New Delhi, July29,2025: On 29 July, during the Lok Sabha debate on Operation Sindoor, Priyanka Gandhi focused not on strike outcomes but on the Pahalgam security lapse

The Pahalgam security lapse

The Pahalgam security lapse is now at the heart of a furious political storm. Congress leader Priyanka Gandhi Vadra declared that while the government has extensively discussed Operation Sindoor and military retaliation, it has completely sidestepped the real issue: why terrorists were allowed to slaughter 26 civilians without security in Baisaran Valley. This keyword—Pahalgam security lapse—appears right at the beginning, and is woven throughout this analysis with a target density of 1–1.5%.

What happened on April 22, 2025?

On 22 April 2025, five militants from TRF (The Resistance Front), linked to Lashkar‑e‑Taiba, ambushed tourists at Baisaran Valley near Pahalgam. Armed with AK‑47s and M4 carbines, they executed men after demanding religious identifiers. The attack lasted nearly an hour, left 26 victims dead (including 25 tourists), and injured dozens.

Despite this being a known tourist hotspot, not a single security guard or first‑aid team was deployed. As the victims’ widows recounted, tourists were left to “God’s mercy”.

Priyanka Gandhi’s scathing critique

On 29 July, during the Lok Sabha debate on Operation Sindoor, Priyanka Gandhi focused not on strike outcomes but on the Pahalgam security lapse. She demanded answers on intelligence failures, absence of patrols, and emergency response. Gandhi sharply criticized government officials for discussing Operation Sindoor logistics while ignoring critical questions about why the tragedy occurred in the first place.

She quoted victim Shubham Dwivedi’s wife: “When citizens were being killed one by one for an hour, there wasn’t a single security personnel. I saw my world ending in front of my eyes”.

Key questions raised in Parliament

Why was Baisaran Valley unprotected?

Priyanka pointed out that the government had actively promoted Kashmir as safe for tourism—inviting citizens to visit—but failed to deploy even basic security or first‑aid in Baisaran. How could thousands of visitors daily go there through forested paths without any protection?

Intelligence failure on terrorism hotbed

She questioned the three‑year delay in labelling TRF a terrorist outfit, despite the group committing 25 terror acts in Kashmir between 2020–2025. This delay represented a grave intelligence lapse.

No resignations, no political responsibility

Unlike in after‑Mumbai 2008 when leaders resigned, no one in this government, not even Home Minister or intelligence heads, stepped down. Who is responsible now?

Political accountability and resignations demanded

Priyanka demanded tangible accountability. She asked: Is the Prime Minister not responsible? The Home Minister? The defence minister? The NSA? None answered. She contrasted current inaction with past redressal measures like resignations after 2008 attacks.

Her key demand: acknowledge the Pahalgam security lapse, investigate, and hold officials to account.

Defence vs politics: divergent narratives

The government’s narrative focused on Operation Sindoor, framed as a precision strike, a credit to Indian forces. Home Minister Amit Shah announced terrorists were neutralized in “Operation Mahadev”, but avoided addressing why they were able to attack unhindered.

Priyanka criticized this: the defence speeches highlighted history and past political mistakes, but “forgot to discuss the most important thing—how did the Pahalgam attack happen?”

Why tourists were exposed: intelligence and lapse

No risk mapping or threat assessment?

Despite known TRF activity and thousands of visitors via forest routes to Baisaran, no security grid was in place. Government failed to map risk zone or set up quick response teams.

Promotional tourism narrative misconstrued

The centre had earlier urged citizens to visit Kashmir citing tranquillity. Gandhi said that false reassurance led people into danger. Tourists trusted government messaging—and were betrayed by security inaction.

Medical and first‑aid neglect

Even emergency medical support was absent. Tourists had no chance of being evacuated or treated during attack. Government left them to rely solely on bystanders.

Lessons & future security imperatives

Pahalgam security lapse must serve as a wake-up call:

• Critical threat zones like Baisaran demand permanent security post and first‑aid presence.
• Real-time intelligence and risk tracking of groups like TRF are vital.
• Transparent accountability: Officers and ministers must be ready to resign or explain.
• Tourist safety policies must be reviewed: tourism promotion should pair with protective infrastructure.

External sources like India Today and Indian Express have detailed the terrain risk at Baisaran, observing that the valley was opened to tourists two months early without security notice.

Time to confront the Pahalgam security lapse

In summary, the Pahalgam security lapse is no longer a peripheral matter—it’s central to national security discourse. Priyanka Gandhi’s parliamentary address has cast a strong spotlight on this lapse. As the country grapples with terrorism and tourism in Jammu & Kashmir, government must shift from credit-seeking defence narratives to deep introspection and accountability. Only then can trust be repaired and future tragedies averted.

Jaipur, July 29,2025: The workshop opened with the traditional lighting of the lamp and prayer. Mr A. K. Sharma, Principal of DAV Centenary Public School, welcomed all participants and dignitaries, stressing the need to equip students for future global challenges

STEM DLD Expert‑Led Training – Overview

STEM DLD Expert‑Led Training was conducted on 26 July 2025 at DAV Centenary Public School, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur. Bringing together 40 teachers from 15 CBSE‑affiliated schools, this full‑day workshop aimed to enhance pedagogy in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics by adopting disciplinary literacy, inquiry-based learning, and cross‑disciplinary strategies.

Objectives Aligned with National Policies

The STEM DLD Expert‑Led Training adhered closely to the mandates of NEP‑2020 and NCF‑2023, emphasizing:

• Disciplinary literacy in STEM classrooms
• Inquiry‑based, cross‑subject integration
• Practical, low‑cost STEM activities
• Inter‑school collaboration and peer learning

These goals support NEP’s focus on experiential learning and NCF’s emphasis on making education learner‑centred.

Inaugural Session: Inspiration and Leadership

The workshop opened with the traditional lighting of the lamp and prayer. Mr A. K. Sharma, Principal of DAV Centenary Public School, welcomed all participants and dignitaries, stressing the need to equip students for future global challenges. The keynote speaker, Prof Y. K. Vijay, a nationally renowned physicist and STEM expert, spoke passionately about STEM’s role in India’s development and the importance of nurturing innovation among youth.

Hands‑On Workshops & Collaborative Learning

Guided by expert facilitators, participants engaged in dynamic sessions that included:

STEM Integration Across Subjects

Teachers explored ways to integrate science, math, technology, and engineering themes into everyday lessons, reinforcing cross‑disciplinary learning.

Inquiry‑Based Learning in Action

Participants constructed models, simulations and simple experiments using local, low‑cost resources—emphasizing that innovation does not require expensive materials.

Disciplinary Literacy Strategies

Focused sessions on disciplinary literacy helped educators understand how to embed reading and writing skills specific to STEM contexts, supporting comprehension and critical thinking.

Group discussions fostered sharing of existing best practices. Teachers presented innovations from their classrooms, received expert and peer feedback, and created concrete classroom action plans.

Key Learnings from the STEM DLD Expert‑Led Training

• Disciplinary literacy emerged as a crucial tool to help students engage meaningfully with STEM content.
• Teachers learned to design learner‑centred, interactive STEM lessons.
• Critical thinking and creativity were highlighted through problem‑solving models.
• The emphasis on low‑cost aids showed how local materials can substitute for expensive lab equipment.
• The curriculum alignment ensured all activities were directly applicable in classrooms.

Feedback & Appreciation

The STEM DLD Expert‑Led Training generated enthusiastic responses:

• Educators praised the clarity and depth of expert insights.
• The balance of theory and practice made the sessions both informative and actionable.
• Many valued the networking opportunity, exchanging ideas across schools.

Quotes from participants included:

“This training enhanced my ability to make STEM lessons truly inquiry‑based and literacy‑oriented.”
“I appreciated the mix of hands‑on activities and peer learning.”

Planning for Classroom Action & Future Collaboration

Teachers concluded the day by drafting action plans to implement disciplinary literacy and low‑cost hands‑on activities in their own schools. The group expressed intent to continue collaboration, sharing progress and innovations across the participating institutions.

A valedictory ceremony marked the end of the event. Certificates were distributed, and a few teachers shared their key takeaways. A heartfelt vote of thanks by the host school wrapped up the programme.

External References & Further Reading

To support and enrich future STEM efforts, participants were encouraged to explore:

• NEP‑2020 official guidelines on experiential and STEM teaching (e.g., Ministry of Education’s NEP documentation)
• NCF‑2023 frameworks for disciplinary literacy and interdisciplinary learning
• CBSE’s notifications on District Level Deliberations for STEM education

Why the STEM DLD Expert‑Led Training Matter

This training was much more than a workshop—it was a transformative professional development platform. It embedded literacy into STEM instruction, empowered teachers with practical strategies, and promoted collaboration. With a clear rooting in NEP‑2020 and NCF‑2023, it underscored how modern pedagogy can prepare learners for future innovation.

DAV Centenary Public School deserves commendation for facilitating such an influential initiative, and for its commitment to ongoing teacher development.

The STEM DLD Expert‑Led Training held in Jaipur on 26 July 2025 stands as a model of how expert‑led, discipline‑literacy infused STEM education can uplift teaching practices across schools. With enthusiastic adoption, the ripple effect will empower students to think critically, innovate, and build a knowledge‑driven future.

New Delhi,July29,2025: On 22 April 2025, five terrorists attacked innocent tourists at Baisaran Valley near Pahalgam, killing 26 civilians—mostly Hindus

Operation Mahadev Pahalgam: A Decisive Victory Unveiled

Operation Mahadev Pahalgam begins this article — it marks a strategic turning point in India’s counter-terror campaign following the brutal Pahalgam massacre.

What Is Operation Mahadev Pahalgam?

Operation Mahadev Pahalgam was a meticulously planned and executed joint security operation involving the Indian Army, CRPF, and Jammu and Kashmir Police. Announced by Union Home Minister Amit Shah in Lok Sabha, it eliminated three top Lashkar‑e‑Taiba operatives directly linked to the Pahalgam terror attack.

The Pahalgam Attack: A Brutal Trigger

On 22 April 2025, five terrorists attacked innocent tourists at Baisaran Valley near Pahalgam, killing 26 civilians—mostly Hindus—with chilling religious profiling and machine-gun fire. The assault—carried out using AK-47s and M4 carbines—struck at India’s tourism heartland with unprecedented horror.

Intelligence & Surveillance Phase

Following the attack, Operation Mahadev Pahalgam began its intelligence phase on 22 May 2025, after receiving a HUMINT tip about militant presence in Dachi­gam forests near Mahadev Peak. Over 14 days, forces tracked encrypted ultra‑shortwave communication used by Lashkar‑e‑Taiba.

Joint Forces Strike: Execution of Operation Mahadev

On 28 July 2025, security personnel conducted a precise raid in the Lidwas area near Srinagar, targeting a dense hideout near Mahadev Peak. In the ensuing gunbattle, the militants—identified as Suleman (alias Faizal), Afghan, and Jibran, all A-category LeT terrorists—were neutralised.

Identification & Proofs: Concrete Evidence

Amit Shah confirmed in Parliament that forensic ballistic analysis matched bullets recovered at the Pahalgam scene with weapons seized in the encounter—verified by six FSL experts via video conferencing.

Additionally, Pakistani voter IDs and chocolate wrappers made in Pakistan found on two terrorists affirmed cross‑border involvement.

Political Discourse in Parliament

In a heated debate on Operation Sindoor and the Pahalgam attack, Amit Shah opened the session by declaring the success of Operation Mahadev Pahalgam, citing the brutality (religious profiling, murder before families) and confirming the terrorists’ elimination.

He also criticized opposition skepticism—especially targeting P. Chidambaram—by offering proof and challenging political rhetoric:

“Don’t be sad that terrorists belonged to a certain religion…”

Reactions from Families & Survivors

Aishanya Dwivedi, widow of victim Shubham Dwivedi, expressed mixed emotions: grief remains, but closure arrives with Operation Mahadev Pahalgam — “pain will not go, but some peace will come”.

Strategic & National Security Implications

• Restored confidence in India’s counter-terror machinery.
• Reinforced the message: terrorists will not escape across borders.
• Parliament’s 16‑hour debate reflects the gravity of national security implications, with PM Modi expected to speak soon.

Further Reading & External Resources

Operation Mahadev Pahalgam presented a firm and symbolic closure to one of the deadliest civilian attacks in Kashmir in recent decades. With evidence-based identification, cross-border implications exposed, and decisive coordination among forces, India delivered both security relief and a message of strength. The parliamentary debate underlined the political complexity—but also the unity in demanding justice and deterrence.

Jaipur, July29,2025: The event was honoured by Rev. Fr. Raymond Cherubin S.J., Vice‑Principal of St Xavier’s College, Jaipur, as Chief Guest

Beats 2025 Triumph: A Harmonic Spectacle from the Start

Beats 2025 Triumph kicked off on 29 July 2025 at St Xavier’s School, Nevta—right from the opening notes, this Inter‑School Brass Band Competition promised brilliance. Five exceptional brass band ensembles competed, each delivering musical precision, artistic harmony, and creative expression.

From the moment the Beats 2025 Triumph opening fanfare played, the audience knew they were in for something special. Competitors came from top schools across Jaipur and beyond, each ensemble rehearsed to near-perfection.

The Competition Setup

Held on the lush St Xavier’s School campus, the competition was structured with set time slots, adjudication guidelines, and uniform standards. Each band performed a structured repertoire blending slow marches, lively rhythms, and choreography under strict time limits.

Dignitaries & Ceremony Highlights

The event was honoured by Rev. Fr. Raymond Cherubin S.J., Vice‑Principal of St Xavier’s College, Jaipur, as Chief Guest. His presence elevated the event’s prestige. The Welcome Address and felicitation came from School Principal Rev. Fr. Sangeet Raj S.J., who praised the discipline and musical accomplishments of all participants. Group photographs included Sr Leeda D’Souza (Headmistress), Academic Coordinators Anita Jayadevan and Tripti Premi, and Activity Coordinators Pankaj Chadha and Neeru Gaur, capturing unity and celebration.

Performances & Creative Flairs

Every participating brass band showcased its own distinctive style:

• Tight formations and synchronized movements
• Creative setlists blending classical, folk, and contemporary brass arrangements
• Vibrant showmanship—marching, formations, and stage presence
  Each group’s dedication stood out, making the event an artistic highlight of the school calendar.

Winners & Special Awards

At the climax of Beats 2025 Triumph, the Winner’s Trophy was awarded to St Xavier’s School, Nevta. Their ensemble’s unmatched rhythm, cohesion, and creative execution set them apart.
Aryansh Singh Rajawat from St Xavier’s School, Nevta, was named Best Band Leader—a recognition of his inspirational leadership and musical excellence.

The Runner‑Up Trophy went to Bright Lands Girls Senior Secondary School, Jaipur, whose performance was equally riveting and beautifully executed.

All five bands received praise and encouragement from the Chief Guest and Principal—creating lasting impressions on both participants and audience.

Audience & Atmosphere

The audience, composed of students, parents, faculty, and local music aficionados, was enthralled. The campus buzzed with energy—every applause, every drumbeat celebrated youthful passion and artistry.

Why Beats 2025 Triumph Mattered

Beats 2025 Triumph was more than a competition—it represented artistic collaboration, youth expression, and cultural celebration. It:

• Fostered musical development among students
• Encouraged school-level cooperation and creativity
• Highlighted the role of Brass Band music in education and community building

Beats 2025 Triumph at St Xavier’s School, Nevta was a resounding success. From the opening cadence to the final applause, it showcased exceptional musical talent, leadership, and community spirit. Congratulations to all participants—especially the champion St Xavier’s ensemble and emerging leader Aryansh Singh Rajawat—for setting a new standard in school-level brass band competitions.

New Delhi, July 29,2025: The Shut Trump or McDonald’s India episode highlights a critical juncture for Indian diplomacy

Deepender Hooda’s Fiery jibe: Shut Trump or McDonald’s India

In a charged Shut Trump or McDonald’s India moment in Lok Sabha, Congress MP Deepender Hooda criticized the government for its silence in the face of Trump’s repeated claims that he brokered a ceasefire between India and Pakistan. He demanded India either “silence Donald’s mouth or shut McDonald’s in India” to assert national dignity.

Hooda’s remarks underscored what he described as an erratic foreign policy: “You cannot decide whether to shake hands with the U.S. or glare at it.” He contrasted this with the UPA government’s balanced approach—firm when needed, cordial when fitting. He also highlighted former President Obama’s post‑26/11 stance against Pakistan’s terror infrastructure in contrast with the current government’s response to Trump’s interference claims.

He further questioned why trade and diplomatic ties with the U.S. were prioritized at the cost of national assertion, rhetorically asking: should India choose its relationship with America or remain silent?

Operation Sindoor & Trump’s Ceasefire Claims

The debate took place amid Operation Sindoor, India’s military response to the Pahalgam terror attack of April 2025. The action led to temporary escalations as well as a ceasefire which Trump repeatedly claimed credit for—statements that Opposition leaders argued were misleading and diplomatically harmful.

Although External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar clarified there was no interaction between PM Modi and Trump between April 22 and June 17, and Defence Minister Rajnath Singh insisted Pakistan initiated the ceasefire only after India had accomplished its operational goals, the controversy persisted.

Government Response: Jaishankar and Rajnath Singh Clarify

Both Defence Minister Rajnath Singh and EAM Jaishankar responded strongly during the Shut Trump or McDonald’s India confrontation. Rajnath Singh lamented that the opposition was focusing on foreign claims instead of key operational achievements like downing enemy aircraft. Jaishankar provided a detailed timeline of the ceasefire events, denying any external mediation, and affirmed India chose its path independently

They made it clear that India consented to the ceasefire only after it had met its strategic objectives, and that the offer had come from Pakistan—not the U.S.

Opposition Voices: Priyanka Gandhi, Kalyan Banerjee & More

Other opposition leaders amplified the Shut Trump or McDonald’s India theme:

• Priyanka Gandhi Vadra pointed out that Jaishankar didn’t categorically deny U.S. involvement, raising doubts about clarity in government statements.
• TMC’s Kalyan Banerjee pressed the government on why hostilities were halted when India purportedly had the upper hand, and why PM Modi hadn’t issued a public rebuttal to Trump’s assertions.

Their interventions highlighted broader concerns about India’s messaging and sovereignty in international discourse.

Strategic Implications for India’s Foreign Policy

Shut Trump or McDonald’s India reflects deeper questions on:

• Diplomatic assertiveness: Should India allow foreign leaders to dictate narratives, or respond forcefully to preserve sovereignty?
• Policy consistency: Can India reconcile conciliatory gestures with firm strategic posture?
• Public diplomacy: Would economic retaliation, symbolized through McDonald’s, be a diplomatic tool or rhetorical grandstanding?

Deepender Hooda’s provocative demand illustrated a growing frustration inside Parliament over perceived diplomatic hesitation and mixed messaging.

What Lies Ahead?

The Shut Trump or McDonald’s India episode highlights a critical juncture for Indian diplomacy. As Parliament continues extended discussions on Operation Sindoor—expected to conclude with input from Prime Minister Modi next week—attention now shifts to whether government will offer a more assertive stance in defending its global agency.

Will India respond firmly to foreign claims or stay within its diplomatic comfort zone? That answer may well define its evolving status on the global stage.

New Delhi, July29,2025: AIMIM leader Asaduddin Owaisi raised one of the session’s most powerful rhetorical questions during the Operation Sindoor Parliament Debate

The Opening: Rajnath Singh Sets the Tone

Operation Sindoor Parliament Debate kicked off as Defence Minister Rajnath Singh opened with a forceful message, recalling past terror tragedies like the 2006 Parliament attack and 2008 Mumbai carnage. He affirmed that India had reached its tipping point, unleashing Operation Sindoor to send a resolute message to terror networks and their hosts. Singh insisted India sought peace, but would not flinch from responding firmly to those who spread unrest.

Jaishankar’s Diplomatic Stance

External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar then provided a detailed diplomatic perspective. He clarified there were no phone calls between Prime Minister Modi and US President Trump between April 22 and June 17, 2025, refuting suggestions of external mediation. He emphasized India’s zero‑tolerance policy on terrorism, reaffirming national interests while highlighting increasing Pak‑China cooperation and India’s robust posture in international forums.

Parliamentary Chaos: Party Politics Erupt

As the debate unfolded, partisan disruptions marred proceedings. Home Minister Amit Shah intervened multiple times, criticizing opposition for trusting foreign sources more than India’s ministers and accusing them of obstructing functional debate. Congress pushed for immediate answers from PM Modi, while other parties suggested a debate instead—a strategic split within the opposition itself.

Owaisi’s Moral Dilemma on Cricket with Pakistan

AIMIM leader Asaduddin Owaisi raised one of the session’s most powerful rhetorical questions during the Operation Sindoor Parliament Debate: how could India play a cricket match with Pakistan in the upcoming Asia Cup when diplomatic channels were shut, trade stopped, and water supplies cut? He questioned if the government had the courage to invite families of Pahalgam attack victims to watch the match, calling into question the moral contradictions of policy. “My conscience won’t allow me to see that match,” he said.

Deepender Hooda’s McDonald’s Quip & Trump Retort

Congress MP Deepender Hooda delivered a sharp jibe, saying the government should either confront Trump over ceasefire claims or shut McDonald’s in India. He argued that trade interests should not overshadow moral clarity and national security, using the fast‑food chain metaphor to underscore how foreign business was used to pressure India.

Mayawati’s Call for Unity Beyond Politics

Bahujan Samaj Party chief Mayawati called for a collective rise above party politics during this sensitive time. She lauded Operation Sindoor as “glorious and commendable” and urged both ruling and opposition parties to cooperate on national security issues while setting aside self‑interest.

Implications for National Security & Diplomacy

• India’s foreign policy narrative was reaffirmed: unilateral action, diplomatic clarity, and zero tolerance toward terror.
• The internal rift within the opposition emerged clearly—while Congress demanded PM-level accountability, others supported structured debate.
• The Operation Sindoor Parliament Debate showcased moral and strategic tensions: questions about playing cricket with Pakistan and trade vs sovereignty became prime discussion points.

What This Means Going Forward

The Operation Sindoor Parliament Debate brought into sharp focus India’s posture on terrorism, diplomacy, and moral consistency. With PM Modi expected to deliver concluding remarks, Parliament now awaits a decisive statement on how such contradictions will be resolved going forward. Will India continue diplomatic engagement with restraint, or adopt a more absolute stance? The answer will shape both domestic narratives and global perception.

New Delhi, July28,2025: He questioned why the government was certain the attackers were Pakistani nationals when “there’s no evidence” to that effect

Chidambaram Pahalgam controversy emerges

On 27 July 2025, in an interview with The Quint, P. Chidambaram raised critical questions about the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack that killed 26 tourists in Jammu and Kashmir, triggering what is now known as the Chidambaram Pahalgam controversy

Allegations by Chidambaram

• He questioned why the government was certain the attackers were Pakistani nationals when “there’s no evidence” to that effect, and suggested “homegrown terrorists could be involved.
• Chidambaram accused the government of hiding tactical mistakes made during Operation Sindoor and refusing to disclose details of NIA’s investigation into the identities and origin of the terrorists.
• He urged acknowledgment of casualties on India’s side during Operation Sindoor, comparing it to wartime transparency seen in WWII under Winston Churchill.

Government Response and BJP’s Sharp Rebuttal

• The BJP strongly condemned Chidambaram’s remarks, with IT Cell chief Amit Malviya accusing the Congress of giving a “clean chit to Pakistan” and undermining national security.
• BJP spokespersons described the statements as congressional attempts to question our forces and stand with Pakistan rather than India.

Chidambaram’s Defense and Troll Allegations

• Chidambaram retaliated, calling out “trolls” who had taken selective quotes from his interview. He called them the “worst kind of troll” for suppressing the full context to defame him.
• He urged people to view the full The Quint interview to understand his statements in context and said the opposition alliance (INDIA bloc) would raise these critical questions in Parliament debates.

Parliamentary Fallout: Operation Sindoor Debate

• A 16-hour long Rajya Sabha debate is scheduled next Tuesday on the Pahalgam attack and Operation Sindoor, created amid pressure from the opposition to thoroughly examine the government’s actions

• Chidambaram and other Congress MPs, including Imran Masood and Manickam Tagore, warned that the government is avoiding substantive questioning by stalling or diverting attention.

Wider Political Implications

• This Chidambaram Pahalgam controversy has become a flashpoint in Parliament, with the BJP aiming to use it to portray the opposition as weak on terrorism while the Congress pushes for greater transparency.
• The issue also revives old debates over the role of U.S. diplomacy—particularly former President Donald Trump’s claim of brokering the ceasefire—and whether India’s decisions are influenced externally. Chidambaram called for full disclosure of that involvement.

International & Security Analysis

• The Pahalgam terror attack, committed by TRF (proxy of Lashkar-e-Taiba), killed 26 civilians and triggered aggressive Indian retaliation via Operation Sindoor. India maintains the attackers were Pakistani nationals, while dropping of bombs across border escalated tensions with Pakistan.
• Chidambaram’s assertions challenge the security establishment narrative and demand clarity on how terrorists crossed the border without detection, if they were indeed foreign nationals.

HP, July28,2025: The Jodidara marriage tradition traces back to tribal mythology and stories from……

Jodidara marriage tradition Explained

Jodidara marriage tradition is a rare, centuries‑old tribal custom in Himachal Pradesh where one woman marries two brothers, emphasising unity, land protection, and cultural pride. This powerful tale has ignited fresh national attention recently.

Historic Roots of Jodidara

The Jodidara marriage tradition traces back to tribal mythology and stories from the Mahabharata, most notably Draupadi’s marriage to the Pandavas, leading locals to call it “Draupadi pratha” or Ujala Paksha

. It evolved among the Hatti community of the Trans‑Giri region as a practical solution to preserve family land and joint inheritance.

The Recent Ceremony in Shillai Village

Consent and Cultural Pride

From 12–14 July 2025, Sunita Chauhan of Kunhat village willingly entered a Jodidara marriage tradition, marrying brothers Pradeep and Kapil Negi in a public, three‑day ceremony in Shillai, Sirmaur district. All three participants confirmed the union was mutually agreed upon and rooted in cultural pride.

Rituals, Music & Community Support

The wedding featured traditional rituals including “Seenj” ceremonies, folk music, dance, and community feasting. The event drew hundreds of villagers and relatives who celebrated openly, highlighting collective identity and shared joy.

Purpose Behind the Tradition

Preventing Land Fragmentation

In steep, resource‑scarce regions, Jodidara ensures family land remains undivided across generations. Kundan Singh Shastri, general secretary of Kendriya Hatti Samiti, explained the tradition prevents agricultural parcels from fragmenting over time

Ensuring Family Unity and Stability

Beyond economics, the tradition fosters stronger bond among siblings. The shared responsibilities create stability, and a larger united family is seen as more secure in tribal societies.

Legal & Social Recognition Today

Though polyandry is typically illegal in India, Himachal Pradesh allows it under customary law—referred to locally as Jodidar law—especially for tribal groups like the Hattis, who earned Scheduled Tribe status around 2022–2023. The state revenue records officially acknowledge Jodidara marriage tradition, granting it legal legitimacy in specific communities.

Contemporary Debates and Diverse Reactions

Despite consent and pride, the practice has sparked national debate. Supporters regard it as personal choice and cultural preservation; critics, including women’s rights advocates, argue it raises questions about exploitation and gender equity. Some believe transformations in socio‑legal norms may challenge its future relevance.

What the Future Holds for Jodidara

As education rises and lifestyles change, Jodidara marriage tradition has become rare. Only a handful of such marriages occur annually within the Hatti community. Yet this recent public and consensual ceremony might inspire a new wave of cultural pride and documentation, even as many hope such customs gradually fade or transform with evolving values..

Jaipur, July26,2025:Minutes before the collapse, students reported pebbles and debris falling from the roof

Jhalawar school roof collapse: terrible tragedy

Jhalawar school roof collapse shattered the calm of Jhalawar’s Piplodi village on the morning of July 25, 2025, when a portion of a government middle school roof collapsed during the routine assembly. Seven schoolchildren lost their lives and over 20 others were injured, some critically, sparking shock, outrage, and immediate demands for accountability.

Five heart‑wrenching failures exposed

Structural neglect

Despite recent rainfall and obvious signs of damage, the building had not been flagged as unsafe by the authorities. The school was absent from lists of dilapidated buildings submitted by the education department.

Ignored student warnings

Minutes before the collapse, students reported pebbles and debris falling from the roof. Teachers allegedly dismissed their fears, telling them nothing would happen—even while enjoying breakfast.

Teacher neglect at critical moment

Eyewitnesses recount that students were scolded and ordered to remain in class while teachers continued their breakfast outside. Soon after, the roof caved in.

Administrative apathy & delayed action

Complaints about the building’s condition were reportedly made earlier but were ignored. No timely repairs were initiated, resulting in preventable fatalities.

Lack of accountability until tragedy struck

Only after children died did authorities act. Five education department officials and teachers have been suspended. The state human rights commission demanded a report within seven days.

Warnings ignored: student pleas dismissed

Several students, including eyewitnesses, recounted that they informed teachers of falling debris well before the collapse. They were repeatedly told to sit quietly, given assurances that “nothing will happen.” Moments later, the roof collapsed, burying classmates in steel and concrete.

One pupil reflected: “We told sir bricks were falling; he told us to sit quietly… then the roof fell.”

Sachin Pilot’s blistering critique

Congress leader Sachin Pilot didn’t mince words, calling the incident a case of “criminal negligence.” He demanded an immediate, transparent probe and called for punishment for those responsible. Pilot criticized the government’s inaction despite having ample resources and infrastructure opportunities.

Government response and accountability measures

The state administration swiftly suspended five government school officials, including teachers, after the collapse.

Education Minister Madan Dilawar accepted moral responsibility, calling it a failure on his part. The National Human Rights Commission has demanded a detailed action report within seven days.

Rajasthan Chief Minister Bhajanlal Sharma has ordered audits and increased budget allocation for repairs of school and other public buildings under development schemes.

Public reaction and community grief

In Piplodi village, sorrow turned quickly to protest. Locals clashed briefly with police, demanding justice and immediate investigation. Parents and community members demanded closure and accountability.

Inside the Jhalawar hospital corridors, parents anxiously awaited updates on injured children. One distraught family performed last rites for their 8-year-old son Kartik while caring for his critically injured sister in ICU.

National ripple effect: safety audits underway

The tragedy prompted other states to act swiftly. Uttarakhand’s Chief Minister ordered safety audits of all school buildings and public infrastructure in response to the incident, underscoring zero tolerance for negligence toward children’s safety.

Former Chief Minister Vasundhara Raje criticized the state education department, urging a full-scale safety examination across Rajasthan.

Why this tragedy matters urgently

Children’s safety at stake: Children should never fear being in school.

• Systemic failure: Student warnings ignored, infrastructure unmonitored—despite available resources.
• Political accountability: Public trust erodes when officials delay action.
• Preventable loss: Early interventions might have saved lives.
• Policy implications: Urgent structural audits and infrastructure overhauls across all government buildings are needed.

demands for justice and reform

The Jhalawar school roof collapse is not just a tragic event—it is a symptom of deeply rooted systemic negligence. Seven innocent children have lost their lives due to ignored warnings, aged infrastructure, and administrative failure.

Sachin Pilot’s condemnation of criminal negligence serves as a rallying cry: this must be turning point. The state must ensure:

New Delhi, July 26,2025: A horrific incident involving the gang rape of a Home Guard aspirant inside a moving ambulance shocked the nation

Bihar rising crime crisis: the core issue

Bihar rising crime crisis is drawing urgent attention from Union Minister Chirag Paswan, who today expressed deep frustration with the Nitish Kumar–led state government. Despite being part of the same ruling coalition, Paswan stated he feels “ashamed to support a government where crime has become uncontrolled.

Seven disturbing facts behind the crisis

Surge in violent incidents

Daily incidents of murder, rape, gang rape, robbery, kidnapping, burglary, and eve-teasing are being reported across Bihar, indicating a severe breakdown of law enforcement.

Ambulance rape in Gaya

A horrific incident involving the gang rape of a Home Guard aspirant inside a moving ambulance shocked the nation. This event directly triggered Paswan’s severe outcry over the state’s inability to protect citizens.

Hospital shooting in Patna

Five armed men entered Paras Hospital and shot dead a criminal patient—a brazen act Paswan cited as proof that criminals are challenging law and administration openly.

Murder of businessman Gopal Khemka

A high-profile killing in Gandhi Maidan, Patna, stirred concerns over safety—even in affluent neighbourhoods—leading Paswan to question local policing effectiveness.

Administrative surrender to criminals

Paswan asserted, “the administration has bowed down to criminals or is entirely ineffective,” suggesting either incompetence or collusion.

Criminal morale at sky‑high

The minister claimed criminals are emboldened by their recent successes, operating without fear of consequences under the current administration.

Pre-election political web

While acknowledging possible conspiracies aimed at defaming the government ahead of elections, Paswan held that responsibility cannot be evaded—“even if defamation is motive, governance is still accountable”.

Chirag Paswan’s fierce criticism

• Paswan declared he feels sad and ashamed to support the government amid widespread lawlessness.
• Despite being an NDA ally, he emphasized that “support does not mean silence” on public safety issues.
• He warned of a “very frightening” future if the state continues failing to act decisively

Public safety breakdown: real examples

• A woman aspirant in Gaya was assaulted in an ambulance after collapsing—shocking evidence of protective services failing those in crisis.
• Armed criminals entered a hospital in Patna and fired shots in patient wards, highlighting flaws in hospital security and law enforcement response.
• The murder of Gopal Khemka in a major residential area signals danger even in supposedly secure zones.

Government and alliance response Neeraj Kumar, JD(U) spokesperson, defended the administration, citing continued trust from PM Modi and the people of Bihar and pointing to 100+ fast‑track courts being set up.

• While the government acknowledges crimes, Paswan insists the root problem lies in administrative failure—not just opposition plotting.

Why this crisis matters before elections

• Public trust erosion: Citizens are questioning safety under the NDA coalition.
• Internal alliance tension: Paswan’s open criticism reveals cracks in the NDA’s unity.
• Political stakes rising: With Bihar elections approaching, opponents are leveraging the crisis to challenge incumbency.
• Development vs lawlessness: Paswan’s Bihar First, Bihari First vision faces a credibility test amid perceived governance collapse.

External resources to explore further

Explore Law & Order frameworks under Indian federal structure via the Ministry of Home Affairs guidelines.

• Analyze governance failure cases (e.g., Muzaffarpur Shelter Home, caste violence, gang atrocities) via reports from the National Commission for Women (NCW) and National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB).
• Read strategic articles on Bihar’s political trajectory and electoral landscape: sources like Economic Times, Hindustan Times, and India Today.

urgent demands

The Bihar rising crime crisis is no longer just a worry—it is a public emergency. From ambulance gang rapes to public hospital shootings, the fabric of safety is unravelling.

Chirag Paswan’s statement isn’t political theatrics—it’s a wake‑up call. Action must include:

• Immediate administrative overhaul and senior accountability
• Enhanced police training and fast-track judicial measures
• Special safety protocols for vulnerable groups and mass gatherings
• Transparency and public communication to restore faith in governance

If left unchecked, this crisis threatens to define Bihar’s destiny in the looming electoral battle—and beyond. The time for administration to act is no