India and Pakistan sparked fresh controversy. India has repeatedly dismissed such claims, stating that no third-party mediation was involved in de-escalating tensions.

New Delhi maintains that all issues with Pakistan are strictly bilateral and will not involve external powers.

International Reactions to the Exchange

While the UN floor has often been a stage for fiery India-Pakistan exchanges, this year’s confrontation gained more attention due to the Pahalgam massacre and ongoing instability in South Asia.

Several analysts noted that India’s direct reference to Osama bin Laden served as a strong reminder of Pakistan’s tainted past.

The Larger India-Pakistan UN Debate

The India-Pakistan rivalry at the UN is decades old, with Kashmir often dominating the discourse. Each year, Pakistan raises the issue, and India counters with reminders of Pakistan’s sponsorship of terrorism.

This year, however, India’s focus on the Pahalgam attack and bin Laden’s sheltering gave the rebuttal extra weight.

Expert Opinions on the Diplomatic Clash

Foreign policy experts praised India’s reply to Shehbaz Sharif at UN for being precise and hard-hitting.

According to strategic analyst Brahma Chellaney, “India has consistently highlighted Pakistan’s duplicity, but linking the Pahalgam massacre to Pakistan’s UN behavior strengthens the credibility of New Delhi’s case.”

Lessons from Past UN Confrontations

This is not the first time India has exposed Pakistan at the UN. In past years, Indian diplomats have countered references to Kashmir by pointing to Pakistan’s record on terrorism, minority rights, and democratic backsliding.

The trend has continued, with India ensuring that Pakistan’s attempts to globalize bilateral disputes are neutralized.

What Lies Ahead for India-Pakistan Relations

The heated exchange raises fresh questions about the future of India-Pakistan relations. While Sharif claims to want peace, India insists on accountability first.

Until Pakistan dismantles terror networks, meaningful dialogue appears unlikely. The latest UN spat only reinforces this deadlock.

India’s reply to Shehbaz Sharif at UN was a powerful reminder to the global community: Pakistan cannot hide its long history of supporting terrorism behind empty calls for peace.

By highlighting the Pahalgam attack and Osama bin Laden’s decade-long shelter in Pakistan, New Delhi made it clear that genuine dialogue will only be possible when Islamabad takes concrete action against terror.

New Delhi, Sep.27,2025:The presence of 27 Indians in Russian Army ranks has emerged as a serious concern for New Delhi. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) confirmed on Friday that efforts are underway to secure the release of these citizens, who were reportedly recruited into Russia’s military amid the ongoing conflict with Ukraine-

MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal, during a press briefing, said, “We have recently learned that some more Indian citizens have joined the Russian Army. Families informed us, and we are actively engaging with the Russian government to bring them back at the earliest.”

Families Raise Alarm, Ministry Confirms Cases

According to officials, several families contacted the Indian government after discovering that their relatives had joined the Russian Army under unclear circumstances. Some accounts suggest that individuals were misled with promises of lucrative jobs, only to be forced into combat roles once they reached Russia.

The MEA confirmed that approximately 27 Indians are currently in service with the Russian Army, and negotiations are ongoing for their safe release.

Previous Warnings from the Indian Government

This is not the first time such an incident has come to light. Earlier this year, the Indian government had issued an advisory warning citizens against joining foreign militaries, particularly in active conflict zones like Russia and Ukraine.

Despite repeated warnings, reports suggest that several Indians, especially from economically weaker backgrounds, were lured with job offers and ended up on the battlefield.

How Did Indians End Up in the Russian Army

Recruitment of foreigners in the Russian Army is not new. Reports indicate that Russia, facing manpower shortages due to the prolonged war in Ukraine, has been hiring foreigners with promises of citizenship and financial incentives.

Several Indians were reportedly offered jobs in construction or support services but later found themselves drafted into active military duty.

Diplomatic Efforts to Secure Release

India has raised this matter multiple times with Russian authorities. According to MEA spokesperson Jaiswal, “The government is in touch with Moscow to ensure the safe return of all Indians. We are closely monitoring the situation and pressing for their early release.”

This follows earlier successful efforts, where India managed to bring back a group of Indians who were stuck in similar circumstances in Russia.

Risks Faced by Indians in the Russian Army

The biggest concern is the safety of Indians deployed in active war zones. Reports from Ukraine’s frontlines highlight the dangers faced by foreign recruits, many of whom are inadequately trained and placed in high-risk positions.

For families in India, every day is filled with uncertainty about the safety and well-being of their loved ones.

International Reactions and Comparisons

The issue of Indians in the Russian Army is not isolated. Citizens from several countries, including Nepal, Sri Lanka, and African nations, have reportedly been recruited by Russia.

Nepal recently confirmed casualties among its citizens fighting for Russia, while Sri Lanka is also negotiating the release of its nationals. India’s case adds more diplomatic pressure on Moscow.

Russia-India Relations at Stake

While India and Russia share historic ties, the issue of Indian citizens in the Russian Army adds a new layer of complexity. Analysts suggest that while it may not derail bilateral relations, it could impact public sentiment and India’s stance on foreign recruitment.

India has so far maintained a delicate balance in its approach to the Russia-Ukraine conflict, but the presence of 27 Indians in Russian Army service raises new diplomatic challenges.

What Families Are Demanding

Families of those trapped in Russia are demanding swift action. Many have appealed directly to the Prime Minister’s Office and the MEA, seeking urgent intervention.

Several parents have publicly spoken about being kept in the dark regarding their sons’ real situation until they received desperate phone calls from Russia.

Expert Views on Recruitment of Foreigners in Conflicts

Defense analysts highlight that the recruitment of foreigners during conflicts is a controversial practice. It not only puts individuals at grave risk but also creates diplomatic strains between nations.

Experts suggest that stronger awareness campaigns are needed in India to prevent citizens from falling prey to such recruitment traps.

Lessons from Past Cases

Earlier incidents involving Indians in conflict zones underline the need for vigilance. For example, several Indians stranded in war-hit Ukraine during the early days of the Russia-Ukraine war had to be rescued through Operation Ganga.

This current situation reinforces the importance of strict monitoring of recruitment agencies and job offers abroad.

The Road Ahead for Affected Indians

For the 27 Indians in Russian Army, the path forward depends heavily on diplomatic negotiations. India’s government is optimistic but has warned families that the process may take time, given the ongoing war situation.

Meanwhile, Indian missions abroad have been instructed to increase surveillance on dubious recruitment drives targeting Indians for foreign militaries.

The presence of 27 Indians in Russian Army service has sparked concern not only among families but also at the diplomatic level. While New Delhi continues to negotiate their release, the incident serves as a cautionary tale for citizens considering risky job offers abroad.

New Delhi, Sep.26,2025:The I Love Mohammad Poster Controversy has triggered a heated political and social debate in India. It began in Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, during the celebration of Barawafat (Eid Milad-un-Nabi), when a poster reading “I Love Mohammad” was displayed. Soon after, authorities ordered its removal, sparking outrage and polarizing opinions across the nation-

AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi stepped into the debate, questioning the government’s stance and highlighting what he sees as selective restrictions on religious and cultural expressions. His fiery response has not only brought the issue into the national spotlight but also raised questions about freedom of expression, secularism, and political motivations in India.

Background of the Poster Row in Kanpur

The controversy started when local Muslims in Kanpur displayed banners reading “I Love Mohammad” during Barawafat celebrations. Police officials intervened, citing government orders against putting up new posters in public spaces without prior approval.

While birthday greetings for Prime Ministers and Chief Ministers were reportedly allowed, religious banners became the subject of objection, creating a double-standard narrative that fuelled anger among communities.

Owaisi’s Strong Reaction to the Controversy

AIMIM leader Asaduddin Owaisi launched a sharp attack against the BJP-led government and right-wing groups. Speaking to journalists, he said:

“When the word love is being used, why does it bother you? Does that mean you are against love? You don’t believe in mohabbat (love)?”

Owaisi accused the BJP and RSS of sending a negative message about India’s pluralism to the world. He reminded them that India is home to 18–19 crore Muslims, the largest Muslim population in Asia outside Indonesia, and questioned the intention behind targeting the phrase “I Love Mohammad.”

Why the Phrase “I Love Mohammad” Became Contentious

The controversy isn’t merely about one poster. It has exposed deeper societal fault lines:

• The use of the word “Love” in a religious context raised objections among right-wing groups.
• Authorities feared potential law and order issues if such posters spread widely.
• Supporters argue it was a peaceful expression of devotion, not a provocation.

Thus, the I Love Mohammad Poster Controversy has quickly become symbolic of the wider struggle between expression, religion, and political narratives in India.

Government and Police Response

The Uttar Pradesh police defended their decision, saying government orders had barred new banners in public places, especially those with religious slogans.

ADGP (Law and Order) was quoted saying:

“Our government policy is clear — no new religious posters will be permitted. However, posters for Prime Minister and Chief Minister birthday greetings can be allowed with due permission.”

This statement further fuelled the debate, with many asking whether political leaders are being given preferential treatment over religious figures.

RSS-BJP’s Stand on the Issue

According to BJP leaders, the restriction was not against any particular religion, but aimed at maintaining neutrality and preventing communal tension.

However, critics argue that the selective allowance for political posters while banning religious ones undermines the principle of equality before law.

Political Reactions Across the Spectrum

The I Love Mohammad Poster Controversy has drawn reactions from across the political spectrum:

• Samajwadi Party leaders accused the BJP of “double standards” and “targeting minorities.”
• Congress called the decision “an attack on secular values.”
• BJP leaders maintained the rule was applied fairly and accused the opposition of “communalizing the issue.”

Can the State Restrict Posters

Legal experts point out that while the state has powers to regulate public displays to maintain order, such restrictions must not discriminate between political and religious speech.

Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution guarantees freedom of speech, but subject to reasonable restrictions. The current controversy raises the question: Are these restrictions being applied equally?

Public Opinion and Social Media Storm

On social media platforms like Twitter (X) and Facebook, hashtags such as #ILoveMohammad and #PosterRow began trending.

• Supporters argued that the poster was a harmless display of love and devotion.
• Critics saw it as provocation aimed at stirring communal emotions.

The storm highlighted how religion-based controversies can spread rapidly online, influencing public opinion within hours.

Owaisi’s Call for Lawmaking

In one of his most controversial statements, Owaisi said sarcastically:

“Why not make a law that no one in India can talk about love anymore?”

This biting remark was aimed at exposing what he views as the absurdity of selective restrictions. For Owaisi, the controversy is less about the poster and more about the shrinking democratic space for minorities in India.

Religion, Politics, and Posters in India

India has a long history of posters and banners as tools of political and religious mobilization. From independence rallies to election campaigns, public displays have been a common form of expression.

However, religious slogans and symbols have often been flashpoints for communal clashes. The I Love Mohammad Poster Controversy fits into this larger historical trend of religious expression colliding with political restrictions.

Experts’ Views on the Controversy

• Dr. Aftab Alam (Political Scientist): “This controversy shows how fragile communal harmony remains in India.”
• Advocate Rina Kapoor (Constitutional Lawyer): “The selective permission for political posters while banning religious ones may not stand the test of law.”
• Sociologist Arvind Mishra: “Posters are symbolic; they amplify underlying tensions. The real issue is mistrust between communities.”

International Perspective on Religious Expression

Globally, countries handle religious expression differently-

• France bans religious symbols in public institutions.
• UK allows freedom but monitors speech for hate content.
• Indonesia actively supports religious banners during Islamic festivals.

India’s handling of the I Love Mohammad Poster Controversy will be scrutinized internationally as a test of its secular democracy.

Explore global policies on religious expression

Impact on Upcoming Elections

With elections looming in several states, political observers say the controversy could polarize voters. For the BJP, it may consolidate majority votes, while for AIMIM and other opposition parties, it could serve as a rallying point for minorities.

The I Love Mohammad Poster Controversy has, therefore, become more than just a local issue — it is now part of India’s election battleground.

The I Love Mohammad Poster Controversy highlights the challenges India faces in balancing freedom of expression, secularism, and communal harmony.

New Delhi,Sep.25,2025:The rejection of the Tahir Hussain bail plea by the Delhi High Court has once again drawn national attention to the tragic 2020 Delhi riots. Former Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) councillor Tahir Hussain has been in custody for more than five years in connection with the murder of Intelligence Bureau (IB) officer Ankit Sharma, who was killed during the riots in northeast Delhi-

The case has remained one of the most politically charged trials in recent history, with Hussain at the center of controversy. His repeated attempts for bail highlight the complexity of riot-related cases and the judiciary’s role in balancing individual rights with the gravity of allegations.

 Background of the 2020 Delhi Riots Case

The Delhi riots of February 2020 broke out amid protests over the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). Clashes between communities led to violence that claimed over 50 lives and left hundreds injured.

Among the most shocking incidents was the murder of IB officer Ankit Sharma, whose body was found in a drain in Chand Bagh, Delhi. The post-mortem revealed multiple stab wounds, sparking nationwide outrage.

The FIR filed on the basis of Sharma’s father’s complaint named Tahir Hussain as a key accused.

 Who Was Ankit Sharma and Why His Murder Shook India

Ankit Sharma, a young Intelligence Bureau officer, had gone missing on February 25, 2020. His body was later recovered near Hussain’s residence.

His death became a symbol of the brutality of the riots, leading to widespread demands for justice. The case against Tahir Hussain has largely revolved around Sharma’s killing, making it one of the most closely watched trials.

Timeline of Tahir Hussain’s Bail Applications

Hussain has made multiple bail attempts since his arrest in 2020:

• December 2023: Filed a regular bail plea.
• February 2024: Withdrew it, citing plans to reapply in trial court.
• March 12, 2024: Trial court rejected his bail plea.
• September 2025: Delhi High Court dismissed his fresh bail application.

Each rejection has kept Hussain behind bars, highlighting the court’s cautious approach in such a sensitive case.

Delhi High Court’s Latest Ruling on the Bail Plea

The High Court emphasized the seriousness of the charges and the potential threat to law and order if Hussain were released.

The court noted that the gravity of the crime and the evidence presented against him did not justify bail. This makes it clear that the judiciary is unwilling to take risks in riot-related cases where communal harmony and public trust are at stake.

Legal Grounds for Rejection of Bail

The rejection of the Tahir Hussain bail plea rests on several legal grounds:

• Section 302 IPC (Murder): Hussain faces direct allegations of involvement in Ankit Sharma’s killing.
• Conspiracy charges: Accused of coordinating attacks during the riots.
• Witness statements: Multiple testimonies link him to violent mobs.
• Threat to society: Court highlighted the possibility of unrest if released.

These factors made it nearly impossible for the court to grant him relief.

What the Defense Argued in Tahir Hussain Bail Plea

Hussain’s defense team has consistently argued that.

• He is being politically targeted due to his association with AAP.
• No direct evidence links him to Sharma’s murder.
• He has already spent more than five years in jail without trial conclusion.
• Prolonged incarceration without conviction violates fundamental rights.

However, the High Court found these arguments insufficient in the face of strong prosecution evidence.

Prosecution’s Strong Opposition to Bail

The prosecution opposed bail, stressing.

• The heinous nature of the crime.
• The possibility of Hussain tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses.
• The need to uphold public faith in the justice system.

This hardline stance ensured that Hussain’s bail plea was rejected once again.

From AAP Councillor to Accused

Tahir Hussain’s political journey took a dramatic turn.

• Once a rising star in the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), elected as councillor.
• Suspended from the party after his name surfaced in riot cases.
• Became a symbol of political controversy, with opposition parties attacking AAP for his role.

The Tahir Hussain bail plea thus carries not just legal but also political implications.

Reactions from Victim’s Family and Civil Society

The family of Ankit Sharma welcomed the High Court’s decision, stating that they have been waiting for justice for five years.

Civil society remains divided:

• Some see the prolonged detention without trial as unjustified.
• Others argue that serious riot crimes must be dealt with strictly.

Expert Opinions on the Bail Rejection

Legal experts highlight that bail in riot and terrorism-linked cases is often extremely difficult to secure.

According to senior advocates, courts tend to prioritize societal security over individual liberty when charges involve murder and conspiracy during riots.

This explains why the Tahir Hussain bail plea faced rejection yet again.

Broader Impact on Delhi Riot Cases

The outcome of Hussain’s bail plea could set a precedent for other pending Delhi riots cases. Many accused are still awaiting trial, and prolonged detentions raise questions about judicial delays.

This case underscores the tension between speedy justice and thorough investigation.

How Long Can Tahir Hussain Remain in Jail Without Conviction

Indian law does not allow indefinite pre-trial detention, but in cases involving grave charges like murder, courts are reluctant to release accused until trials conclude.

Unless his trial is fast-tracked, Hussain may remain in jail for years before a final verdict is reached.

Comparing With Other High-Profile Bail Cases in India

The Tahir Hussain bail plea has drawn comparisons with.

• The Umar Khalid case, where bail was denied in UAPA-related charges.
• The Rhea Chakraborty case, where bail was eventually granted after strong media attention.
• The Lalu Prasad Yadav fodder scam case, where repeated bail pleas were rejected before eventual relief.

These comparisons show how high-profile cases often become legal and political battlegrounds.

Lessons from the Tahir Hussain Bail Plea

The rejection of the Tahir Hussain bail plea marks yet another chapter in the long and controversial Delhi riots trial.

For Hussain, it means continued incarceration and an uncertain future. For the judiciary, it highlights the need to balance justice for victims with rights of the accused. And for society, it is a reminder of how deeply the 2020 riots scarred India’s social fabric.

New Delhi,Sep.25,2025:PM Modi connected self-reliance with the broader target of making India a developed nation by 2047–

The PM Modi India self-reliance statement carried several strong messages.

• India cannot afford to depend on external powers for growth.
• Despite global disruptions, India’s economic growth remains “attractive.”
• India is determined to strengthen its foundation for decades.
• From semiconductors to shipping, India wants to build everything domestically.
• Atmanirbhar Bharat is not just a slogan, but a national mission.

India’s Vision for 2047 A Developed Nation

PM Modi connected self-reliance with the broader target of making India a developed nation by 2047, when the country celebrates 100 years of independence.

According to him, every disruption in global trade or politics should be seen as an opportunity:

“Disruptions don’t divert us. Instead, we discover new directions.”

This reflects the government’s approach of turning crises into opportunities, especially during COVID-19 when India boosted domestic production of PPE kits, vaccines, and medical equipment.

Why Self-Reliance is Crucial in Today’s Global Landscape

The PM Modi India self-reliance statement comes at a time when:

• The Russia-Ukraine war has disrupted global energy and food supplies.
• Tensions in the Indo-Pacific are reshaping trade routes.
• Countries are prioritizing domestic manufacturing for resilience.

For India, reducing dependence on imports in critical areas like electronics, defence, and energy is key to maintaining strategic autonomy.

“Chip to Ship” – What PM Modi Means by Complete Value Chains

One of the most striking parts of the PM Modi India self-reliance statement was his call to produce everything “from chip to ship” in India.

This phrase emphasizes:

• Building a semiconductor ecosystem domestically.
• Expanding electronics manufacturing hubs.
• Strengthening the shipping and logistics industry.

It is not just about producing goods but also about owning the entire value chain, reducing vulnerabilities in global supply disruptions.

India vs. Global Trade Barriers – The 50% US Tariff Challenge

Currently, Indian exports face steep tariffs, with the United States imposing 50% duties on certain products.

This makes self-reliance even more critical. Instead of being restricted by foreign markets, India must strengthen domestic consumption and regional partnerships.

Atmanirbhar Bharat- Progress Made So Far

Since 2020, the Atmanirbhar Bharat mission has been driving India’s policies. Achievements include:

• Rise in defence exports (from ₹1,500 crore in 2016 to over ₹21,000 crore in 2023).
• PLI schemes boosting smartphone and electronics production.
• Green energy expansion, making India a global leader in renewables.
• Start-up ecosystem crossing 100 unicorns.

The PM Modi India self-reliance statement builds on these successes, projecting a confident roadmap for the next two decades.

Experts React to PM Modi India Self-Reliance Statement

Economic and defence experts largely welcomed the speech.

Dr. Arvind Virmani, member of NITI Aayog, told The Economic Times:

“Self-reliance doesn’t mean isolation. It means building capabilities while staying connected to global supply chains.”

Former Army Chief General V.P. Malik highlighted that a strong domestic industry also ensures strategic autonomy in defence.

How Self-Reliance Links to India’s Economic Growth

The PM Modi India self-reliance statement is not only about nationalism; it is also about economic logic:

• India imports goods worth over $600 billion annually.
• Reducing this dependency can save foreign exchange.
• Domestic production creates jobs for millions.
• A strong industrial base attracts global investors.

In essence, self-reliance strengthens both GDP growth and social stability.

Challenges India Must Overcome to Achieve the Vision

While the vision is bold, challenges remain.

• Dependence on foreign technology in semiconductors.
• Infrastructure bottlenecks in ports and logistics.
• Need for skilled workforce in advanced industries.
• Balancing environmental sustainability with industrial growth.

Without addressing these, the PM Modi India self-reliance statement risks becoming aspirational rather than achievable.

Global Comparisons of Self-Reliance Efforts

Other nations are also pursuing self-reliance:

• China has doubled down on domestic manufacturing under “Made in China 2025.”
• USA is reshoring industries under the CHIPS Act.
• Japan is investing heavily in supply chain resilience.

India’s efforts, as outlined in the PM Modi India self-reliance statement, put it in sync with global trends while maintaining its democratic and open-market character.

A Strong India in an Uncertain World

The PM Modi India self-reliance statement is more than just political rhetoric. It is a strategic declaration that India will not be held back by global disruptions or external dependencies.

By strengthening its domestic capabilities — from chip to ship — India is laying the groundwork for its Vision 2047.

In PM Modi’s words, self-reliance is both a mantra and a mission. The coming decades will reveal how effectively India can translate this philosophy into reality, shaping its destiny as a developed and resilient global power.

New Delhi,Sep.25,2025:General Anil Chauhan is a decorated officer with over four decades of service in the Indian Army. Born in 1961, he is currently 64 years old and was appointed as the Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) on September 30, 2022–

Apart from being the CDS, he also serves as the Secretary of the Department of Military Affairs (DMA), a crucial wing of the Ministry of Defence. His military career has been defined by leadership in counter-insurgency operations, strategic planning, and modernization of armed forces.

General Anil Chauhan CDS Tenure Extension Announcement

The General Anil Chauhan CDS tenure extension was confirmed by the Ministry of Defence on Wednesday. According to the statement, the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet (ACC) approved the extension.

The official release stated.

“General Anil Chauhan will continue as the Chief of Defence Staff and Secretary, Department of Military Affairs, until 30 May 2026 or until further orders.”

This means his tenure has effectively been extended by nearly 20 months, giving him ample time to oversee long-term reforms and operational preparedness.

Why the Extension Matters for India’s Defence Strategy

Continuity in military leadership is critical, especially at a time when India faces multiple security challenges.

• Border tensions with China along the Line of Actual Control (LAC).
• Counter-terror operations in Jammu and Kashmir.
• Enhancing defence preparedness in the Indo-Pacific region.
• Accelerating jointness among the Army, Navy, and Air Force.

The General Anil Chauhan CDS tenure extension provides stability to these processes and ensures that reforms initiated in the last two years continue without disruption.

Key Responsibilities of the Chief of Defence Staff (CDS)

The CDS is India’s top military officer and acts as the principal military advisor to the Defence Minister. His primary roles include:

• Promoting jointness among the three armed services.
• Driving theatre command reforms.
• Streamlining defence procurement.
• Overseeing training, logistics, and capability development.
• Representing India in strategic military dialogues globally.

With his tenure extended, General Chauhan is expected to accelerate progress in all these areas.

Cabinet Approval and Political Backing

The decision reflects the strong backing General Chauhan enjoys from the political leadership. The Appointments Committee of the Cabinet (ACC), chaired by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, gave its formal nod.

This political endorsement shows that the government wants long-term military reforms to be led by an experienced hand who has already built momentum since 2022.

General Chauhan’s Achievements Since 2022

Since taking charge in September 2022, General Chauhan has.

• Advanced work on theatre commands, aimed at integrated joint operations.
• Strengthened civil-military synergy through the Department of Military Affairs.
• Promoted indigenisation in defence procurement, aligned with the Atmanirbhar Bharat initiative.
• Enhanced cooperation with allies through international defence exercises.
• Oversaw critical counter-insurgency operations in the northeast.

Impact on India’s Military Reforms and Joint Operations

Military analysts believe the General Anil Chauhan CDS tenure extension gives India the rare opportunity to see through structural reforms without leadership disruption.

Some of the reforms General Chauhan is spearheading include.

• Establishing Integrated Theatre Commands.
• Restructuring forces for better resource optimisation.
• Modernising forces with a focus on cyber and space warfare.
• Coordinating joint training and logistics across services.

These reforms are complex and require time — something the extension now guarantees.

Reactions from Defence Experts and Veterans

Defence experts have largely welcomed the move. Retired Lt. Gen. D.S. Hooda commented in an interview with The Hindu.

“The extension ensures continuity at a critical juncture. The reforms underway are long-term, and this move prevents any disruption.”

Similarly, former Navy Chief Admiral Arun Prakash noted that stability in leadership is essential to maintain India’s deterrence against regional adversaries.

Comparing CDS Tenures Globally

Globally, the concept of a Chief of Defence Staff exists in several nations, including the United States (Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff) and the United Kingdom.

In many of these countries, CDS tenures are longer to ensure consistency in reforms. India extending General Chauhan’s tenure until 2026 aligns with global best practices.

What This Means for India’s National Security Until 2026

With the General Anil Chauhan CDS tenure extension, India’s national security strategy until 2026 is expected to focus on.

1. Theatre Command Rollout – ensuring integrated commands become operational.
2. Indigenisation Drive – boosting Made-in-India defence equipment.
3. Cyber & Space Capabilities – preparing for future warfare.
4. Border Security – continued vigilance along China and Pakistan borders.
5. Global Defence Diplomacy – stronger partnerships with the U.S., France, Japan, and QUAD allies.

The General Anil Chauhan CDS tenure extension is more than just a personnel decision — it is a strategic step to safeguard India’s defence reforms and national security in a volatile region.