Tianjin, Sep.12,2025:The SCO Development Bank is emerging as one of the most talked-about financial institutions on the global stage. At a time when geopolitical tensions are high and nations are seeking alternatives to Western-dominated financial systems, this new initiative has the potential to reshape the global order.

Born out of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), the bank is not just another multilateral financial body—it symbolizes the growing desire of Eurasian nations to reduce dependence on the US dollar and create a multipolar world economy.

What is the SCO Development Bank

The SCO Development Bank is a proposed multilateral financial institution backed by China, Russia, and other SCO member nations. Its core mission is to provide infrastructure financing, boost trade, and create a stable financial alternative to Western-controlled institutions such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

According to Chinese officials, the bank will serve as a “new platform for multilateral cooperation” and will provide funds for roads, energy pipelines, hydropower plants, and cross-border transport projects.

A Decade in the Making

The idea of an SCO Development Bank was first floated by China in 2010. However, it faced resistance, especially from Russia, which preferred expanding its own Eurasian Development Bank (EDB).

Momentum picked up after 2022, when Western sanctions on Russia over the Ukraine war created urgency for alternative financial structures. By mid-2025, SCO leaders reached a “political consensus” to establish the bank, and during the Tianjin summit (August–September 2025), the plan was officially approved.

The Geopolitical Shift Behind the Bank

The launch of the SCO Development Bank comes at a critical juncture. Western financial sanctions against Russia, coupled with global dollar dominance, have triggered calls for financial sovereignty in Eurasia.

For China, the bank supports its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), strengthening trade routes and supply chains across Eurasia. For Russia and Iran, both heavily sanctioned, the bank provides a much-needed lifeline to bypass Western systems.

How SCO Development Bank Differs from BRICS Bank

Although comparisons with the BRICS New Development Bank (NDB) are inevitable, the SCO Development Bank has unique characteristics:

• Stronger focus on Central Asia (Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan).
• Direct alignment with Belt and Road corridors.
• Higher emphasis on energy, transport, and connectivity projects.
• Potential headquarters in Central Asia, rather than China, to show inclusivity.

Ways SCO Development Bank Could Reshape Global Finance

1. Boosting Infrastructure in Resource-Rich Nations

Countries like Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Kyrgyzstan are rich in natural resources but lack financing for infrastructure. The SCO Development Bank could provide capital for pipelines, mining projects, and hydropower plants.

2. Reducing Dollar Dependency

One of the bank’s main goals is to cut reliance on the US dollar. By encouraging settlements in Chinese yuan (renminbi) and local currencies, it could slowly weaken the dominance of Western currencies.

3. Expanding China’s Belt and Road Initiative

Through financing highways, railways, and ports, the SCO Development Bank will strengthen China’s BRI and cement its economic leadership in Eurasia.

4. Supporting Sanctioned States Like Russia and Iran

For Russia and Iran, both hit by Western sanctions, this bank provides a financial shield. It allows them to borrow, invest, and trade without relying on Western institutions.

5. Financing Energy and Transport Corridors

Energy pipelines, electricity grids, and transport networks across Eurasia could be financed directly, ensuring energy security and trade expansion.

6. Attracting New Members from Asia and Africa

Analysts predict that countries in Southeast Asia and Africa could seek membership, making the SCO Development Bank a global South powerhouse.

7. Promoting Multipolar Global Order

Above all, the bank symbolizes the push for a multipolar financial system—one where no single power dominates.

Challenges Facing SCO Development Bank

Despite its promise, the SCO Development Bank faces hurdles-

• Diverging interests of China, Russia, and India.
• Risk of US sanctions or trade retaliation.
• Ensuring credibility and transparency in lending.
• Competition with BRICS Bank and AIIB (Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank).

India’s Ambivalent Stance

India’s position on the SCO Development Bank remains cautious. While New Delhi supports multilateralism, it is wary of China’s dominance and fears antagonizing the US.

Analysts argue India may prefer to focus on bilateral infrastructure deals rather than fully embrace the bank.

The US and Western Response

The US views the SCO Development Bank as a direct challenge to its financial supremacy. Washington has in the past threatened tariffs and sanctions on countries that attempt to bypass the dollar system. Similar reactions could be expected if the SCO Bank grows rapidly.

Can SCO Bank Redefine Global Finance

The SCO Development Bank has the potential to become a transformative institution. By reducing dollar dependency, boosting regional connectivity, and supporting sanctioned economies, it could usher in a new financial era.

However, its success will depend on member unity, governance transparency, and resilience against Western pushback.

The creation of the SCO Development Bank marks a historic moment in global finance. More than just a financial body, it represents a broader vision—healing the financial divides of Eurasia and honouring the economic roles of emerging powers.

If implemented effectively, this institution could tilt the balance of global finance away from unilateral dominance toward a fairer, multipolar world order.

New Delhi, Sep.11,2025:Vote theft proof by Rahul Gandhi came into the spotlight again on 11 September 2025, when Rahul Gandhi, Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, announced that he has “dynamic, explosive proof” of widespread electoral fraud. He claimed that the slogan “vote chor, gaddi chhod” is now echoing throughout India, indicating public sentiment that votes are being stolen.

Gandhi says governments were formed via stolen votes in states such as Maharashtra, Haryana, and Karnataka, and he guarantees more evidence will be presented soon. He also used a striking metaphor: that a “hydrogen bomb” will “clear everything,” meaning his evidence will leave no shadows.

What led to the Vote Theft allegations

Previous claims and examples

Rahul Gandhi’s vote theft narrative began earlier, asserting irregularities in the preparation and revision of electoral rolls. He pointed particularly to Mahadevapura Assembly constituency in Karnataka, alleging duplicate entries, invalid father names, house numbers missing, etc.

He also highlighted cases in Bihar, where during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voter rolls, there were claims of names being removed. One case involved a person named Subodh Kumar, allegedly removed from draft rolls; the Election Commission of India (ECI) clarified that Kumar was never a voter but a booth-level agent.

Another case involved Ranju Devi, claimed by Gandhi to have been removed from the voter list, but ECI said her name was intact.

The Election Commission’s response so far

The ECI has repeatedly dismissed many of the claims as baseless or lacking formal structure. In several cases it has requested written declarations under oath per rule provisions, and asked Rahul Gandhi to submit documentary evidence or apologies where claims were made.

In one significant legal instance, the Madras High Court dismissed a PIL seeking directions for the ECI to investigate Rahul’s “vote chori” allegations, calling the plea vague and without material particulars. A cost of Rs 1 lakh was imposed on the petitioner.

Regions, evidence & slogans

 States cited

Rahul Gandhi has specifically named Maharashtra, Haryana, and Karnataka as states where elections were allegedly stolen through manipulation of electoral rolls or other means.

Types of evidence claimed

• He says Congress has already provided “black-and-white proof” of wrongdoings.
• Complaints of duplicate voter entries, irregular father-names, missing or invalid house numbers in voter list drafts.
• Video or social media content where voters claim they were either removed or misled about their voter-registration status.

Slogans & metaphors

• The slogan “Vote Chor, Gaddi Chhod” (which means “Vote thief, vacate your seat”) is being widely used by Rahul Gandhi and his supporters. He says it is “spreading like fire.”
• He uses strong metaphors like “hydrogen bomb” to emphasize the scale and impact of the evidence to come.

ECI, BJP and legal pushback

Election Commission of India (ECI)

• The ECI has demanded formal, sworn declarations or evidence when accusations are made. It has said without such formal proof the claims are not actionable.
• The ECI clarified in specific cases (like Subodh Kumar) that some persons are not registered voters, or no names were ever on the roll.

BJP’s counter

• BJP leaders have accused Rahul Gandhi and Congress of spreading misinformation and using these allegations to mobilize political support.
• They argue that such claims muddy public trust in democratic institutions.

Judicial / legal observations

• As noted, Madras High Court dismissed a PIL seeking ECI to clarify “vote theft” that lacked specific evidence. The court criticised the vagueness.
• There have been legal notices demanding Rahul Gandhi produce affidavits or evidence.

Protests, media, and public reaction

Protests & campaigns

• Congress has launched protests in states such as Rajasthan, with slogans “Vote Chor, Gaddi Chhod,” demanding transparency from the ECI.
• The “Vote Adhikar Yatra” and various public meetings are being organized, both to raise awareness and to press for evidence.

Media & public sentiment

• Media coverage is intense, with wide reporting on Rahul’s promise of “explosive proof,” speculation on what that evidence might be, and whether it will hold up legally.
• Some public discussion is supportive—people who feel disenfranchised or suspicious of electoral rolls are rallying behind the claims. Others are skeptical, calling for formal disclosures.

Political risk & strategy

• Rahul Gandhi’s strategy seems aimed at shifting public discourse, especially in states where elections were controversial or margins were thin.
• BJP and ECI’s responses reflect high stakes: dismissing too lightly could alienate voters; acknowledging could open legal or procedural scrutiny.

Implications for Indian democracy and elections

Trust in the electoral system

If the vote theft proof by Rahul Gandhi is substantiated, it could severely impact public trust in the Election Commission of India and the legitimacy of election outcomes.

Legal precedents

This could lead to more PILs, court cases, possibly revisiting results if irregularities are proven. The demand for evidence under oath suggests legal thresholds are important.

Electoral reforms & procedural changes

• There may be increased calls for use of paper ballots or stronger audit mechanisms, as already seen in some states pushing for paper ballots.
• Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voter rolls may come under stricter oversight.

Political polarization and stability

• These claims contribute to political polarization—opposition vs ruling party, public vs establishment.
• The impact on voter morale, especially among youth, marginalized, or those who believe their votes don’t count, could be significant.

Timeline of promised disclosures

Vote theft proof by Rahul Gandhi is no longer just a political slogan—it has become a promise of major revelations. Whether those revelations will change the electoral landscape depends on the credibility, detail, and transparency of the evidence he presents.

For now, the allegations have stirred controversy, heightened scrutiny of the ECI and the ruling party, and raised profound questions of fairness in India’s democratic process.

New Delhi, Sep.11,2025:Alongside its reply to Switzerland, India also sharply criticized Pakistan. Tyagi labelled Pakistan as a “failed state” dependent on political propaganda, accusing it of harboring terror networks-

The opening salvo

India hits back at Switzerland with a stern, assertive response after Swiss remarks at the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) concerning minority rights, freedom of expression, and media freedom. What began as a diplomatic recommendation turned into a heated exchange, with India calling the comments “surprising, shallow and ill-informed.”

This response reflects India’s evolving posture on the global stage—a country no longer content to quietly absorb criticism, especially from foreign governments, but commanding attention and pushing back when it deems narratives misaligned with its self-image and its record.

What Switzerland said at the UNHRC

The Swiss delegate, Michael Meier, in his capacity during the 60th Session of the UNHRC, called on India to:

• “Take effective measures to protect minorities in India”;
• “Uphold freedom of expression and media rights.” These remarks formed part of a broader review in which Switzerland also expressed concern about human rights issues in other countries like Syria, Turkiye, and Serbia.

India’s rebuttal

India’s counter-response, delivered by Kshitij Tyagi, Counsellor in Permanent Mission of India at Geneva, was strong, multifaceted, and aimed at redirecting the narrative.

Racism, discrimination, xenophobia allegations against Switzerland

• India hit back by saying that Switzerland should focus on its own challenges, including racism, systematic discrimination, and xenophobia within its borders.
• Tyagi described the Swiss remarks as “surprising, shallow and ill-informed.” He suggested that, given Switzerland’s role as UNHRC president, the country should avoid narratives that misrepresent India’s reality.
• India’s image: Pluralism, democracy, ready to assist

• India emphasized that it is the world’s largest, most diverse and vibrant democracy, with a strong civilisational tradition of pluralism.
• In a somewhat unusual diplomatic move, India offered to assist Switzerland in addressing its own issues of racism, xenophobia and discrimination.

Response to Pakistan -“failed state” claims

• Alongside its reply to Switzerland, India also sharply criticized Pakistan. Tyagi labelled Pakistan as a “failed state” dependent on political propaganda, accusing it of harboring terror networks.
• India referenced past terror attacks (Pahalgam, Uri, Pathankot, Mumbai) and Bin Laden’s presence in Pakistan to underline its accusations.

netizens & media

• Social media in India responded loudly. Many praised India’s firm stance, calling it dignified, confident, and emblematic of what some are terming a more assertive “New India.”
• Indian media described the exchange as a diplomatic “clapback” or “slap of truths.” Some analysts see this as part of India’s pattern of resisting what it sees as biased criticism from the West or international forums.

Wider diplomatic implications

• Diplomatic tone and norms: This incident raises questions about how much critique from one democratic nation to another is acceptable, especially within bodies like the UNHRC. India’s response suggests that it expects mutual respect rather than one-sided moral lectures.
• Soft power and global image: By calling out Switzerland, India not only defended its reputation internally, but also projected soft power—asserting itself as a democracy unapologetic of its practices and proud of its diversity.
• Future UNHRC debates: Such exchanges may tighten the boundaries of what countries are willing to accept in terms of external criticism, especially from nations that themselves have human rights challenges.

Stakes & what lies ahead

India hits back at Switzerland wasn’t just about a single statement; it was about a changing diplomatic posture. India seems less willing to be lectured by others—particularly when it believes those others have their own issues of prejudice and systemic discrimination.

Nepal, Sep.10,2025:Balen pursued his education in civil engineering at the White House Institute of Technology in Kathmandu. Furthering his academic credentials, he completed a master’s degree in structural engineering from Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology in Karnataka-

The Rise of Balen Shah

In the heart of Kathmandu, a transformative figure has emerged, capturing the imagination of Nepal’s youth and challenging the traditional political landscape. Balendra Shah, known popularly as Balen, is not just the current mayor of Kathmandu Metropolitan City but also a symbol of change and hope for many. His journey from an underground rapper to an independent political leader reflects the aspirations of a generation eager for reform.

Early Life and Education

Born on April 27, 1990, in Kathmandu, Balen Shah hails from a Newar Buddhist family of Maithil Madhesi origin. His father, Ram Narayan Shah, is an Ayurvedic doctor, and his mother, Dhruva Devi Shah, is a homemaker. Growing up in a culturally rich environment, Balen developed an early interest in music and social issues.

Balen pursued his education in civil engineering at the White House Institute of Technology in Kathmandu. Furthering his academic credentials, he completed a master’s degree in structural engineering from Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology in Karnataka, India. His academic background laid a strong foundation for his future endeavors in both engineering and music.

From Rapper to Political Activist

Balen’s foray into music began in 2012, when he became active in Nepal’s underground hip-hop scene. His music, often categorized as ‘Nephop’ (Nepali hip-hop), addressed pressing social issues such as corruption, inequality, and the struggles of the common man. Songs like “Aam Nepali Buba” and “Police Patraikar” resonated with the masses, especially the youth, due to their raw and relatable lyrics.

Beyond his musical talents, Balen’s activism became evident during the 2015 economic blockade imposed by India. He actively participated in relief efforts, providing aid to affected communities. His commitment to social causes further solidified his image as a leader who genuinely cared for the welfare of the people.

The 2022 Mayoral Election- A Historic Victory

In May 2022, Kathmandu witnessed a political upheaval when Balen Shah, running as an independent candidate, contested the mayoral election. His opponents included Sirjana Singh from the Nepali Congress and Keshav Sthapit from the Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Marxist-Leninist). Against all odds, Balen emerged victorious, securing 61,767 votes, while Singh garnered 38,341 votes. His win was a testament to the growing disillusionment with traditional political parties and the desire for fresh leadership.

Balen’s campaign was characterized by its simplicity and directness. He focused on issues that mattered most to the common people, such as infrastructure development, transparency, and efficient governance. His approach resonated with the electorate, leading to his unprecedented victory.

Leadership as Kathmandu’s Mayor

Since assuming office, Mayor Balen Shah has initiated several reforms aimed at modernizing Kathmandu’s infrastructure and governance. One of his notable actions was the introduction of live broadcasts for municipal council meetings, promoting transparency and public participation. Additionally, he has emphasized the importance of digital governance, aiming to make municipal services more accessible and efficient.

His leadership style is often described as dynamic and hands-on. He is frequently seen interacting with citizens, addressing their concerns, and ensuring that development projects are executed promptly. This proactive approach has earned him the admiration of many Kathmandu residents.

The Gen Z Movement and Shah’s Role

In 2025, Nepal experienced a significant political crisis when widespread youth-led protests erupted across the country. The protests, primarily driven by Generation Z, were fueled by frustrations over corruption, economic inequality, and government censorship of social media platforms. The movement culminated in the resignation of Prime Minister K.P. Sharma Oli.

Throughout the protests, Balen Shah maintained a supportive stance. While he did not participate directly due to age restrictions, he voiced his solidarity with the youth and encouraged them to lead the nation towards a more transparent and accountable future. His support further solidified his status as a leader who genuinely understands and represents the aspirations of the younger generation.

Public Perception and Media Coverage

Balen’s rise in politics has garnered significant media attention both within Nepal and internationally. He has been featured in various global publications, highlighting his unique journey from rapper to mayor. His ability to connect with the youth and challenge the status quo has made him a subject of interest for political analysts and journalists alike.

However, his unconventional path has also attracted criticism. Some detractors question his lack of experience in traditional politics and governance. Nevertheless, his supporters argue that his fresh perspective is precisely what Nepal needs to break free from the shackles of traditional political paradigms.

Challenges and Criticisms

Despite his popularity, Balen Shah faces several challenges. His independent status means he lacks the support of a major political party, which can sometimes hinder the implementation of policies. Additionally, the entrenched political establishment often views his rise as a threat, leading to attempts to undermine his efforts.

Moreover, the expectations placed upon him are immense. As a leader who represents change, there is constant pressure to deliver tangible results. Balancing the aspirations of the youth with the realities of governance remains a delicate task.

Future Prospects- Is Shah Nepal’s Next Prime Minister

Given the current political climate and the support he enjoys among the youth, discussions have begun about Balen Shah’s potential candidacy for the position of Prime Minister. Many believe that his leadership qualities, combined with his understanding of the challenges faced by the younger generation, make him a suitable candidate for the nation’s highest office.

However, Balen has remained non-committal regarding such aspirations. He continues to focus on his responsibilities as the mayor, emphasizing the importance of grassroots development and public welfare. Whether he will take the plunge into national politics remains to be seen.

A New Era in Nepali Politics

Balen Shah’s journey from an underground rapper to the mayor of Kathmandu is a testament to the changing dynamics of Nepali politics. His rise signifies a shift towards a more inclusive and youth-centric political landscape. As Nepal stands at a crossroads, leaders like Balen offer a glimpse into a future where governance is more transparent, accountable, and attuned to the needs of the people.

In a country where traditional political structures have often been criticized for their inefficiency and corruption, Balen Shah represents a beacon of hope. His story inspires many to believe that change is possible and that the youth have the power to shape the nation’s destiny.

Nepal,Sep.09,2025:The unrest turned deadly when police met protests with harsh force—live bullets, rubber rounds, and tear gas. At least 19 people were killed, with over 100 injured, marking one of Nepal’s bloodiest political days in decades-

Gen Z Protests in Nepal Ignite Nationwide Chaos

Gen Z protests in Nepal began as a localized outcry over a sudden social media ban but quickly amplified into something much more dramatic and desperate. Fueled by frustrations with censorship, corruption, and limited opportunities, the youth-led demonstrations snowballed into a formidable force demanding change.

Social Media Ban Fuels Young People’s Fury

The protests were triggered by a government-imposed ban on social media platforms such as Facebook, X, YouTube, and others—ostensibly due to failure to register with local regulators. But citizens, especially young Nepalese, saw it as authoritarian overreach restricting free expression. The move backfired, pushing young people into the streets in droves.

Deadly Confrontations- 19 Lives Lost

The unrest turned deadly when police met protests with harsh force—live bullets, rubber rounds, and tear gas. At least 19 people were killed, with over 100 injured, marking one of Nepal’s bloodiest political days in decades. Protesters set fire to politicians’ homes and even the parliament, as rioting spiraled across Kathmandu.

Oli’s Resignation- A Step Toward Political Redemption?

Amid escalating chaos, Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli resigned on September 9, 2025, acknowledging the extraordinary turmoil and signaling a concession to political pressure. His resignation was announced just after the prime minister’s residence was stormed, and a curfew was imposed across affected regions.

Official Response- Lifting the Ban and Promise of Inquiry

In a rapid government reversal, the social media ban was lifted on the same day as the resignation. Authorities promised compensation to victims’ families, free treatment for the injured, and a formal inquiry panel to report within 15 days on what went wrong and how to prevent future tragedies.

The Bigger Picture- Youth Disillusionment and Governance Crisis

These Gen Z protests in Nepal reflect much deeper societal issues: a generation disillusioned with entrenched corruption, political privilege (“Nepo Kids”), and economic stagnation. The youth’s rage was as much about broken promises as it was about digital freedoms.

Global Implications and Next Steps

Nepal’s upheaval sends ripples beyond its borders. Regional powers like India and China are watching closely, given their political and strategic ties with Kathmandu. The mass resignation and promised reforms pose the question: can Nepal heal, reform, and avoid repeating history?

Gen Z Protests in Nepal

• Youth-led uprising over digital censorship and systemic injustice.
• Fierce police response leads to 19 deaths, escalating unrest.
• Prime Minister Oli resigns amid national crisis.
• Authorities reverse ban, vow reparations and investigation.
• The protests signify deeper discontent and a call for genuine change.

Japan,Sep.08,2025: Japanese First far-right surge is more than a headline—it’s a seismic shift reshaping Japan’s traditionally centrist political landscape. The rise of Sanseitō, under the banner “Japanese First,” is challenging decades-old power structures and redefining voter priorities.

What Is the Japanese First Far-Right Surge

The Japanese First far-right surge refers to the rapid ascension of Sanseitō, a far-right, ultraconservative party founded in 2020. Emerging from YouTube-driven conspiracy narratives during COVID-19, it has captured attention—and seats—in Japan’s national politics.

Led by Sohei Kamiya, a YouTuber-turned-politician, Sanseidō advocates nativist, anti-immigration, anti-LGBTQ+, and anti-globalist policies, drawing comparisons to Trump-style populism.

Shocking Truths Behind the Surge

Trump-Inspired Strategy

Kamiya explicitly cites U.S. President Donald Trump’s bold political style as inspiration. Critics even dub him “Japan’s Donald Trump,” noting parallels in approach and messaging.

Electoral Breakthrough in Upper House

In July 2025’s Upper House election, Sanseidō catapulted from a single seat (in 2022) to 14–15 seats. This leap dramatically weakened the ruling coalition’s parliamentary grip.

Nativist Messaging that Resonates

The party’s “Japanese First” campaign taps into unease over immigration, perceived elite influence, and economic strain. Phrases like “silent invasion” struck a nerve with voters frustrated by the status quo.

A Warning Sign for the LDP

This Japanese First far-right surge is not just about Sanseidō—it exposes cracks in the long-dominant Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), now losing its grip after decades in power.

Implications for Japanese Politics

• Political Fragmentation: Sanseidō’s growth complicates LDP’s dominance and may force coalition-building or policy concessions.
• Populist Influence: Its success signals the rise of populist messaging over traditional consensus-driven politics.
• Policy Shifts: Expect tighter immigration rules, nationalist rhetoric, and harsher stances on social issues.
• Media’s Power: This surge underscores how social platforms like YouTube can reshape political narratives.

The Japanese First far-right surge isn’t a footnote—it’s a political earthquake. Sanseidō has disrupted Japan’s centrist equilibrium, emboldening nationalist voices and marking a turning point in modern Japanese politics. Whether this is a lasting realignment or a protest wave remains to be seen—but it has already left a significant mark.

Jaipur, Sep.06,2025:In recent discussions, Rajasthan’s former Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot has highlighted the accuracy of Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s earlier predictions regarding the Goods and Services Tax-

In recent discussions, Rajasthan’s former Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot has highlighted the accuracy of Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s earlier predictions regarding the Goods and Services Tax (GST). Gehlot emphasized that Gandhi had foreseen the challenges that GST would pose to various sectors, particularly traders. This acknowledgment underscores the importance of timely and effective policy implementation to address the concerns of the business community.

Rahul Gandhi’s Early Predictions on GST

During the initial rollout of GST in 2017, Rahul Gandhi criticized the tax structure, labeling it as the “Gabbar Singh Tax” due to its complexity and the burdens it imposed on small and medium enterprises (SMEs). He argued that the tax regime was designed in a way that disproportionately affected these businesses, leading to widespread distress among traders. Gandhi’s assertions were based on his understanding of the economic landscape and the challenges faced by the business community.

Ashok Gehlot’s Acknowledgment

Ashok Gehlot recently acknowledged that nearly every prediction made by Rahul Gandhi regarding GST has proven to be correct. Gehlot emphasized that the concerns raised by Gandhi about the adverse effects of GST on traders and consumers were valid and have materialized over time. He criticized the government’s delayed response to these issues and called for immediate reforms to alleviate the burdens on the business community.

Challenges Faced by Traders

The implementation of GST introduced several challenges for traders, including:

• Complex Compliance Requirements: Traders had to navigate multiple tax slabs and intricate filing procedures, leading to confusion and increased compliance costs.
• Cash Flow Issues: The upfront tax payments required under GST strained the cash flow of many small businesses, affecting their operations.
• Technological Barriers: The need for digital literacy and access to technology posed challenges for traders, especially in rural areas.

These issues have led to widespread dissatisfaction among the trading community, highlighting the need for a more trader-friendly tax system.

Government’s Response and Reforms

In response to the challenges faced by traders, the government has initiated several reforms to simplify the GST structure:

• Rationalization of Tax Slabs: The government has reduced the number of tax slabs to ease the compliance burden on traders.
• Simplification of Filing Procedures: Efforts have been made to streamline the filing process, making it more user-friendly.
• Introduction of GST 2.0: Discussions are underway for the introduction of GST 2.0, aimed at further simplifying the tax regime and addressing the concerns of traders.

While these reforms are steps in the right direction, experts argue that more needs to be done to create a truly trader-friendly tax environment.

The Need for a Simplified Tax Structure

Experts and industry leaders advocate for a single tax slab under GST to simplify the tax structure and reduce compliance costs. A unified tax rate would eliminate the complexities associated with multiple slabs and make the system more transparent and efficient. Additionally, enhancing digital infrastructure and providing training to traders can help bridge the technological divide and ensure smoother implementation of GST reforms.

The acknowledgment by Ashok Gehlot of Rahul Gandhi’s accurate predictions regarding GST underscores the importance of considering the perspectives of all stakeholders in policy formulation. The challenges faced by traders highlight the need for continuous dialogue between the government and the business community to create a tax system that is equitable, efficient, and conducive to economic growth. As discussions continue on the future of GST, it is crucial to prioritize the concerns of traders to ensure the success of the tax regime.

New Delhi, Sep.06,2025:On September 8, 2025, a pivotal virtual summit of the BRICS nations—Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—will convene to address the escalating trade tensions stemming from U.S. tariff policies. In a notable shift, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi will not attend the summit; instead, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar will represent India. This development underscores India’s strategic approach to navigating complex international trade dynamics.

BRICS Virtual Summit Details

The summit, hosted by Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, aims to formulate a unified response to the U.S. administration’s recent tariff impositions. These tariffs have disrupted global trade flows, prompting BRICS nations to seek collaborative solutions. The meeting is expected to culminate in a joint statement outlining the group’s collective stance on these trade issues.

India’s Representation

The decision for External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar to attend the summit instead of Prime Minister Modi reflects India’s diplomatic strategy. This move allows India to engage in multilateral discussions while maintaining a balanced relationship with the United States. Minister Jaishankar has emphasized the importance of continued engagement with the U.S., highlighting the significance of the India-U.S. partnership.

U.S. Tariff Policies and Their Impact

The U.S. administration’s imposition of tariffs on BRICS nations, including a 25% additional tariff on Indian goods, has raised concerns among these countries. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick outlined three conditions for removing these tariffs: India must cease purchasing oil from Russia, exit the BRICS grouping, and align more closely with U.S. policies.

These conditions have sparked debates within India, with officials asserting that the nation’s oil purchases from Russia are driven by economic considerations rather than political alignment.

Brazil’s Role and Leadership

As the current chair of BRICS, Brazil has taken a proactive role in addressing the challenges posed by U.S. tariff policies. President Lula’s leadership aims to strengthen multilateral cooperation among BRICS nations and counteract what is perceived as unilateral trade actions by the U.S.

India’s Strategic Position

India’s participation in the BRICS virtual summit, led by Minister Jaishankar, reflects the country’s commitment to multilateralism and strategic autonomy. While engaging with BRICS, India continues to value its relationship with the United States, navigating the complexities of global trade and diplomacy.

The upcoming BRICS virtual summit represents a critical juncture for member nations to address the challenges posed by U.S. tariff policies. India’s representation by External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar underscores the nation’s balanced approach to international relations, emphasizing the importance of both multilateral engagement and bilateral partnerships. As the summit approaches, the global community watches closely to see how BRICS nations will collectively respond to the evolving trade landscape.

US,Sep.06,2025:The recent exchange between President Trump and Prime Minister Modi highlights the complexities of international relations in a multipolar world

A Diplomatic Roller Coaster

In a surprising turn of events, former U.S. President Donald Trump has expressed unwavering support for Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, describing him as a “true friend” and a “great Prime Minister.” This declaration comes amid escalating trade tensions between the two nations, raising questions about the future trajectory of India-US relations.

The relationship between the United States and India has been marked by periods of cooperation and discord. While both nations have shared interests in countering China’s influence in the Indo-Pacific region, recent developments have tested the strength of their partnership.

Tariffs and Trade Wars

The current strain in India-US relations can be traced back to a series of trade disputes. In early September 2025, President Trump imposed a 50% tariff on Indian goods, citing India’s high tariffs on U.S. imports and its continued purchase of discounted Russian oil. These actions were perceived by India as unfair and damaging to their economic interests.

The imposition of these tariffs was accompanied by strong rhetoric from the Trump administration, labeling India as a “very big abuser” of trade relations. This characterization angered Indian officials and led to a reassessment of the bilateral trade framework.

Trump’s Reversal- A Friend in Need

Despite the harsh measures, President Trump has recently reversed course, emphasizing the enduring strength of the India-US relationship. In a press conference, he stated, “I will always be a friend of Modi,” signaling a desire to mend fences and restore diplomatic ties.

This shift in tone is seen as an attempt to stabilize relations and prevent further deterioration. Analysts suggest that the reversal may be motivated by strategic considerations, including the need to maintain a counterbalance to China’s growing influence in the region.

Modi’s Response-Strengthening Strategic Ties

Prime Minister Modi has responded to President Trump’s overtures with measured optimism. In a statement, he expressed appreciation for Trump’s remarks and reaffirmed India’s commitment to a strong and strategic partnership with the United States.

Modi’s response underscores India’s diplomatic approach of balancing relations with major powers while safeguarding its national interests. By reciprocating Trump’s sentiments, Modi aims to keep the door open for dialogue and cooperation, even amidst challenges.

The Global Implications- A Shifting Geopolitical Landscape

The recent developments in India-US relations have broader implications for global geopolitics. As the U.S. and India navigate their differences, both nations are also recalibrating their relationships with other global players.

India’s strengthened ties with Russia and China, exemplified by joint appearances at a military parade in Beijing, signal a diversification of its foreign policy. This pivot may be influenced by the need to hedge against uncertainties in U.S. policy and to assert strategic autonomy.

For the United States, the challenge lies in managing its relations with India while addressing concerns over trade imbalances and geopolitical alignments. The evolving dynamics necessitate a nuanced approach to diplomacy and international engagement.

Navigating the Future of India-US Relations

The recent exchange between President Trump and Prime Minister Modi highlights the complexities of international relations in a multipolar world. While trade tensions have tested the India-US partnership, both leaders have expressed a willingness to engage and find common ground.

Moving forward, the trajectory of India-US relations will depend on continued dialogue, mutual respect, and a shared commitment to addressing global challenges. By focusing on areas of convergence and managing differences constructively, both nations can work towards a more stable and cooperative future.

US, Sep.05,2025:Insiders report inconsistent messaging: while Trump’s aides like Rubio pushed for softer trade terms, others doubled down, deepening diplomatic

Lost India and Russia to China Comment Ignites Global Buzz

Lost India and Russia to China Comment opens with Donald Trump’s blunt post on Truth Social, writing:

“Looks like we’ve lost India and Russia to deepest, darkest, China. May they have a long and prosperous future together!”

This darkly ironic remark came alongside a photo of Indian Prime Minister Modi, Russian President Putin, and China’s Xi Jinping, visibly signaling a shift in global alignments.

Trump’s Tariffs Sparked the Rift

This bold comment unfolded amid escalating U.S.–India tensions, as Trump’s administration slapped sweeping 50% tariffs on Indian goods—25% reciprocal plus a 25% penalty tied to India’s Russian oil imports.

Insiders report inconsistent messaging: while Trump’s aides like Rubio pushed for softer trade terms, others doubled down, deepening diplomatic destabilization.

SCO Summit Symbolizes Shifted Loyalties

At the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit in Tianjin, Modi, Putin, and Xi displayed striking unity—sharing candid conversations and stage presence.

This convergence echoed across the global media as a dramatic realignment, one that Trump himself immediately acknowledged.

Indian Industries Brace for Impact

Trump’s punitive tariffs are hitting India hard. Key sectors like textiles, footwear, seafood, and leather face massive losses—with estimates suggesting up to £45 billion could be wiped off, potentially shaving 1% off India’s GDP.

Factories in Tirupur have already shuttered. India is urgently seeking alternate markets like Japan and South Korea.

Fallout and Future Prospects

Strategists now warn of broader fallout: destabilized trust, potential shifts toward multipolar alliances, and a setback in Indo-U.S. cooperation on regional security.

With uncertainty looming, global observers are watching closely—this could mark the most consequential dip in U.S.–India relations in decades.

This Lost India and Russia to China Comment reflects more than a flippant tweet. It symbolizes geopolitical fractures, economic retaliation, and shifting loyalties—all wrapped in cutting irony. As alliances reshape, the world watches closely, seeking the next move in this high-stakes game.