Politics
Political Fallout: Sonia Gandhi’s “Poor Thing” Remark on President Murmu Draws Criticism

Contents
Introduction to the Privilege Motion
A privilege motion serves as a vital mechanism within parliamentary proceedings, allowing members to address grievances arising from the improper conduct or remarks of another member. This motion underscores the importance of maintaining decorum and respect in legislative discourse, ensuring that all members can operate within a framework that upholds dignity and credibility. When a privilege motion is introduced, it necessitates a response and thorough examination, allowing the parliament to address any perceived breaches of privilege.
The significance of privilege motions lies in their ability to protect the rights of parliamentarians and maintain the integrity of parliamentary operations. In essence, such motions can serve as a tool to confront inappropriate statements or conduct that may tarnish the fabric of legislative responsibility. By raising a privilege motion, members signify their intent to uphold the foundational principles of parliamentary democracy, thereby influencing the political dynamics within the legislature.
In the current context, the privilege motion against Sonia Gandhi stems from her recent remarks concerning President Droupadi Murmu. The comments have sparked intense debate and criticism, thereby elevating the political tension surrounding this issue. As discussions progress, the implications of the privilege motion extend beyond the immediate response to Gandhi’s remarks; they also encapsulate a broader narrative concerning the treatment of political figures and the conduct expected from members of the ruling and opposition parties.
This development not only impacts Sonia Gandhi and her party but also sets a precedent for how remarks about constitutional authorities are perceived in the political landscape. Understanding the ramifications of such a motion will provide insights into the intricate relationship between lawmakers and the institutions they represent, shedding light on the evolving nature of parliamentary etiquette in India.
Background on Sonia Gandhi’s Remarks
The controversy surrounding Sonia Gandhi’s remarks regarding President Droupadi Murmu has generated significant political discourse in recent weeks. These statements were made during a public address where Gandhi criticized certain government practices while simultaneously addressing issues faced by marginalized communities. Her comments, while ostensibly aimed at policy critique, attracted intense scrutiny due to the context in which they were delivered and the implications they held for the current socio-political climate. The occasion attracted numerous leaders from various political factions, with Gandhi underscoring the importance of representation in governance, particularly in relation to tribal communities and gender.
Gandhi’s remarks implied a dichotomy between her party’s vision for inclusivity and the ruling party’s actions, leading to immediate backlash from members of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). Many BJP leaders viewed her statements as an affront to President Murmu, who is the first tribal woman to hold the presidential office in India. Consequently, they labeled her comments as disrespectful and indicative of a broader trend of undermining the significance of marginalized leadership in contemporary Indian politics. This triggered the filing of the privilege motion against Gandhi, illustrating how political rhetoric can swiftly escalate into calls for accountability within legislative bodies.
The incident reflects not only the high stakes involved in political discourse but also highlights the contentious atmosphere prevalent in Indian politics today. Gandhi’s remarks have divided opinion across party lines, with supporters arguing for the necessity of her critique in addressing systemic inequities, while critics maintain that her statements reflect a lack of respect for constitutional offices. As the political stage continues to evolve, the repercussions of this episode may influence future interactions within and beyond the legislature.
Who is President Murmu? A Brief Profile
Droupadi Murmu, the current President of India, is a prominent political figure who has made history as the first tribal woman to hold the nation’s highest office. Born on June 20, 1958, in the Mayurbhanj district of Odisha, she hails from the Santhal tribe, a significant community in the region. Her early education took place in local schools, before she pursued further studies at the Rama Devi Women’s College in Bhubaneswar, where she earned a Bachelor’s degree in Arts. Her humble beginnings and educational journey symbolize her resilience and commitment to public service.

Murmu’s political career commenced in the late 1990s when she joined the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). Over the years, she held various important roles within the party, including that of a state leader. Her political acumen was evident during her tenure as the Governor of Jharkhand from 2015 to 2021, where she became the first tribal woman to occupy that position as well. As Governor, she focused on social justice and development issues, particularly those affecting marginalized communities, showcasing her dedication to public welfare.
In July 2022, Droupadi Murmu was elected as the 15th President of India, marking a significant milestone in India’s political landscape. Her election represents a landmark moment for tribal communities and women in India, as it symbolizes their representation at the highest echelons of power. Murmu’s presidency is characterized by her commitment to inclusive governance, social equity, and empowerment of the underprivileged. Through her leadership, she has the opportunity to influence policies aimed at the betterment of marginalized sections of society. Her journey from a tribal background to the presidency serves as an inspirational narrative for many, highlighting the importance of diversity and representation in Indian politics.
Political Reactions to Sonia Gandhi’s Statement
Sonia Gandhi’s remarks regarding President Droupadi Murmu have sparked widespread political reactions, illustrating the divisions within Indian politics. The ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) was quick to condemn her statements, accusing Gandhi of undermining the dignity of the presidency. Prominent BJP leaders described her comments as disrespectful, arguing that such remarks are indicative of a broader pattern of the opposition’s disregard for constitutional offices. The BJP’s response reflects a strategic positioning to rally its base around the idea of protecting institutional integrity, particularly emphasizing the significance of Murmu’s position as India’s first tribal woman president.
On the other hand, leaders from the Indian National Congress defended Sonia Gandhi, asserting that her comments were misinterpreted and taken out of context. They argued that Gandhi was highlighting the importance of respecting all individuals in holding high offices, regardless of their background. Several Congress spokespersons took to social media platforms to articulate that the ruling party’s outrage was a diversion from pressing issues facing the nation, such as unemployment and inflation. This indicates a tactical approach by the Congress party, showcasing its commitment to social justice while attempting to shift the narrative back to pressing national issues.
Political analysts have weighed in on the controversy, suggesting that this incident could have lasting implications for alliances and electoral strategies ahead of upcoming state elections. Some experts predict that the BJP may leverage this incident to reinforce its narrative of patriotism and respect for institutions, while the opposition could use it as an opportunity to rally support for their platform and challenge the ruling party’s governance. The contrasting political strategies underscore a complex landscape where every remark can be analyzed for its potential electoral ramifications, making this incident a focal point in the ongoing political discourse in India.
The Concept of Parliamentary Privilege
Parliamentary privilege is a legal immunity granted to members of the legislature, allowing them to perform their duties without interference from external forces, such as the judiciary or law enforcement. This privilege is rooted in the principle of protecting the legislative process, ensuring that legislators can discuss and deliberate freely on matters of public interest. It serves as a foundational element in maintaining the integrity and independence of parliamentary proceedings.
There are two primary dimensions to parliamentary privilege: freedom of speech and the exclusive jurisdiction of the legislature. The former allows parliamentarians to express their views and opinions during debates without the fear of being sued for defamation or facing other legal repercussions. This ensures a robust and vigorous exchange of ideas, essential for a healthy democracy. On the other hand, exclusive jurisdiction confers upon the parliament the authority to determine its internal affairs and procedural rules, limiting the intervention of outside entities in legislative matters.
Beyond its legal aspects, the importance of parliamentary privilege lies in its role as a safeguard against political pressures and attempts to stifle dissent. In situations where a legislator’s statements or actions are called into question, as is the case with the privilege motion against Sonia Gandhi, the implications can be far-reaching. Such motions reflect the gravity with which incidents involving parliamentary privilege are treated, reinforcing the idea that members of parliament must be held accountable for their conduct. However, they also underscore the need for safeguarding lawmakers against undue influence, allowing them to fulfill their constitutional responsibilities effectively.
In light of these considerations, examining the intricacies of parliamentary privilege is essential to grasp the broader context of the ongoing discussions and controversies surrounding legislative actions, including the motion against Sonia Gandhi. Understanding this framework can enhance appreciation for the complexities involved in legislative interactions and the protections in place that uphold democratic values.
Implications of the Privilege Motion
The recent privilege motion against Sonia Gandhi regarding her comments on President Droupadi Murmu has significant implications for both her political career and the Congress party as a whole. This development could have profound effects on legislative processes within the Indian Parliament, shaping the dynamics between different political factions. In India’s complex political landscape, such motions are often viewed seriously, as they can signal breaches of parliamentary etiquette and decorum.
One immediate consequence of this privilege motion may be the potential for increased scrutiny on Gandhi’s remarks and actions. If this motion advances, it could result in a precedent where political leaders are held accountable for their statements, thus altering the way political debates are conducted. This may lead party members to exercise greater caution in their public speeches to avoid similar repercussions. Consequently, this could impede the Congress party’s ability to vocally criticize the ruling government, thereby affecting their overall legislative strategy.
Moreover, this situation could exacerbate divisions within the Congress party, particularly among those who support Gandhi and those who may feel their loyalty lies with broader party unity. A contentious privilege motion has the potential to erode party cohesion, leading to internal strife and dissatisfaction among party cadres. Furthermore, if party members perceive a lack of leadership or a miscalculation in handling such political controversies, it could diminish Gandhi’s influence and her ability to steer the party effectively.
Public perception will also play a vital role. As citizens and voters become increasingly aware of the implications of such motions, there may be a shift in how they view Gandhi’s leadership. A politically charged atmosphere can either galvanize support around her or lead to declining trust, depending on how the narrative unfolds in the media. Thus, the outcomes of this privilege motion could very well dictate the future political landscape for both Gandhi and the Congress party.
Historical Precedents of Privilege Motions in India
The concept of privilege motions has a significant historical background in the Indian Parliament, serving as a crucial mechanism for maintaining decorum and ensuring accountability among its members. Privilege motions have been raised on various grounds, primarily focusing on breaches of parliamentary privilege, which includes actions that disrespect the institution, its members, or undermine its dignity. Historically, these motions have often aimed to address perceived transgressions by politicians, officials, or even the media.
One of the early notable instances was the privilege motion raised against then-Prime Minister Indira Gandhi in 1975 when she was accused of misleading the House regarding the allocation of funds for certain social programs. The motion received significant attention and contributed to the political tensions that escalated into the Emergency period in India. This highlights how a privilege motion can not only address specific grievances but also affect broader political contexts and relations among various political factions.
More recently, in 2017, a privilege motion was introduced against a Member of Parliament for allegedly misusing parliamentary facilities during a public protest. The motion prompted lively debates regarding the proper conduct expected of elected officials and their accountability to the legislative assembly. The ensuing discussions played an essential role in reiterating the importance of maintaining ethical standards within the parliament’s operations.
Another significant instance occurred in 2019 when a privilege motion was brought against a minister who allegedly made derogatory remarks about a fellow parliamentarian. The motion led to widespread media coverage and intensified scrutiny on inter-party relationships within Parliament. Such historical instances demonstrate that privilege motions serve not only as tools for addressing specific grievances but also as catalysts for broader political discourse and reform. The outcomes of these motions can have lasting impacts on the political landscape, reflecting the ongoing evolution of parliamentary norms and practices in India.
Media Coverage and Public Opinion
The recent privilege motion against Sonia Gandhi has garnered significant media attention, sparking discussions across various platforms. News outlets have predominantly focused on the context surrounding Gandhi’s remarks regarding President Droupadi Murmu, exploring the implications of her statements. Major newspapers and television networks provided extensive coverage, highlighting not only the incident itself but also the ensuing political repercussions. Many articles emphasized how political dynamics are shifting in India, especially in the backdrop of a growing emphasis on respect towards constitutional authorities.
Opinion pieces have played a critical role in shaping public discourse about this situation. Several commentators have expressed concern over Gandhi’s choice of words and the potential impact on her political party, the Indian National Congress. Critics argue that her remarks reflect a broader issue of political decorum and respect for officeholders, which has shifted dramatically in recent years. On the other hand, supporters of Gandhi argue that her intent was misconstrued, defending her right to voice dissent in a democratic society. This dichotomy in opinion reflects a divided public sentiment and indicates the complexities involved in interpreting political discourse.
Social media platforms have also been instrumental in galvanizing public opinion. Twitter and Facebook have served as arenas for both condemnation and support, illustrating a wide array of perspectives. Hashtags related to the incident have trended, enabling users to express their views rapidly, and the virality of posts has often led to heated debates. Polls conducted online have shown mixed results, with some segments of the population firmly standing behind Gandhi, while others feel her remarks undermine the dignity of the presidency. The interplay between media representing various angles and public sentiment highlights the evolving relationship between politics and media in contemporary India.
Conclusion: The Future of Political Discourse in India
The recent privilege motion against Sonia Gandhi concerning her remarks on President Murmu has placed a spotlight on the evolving nature of political communication in India. This incident serves as a critical reminder of the heightened sensitivity surrounding public discourse and the consequences that can arise from seemingly innocuous statements made by political leaders. As the nation navigates its complex socio-political landscape, it is imperative for all politicians to engage in discourse that not only reflects their ideological positions but also upholds a standard of respect and civility.
In the context of Indian democracy, the interplay of privilege motions and political commentary raises intriguing questions about accountability and freedom of expression. Leaders must recognize that their words have the power to incite division or foster understanding amongst a diverse populace. This incident demonstrates the potential ramifications of political rhetoric, urging all parties to consider the broader implications of their statements. Such moments can serve as a catalyst for more circumspect communication strategies, compelling politicians to prioritize ethical dialogue over partisan attacks.
Furthermore, the current atmosphere challenges political actors to reassess how they engage with one another and with the electorate. As political debates become increasingly charged, the responsibility to promote decorum falls not only on individual leaders but also on political institutions and the media to cultivate an environment in which constructive criticism is the norm, rather than personal disparagement. This evolving landscape necessitates a commitment to dialogue characterized by integrity, minimizing inflammatory language that detracts from critical discussions.
The incident involving Sonia Gandhi and President Murmu is more than an isolated event; it embodies the potential for growth in political communication. If taken as a lesson, it could usher in a new era where discourse is enriched by mutual respect and an earnest commitment to democratic values, thus shaping a more resilient Indian democracy moving forward.
Bihar
Bihar Double Loot Allegations- Congress Accuses BJP of Giving 1,050 Acres to Adani at Rs.1-

Contents
New Delhi,Sep.16,2025:Bihar Double Loot has become the latest political flashpoint after Congress alleged that the ruling BJP has given away 1,050 acres of land in Bhagalpur to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s close associate, Gautam Adani, at a token rent of just Re 1 per year for 33 years-
Congress spokesperson Pawan Khera made these claims during a press conference in New Delhi, calling the deal a “shocking example of crony capitalism” that hurts both Bihar’s farmers and its citizens.
Why Congress Calls It a Double Loot
Congress argues that the deal amounts to a “double loot” of Bihar’s people:
- Land Grab at Throwaway Price – Farmers are losing their fertile land, and nearly 10 lakh trees are to be cut down.
- Expensive Electricity – The same people whose land and resources are used will have to buy electricity at ₹6.75 per unit.
Khera alleged-
“This is not development; this is Bihar Double Loot. Farmers lose land, forests vanish, and in the end, ordinary citizens are forced to pay more for electricity.”
Details of Bhagalpur Adani Power Project
The controversial project involves setting up a 2,400 MW power plant in Bhagalpur district.
Key Details as Alleged by Congress–
- Land Allocated: 1,050 acres
- Lease Period: 33 years
- Annual Rent: Re 1
- Trees Affected: Nearly 10 lakh
- Project Budget: ₹21,400 crore
- Power Tariff: ₹6.75 per unit
Initially, the plant was announced in the Budget as a government initiative. Later, Congress claims, it was handed over to Adani Group without transparency.
Election Timing and Political Accusations
The timing of the deal has raised eyebrows. Bihar is heading for Assembly elections, and opposition parties allege that this “sweetheart deal” is meant to secure corporate backing.
Khera further claimed similar patterns in other states:
- Maharashtra: Dharavi redevelopment handed to Adani before polls.
- Jharkhand & Chhattisgarh: Big projects awarded to Adani before elections.
Congress is projecting this as a nationwide strategy of “loot before vote.”
Crony Capitalism vs Development Debate
This controversy reignites the old debate on crony capitalism. Opposition parties have long accused the Modi government of favoring select industrialists like Adani and Ambani.
BJP, on the other hand, defends private participation, arguing that it brings investment, jobs, and growth.
For reference: The Hindu report on crony capitalism accusations outlines similar debates.
Impact on Farmers and Environment
The most direct impact of this alleged Bihar Double Loot will be felt by:
- Farmers: Losing ancestral land without fair compensation.
- Environment: Nearly 10 lakh trees cut, worsening Bihar’s already fragile ecosystem.
- Villagers: Displacement and loss of livelihoods.
Environmental activists warn that such projects may cause long-term ecological damage.
How Similar Deals Happened Before Elections
Congress highlighted a trend:
- In Maharashtra, Adani bagged the Dharavi project before state elections.
- In Jharkhand, coal blocks were allotted to Adani-linked firms just before polls.
- In Chhattisgarh, energy projects were cleared weeks before elections.
This repetition strengthens the opposition’s claim that “corporate deals” are linked with political calendars.
What BJP and Adani Say
So far, BJP has not officially responded to these fresh allegations.
In earlier cases, BJP leaders have argued that:
- Large-scale projects boost infrastructure.
- Private companies create jobs.
- Power generation helps tackle Bihar’s energy crisis.
The Adani Group has also previously dismissed such allegations, saying all projects are won through a fair bidding process.
Public Reactions in Bihar
On the ground, reactions are mixed:
- Farmers & activists oppose land acquisition, calling it exploitation.
- Urban middle class worry about rising electricity bills.
- Some traders support the project, expecting better power supply and jobs.
This divide could shape the 2025 Bihar Assembly elections narrative.
Expert Opinions on the Alleged Double Loot
Political experts say the “Bihar Double Loot” slogan could become a major weapon for Congress in rural areas.
- Economists argue that selling electricity at ₹6.75 per unit from land given almost free raises questions of fairness.
- Political analysts note that if BJP fails to counter the narrative, it may dent their pro-development image.
Bihar Politics at Crossroads
The Bihar Double Loot controversy highlights the clash between development promises and accusations of crony capitalism.
While BJP projects itself as the driver of growth, Congress and the opposition are painting it as corporate favouritism at the cost of common people.
With elections looming, this issue may dominate Bihar’s political stage. Whether it changes voter behaviour or gets lost in larger narratives remains to be seen.
Breaking News
India-US Relations 2025, John Bolton Trump Advice, US-India Trade Tensions, Indo-US Diplomacy, Russia Oil Tariffs India-

Contents
US, Sep.13,2025:Speaking to the media, Bolton highlighted that the India-US relationship remains largely unchanged, but India must remain cautious of Trump’s unstable policy patterns-
India-US Relations 2025 at a Crossroads
The India-US Relations 2025 debate has intensified after former US National Security Advisor John Bolton made striking remarks on America’s policies toward India, particularly during Donald Trump’s presidency.
Bolton, known for his blunt and hawkish diplomatic views, argued that Washington’s unpredictable stance under Trump complicated trade and energy ties between the two nations. His comments have reignited discussions about whether India should adjust its approach in dealing with US administrations that follow different foreign policy styles.
John Bolton’s Latest Statement on Bilateral Ties
Speaking to the media, Bolton highlighted that the India-US relationship remains largely unchanged, but India must remain cautious of Trump’s unstable policy patterns.
He emphasized that while multiple concerns exist, the biggest flashpoint has been the 25% tariff imposed on Indian oil and gas imports from Russia. This penalty, according to Bolton, was symbolic of Trump’s erratic foreign policy choices.
“India should treat Trump as a one-off situation and act strictly in its national interest,” Bolton advised.
Trump’s Unpredictability and Its Impact on India
One of the key takeaways from Bolton’s remarks is Trump’s unpredictability in handling global affairs.
- Trump imposed tariffs on Indian firms purchasing Russian energy.
- He did not impose similar restrictions on China, Turkey, or Pakistan, even though they buy more Russian energy than India.
This inconsistency, Bolton argues, underscores the instability in Trump’s decision-making. For India, such unpredictability creates uncertainty in bilateral economic ties and strategic cooperation.
Why Russia Oil Imports Became a Flashpoint
At the heart of the tension lies India’s purchase of Russian oil and gas. The US imposed a 25% tariff on these imports, claiming it was necessary to reduce the trade deficit and discourage buying from sanctioned Russian firms.
But the question remains: why target India specifically?
- India’s energy dependency: India is the third-largest oil importer in the world.
- Russian supplies: India increased purchases of discounted Russian crude after Western sanctions post-Ukraine conflict.
- Washington’s move: By penalizing Indian firms, the Trump administration aimed to push New Delhi closer to US-aligned energy suppliers.
For India, however, diversifying energy sources is a matter of national security rather than politics.
China, Turkey, and Pakistan Not Penalized
Bolton pointed out what many analysts describe as double standards in Trump’s policy. While India was penalized, China, a far larger buyer of Russian oil, faced no such tariffs.
Similarly, Turkey and Pakistan continued purchasing Russian energy without significant US penalties.
This selective targeting raises questions: was India singled out because it is seen as a rising power that Washington wants to pressure, or was it a tactical miscalculation?
Are India-US Relations Really Stagnant? Bolton’s Take
Despite the tension, Bolton insists that the India-US relationship has not fundamentally changed.
Trade, defense cooperation, and diplomatic dialogue remain active. The Quad alliance (India, US, Japan, Australia) continues joint military exercises, and technology transfers between Washington and New Delhi are expanding.
However, the strain caused by tariff disputes cannot be ignored. Bolton’s advice: treat Trump’s policy as temporary and avoid long-term disruption in the strategic partnership.
Strategic Lessons for India- How to Handle Trump
Bolton’s most significant recommendation was strategic:
- Do not overreact: Treat Trump’s tariffs as temporary.
- Prioritize national interest: Continue energy imports if essential for India’s economy.
- Maintain balance: Engage the US diplomatically but do not sacrifice ties with Russia.
This aligns with India’s long-standing policy of strategic autonomy, ensuring flexibility in foreign relations.
India’s Balancing Act Between US and Russia
The India-US Relations 2025 discussion cannot ignore India’s delicate balancing act.
- With Russia, India shares defense and energy cooperation.
- With the US, India shares trade, technology, and strategic alignment against China.
This dual-track diplomacy has been India’s trademark since the Cold War. Bolton’s comments simply underline that New Delhi should continue this approach rather than bend to Washington’s pressure.
Read analysis from Brookings.
Expert Opinions Beyond Bolton
Other foreign policy experts echo Bolton’s concerns.
- Richard Haass, former president of the Council on Foreign Relations, said that Trump’s transactional approach often weakened US alliances.
- C. Raja Mohan, an Indian foreign policy analyst, argues that India should hedge its bets by strengthening partnerships with Europe and Southeast Asia alongside the US.
This diversity of opinions shows that while Trump’s policies were disruptive, the long-term trajectory of India-US relations may remain stable.
The Future of India-US Relations 2025
So, what lies ahead for India-US Relations 2025?
- Trade tensions may continue if tariffs remain in place.
- Defense cooperation is likely to deepen, particularly with Indo-Pacific security in focus.
- Technology partnerships in AI, semiconductors, and cybersecurity are expected to grow.
- Energy diplomacy will be the most delicate issue, as India balances Russian supplies with American expectations.
The outcome will depend on whether future US administrations adopt a more predictable, rules-based foreign policy or continue Trump’s erratic style.
Bolton’s Advice in Perspective
John Bolton’s remarks on India-US Relations 2025 highlight both opportunities and challenges. His advice to India is clear:
- Do not panic over Trump’s policies.
- Keep national interest above foreign pressure.
- Recognize Trump as an exception, not the rule.
For India, this is not new advice—it aligns with New Delhi’s doctrine of multi-alignment. But coming from Bolton, a seasoned US policymaker, it carries weight in the ongoing debate.
Breaking News
Sushila Karki, Nepal’s first female Chief Justice, is now the country’s first interim woman Prime Minister-

Contents
Nepal,Sep.13,2025:Sushila Karki Nepal Interim Prime Minister is a phrase echoing across global headlines today. On Friday evening, after days of heated negotiations, Nepal appointed its first woman interim Prime Minister – Sushila Karki. A respected figure known for her integrity, she has stepped into leadership at one of the most turbulent moments in the country’s recent history.
Her appointment comes after the resignation of KP Sharma Oli, who was forced out of office amid massive anti-corruption protests led primarily by Nepal’s Gen Z population. These protests, marked by tragic violence and 51 confirmed deaths, have shaken the foundations of Nepal’s political establishment.
Why Sushila Karki Was Chosen
Nepalese President Ram Chandra Paudel administered the oath of office to Sushila Karki Nepal Interim Prime Minister late on Friday.
Her name emerged as a consensus candidate after youth groups, opposition leaders, and legal experts demanded someone with credibility, independence, and honesty. Karki’s reputation as a corruption fighter made her the strongest choice.
Even Kathmandu’s mayor, Balen Shah, a cultural icon among young Nepalis, voiced his support. On X (formerly Twitter), Shah wrote:
“The name put forward by the youth – former Chief Justice Sushila Karki – has my complete support to lead the interim government.”
Gen Z Protests and Youth Power
The road to Karki’s appointment was paved by Nepal’s Gen Z movement, a leaderless but powerful uprising fueled by social media.
- Protesters accused the Oli government of corruption, abuse of power, and a proposed social media ban that threatened free expression.
- Demonstrations swept through major cities, leading to clashes with police.
- According to police reports, 51 people have died so far in related events.
Karki acknowledged this tragedy in her first remarks, saying:
“My first priority will be the boys and girls who lost their lives in the protests. We must do something for them and their families who are in deep sorrow.”
This emotional connection with the youth explains why the Gen Z movement trusted her with interim leadership.
Balen Shah’s Role in the Movement
Another name tied closely to this political shift is Balen Shah, Kathmandu’s young mayor and a popular rapper.
- In 2022, Shah shocked traditional parties by defeating the Nepali Congress candidate Srijana Singh with over 61,000 votes.
- During the Gen Z protests, many called on Shah to resign as mayor and lead the national movement.
- Instead, he chose to remain in his post but actively supported the youth’s demands and endorsed Karki.
This blend of traditional leadership (Karki) and new-age influence (Shah) shows how Nepal’s politics is entering a new hybrid era.
Who is Sushila Karki
Born on June 7, 1952, in Biratnagar, eastern Nepal, Karki’s journey to becoming Sushila Karki Nepal Interim Prime Minister is extraordinary.
- Graduated from Biratnagar in 1972.
- Completed her post-graduate studies in Political Science at Banaras Hindu University (BHU), India in 1975.
- Earned a law degree from Tribhuvan University in 1978.
- Began her legal career in 1979 in Biratnagar while also teaching at Dharan’s Mahendra Multiple Campus.
Her rise in Nepal’s legal system was steady and groundbreaking.
Her Career as Nepal’s First Woman Chief Justice
Karki’s most historic role before becoming Prime Minister was her appointment as Nepal’s first female Chief Justice.
- Appointed as a temporary Supreme Court justice in 2009.
- Became a permanent justice in 2010.
- Served as Acting Chief Justice briefly in 2016.
- Officially led the judiciary from July 11, 2016 to June 6, 2017.
Her tenure was marked by tough anti-corruption rulings, which earned her both respect and enemies in the political establishment.
The Impeachment Controversy
In 2017, Karki was nearly removed from her position when the government tabled an impeachment motion against her.
- She was accused of bias and interference in government affairs.
- This led to her suspension as Chief Justice.
- However, widespread public outcry and support for judicial independence forced parliament to withdraw the motion.
This episode cemented her image as a fearless woman unwilling to bend under political pressure.
India Connection- Education and Memories
Karki’s bond with India goes beyond geopolitics. She studied at Banaras Hindu University in Varanasi, where she completed her master’s degree in Political Science.
In a recent interview with CNN-News18, she shared her fond memories:
“I still remember the Ganga river, my teachers, my friends, and the summer nights sitting on the hostel rooftop watching the flowing river.”
Her hometown Biratnagar is just 25 miles from the Indian border, and she frequently visited Indian markets. She also speaks Hindi, though she modestly admits it is “not perfect.”
On bilateral relations, she remarked:
“India and Nepal have always had close ties. Governments may change, but the people’s relationship remains strong.”
For more context on India–Nepal ties, see The Hindu’s coverage.
Nepal’s Political Crisis Explained
To understand the significance of Sushila Karki Nepal Interim Prime Minister, we must see the larger crisis.
- KP Sharma Oli resigned on Tuesday after mounting pressure.
- His tenure was marred by corruption scandals and attempts to regulate social media.
- The Gen Z protests revealed deep dissatisfaction with Nepal’s old political elite.
This crisis is not just about one leader – it is about Nepal’s struggle to reform its democratic institutions.
Challenges Ahead for the Interim PM
Karki faces enormous challenges-
- Conducting Free Elections – Her top mandate is to oversee credible elections.
- Restoring Order – Protests have left families grieving and public trust shaken.
- Fighting Corruption – The biggest demand from protesters remains the removal of corruption from Nepal’s political system.
- Balancing India and China – Nepal’s two giant neighbors will closely watch her tenure.
The appointment of Sushila Karki Nepal Interim Prime Minister is more than a change in leadership – it is a generational shift. She represents integrity, legal authority, and a bridge between the demands of the youth and the structures of the state.
Whether she can stabilize Nepal and guide it toward free elections will define not only her legacy but also the future of Nepali democracy.
Breaking News
The SCO Development Bank is set to reshape global finance by empowering Eurasian nations-

Contents
Tianjin, Sep.12,2025:The SCO Development Bank is emerging as one of the most talked-about financial institutions on the global stage. At a time when geopolitical tensions are high and nations are seeking alternatives to Western-dominated financial systems, this new initiative has the potential to reshape the global order.
Born out of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), the bank is not just another multilateral financial body—it symbolizes the growing desire of Eurasian nations to reduce dependence on the US dollar and create a multipolar world economy.
What is the SCO Development Bank
The SCO Development Bank is a proposed multilateral financial institution backed by China, Russia, and other SCO member nations. Its core mission is to provide infrastructure financing, boost trade, and create a stable financial alternative to Western-controlled institutions such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
According to Chinese officials, the bank will serve as a “new platform for multilateral cooperation” and will provide funds for roads, energy pipelines, hydropower plants, and cross-border transport projects.
A Decade in the Making
The idea of an SCO Development Bank was first floated by China in 2010. However, it faced resistance, especially from Russia, which preferred expanding its own Eurasian Development Bank (EDB).
Momentum picked up after 2022, when Western sanctions on Russia over the Ukraine war created urgency for alternative financial structures. By mid-2025, SCO leaders reached a “political consensus” to establish the bank, and during the Tianjin summit (August–September 2025), the plan was officially approved.
The Geopolitical Shift Behind the Bank
The launch of the SCO Development Bank comes at a critical juncture. Western financial sanctions against Russia, coupled with global dollar dominance, have triggered calls for financial sovereignty in Eurasia.
For China, the bank supports its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), strengthening trade routes and supply chains across Eurasia. For Russia and Iran, both heavily sanctioned, the bank provides a much-needed lifeline to bypass Western systems.
How SCO Development Bank Differs from BRICS Bank
Although comparisons with the BRICS New Development Bank (NDB) are inevitable, the SCO Development Bank has unique characteristics:
- Stronger focus on Central Asia (Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan).
- Direct alignment with Belt and Road corridors.
- Higher emphasis on energy, transport, and connectivity projects.
- Potential headquarters in Central Asia, rather than China, to show inclusivity.
Ways SCO Development Bank Could Reshape Global Finance
1. Boosting Infrastructure in Resource-Rich Nations
Countries like Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Kyrgyzstan are rich in natural resources but lack financing for infrastructure. The SCO Development Bank could provide capital for pipelines, mining projects, and hydropower plants.
2. Reducing Dollar Dependency
One of the bank’s main goals is to cut reliance on the US dollar. By encouraging settlements in Chinese yuan (renminbi) and local currencies, it could slowly weaken the dominance of Western currencies.
3. Expanding China’s Belt and Road Initiative
Through financing highways, railways, and ports, the SCO Development Bank will strengthen China’s BRI and cement its economic leadership in Eurasia.
4. Supporting Sanctioned States Like Russia and Iran
For Russia and Iran, both hit by Western sanctions, this bank provides a financial shield. It allows them to borrow, invest, and trade without relying on Western institutions.
5. Financing Energy and Transport Corridors
Energy pipelines, electricity grids, and transport networks across Eurasia could be financed directly, ensuring energy security and trade expansion.
6. Attracting New Members from Asia and Africa
Analysts predict that countries in Southeast Asia and Africa could seek membership, making the SCO Development Bank a global South powerhouse.
7. Promoting Multipolar Global Order
Above all, the bank symbolizes the push for a multipolar financial system—one where no single power dominates.
Challenges Facing SCO Development Bank
Despite its promise, the SCO Development Bank faces hurdles-
- Diverging interests of China, Russia, and India.
- Risk of US sanctions or trade retaliation.
- Ensuring credibility and transparency in lending.
- Competition with BRICS Bank and AIIB (Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank).
India’s Ambivalent Stance
India’s position on the SCO Development Bank remains cautious. While New Delhi supports multilateralism, it is wary of China’s dominance and fears antagonizing the US.
Analysts argue India may prefer to focus on bilateral infrastructure deals rather than fully embrace the bank.
The US and Western Response
The US views the SCO Development Bank as a direct challenge to its financial supremacy. Washington has in the past threatened tariffs and sanctions on countries that attempt to bypass the dollar system. Similar reactions could be expected if the SCO Bank grows rapidly.
Can SCO Bank Redefine Global Finance
The SCO Development Bank has the potential to become a transformative institution. By reducing dollar dependency, boosting regional connectivity, and supporting sanctioned economies, it could usher in a new financial era.
However, its success will depend on member unity, governance transparency, and resilience against Western pushback.
The creation of the SCO Development Bank marks a historic moment in global finance. More than just a financial body, it represents a broader vision—healing the financial divides of Eurasia and honouring the economic roles of emerging powers.
If implemented effectively, this institution could tilt the balance of global finance away from unilateral dominance toward a fairer, multipolar world order.
Breaking News
Vote theft proof by Rahul Gandhi explosive-revelations-

Contents
New Delhi, Sep.11,2025:Vote theft proof by Rahul Gandhi came into the spotlight again on 11 September 2025, when Rahul Gandhi, Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, announced that he has “dynamic, explosive proof” of widespread electoral fraud. He claimed that the slogan “vote chor, gaddi chhod” is now echoing throughout India, indicating public sentiment that votes are being stolen.
Gandhi says governments were formed via stolen votes in states such as Maharashtra, Haryana, and Karnataka, and he guarantees more evidence will be presented soon. He also used a striking metaphor: that a “hydrogen bomb” will “clear everything,” meaning his evidence will leave no shadows.
What led to the Vote Theft allegations
Previous claims and examples
Rahul Gandhi’s vote theft narrative began earlier, asserting irregularities in the preparation and revision of electoral rolls. He pointed particularly to Mahadevapura Assembly constituency in Karnataka, alleging duplicate entries, invalid father names, house numbers missing, etc.
He also highlighted cases in Bihar, where during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voter rolls, there were claims of names being removed. One case involved a person named Subodh Kumar, allegedly removed from draft rolls; the Election Commission of India (ECI) clarified that Kumar was never a voter but a booth-level agent.
Another case involved Ranju Devi, claimed by Gandhi to have been removed from the voter list, but ECI said her name was intact.
The Election Commission’s response so far
The ECI has repeatedly dismissed many of the claims as baseless or lacking formal structure. In several cases it has requested written declarations under oath per rule provisions, and asked Rahul Gandhi to submit documentary evidence or apologies where claims were made.
In one significant legal instance, the Madras High Court dismissed a PIL seeking directions for the ECI to investigate Rahul’s “vote chori” allegations, calling the plea vague and without material particulars. A cost of Rs 1 lakh was imposed on the petitioner.
Regions, evidence & slogans
States cited
Rahul Gandhi has specifically named Maharashtra, Haryana, and Karnataka as states where elections were allegedly stolen through manipulation of electoral rolls or other means.
Types of evidence claimed
- He says Congress has already provided “black-and-white proof” of wrongdoings.
- Complaints of duplicate voter entries, irregular father-names, missing or invalid house numbers in voter list drafts.
- Video or social media content where voters claim they were either removed or misled about their voter-registration status.
Slogans & metaphors
- The slogan “Vote Chor, Gaddi Chhod” (which means “Vote thief, vacate your seat”) is being widely used by Rahul Gandhi and his supporters. He says it is “spreading like fire.”
- He uses strong metaphors like “hydrogen bomb” to emphasize the scale and impact of the evidence to come.
ECI, BJP and legal pushback
Election Commission of India (ECI)
- The ECI has demanded formal, sworn declarations or evidence when accusations are made. It has said without such formal proof the claims are not actionable.
- The ECI clarified in specific cases (like Subodh Kumar) that some persons are not registered voters, or no names were ever on the roll.
BJP’s counter
- BJP leaders have accused Rahul Gandhi and Congress of spreading misinformation and using these allegations to mobilize political support.
- They argue that such claims muddy public trust in democratic institutions.
Judicial / legal observations
- As noted, Madras High Court dismissed a PIL seeking ECI to clarify “vote theft” that lacked specific evidence. The court criticised the vagueness.
- There have been legal notices demanding Rahul Gandhi produce affidavits or evidence.
Protests, media, and public reaction
Protests & campaigns
- Congress has launched protests in states such as Rajasthan, with slogans “Vote Chor, Gaddi Chhod,” demanding transparency from the ECI.
- The “Vote Adhikar Yatra” and various public meetings are being organized, both to raise awareness and to press for evidence.
Media & public sentiment
- Media coverage is intense, with wide reporting on Rahul’s promise of “explosive proof,” speculation on what that evidence might be, and whether it will hold up legally.
- Some public discussion is supportive—people who feel disenfranchised or suspicious of electoral rolls are rallying behind the claims. Others are skeptical, calling for formal disclosures.
Political risk & strategy
- Rahul Gandhi’s strategy seems aimed at shifting public discourse, especially in states where elections were controversial or margins were thin.
- BJP and ECI’s responses reflect high stakes: dismissing too lightly could alienate voters; acknowledging could open legal or procedural scrutiny.
Implications for Indian democracy and elections
Trust in the electoral system
If the vote theft proof by Rahul Gandhi is substantiated, it could severely impact public trust in the Election Commission of India and the legitimacy of election outcomes.
Legal precedents
This could lead to more PILs, court cases, possibly revisiting results if irregularities are proven. The demand for evidence under oath suggests legal thresholds are important.
Electoral reforms & procedural changes
- There may be increased calls for use of paper ballots or stronger audit mechanisms, as already seen in some states pushing for paper ballots.
- Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voter rolls may come under stricter oversight.
Political polarization and stability
- These claims contribute to political polarization—opposition vs ruling party, public vs establishment.
- The impact on voter morale, especially among youth, marginalized, or those who believe their votes don’t count, could be significant.
Timeline of promised disclosures
Time Frame | What Rahul Gandhi Promised | Likely Outcome / Watchpoints |
Short term (days-weeks) | “More explosive proof” to be released, possibly specific complaints or data from Maharashtra, Karnataka, Haryana. | Scrutiny of the evidence: whether it is documentary, voter roll data, affidavits, or witness statements. |
Medium term (weeks-months) | Intensification of public campaigns, possible legal action or PILs, demands to ECI. | ECI responses, court judgments, possibly political fallout in key constituencies. |
Long term | Possible reforms in electoral roll revision, audit or verification of claimed irregularities. | Legislative or ECI mandated changes, shifts in political messaging or election strategies. |
Vote theft proof by Rahul Gandhi is no longer just a political slogan—it has become a promise of major revelations. Whether those revelations will change the electoral landscape depends on the credibility, detail, and transparency of the evidence he presents.
For now, the allegations have stirred controversy, heightened scrutiny of the ECI and the ruling party, and raised profound questions of fairness in India’s democratic process.
Breaking News
India hits back at Switzerland

Contents
New Delhi, Sep.11,2025:Alongside its reply to Switzerland, India also sharply criticized Pakistan. Tyagi labelled Pakistan as a “failed state” dependent on political propaganda, accusing it of harboring terror networks-
The opening salvo
India hits back at Switzerland with a stern, assertive response after Swiss remarks at the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) concerning minority rights, freedom of expression, and media freedom. What began as a diplomatic recommendation turned into a heated exchange, with India calling the comments “surprising, shallow and ill-informed.”
This response reflects India’s evolving posture on the global stage—a country no longer content to quietly absorb criticism, especially from foreign governments, but commanding attention and pushing back when it deems narratives misaligned with its self-image and its record.
What Switzerland said at the UNHRC
The Swiss delegate, Michael Meier, in his capacity during the 60th Session of the UNHRC, called on India to:
- “Take effective measures to protect minorities in India”;
- “Uphold freedom of expression and media rights.” These remarks formed part of a broader review in which Switzerland also expressed concern about human rights issues in other countries like Syria, Turkiye, and Serbia.
India’s rebuttal
India’s counter-response, delivered by Kshitij Tyagi, Counsellor in Permanent Mission of India at Geneva, was strong, multifaceted, and aimed at redirecting the narrative.
Racism, discrimination, xenophobia allegations against Switzerland
- India hit back by saying that Switzerland should focus on its own challenges, including racism, systematic discrimination, and xenophobia within its borders.
- Tyagi described the Swiss remarks as “surprising, shallow and ill-informed.” He suggested that, given Switzerland’s role as UNHRC president, the country should avoid narratives that misrepresent India’s reality.
- India’s image: Pluralism, democracy, ready to assist
- India emphasized that it is the world’s largest, most diverse and vibrant democracy, with a strong civilisational tradition of pluralism.
- In a somewhat unusual diplomatic move, India offered to assist Switzerland in addressing its own issues of racism, xenophobia and discrimination.
Response to Pakistan -“failed state” claims
- Alongside its reply to Switzerland, India also sharply criticized Pakistan. Tyagi labelled Pakistan as a “failed state” dependent on political propaganda, accusing it of harboring terror networks.
- India referenced past terror attacks (Pahalgam, Uri, Pathankot, Mumbai) and Bin Laden’s presence in Pakistan to underline its accusations.
netizens & media
- Social media in India responded loudly. Many praised India’s firm stance, calling it dignified, confident, and emblematic of what some are terming a more assertive “New India.”
- Indian media described the exchange as a diplomatic “clapback” or “slap of truths.” Some analysts see this as part of India’s pattern of resisting what it sees as biased criticism from the West or international forums.
Wider diplomatic implications
- Diplomatic tone and norms: This incident raises questions about how much critique from one democratic nation to another is acceptable, especially within bodies like the UNHRC. India’s response suggests that it expects mutual respect rather than one-sided moral lectures.
- Soft power and global image: By calling out Switzerland, India not only defended its reputation internally, but also projected soft power—asserting itself as a democracy unapologetic of its practices and proud of its diversity.
- Future UNHRC debates: Such exchanges may tighten the boundaries of what countries are willing to accept in terms of external criticism, especially from nations that themselves have human rights challenges.
Stakes & what lies ahead
India hits back at Switzerland wasn’t just about a single statement; it was about a changing diplomatic posture. India seems less willing to be lectured by others—particularly when it believes those others have their own issues of prejudice and systemic discrimination.
Breaking News
Balen Shah, Kathmandu’s independent mayor, from rapper to political leader. Explore his rise amidst Nepal’s youth-led revolution-

Contents
Nepal, Sep.10,2025:Balen pursued his education in civil engineering at the White House Institute of Technology in Kathmandu. Furthering his academic credentials, he completed a master’s degree in structural engineering from Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology in Karnataka-
The Rise of Balen Shah
In the heart of Kathmandu, a transformative figure has emerged, capturing the imagination of Nepal’s youth and challenging the traditional political landscape. Balendra Shah, known popularly as Balen, is not just the current mayor of Kathmandu Metropolitan City but also a symbol of change and hope for many. His journey from an underground rapper to an independent political leader reflects the aspirations of a generation eager for reform.
Early Life and Education
Born on April 27, 1990, in Kathmandu, Balen Shah hails from a Newar Buddhist family of Maithil Madhesi origin. His father, Ram Narayan Shah, is an Ayurvedic doctor, and his mother, Dhruva Devi Shah, is a homemaker. Growing up in a culturally rich environment, Balen developed an early interest in music and social issues.
Balen pursued his education in civil engineering at the White House Institute of Technology in Kathmandu. Furthering his academic credentials, he completed a master’s degree in structural engineering from Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology in Karnataka, India. His academic background laid a strong foundation for his future endeavors in both engineering and music.
From Rapper to Political Activist
Balen’s foray into music began in 2012, when he became active in Nepal’s underground hip-hop scene. His music, often categorized as ‘Nephop’ (Nepali hip-hop), addressed pressing social issues such as corruption, inequality, and the struggles of the common man. Songs like “Aam Nepali Buba” and “Police Patraikar” resonated with the masses, especially the youth, due to their raw and relatable lyrics.
Beyond his musical talents, Balen’s activism became evident during the 2015 economic blockade imposed by India. He actively participated in relief efforts, providing aid to affected communities. His commitment to social causes further solidified his image as a leader who genuinely cared for the welfare of the people.
The 2022 Mayoral Election- A Historic Victory
In May 2022, Kathmandu witnessed a political upheaval when Balen Shah, running as an independent candidate, contested the mayoral election. His opponents included Sirjana Singh from the Nepali Congress and Keshav Sthapit from the Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Marxist-Leninist). Against all odds, Balen emerged victorious, securing 61,767 votes, while Singh garnered 38,341 votes. His win was a testament to the growing disillusionment with traditional political parties and the desire for fresh leadership.
Balen’s campaign was characterized by its simplicity and directness. He focused on issues that mattered most to the common people, such as infrastructure development, transparency, and efficient governance. His approach resonated with the electorate, leading to his unprecedented victory.
Leadership as Kathmandu’s Mayor
Since assuming office, Mayor Balen Shah has initiated several reforms aimed at modernizing Kathmandu’s infrastructure and governance. One of his notable actions was the introduction of live broadcasts for municipal council meetings, promoting transparency and public participation. Additionally, he has emphasized the importance of digital governance, aiming to make municipal services more accessible and efficient.
His leadership style is often described as dynamic and hands-on. He is frequently seen interacting with citizens, addressing their concerns, and ensuring that development projects are executed promptly. This proactive approach has earned him the admiration of many Kathmandu residents.
The Gen Z Movement and Shah’s Role
In 2025, Nepal experienced a significant political crisis when widespread youth-led protests erupted across the country. The protests, primarily driven by Generation Z, were fueled by frustrations over corruption, economic inequality, and government censorship of social media platforms. The movement culminated in the resignation of Prime Minister K.P. Sharma Oli.
Throughout the protests, Balen Shah maintained a supportive stance. While he did not participate directly due to age restrictions, he voiced his solidarity with the youth and encouraged them to lead the nation towards a more transparent and accountable future. His support further solidified his status as a leader who genuinely understands and represents the aspirations of the younger generation.
Public Perception and Media Coverage
Balen’s rise in politics has garnered significant media attention both within Nepal and internationally. He has been featured in various global publications, highlighting his unique journey from rapper to mayor. His ability to connect with the youth and challenge the status quo has made him a subject of interest for political analysts and journalists alike.
However, his unconventional path has also attracted criticism. Some detractors question his lack of experience in traditional politics and governance. Nevertheless, his supporters argue that his fresh perspective is precisely what Nepal needs to break free from the shackles of traditional political paradigms.
Challenges and Criticisms
Despite his popularity, Balen Shah faces several challenges. His independent status means he lacks the support of a major political party, which can sometimes hinder the implementation of policies. Additionally, the entrenched political establishment often views his rise as a threat, leading to attempts to undermine his efforts.
Moreover, the expectations placed upon him are immense. As a leader who represents change, there is constant pressure to deliver tangible results. Balancing the aspirations of the youth with the realities of governance remains a delicate task.
Future Prospects- Is Shah Nepal’s Next Prime Minister
Given the current political climate and the support he enjoys among the youth, discussions have begun about Balen Shah’s potential candidacy for the position of Prime Minister. Many believe that his leadership qualities, combined with his understanding of the challenges faced by the younger generation, make him a suitable candidate for the nation’s highest office.
However, Balen has remained non-committal regarding such aspirations. He continues to focus on his responsibilities as the mayor, emphasizing the importance of grassroots development and public welfare. Whether he will take the plunge into national politics remains to be seen.
A New Era in Nepali Politics
Balen Shah’s journey from an underground rapper to the mayor of Kathmandu is a testament to the changing dynamics of Nepali politics. His rise signifies a shift towards a more inclusive and youth-centric political landscape. As Nepal stands at a crossroads, leaders like Balen offer a glimpse into a future where governance is more transparent, accountable, and attuned to the needs of the people.
In a country where traditional political structures have often been criticized for their inefficiency and corruption, Balen Shah represents a beacon of hope. His story inspires many to believe that change is possible and that the youth have the power to shape the nation’s destiny.
Breaking News
Gen Z Fury Shakes Nepal 19 Dead, Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli Resigns

Contents
Nepal,Sep.09,2025:The unrest turned deadly when police met protests with harsh force—live bullets, rubber rounds, and tear gas. At least 19 people were killed, with over 100 injured, marking one of Nepal’s bloodiest political days in decades-
Gen Z Protests in Nepal Ignite Nationwide Chaos
Gen Z protests in Nepal began as a localized outcry over a sudden social media ban but quickly amplified into something much more dramatic and desperate. Fueled by frustrations with censorship, corruption, and limited opportunities, the youth-led demonstrations snowballed into a formidable force demanding change.
Social Media Ban Fuels Young People’s Fury
The protests were triggered by a government-imposed ban on social media platforms such as Facebook, X, YouTube, and others—ostensibly due to failure to register with local regulators. But citizens, especially young Nepalese, saw it as authoritarian overreach restricting free expression. The move backfired, pushing young people into the streets in droves.
Deadly Confrontations- 19 Lives Lost
The unrest turned deadly when police met protests with harsh force—live bullets, rubber rounds, and tear gas. At least 19 people were killed, with over 100 injured, marking one of Nepal’s bloodiest political days in decades. Protesters set fire to politicians’ homes and even the parliament, as rioting spiraled across Kathmandu.
Oli’s Resignation- A Step Toward Political Redemption?
Amid escalating chaos, Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli resigned on September 9, 2025, acknowledging the extraordinary turmoil and signaling a concession to political pressure. His resignation was announced just after the prime minister’s residence was stormed, and a curfew was imposed across affected regions.
Official Response- Lifting the Ban and Promise of Inquiry
In a rapid government reversal, the social media ban was lifted on the same day as the resignation. Authorities promised compensation to victims’ families, free treatment for the injured, and a formal inquiry panel to report within 15 days on what went wrong and how to prevent future tragedies.
The Bigger Picture- Youth Disillusionment and Governance Crisis
These Gen Z protests in Nepal reflect much deeper societal issues: a generation disillusioned with entrenched corruption, political privilege (“Nepo Kids”), and economic stagnation. The youth’s rage was as much about broken promises as it was about digital freedoms.
Global Implications and Next Steps
Nepal’s upheaval sends ripples beyond its borders. Regional powers like India and China are watching closely, given their political and strategic ties with Kathmandu. The mass resignation and promised reforms pose the question: can Nepal heal, reform, and avoid repeating history?
Gen Z Protests in Nepal
- Youth-led uprising over digital censorship and systemic injustice.
- Fierce police response leads to 19 deaths, escalating unrest.
- Prime Minister Oli resigns amid national crisis.
- Authorities reverse ban, vow reparations and investigation.
- The protests signify deeper discontent and a call for genuine change.
Breaking News
Japanese First far-right surge reveals how Sanseito’s Trump-inspired rise is transforming Japan’s political fabric—

Contents
Japan,Sep.08,2025: Japanese First far-right surge is more than a headline—it’s a seismic shift reshaping Japan’s traditionally centrist political landscape. The rise of Sanseitō, under the banner “Japanese First,” is challenging decades-old power structures and redefining voter priorities.
What Is the Japanese First Far-Right Surge
The Japanese First far-right surge refers to the rapid ascension of Sanseitō, a far-right, ultraconservative party founded in 2020. Emerging from YouTube-driven conspiracy narratives during COVID-19, it has captured attention—and seats—in Japan’s national politics.
Led by Sohei Kamiya, a YouTuber-turned-politician, Sanseidō advocates nativist, anti-immigration, anti-LGBTQ+, and anti-globalist policies, drawing comparisons to Trump-style populism.
Shocking Truths Behind the Surge
Trump-Inspired Strategy
Kamiya explicitly cites U.S. President Donald Trump’s bold political style as inspiration. Critics even dub him “Japan’s Donald Trump,” noting parallels in approach and messaging.
Electoral Breakthrough in Upper House
In July 2025’s Upper House election, Sanseidō catapulted from a single seat (in 2022) to 14–15 seats. This leap dramatically weakened the ruling coalition’s parliamentary grip.
Nativist Messaging that Resonates
The party’s “Japanese First” campaign taps into unease over immigration, perceived elite influence, and economic strain. Phrases like “silent invasion” struck a nerve with voters frustrated by the status quo.
A Warning Sign for the LDP
This Japanese First far-right surge is not just about Sanseidō—it exposes cracks in the long-dominant Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), now losing its grip after decades in power.
Implications for Japanese Politics
- Political Fragmentation: Sanseidō’s growth complicates LDP’s dominance and may force coalition-building or policy concessions.
- Populist Influence: Its success signals the rise of populist messaging over traditional consensus-driven politics.
- Policy Shifts: Expect tighter immigration rules, nationalist rhetoric, and harsher stances on social issues.
- Media’s Power: This surge underscores how social platforms like YouTube can reshape political narratives.
The Japanese First far-right surge isn’t a footnote—it’s a political earthquake. Sanseidō has disrupted Japan’s centrist equilibrium, emboldening nationalist voices and marking a turning point in modern Japanese politics. Whether this is a lasting realignment or a protest wave remains to be seen—but it has already left a significant mark.
Breaking News
GST impact on traders Ashok Gehlot Rahul Gandhi predictions

Contents
Jaipur, Sep.06,2025:In recent discussions, Rajasthan’s former Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot has highlighted the accuracy of Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s earlier predictions regarding the Goods and Services Tax-
In recent discussions, Rajasthan’s former Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot has highlighted the accuracy of Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s earlier predictions regarding the Goods and Services Tax (GST). Gehlot emphasized that Gandhi had foreseen the challenges that GST would pose to various sectors, particularly traders. This acknowledgment underscores the importance of timely and effective policy implementation to address the concerns of the business community.
Rahul Gandhi’s Early Predictions on GST
During the initial rollout of GST in 2017, Rahul Gandhi criticized the tax structure, labeling it as the “Gabbar Singh Tax” due to its complexity and the burdens it imposed on small and medium enterprises (SMEs). He argued that the tax regime was designed in a way that disproportionately affected these businesses, leading to widespread distress among traders. Gandhi’s assertions were based on his understanding of the economic landscape and the challenges faced by the business community.
Ashok Gehlot’s Acknowledgment
Ashok Gehlot recently acknowledged that nearly every prediction made by Rahul Gandhi regarding GST has proven to be correct. Gehlot emphasized that the concerns raised by Gandhi about the adverse effects of GST on traders and consumers were valid and have materialized over time. He criticized the government’s delayed response to these issues and called for immediate reforms to alleviate the burdens on the business community.
Challenges Faced by Traders
The implementation of GST introduced several challenges for traders, including:
- Complex Compliance Requirements: Traders had to navigate multiple tax slabs and intricate filing procedures, leading to confusion and increased compliance costs.
- Cash Flow Issues: The upfront tax payments required under GST strained the cash flow of many small businesses, affecting their operations.
- Technological Barriers: The need for digital literacy and access to technology posed challenges for traders, especially in rural areas.
These issues have led to widespread dissatisfaction among the trading community, highlighting the need for a more trader-friendly tax system.
Government’s Response and Reforms
In response to the challenges faced by traders, the government has initiated several reforms to simplify the GST structure:
- Rationalization of Tax Slabs: The government has reduced the number of tax slabs to ease the compliance burden on traders.
- Simplification of Filing Procedures: Efforts have been made to streamline the filing process, making it more user-friendly.
- Introduction of GST 2.0: Discussions are underway for the introduction of GST 2.0, aimed at further simplifying the tax regime and addressing the concerns of traders.
While these reforms are steps in the right direction, experts argue that more needs to be done to create a truly trader-friendly tax environment.
The Need for a Simplified Tax Structure
Experts and industry leaders advocate for a single tax slab under GST to simplify the tax structure and reduce compliance costs. A unified tax rate would eliminate the complexities associated with multiple slabs and make the system more transparent and efficient. Additionally, enhancing digital infrastructure and providing training to traders can help bridge the technological divide and ensure smoother implementation of GST reforms.
The acknowledgment by Ashok Gehlot of Rahul Gandhi’s accurate predictions regarding GST underscores the importance of considering the perspectives of all stakeholders in policy formulation. The challenges faced by traders highlight the need for continuous dialogue between the government and the business community to create a tax system that is equitable, efficient, and conducive to economic growth. As discussions continue on the future of GST, it is crucial to prioritize the concerns of traders to ensure the success of the tax regime.
- Breaking News6 days ago
Balen Shah, Kathmandu’s independent mayor, from rapper to political leader. Explore his rise amidst Nepal’s youth-led revolution-
- Breaking News2 weeks ago
Mumbai Ganesh Visarjan Security is elevated with AI, drones, 10,000+ CCTVs, over 21,000 police personnel and
- Education2 months ago
Grandparents’ Day Jaipur School Celebration on 26 July ,honored grandparents’ vital role – a heartfelt
- Festival3 weeks ago
Ganesh Chaturthi 2025 unfolds with rare planetary yogas—brings an especially powerful, auspicious start to the festival
- Breaking News1 week ago
Pitru Paksha 2025-Seven Powerful Rituals and Sacred Places to Free Five Generations
- Accident1 month ago
uttarkashi‑cloudburst‑flash‑flood‑devastation‑4‑dead
- Breaking News1 week ago
Nepal Gen Z Revolution Is Shaking the Nation
- Art3 weeks ago
Discover the Mewar Gavari Dance Festival’s mesmerizing 40-day performances, rich folklore, and tribal devotion—an awe-inspiring cultural phenomenon of Mewar