India
Bulldozers in Action: Unraveling the Nagpur Violence and Key Accused Fahim Khan’s House Demolition

Contents
Introduction to the Incident
The recent violence in Nagpur has sparked significant concern and debate across various sectors of society, highlighting crucial social and political dynamics at play. The unrest erupted amid tensions between different community groups, culminating in clashes that drew widespread media attention. The events were set against a backdrop of escalating socio-political grievances, involving issues of communal relations, identity politics, and the role of governmental authority in maintaining public order.
Initial reports indicate that the conflict began with a local incident that quickly escalated, igniting long-standing tensions within the community. As rumors spread and emotions flared, groups gathered, leading to confrontations that resulted in property damage and injuries. The situation rapidly deteriorated, drawing increased law enforcement presence and prompting officials to respond with force to quell the unrest.
At the center of this violence is Fahim Khan, who has emerged as a key figure in the unfolding narrative. His house became a focal point during the unrest, leading to demands for accountability and justice from those affected by the violence. The government’s subsequent decision to demolish Fahim Khan’s residence raised further questions regarding the appropriateness of such measures in response to civil disturbances. Critics argue that the demolition was not merely a punitive action but rather a politically motivated step aimed at consolidating power and suppressing dissent.
This incident in Nagpur violence serves as a stark reminder of the fragile state of communal harmony in certain regions of India. It reflects a complex interplay of historical grievances, contemporary conflicts, and the various stakeholders’ interests, illustrating how quickly tensions can escalate into violence. As the situation continues to develop, it is clear that the repercussions of this unrest will be felt throughout the community and beyond.
Who is Fahim Khan?
Fahim Khan is a prominent figure in Nagpur, Maharashtra, whose involvement in local politics and controversies has garnered significant public attention. Born into a modest family, he navigated his early life in a challenging socio-economic environment. Over the years, Fahim built a reputation as a community leader, known for his assertiveness and ability to rally support for various local issues. His rise in the political landscape can be attributed to his connections with key political figures, which enabled him to influence local governance and community decisions.
Despite his community-oriented facade, Fahim Khan’s tenure has not been devoid of conflicts. He has had several confrontations with law enforcement in the past, primarily stemming from allegations related to land disputes and the mobilization of local youth for political activities. His confrontations often escalated into larger public incidents, generating mixed reactions among the constituents of Nagpur. This contentious relationship with law enforcement has repeatedly placed him in the spotlight, making him a figure both revered and reviled within his community.
The recent Nagpur violence further cast Fahim Khan into the national narrative as a key accused. His alleged involvement in orchestrating unrest among different community factions during the violent outburst raised significant questions about the underlying motivations driving his actions. Critics argue that he exploited prevailing tensions for political advantage, reflecting a broader trend of utilizing violence as a tool for power. This perspective invites deeper scrutiny into the intricacies of his political maneuvers and their implications for local governance and social cohesion.
As the legal proceedings unfold, Fahim Khan’s story serves as a focal point for discussions about communal relations and political accountability in Nagpur violence. Understanding his background is essential for comprehending the broader impacts of the violence and the subsequent demolition of his house, which has become symbolic of the ongoing strife.
The Role of Bulldozers in Law Enforcement
In recent years, the use of bulldozers by law enforcement agencies in India has garnered significant attention, particularly in the context of civil unrest and riots. This mechanized equipment, traditionally associated with construction and demolition, has been repurposed as an instrument of law enforcement. The underlying rationale is to deter criminal activities and signal a strong government response to public disorder. The practice is rooted in the premise that demolishing properties linked to violence can serve as a form of retribution against offenders.
The legal framework governing the use of bulldozers during such events is complex and often controversial. Authorities typically rely on existing laws relating to public disorder, land use, and urban planning to justify these actions. Although demolishing structures linked to criminal incidents is sometimes viewed as a necessary means to uphold public order, it raises important questions about the legality and morality of such actions. Critics argue that the indiscriminate use of bulldozers may infringe on individuals’ rights and due process, often disproportionately affecting the lower-income segments of society.
Bulldozers have been utilized in several high-profile cases across India, where they have been deployed in the aftermath of riots or violent protests. This technique serves multiple purposes, including the demolition of illegal constructions and the dissuasion of potential offenders. When associated with specific incidents of violence, such as the recent Nagpur riots linked to key accused Fahim Khan, bulldozers symbolize the state’s resolve to address lawlessness and restore order. However, this approach has sparked widespread debate regarding its efficacy, ethical implications, and potential for abuse, thus highlighting the delicate balance between law enforcement actions and civil liberties.
Details of the Demolition
The demolition of Fahim Khan’s house took place on a significant day marked by heightened tensions within the community. The sequence of events began shortly after the local authorities received clearance to proceed with the destruction, which was reported to be a response to his alleged involvement in the recent violence. Early in the morning, heavy machinery, including bulldozers, arrived at the site, signaling an impending action that had been a hot topic of discussion in the community and beyond.
Local media coverage ramped up as news quickly spread about the demolition. Television channels broadcast live footage, capturing the bulldozers tearing down the structure, which had been the center of much controversy. Reporters on the ground provided real-time updates, emphasizing the emotional reactions from residents who had gathered to witness the event. The media’s portrayal varied significantly; some outlets framed the demolition as a necessary step towards restoring order, while others expressed concerns about the potential for escalation of community unrest.
The local community exhibited a mix of reactions, reflecting the complex social dynamics at play. While some residents expressed approval of the demolition, viewing it as a means of accountability, others protested against what they perceived as an unjust and disproportionate response. The atmosphere was charged with conflicting opinions, and the presence of law enforcement ensured that public order was maintained throughout the event. Eyewitness accounts detail a scene filled with tension, as bystanders grappled with their sentiments regarding justice and the implications of such demolitions on community relationships.
As the demolition progressed, reactions from various stakeholders, including community leaders and activists, began to emerge. Many concerned citizens called for a more nuanced approach to addressing the underlying issues contributing to the recent violence, highlighting the need for dialogue and community engagement rather than property destruction. The bulldozers, emblematic of the state’s assertive response, left a marked impact on the local landscape, both physically and socially, as the aftermath of the demolition continued to ripple through the community.
Public Reaction and Outrage
The demolition of Fahim Khan’s house in Nagpur has sparked significant public reaction and outrage, drawing attention from various stakeholders within the community. Local residents, political leaders, and social activists have all expressed their views on the incident, underscoring the complexity of the situation and the diverse opinions surrounding it.
Many residents in the area responded with shock and dismay, arguing that the demolition was an excessively harsh punishment for the alleged actions of one individual. This sentiment has been echoed widely on social media platforms, where discussions surrounding justice and due process have gained traction. Individuals have voiced concerns over the potential implications such actions might have on community trust in law enforcement and the judicial system. Proponents of due process argue that demolishing a person’s residence could set a dangerous precedent, undermining the fundamental principles of justice.
Conversely, some members of the community and political leaders contend that the demolition was necessary to uphold law and order. They argue that such measures serve as a deterrent against unlawful behavior, especially in light of the violent events associated with Khan. These voices highlight a segment of society that perceives immediate and stringent actions as essential for restoring peace and safety in the community.
Social activists have taken a particularly vocal stance, advocating for the protection of civil liberties and questioning the legality of the demolition. They emphasize the need for a balanced approach, calling for comprehensive investigations into the violence rather than widespread punitive actions that affect family members and the local community at large. Overall, the varied reactions to this incident reflect broader societal sentiments regarding justice, law enforcement, and the fine line between maintaining order and respecting individual rights.
Legal Ramifications for Fahim Khan
The recent violence in Nagpur, which has garnered significant media attention, has placed Fahim Khan, a key accused, at the center of legal scrutiny. The charges Khan may face are manifold and could potentially range from public disorder and rioting to more severe accusations, such as inciting violence and conspiracy. In the wake of the unrest, law enforcement authorities are tasked with determining the extent of his involvement, which will heavily influence the legal proceedings against him.
One of the critical aspects of this situation is the decision to demolish Khan’s residence. This action, although framed as a response to the violence, has broader implications for his legal standing. The demolition can be perceived as a punitive measure, raising questions about the due process and legality of such an action. In many jurisdictions, property destruction without due judicial process can complicate the legal landscape, especially if it can be argued that it undermines the principles of fair trial and presumption of innocence.
The charges that Khan faces could also severely affect his defense strategy. With the demolition of his home, key evidence and personal belongings might be lost, potentially hampering his legal counsel’s ability to build a robust case. Furthermore, public sentiment may have shifted against him due to the associated violence, complicating matters further as the prosecution might leverage this sentiment in their arguments. The legal ramifications of the course of events will not only shape the immediate proceedings but could also have lasting impacts on Khan’s future, affecting potential sentencing and his civil rights.
Comparative Analysis of Similar Cases
In addressing the recent violence in Nagpur associated with the key accused, Fahim Khan, it is crucial to examine comparable incidents across India where authorities employed demolitions as a punitive response. Such actions often evoke public debate over the balance between law enforcement and civil liberties.
One notable example occurred in Uttar Pradesh in 2022, where the properties of individuals alleged to be involved in communal riots were demolished. Authorities justified these actions by framing them as a necessary deterrent against future violence. However, critics argued that such measures disproportionately impact the accused and their families, raising concerns about the legality and ethics of demolishing homes without thorough judicial processes.
Another incident in Madhya Pradesh highlighted similar patterns. Following clashes during a festival, officials ordered the demolition of properties linked to suspects. Local government statements often emphasized the need for swift action to uphold public order. Yet, this approach has led to accusations of targeting minorities and selective enforcement, which further complicates the narrative surrounding justice and accountability.
The Nagpur situation reflects these broader trends, wherein demolitions serve as an extension of state power in response to violence. Authorities may perceive this as a means to restore order, but the implications extend beyond physical structures; they impact families and communities, often perpetuating cycles of fear and resentment. Evaluating Shaikh Fahim’s case alongside these incidents reveals recurring themes: the interplay of law enforcement tactics, societal pressures, and the critical discourse surrounding human rights.
As tensions mount in such scenarios, the legal frameworks guiding these demolitions warrant careful scrutiny to ensure they align with principles of justice and due process, striking a balance between maintaining public order and safeguarding individual rights.
Impacts on the Local Community
The recent violence and subsequent demolition of Fahim Khan’s house in Nagpur have reverberated throughout the local community, leaving lasting impressions both socially and economically. The events surrounding the violence fueled a climate of fear and uncertainty, particularly among residents who share similar backgrounds. Many in the neighborhood expressed feelings of vulnerability, worrying that they too could be subjected to similar actions regardless of their actual involvement. This erosion of trust among community members significantly affects social cohesion, fostering an environment where individuals may distrust their neighbors and feel isolated.
Economically, the fallout from this turmoil cannot be ignored. The local businesses that were already struggling due to the pandemic now face additional threats as customers fear visiting areas associated with violence. Business owners have reported declines in foot traffic, resulting in decreased revenue and job insecurity for employees. Furthermore, the demolition of property raises perfect questions regarding property rights and security, leading to broader concerns about investment in the area. Potential investors may be deterred by the perceived instability, thus hindering economic growth and development in Nagpur.
Also read : Political Maneuvers: MK Stalin Hosts Opposition Meet Amid BJP’s Criticism
The psychological toll on residents is profound, as witnessing such events can lead to heightened stress and anxiety levels. For families with children, concerns about safety loom larger than ever, impacting their quality of life. Many have reported increased instances of sleeplessness and fear, affecting daily routines and relationships. This collective trauma may lead to long-term psychological effects that necessitate community support and comprehensive mental health services to aid in recovery.
In summary, the violence and demolition associated with Fahim Khan’s case extend far beyond the immediate actions, significantly impacting the local community in Nagpur. The repercussions can be seen across social, economic, and psychological dimensions, highlighting the critical need for community solidarity and recovery initiatives.
Looking Forward: The Future of Law and Order in Nagpur
The recent violence in Nagpur and the subsequent demolition of Fahim Khan’s house have raised significant concerns regarding law enforcement practices and community safety in the region. As authorities analyze this incident, it is imperative to consider reforms that could enhance law and order while preventing similar occurrences in the future.
One crucial aspect of improving law enforcement is the implementation of community engagement strategies. Establishing strong relationships between law enforcement agencies and local communities can foster trust and cooperation. Initiatives like community policing, where officers collaborate with residents to address local issues, can help identify potential conflicts before they escalate. By involving community members in decision-making processes and ensuring their voices are heard, law enforcement can create a more harmonious environment.
Furthermore, training and equipping law enforcement personnel to handle such situations more effectively is critical. Emphasis should be placed on conflict resolution and negotiation skills, allowing officers to de-escalate volatile situations without resorting to force. Regular workshops and training sessions can prepare officers to engage with diverse communities sensitively, understanding the cultural contexts that may influence individual behavior and community dynamics.
Local governance must also play a pivotal role in preventing future incidents. Policies that promote transparency and accountability within law enforcement agencies are of utmost importance. Establishing independent oversight committees can ensure that police actions are monitored, particularly in high-tension situations. These committees can help restore public confidence in the law enforcement system, ensuring it serves the community effectively and justly.
In summary, the implications of the Nagpur violence extend beyond immediate consequences. They offer an opportunity to reevaluate and strengthen law enforcement strategies, emphasizing community engagement and accountability. Through careful consideration and implementation of reforms, Nagpur can work towards a safer future and mitigate the likelihood of similar incidents occurring again.
Breaking News
Gwalior SP Hina Khan stunned a mob of lawyers by chanting “Jai Shri Ram” during a tense face-off over Ambedkar statue row-

Contents
MP,Oct.16,2025:SP Hina Khan chants Jai Shri Ram, in a moment that instantly went viral across news and social media. The Gwalior City Superintendent of Police Hina Khan used the religious slogan to defuse tension during a heated clash with lawyers over the installation of a Dr B.R. Ambedkar statue in the High Court premises-
In a scene rare and provocative, both sides ended up chanting “Jai Shri Ram”, in front of a crowd, turning a legal dispute spiraling into a religious symbol clash. What exactly happened, and what does it signal for law, order, and communal sensitivity?
The Ambedkar statue dispute that set the stage
The controversy began in February 2025 when some lawyers petitioned to install a 10-foot statue of Dr B.R. Ambedkar in the Gwalior Bench premises of Madhya Pradesh High Court. Their proposal was backed by a few senior advocates and a platform was built by PWD authorities.
Later, the High Court Bar Association opposed the plan, claiming procedural lapses — no communication with the Bar, no building committee permission. Tensions escalated, especially after lawyer Anil Mishra made objectionable remarks about Ambedkar in a video, prompting legal complaints.
When lawyers attempted a Sundarkand paath (scripture recital) protest in a temple near the High Court, authorities stepped in citing prohibitory orders (Section 163). It was in this charged context that the confrontation with SP Khan unfolded.
The confrontation unfolds- Lawyers vs SP Khan
Attempted gathering denied
Lawyers led by Anil Mishra arrived near the Hanuman temple, planning a Sundarkand recital and setting up a tent. But SP Khan, acting under prohibitory orders, blocked the event, returned the tent materials, and requested compliance with law.
When Mishra’s camp accused Khan of being “anti-Sanatan Dharma” and began chanting “Jai Shri Ram”, chaos began.
The moments that shocked everyone
- The lawyers called Khan “anti-Sanatan,” raising a religious charge in a law and order dispute.
- Khan walked up, sustained eye contact, raised her fist, and chanted “Jai Shri Ram” four times.
- She addressed the crowd: “If you raise the slogan, so will I … But if you do it to put pressure, that is wrong.”
- The lawyers were stunned; chatter subsided, forced pause in confrontation.
- Khan later told media she was “saddened” by the accusation and said she acted to restore calm, not to provoke.
In effect: SP Hina Khan chants Jai Shri Ram became both a defying assertion and a symbolic gesture to break tension.
SP Hina Khan’s response- Why she joined the chant
A strategic and emotional move
Khan later explained her action was not planned rhetoric, but a spontaneous expression: “It was a feeling from my heart.” She said her first aim was to defuse the situation and maintain peace and law and order.
She also said that as an officer, her duty requires preventing escalation: “My goal was to ensure nothing happens that worsens the situation.”
Her background adds weight to the act
Khan hails from Guna district, originally from Aron tehsil. Her father was a retired teacher and her mother is a homemaker. She studied physiotherapy, briefly worked in the GST department as Assistant Commercial Tax Officer, and later joined the police via MPPSC in 2016, serving from 2018 onward.
This context — a Muslim woman officer choosing a Hindu chant in a sensitive scenario — magnifies the symbolic import of SP Hina Khan chants Jai Shri Ram.
lawyers, public, political voices
Lawyers and Anil Mishra’s stance
Mishra and his cohort claimed that Khan’s chanting was coerced or theatrics: she rang the chants under pressure. They asserted their Sundarkand recital and temple access were blocked.
Mishra said the temple was locked, participants blocked from entry, and protest was their only recourse.
Public and civil society response
Across social media and local public opinion, reactions ranged from applause to sarcasm. Many praised Khan’s calm and bold move; others criticized mixing religion into policing.
Several noted the rarity of a police officer chanting religious slogans in an operational context, particularly in a charged environment.
Political voices and media
The episode triggered wider debate: why would an SP join slogans? Was it law enforcement overreach or smart crowd control?
Media houses highlighted the clash of law vs religious assertion and questioned whether policing should remain secular in practice. Reports from Times of India: Khan’s chanting “calms lawyers.” Other media pointed to the accusation of being “anti-Sanatan” that triggered the move.
The incident is being framed as a microcosm of larger tensions over religion, authority, and symbolism in India.
Slogan politics, law enforcement, and symbolism
When slogans enter policing
A chant like “Jai Shri Ram” carries heavy religious and political overtones in India. Its invocation by a state official in a law-and-order context blurs lines between civic duty and symbolic alignment.
Yet, Khan’s usage may also reflect a tactical decision — using shared religious lexicon to pacify a charged crowd. It is a gamble: it can calm or inflame.
Defusing vs provoking
Given the crowd had already begun chants, Khan matching them might have signalled affirmation or control. Her follow-up line — “If you do it to pressure me, that is wrong” — attempts to draw a boundary.
So SP Hina Khan chants Jai Shri Ram functioned as both mirror and distinction: matching the crowd, yet denying coercion.
Impact on secular policing norms
Critics could argue that police must maintain religious neutrality; officials overtly adopting religious slogans risks favouring one group’s sentiment. Supporters will say in this instance it was situational — not ideological.
The episode tests the balance: maintaining secular institutional ethos while navigating emotionally charged religious flashpoints.
Symbolism in the Ambedkar dispute
Given the dispute centred on Ambedkar’s statue (a Dalit icon), the chanting of Jai Shri Ram layers additional symbolism. It juxtaposes Hindu symbol against Dr Ambedkar’s legacy, intensifying emotions.
Implications for communal balance and policing norms
Precedents and future policing
This moment may serve as a precedent — where state officers may feel emboldened (or pressured) to use religious symbolism in public confrontation. Future incidents may test whether Khan’s act was exception or turning point.
Communal sensitivity risks
In a diverse society, religious slogans in official action risk alienating sections. If a Muslim officer chants “Jai Shri Ram,” some see it as bridging, others as symbolic compulsion.
It raises questions: would she similarly have chanted in a dispute with another religious group? The optics matter immensely.
Political echo chambers
Opposition or ideological critics will use the incident to claim institutional bias or performative allegiance. Supporters will hail it as courageous and even unifying.
Thus, SP Hina Khan chants Jai Shri Ram may become a touchstone in political debates about religious expression in public institutions.
After the chant, what lessons remain
When SP Hina Khan chants Jai Shri Ram in a live, tense standoff, it forces reflection on the intersection of religion, authority and civil order.
Her act defused immediate anger — but the deeper debates linger: the boundaries of policing neutrality, the role of symbolism amid communal tension, and whether slogans can be tools of peace or provocation.
India’s public institutions operate in a complex mosaic of identity, faith, and law. This episode will likely remain a reference point — not because of the chant itself, but because it spotlighted tensions many prefer remain implicit.
Breaking News
Gujarat cabinet resignations, Gujarat ministers resign en masse, Bhupendra Patel, Gujarat politics, BJP Gujarat reshuffle-

Contents
Gujrat, Oct.16,2025:Gujarat ministers resign en masse — in a dramatic political development, all 16 ministers of the Gujarat state government, except Chief Minister Bhupendra Patel, have tendered their resignations. The move precedes a major cabinet reshuffle and has stirred speculation about internal dynamics, caste balancing, electoral strategies, and party consolidation-
This mass resignation is unprecedented in recent Gujarat history, especially with two years to go before the next assembly elections. It signals a bold reset by the BJP in one of its strongholds.
What exactly happened — timeline & key facts
- On October 16, 2025, all 16 ministers in the Gujarat government resigned their posts, leaving only CM Bhupendra Patel in charge.
- The resignations coincided with announcements of a cabinet expansion scheduled for the next day at Mahatma Mandir in Gandhinagar.
- Reports suggest approximately 5–10 ministers might be re-inducted or retained, while others would be replaced or shuffled.
- The size of the new cabinet is expected to increase from 16 to perhaps 22 or 23, keeping within Gujarat’s assembly limits (a maximum of 15% of total seats).
- The expansion and swearing-in are planned for October 17, 2025, at 11:30 a.m. This move is being interpreted as both proactive and tactical — possibly to manage internal discontent, refresh the government’s image, and reposition ahead of local and state-level elections.
Who resigned and the composition of the old cabinet
The outgoing cabinet had 16 ministers besides the CM, divided roughly evenly between cabinet rank ministers and state ministers.
Some of the cabinet ministers who submitted resignations include:
- Kanubhai Desai
- Rishikesh Patel
- Raghavji Patel
- Balvantsinh Rajput
- Kunwarji Bavaliya
- Mulubhai Bera
- Kuber Dindor
- Bhanuben Babariya
- Ministers of State who resigned include:
- Harsh Sanghvi
- Jagdish Panchal
- Purushottam Solanki
- Bacchubhai Khabad
- Mukesh Patel
- Prafull Pansheria
- Bhikhu Singh Parmar
- Kunwarji Halpati It’s worth noting that the cabinet structure just before the resignations comprised 8 cabinet ministers and 8 state ministers (or similar split) under CM Patel’s leadership.
The mass resignation spares only the chief minister, signaling that while the broader team was reshuffled, leadership continuity is intended.
Why did the ministers resign- Political calculus & expert views
Proactive reset ahead of local polls
One dominant interpretation is strategic — the BJP may be seeking to refresh its face ahead of municipal and district elections in 2026, and eventually for the 2027 assembly polls. By resetting the cabinet now, the party can reorient itself in response to shifting public mood and internal dynamics.
Blame shifting & internal accountability
Analysts suggest that the BJP wants to “dump” unpopular ministers — shifting blame for administrative lapses, underperformance, or local discontent onto them. This gives room for reallocation of portfolios, removes liabilities, and allows for fresh starts.
Political observer Vidyut Joshi argues that the BJP has previously responded this way when facing anti-incumbency waves — changing faces, shuffling ministers, and leveraging organizational resets.
Caste balance, regional representation & dissent management
Gujarat’s internal politics often hinge on caste mathematics and regional balance, especially between Saurashtra, North Gujarat, and South Gujarat. Some ministers’ resignations are thought to address perceptions of regional neglect or vote-bank discontent, particularly in Saurashtra where locals felt sidelined.
Senior journalist Kaushik Mehta claimed that voters from Saurashtra felt underrepresented and that BJP needed to correct the balance by inducting leaders from that region in key portfolios.
Professor Ghanshyam Shah (former JNU) observed that BJP’s current seat dominance is akin to Congress’s 1985 run, but managing so many MLAs’ ambitions is difficult. Cabinet reshuffle allows the party to placate internal factions.
Pressure from dissenters and external challenge (AAP threat)
The rise of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) in certain Gujarat pockets, and independent defections, have put pressure on BJP to show responsiveness. In regions like Botad and Visavadar, AAP’s ground presence is reportedly growing, so BJP may be recalibrating.
BJP may hope the shake-up both cools internal dissent and demonstrates to the electorate that it is responsive.
Rebalancing Gujarat- Saurashtra, caste, and regional politics
Saurashtra versus South Gujarat tensions
Saurashtra has long felt neglected relative to South Gujarat and Ahmedabad. Journalists and party insiders say the resignations reflect intent to give greater voice to Saurashtra in the incoming cabinet.
The placement of portfolios to balance the Patel (OBC) base in Saurashtra is cited as a factor. Leaders like Jagdish Panchal (resigned MoS) may be brought back in revised roles to appease certain communities.
Caste equations and BJP’s internal adjusters
BJP has historically managed internal caste fault lines. Resignations and new inductions provide an opportunity to rejig portfolio allocations to satisfy diverse castes and relocate disgruntled segments.
Because many resigning ministers belonged to key communities or regions, the vacancy slate offers flexibility to restructure representation.
Organizational signalling
This reset may also send a message internally — both to state MLAs and party workers — that performance, loyalty, and organizational discipline matter. New inductees will likely be those viewed as aligned with current leadership and party ideology.
What this means for BJP and the opposition
For BJP-Reset, but risk of instability
- A successful reshuffle could rejuvenate governance, remove underperformers, and reenergize BJP’s state machinery.
- But mass resignations are also risky: they may signal internal strife, give fodder to critics, and unsettle administrative continuity.
- Managing expectations among 182 MLAs is complicated; those excluded may feel alienated.
For opposition- A window to attack
Opposition parties, especially the Congress and the AAP, may portray the move as panic or admission of governance failure. They can question why ministers needed to resign — what failures they are hiding.
An opposition narrative could highlight that this is not renewal but damage control.
Electoral signalling
Gujarat’s local body polls (2026) and district panchayat elections are on the horizon. BJP’s reset may help it preempt anti-incumbency. The reshuffle may also lay groundwork for contesting assembly elections.
What to expect- New cabinet, potential names, strategy
Cabinet expansion edges
- The new cabinet is expected to expand to 22–23 ministers (within Gujarat’s limit of up to 27)
- Some ministers likely to be re-inducted; others replaced by fresh faces. Reports suggest 5–10 may stay.
- Younger and more performance-oriented faces may be favoured.
Possible ministerial names and factions
- Harsh Sanghvi: Was MoS — speculated for elevation or re-induction.
- Rivaba Jadeja: She was being discussed for elevation in recent reports.
- Key Saurashtra leaders: likely to be given important portfolios to realign voter sentiment.
- Possible deputy chief minister job: Names like Jagdish Panchal and Kunwarji Halpati are mentioned in reports about deputy CM speculation.
Strategy posture
- The BJP will likely tout fresh faces as a sign of accountability and rejuvenation.
- Performance will be emphasized over tenure.
- The timing suggests that ahead of civic polls, the new team will be expected to deliver visible results fast.
Gujarat ministers resign en masse is not merely a dramatic headline — it’s a strategic gambit. The BJP is betting that a bold cabinet reset can manage internal dissensions, rebalance regional and caste representation, and preempt electoral headwinds.
But achieving that requires finesse: inclusion of key stakeholders, maintaining administrative continuity, and convincing the public that this is renewal, not turmoil.
If the new cabinet is perceived as superficial or alienating to influential factions, it might breed resentment. But if executed well, it could reposition the BJP as responsive, performance-focused, and politically nimble in Gujarat.
Breaking News
Rahul Gandhi responded fiercely after Trump’s claim that India would halt Russian oil imports-

Contents
New Delhi, Oct.16,2025:Modi afraid of Trump, declared Rahul Gandhi in a scathing post on X (formerly Twitter), following Donald Trump’s claim that Prime Minister Narendra Modi had assured him India would stop purchasing Russian oil. Gandhi accused Modi of outsourcing critical decisions to Trump and ignoring repeated slights. The opposition leader’s remarks stirred new controversy in an already heated debate over India’s energy diplomacy and strategic autonomy-
Trump’s announcement on Russian oil
On October 15, 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump stated that PM Modi had given him a personal assurance that India would cease buying oil from Russia. He framed this as a big diplomatic win and a step to apply pressure on Moscow regarding the Ukraine war.
Trump emphasized that the move would not be immediate but would occur “within a short period of time.”
Reuters reported that Trump said, “He assured me today that they will not be buying oil from Russia,” positioning the announcement as part of a broader effort to curb Russia’s energy revenues.
However, the Indian government has not confirmed such an assurance. Critics and analysts immediately questioned whether this claim was part of political posturing.
Rahul Gandhi’s blistering post-5 core accusations
In response, Rahul Gandhi posted-
“Prime Minister Modi is frightened of Trump. He allows Trump to decide and announce that India will not buy Russian oil. He keeps sending congratulatory messages despite repeated snubs.”
He further said Modi had-
- Allowed Trump to make the announcement in his name.
- Continued sending congratulatory messages to Trump despite repeated neglect.
- Cancelled the Finance Minister’s visit to the U.S.
- Skipped attending the climate summit in Sharm el-Sheikh.
- Avoided contradicting Trump on Operation Sindoor. Gandhi also said:
“Modi is outsourcing key decisions to America, his famed ‘56-inch chest’ has shrunk.”
His tone was pointed, bold, and intended to shift the political narrative: rather than debating energy policy, the focus becomes leader inaction and perceived subordination.
India’s official response & strategic posture
In reaction, the government emphasized that energy decisions are guided by India’s own interests, especially those of consumers, not external dictates.
The Ministry of External Affairs stated-
“Our import policies are guided entirely by safeguarding consumer interests in a volatile energy scenario. Ensuring stable prices and supply security are twin goals.”
The government did not explicitly confirm or deny Trump’s reported assurance, choosing rather to lean into strategic ambiguity and highlight India’s history of independent energy policy.
Indian refiners, meanwhile, were reported to be exploring gradual reduction in Russian crude imports under pressure from tariffs imposed by the U.S.
But observers note that rapidly curtailing dependence on Russian oil cannot be done overnight — supply chains, refinery configurations, and alternate sourcing need time.
Energy dynamics, U.S. pressure and Indian autonomy
The U.S. leverage & tariff framing
Earlier in 2025, the Trump administration slapped a 25 % retaliatory tariff on Indian goods, citing India’s continued Russian oil imports. Later, an additional 25 % surcharge was introduced — raising the total to 50 %.
This tariff escalation is widely viewed as a tool to compel India to change its energy sourcing.
Trading analysts say the pressure is real: high tariffs can severely damage India’s export competitiveness.
Russia-India oil trade: deepening ties
Since the Ukraine war, India has sharply increased its buys of discounted Russian crude. Some estimates suggest 30–40 % of India’s oil imports now come from Russia.
Russia and India have also begun negotiating joint ventures to strengthen their energy cooperation.
Indian refineries have gradually adapted to processing heavier and varied crude grades to accommodate Russian oil.
Constraints, risks and strategic sovereignty
Switching away from Russian oil would mean revising contracts, adjusting refinery blends, and paying premiums for alternate crude. These changes risk inflationary pressures.
Import dependence, global price volatility, geopolitics (e.g. Middle East tensions) all constrain India’s freedom to drastically shift overnight.
Hence, while the U.S. pressure is material, India’s strategic calculus balances national interest — energy security, price stability, and autonomy.
Reactions across the political spectrum
- Congress & Opposition: They seized on Gandhi’s framing to challenge Modi’s leadership, arguing the Prime Minister is yielding to foreign demands.
- BJP & ruling camp: Likely to portray this as typical opposition theatrics, and emphasize India makes sovereign decisions.
- Media & analysts: Debate ranges from viewing Trump’s claim as exaggeration to assessing the practical difficulty of halting Russian imports immediately.
- International observers: Many treat Trump’s announcement with caution — noting India has made no formal statement confirming the commitment, and that energy policy shifts take time.
Broader implications for India’s foreign policy
- Strategic autonomy test: India’s response will be closely watched as a measure of whether strategic independence holds under pressure.
- U.S.–India ties: A commitment to curb Russian oil could ease tensions and unlock trade deals, but doing so under duress raises questions about sovereignty.
- Russia partnership: Reducing imports may strain the longstanding India–Russia energy bond, potentially pushing Moscow to seek new partners or leverage.
- Global energy realignments: India’s decision will impact global oil flows, pricing, and the effectiveness of sanctions on Russia.
Will Modi afraid of Trump become a lasting narrative
Rahul Gandhi’s slogan “Modi afraid of Trump” crisply captures his political counterattack against Trump’s claim about Russian oil. Whether it sticks will depend on how India responds — whether it confirms, denies, or acts.
Breaking News
Afghanistan, Pakistan-India tensions, Russian oil supply, India-Russia energy, proxy war, geopolitics-

Contents
Russia, Oct.16,2025:Afghanistan fighting India’s proxy war has been a dramatic narrative recently promoted by Pakistan’s defence circles. At the same time, Russian diplomats are vigorously defending Russia supplying India oil as mutually beneficial amid U.S. pressure. These competing storylines reflect broader fault lines: regional security, energy diplomacy, and influence in South Asia. This article explores both narratives in tandem, assesses their credibility, and teases out deeper geopolitical significance-
Trump’s claim vs Moscow’s response
Trump’s claim: India to stop buying Russian oil
On October 15, 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump publicly claimed that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi assured him India would cease purchasing Russian oil. Trump called this “a big step” in pressuring Moscow over the Ukraine conflict.
Trump’s comment followed previous U.S. measures: in August 2025, he escalated tariffs on Indian goods, notably citing India’s Russian oil imports as part of the rationale.
But India has not officially confirmed Trump’s assertion. New Delhi has instead emphasized its energy decisions prioritize national interest and consumer stability amid volatile global markets.
Russia’s rebuttal- Oil ties remain “beneficial”
Russia swiftly countered Trump’s claim. Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak affirmed that cooperation with India would continue “economically advantageous” and that India remains a friendly partner.
Likewise, Russian Ambassador to India Denis Alipov emphasized that Russia does not interfere in India–U.S. relations and defended Russian oil supply as extremely beneficial for India’s economy.
Thus, the competing claims set the stage: the U.S. paints India’s Russian oil purchases as a lever to influence Russia; Moscow and New Delhi portray them as pragmatic, sovereign choices.
Russia supplying India oil- Strategic motivations
From marginal supplier to dominant role
Before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, it played a limited role in India’s oil imports. But sanctions on Russian energy created a dramatic pivot: India began buying Russian crude at steep discounts.
By 2024–2025, Russia became one of India’s top oil suppliers, with estimates putting Russian crude at 34–40 % of India’s total imports.
Importantly, India’s state refiners have recently reduced Russian intake, but private entities like Reliance and Nayara have compensated by increasing their Russian crude purchases.
Mechanisms to sustain supply
To bypass Western sanctions, Russia reportedly uses “very, very special mechanism(s)” to keep oil flowing to India, per Russian embassy officials.
Moscow also remains keen on joint energy projects with India (e.g. in the Far East, Arctic) to deepen interdependence.
Benefits and risks
- Benefits for India: Lower-cost crude—often at discounts below Brent—boosts cost savings, energy security, and keeps inflation in check.
- Benefits for Russia: Diversification away from Western markets subjected to sanctions; stable revenue from one of few willing importers.
- Risks: Diplomatic pushback (e.g. U.S. tariffs), reputational costs, exposure to secondary sanctions, dependency in volatile geopolitical times.
“Afghanistan fighting India’s proxy war” A contrasting narrative
While the focus on Russian oil dominates headlines, a separate thread persists: Afghanistan fighting India’s proxy war—a narrative advanced by Pakistan’s defence establishment.
Origin and framing
Pakistan has periodically accused Kabul of harboring groups hostile to its security interests, alleging Indian influence behind such actors. In recent border clashes and fragile ceasefire scenarios, Pakistani officials have revived this line: that Afghan forces (or militants supported by Kabul) act at India’s behest.
By invoking “Afghanistan fighting India’s proxy war,” Islamabad aims to shift blame outward, link external support to internal security threats, and galvanize domestic narratives.
How the narrative plays
- It delegitimizes Afghan claims or defense actions by labelling them as part of Indian strategic designs.
- It provides a pretext for escalated response by Pakistan while framing the situation as defensive.
- It leverages information warfare: strong language helps dominate regional discourse even in the absence of transparent proof.
Strengths vs weaknesses
- Strengths: Resonates in Pakistani media and policy circles, plays into long-standing India-Pakistan strategic rivalry, taps into regional distrust.
- Weaknesses: Hard to independently verify; international press remains cautious and relies on multiple claims without endorsing proxy narratives. Independent coverage often limits itself to reporting clashes and ceasefire statements rather than affirming clandestine backing.
Geopolitical implications of both narratives
Energy diplomacy meets strategic rivalry
The two narratives—Afghanistan fighting India’s proxy war vs Russia supplying India oil—might seem unrelated, but they converge in how states project power, deter adversaries, and negotiate alliances.
- India’s growing reliance on Russian oil gives it leverage against energy pressures but also exposes diplomatic vulnerabilities.
- Pakistan’s proxy claims highlight how security narratives are weaponized to manage internal and external threats.
U.S.–India tensions in 2025
The U.S.–India diplomatic and trade crisis of 2025 erupted largely due to U.S. pressure on Indian oil imports from Russia, including steep 50% tariffs.
India’s decision-making becomes a balancing act among: securing energy at affordable rates, maintaining strategic autonomy, and managing U.S. expectations.
Stability in South Asia
Proxy war accusations risk reigniting escalation in already volatile zones (Pakistan–Afghan border, Taliban dynamics). Combined with energy competition, the region may see sharper alignments with outside powers (China, U.S., Russia) to secure strategic depth.
Reception, pushback and international commentary
- Indian media and analysts have largely treated Trump’s claim with skepticism, noting India’s consistent position on energy sovereignty.
- Western outlets emphasize the complexity of supply chains, sanction evasion, and careful maneuvering by New Delhi.
- Russian officials use diplomatic language to assert that supply decisions are bilateral and beneficial, rejecting allegations of coercion.
- Pakistan’s narrative of Afghanistan fighting India’s proxy war is amplified domestically, with limited traction in international forums unless backed by hard intelligence.
“Afghanistan fighting India’s proxy war” remains a powerful rhetorical tool in Pakistan’s strategic narrative arsenal, though its empirical basis is contested. Meanwhile, Russia supplying India oil is a tangible, ongoing reality affirmed by trade data and diplomatic confirmation.
Breaking News
Attorney General Approves Contempt Action Against Lawyer for Attempted Shoe Throw at CJI Gavai-

Contents
New Delhi, Oct.16,2025:In a significant development within India’s legal landscape, Attorney General R Venkataramani has granted consent to initiate criminal contempt proceedings against Advocate Rakesh Kishore. This decision follows an incident on October 6, 2025, where Kishore attempted to throw a shoe at Chief Justice of India (CJI) B R Gavai during a Supreme Court hearing. The incident has sparked widespread condemnation and raised concerns about the sanctity of judicial proceedings-
Background of the Incident
The incident occurred during a routine Supreme Court session when Advocate Rakesh Kishore, aged 71, allegedly hurled a shoe towards CJI Gavai. Reports indicate that Kishore shouted, “Sanatan ka apmaan nahi sahenge” (“We will not tolerate disrespect to Sanatan Dharma”) before the act. Security personnel swiftly intervened, and the shoe did not make contact with the bench. CJI Gavai remained composed and directed the court to continue proceedings. The Bar Council of India (BCI) suspended Kishore’s license pending an inquiry, labeling the act as “a blot on the legal fraternity.”
Legal Reactions and Proceedings
Following the incident, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta and Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) President Vikas Singh jointly approached the Supreme Court, requesting the initiation of criminal contempt proceedings against Advocate Kishore. On October 16, 2025, the Supreme Court was informed that Attorney General R Venkataramani had granted consent for such proceedings. In his consent letter, the Attorney General described Kishore’s actions as “not only scandalous but also calculated to demean the Supreme Court.”
The Supreme Court bench, led by Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi, acknowledged the gravity of the situation. However, they expressed concerns about the potential repercussions of reviving the matter, suggesting it might fuel further social media debates. The bench indicated that the case would be considered after the Diwali break.
Public and Political Reactions
The shoe-throwing incident has elicited strong reactions from various quarters. Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah condemned the act, linking it to ideological influences by mentioning that the accused was a “person belonging to Sanatan Dharm.” Following the episode, an FIR was filed against the lawyer in Mysuru.
Union Minister Ramdas Athawale also expressed his disapproval, suggesting that the attack occurred due to CJI Gavai’s Dalit background. He called for action under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
On the other hand, Advocate Rakesh Kishore has maintained that his actions were not caste-motivated. He stated, “Can someone tell my caste? Maybe I am a Dalit too,” and offered to provide his caste certificate to prove his background.
The Attorney General’s consent to initiate contempt proceedings against Advocate Rakesh Kishore underscores the seriousness with which the Indian legal system views any attempt to undermine its authority. As the Supreme Court prepares to hear the case post-Diwali, the incident serves as a stark reminder of the importance of maintaining decorum and respect within judicial proceedings. The legal community and the public await the Court’s decision, which will likely set a precedent for handling similar incidents in the future.
Breaking News
Gauhati High Court Quashes Lower Court’s Order in Rahul Gandhi Defamation Case-

Contents
Gauhati, Oct.16,2025:In a significant legal development, the Gauhati High Court has provided a major relief to Congress leader Rahul Gandhi by quashing a lower court’s order that allowed additional witnesses in a long-standing defamation case. This decision has garnered widespread attention and has implications for the legal proceedings against Gandhi.
Background of the Defamation Case
The defamation case against Rahul Gandhi dates back to 2016 when RSS worker Anjan Kumar Bora filed a criminal defamation petition. The case stemmed from remarks made by Gandhi during his visit to Barpeta Satra in Assam, where he alleged that RSS workers had prevented him from entering the monastery. The trial court had recorded statements from six witnesses, and in March 2023, the magistrate had declined to allow additional witnesses. However, the additional sessions judge later permitted the inclusion of new witnesses, prompting Gandhi’s legal team to challenge this decision in the Gauhati High Court.
Gauhati High Court’s Recent Ruling
On October 13, 2025, Justice Arun Dev Choudhury of the Gauhati High Court heard the criminal revision petition filed by Gandhi’s legal team. The court found that the application for additional witnesses was vague and lacked specific details, leading to the magistrate’s original decision being upheld. Justice Choudhury criticized the lower court’s intervention, stating that it had “mechanically interfered” with the reasoned order of the magistrate. Furthermore, the High Court directed the trial court to expedite the proceedings, considering Gandhi’s status as a sitting Member of Parliament. This ruling effectively limits the scope of additional evidence in the ongoing defamation case.
Legal Implications of the Decision
The Gauhati High Court’s decision underscores the importance of adhering to procedural norms in legal proceedings. By quashing the lower court’s order, the High Court has reinforced the principle that applications for additional witnesses must be substantiated with clear and specific details. This ruling may set a precedent for similar cases, emphasizing the need for transparency and specificity in legal applications.
Public and Political Reactions
The High Court’s decision has elicited varied reactions from the public and political circles. Supporters of Rahul Gandhi view the ruling as a vindication of his stance, interpreting it as a check on the misuse of legal provisions. Opponents, however, may perceive it as a setback in their efforts to hold public figures accountable. The case continues to be a topic of discussion, reflecting the intersection of law and politics in contemporary India.
The Gauhati High Court’s ruling in the defamation case against Rahul Gandhi marks a significant development in the legal landscape. By quashing the lower court’s order allowing additional witnesses, the High Court has emphasized the need for specificity and clarity in legal applications. As the case proceeds, it will likely continue to influence discussions on the balance between legal procedures and political accountability.
Breaking News
Jaipur Police’s Night Raid132 Arrested in Major Crackdown-

Contents
Jaipur, Oct.16,2025:In a significant move to curb rising crime rates, the Jaipur Police conducted a surprise raid late at night, resulting in the arrest of 132 individuals. This operation, dubbed ‘Operation Domination,’ aimed to dismantle criminal networks and restore public confidence in law enforcement-
The Operation- ‘Domination’
‘Operation Domination’ was a meticulously planned initiative by the Jaipur Police to target known criminals and disrupt illegal activities. The operation was carried out under the guidance of senior police officials and involved extensive surveillance and intelligence gathering.
Execution and Coordination
The operation was executed with precision, involving multiple police teams and coordination with other law enforcement agencies. The arrested individuals were found to be involved in various criminal activities, including drug trafficking, illegal arms possession, and organized crime.
Profile of the Arrested Individuals
Among those arrested were several individuals with prior criminal records. Their apprehension is expected to have a significant impact on the local crime landscape, leading to a decrease in criminal activities in the region.
Public and Media Reaction
The public response to the operation has been largely positive, with many expressing relief and support for the police’s efforts. Media coverage has highlighted the operation as a successful example of proactive policing.
‘Operation Domination’ marks a decisive step in Jaipur’s ongoing battle against crime. The successful execution of this raid demonstrates the police’s commitment to ensuring public safety and upholding the rule of law.
Breaking News
Online Shopping Scam Alert 2025 warns shoppers of 4 ruthless fraud tricks used this Diwali-Protect your bank data and avoid being cheated-

Contents
Jaipur, Oct.16,2025:Online Shopping Scam Alert 2025 begins with a stern warning from Rajasthan’s Cyber Crime Branch. With Diwali approaching and online purchases skyrocketing, fraudsters are stepping up their game. Under the guise of popular e-commerce platforms, they are deploying four major scam tactics to drain bank accounts, hijack OTPs, and mislead consumers. This Online Shopping Scam Alert 2025 is intended to arm you early — before the deals tempt you-
This advisory is backed by top officials. Rajasthan’s Deputy Inspector General (DIG) of Cyber Crime, Vikas Sharma, has urged the public to spot and avoid these dangerous traps before damage is done.
Why This Year Is Riskier
In 2025, the digital boom across India means more people are shopping online than ever before. But this rapid growth also gives criminals a larger playground. The government reports that cyber fraud incidents rose from 10.29 lakh in 2022 to 22.68 lakh in 2024.
As internet penetration deepens and trust in UPI and digital payments grows, scammers are exploiting that trust. This year, they have refined their tools: fake apps, cloned websites, AI-generated messages, and social engineering. The stakes are higher in Diwali season, when festive urgency clouds caution.
Hence, this Online Shopping Scam Alert 2025 is both timely and essential.
The 4 Most Common Fraud Schemes
Below are the four principal ways scammers are ripping people off this festive season-
Fake E-commerce Websites & Apps
Scammers create websites or mobile apps that mimic trusted online stores. The interface looks real. You log in, add items, and enter payment details — but the money goes straight into the fraudster’s account.
They often register domain names very similar to reputed brands (for example, flipkart-xyz.com) and advertise them on social media or via SMS. Once your data is in, they’ll ask for OTP or banking details and vanish.
WhatsApp / Social Media Links & “Lucky Draws”
This trick is pervasive: via WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram, or SMS, a “lucky draw” or “mega coupon” link is forwarded. It promises huge discounts, free gifts, or a chance to win something big. Curious users click. That link either takes them to a phishing site or a fake page requesting login or payment credentials.
These offers often look extremely attractive — just what people want during Diwali sales.
Refund / Order Cancellation Trick
In this scheme, fraudsters pretend your order was cancelled or ask for “refund verification.” They call or message, asking you to share OTP or bank details so they can “process refund.” Instead, they use that data to siphon money.
They may also coax you into clicking on a “refund adjustment link” that leads to a phishing site.
Impersonated Customer Care / Fake Helpline
Scammers impersonate the customer care numbers of e-commerce platforms. They may use spoofed caller IDs or fake numbers found via Google search. Then they ask for your bank account, card number, or OTP, claiming it’s required for resolving a complaint or refund.
Victims trust the conversation and unwittingly hand over sensitive credentials.
Real Cases & Local Incidents
Several incidents confirm these scams are happening now:
- Rajasthan Police recently warned about fake QR code fraud, where criminals overlay counterfeit QR codes onto legitimate ones in shops, diverting payments to their accounts.
- In Jaipur, two people were arrested for defrauding around ₹42 lakh through promises of investment returns and crypto schemes—though not exactly a shopping scam, the modus operandi of phishing and fake promises is similar.
- Earlier, Rajasthan police issued a broader advisory on malware and phishing attacks, especially via fake websites and malicious links.
- The central CBI recently cracked down on a ’digital arrest’ fraud network, highlighting the dark side of impersonation and psychological coercion.
These cases underscore that fraud is not just a warning—it’s reality.
Must-Do Safety Measures
After issuing this Online Shopping Scam Alert 2025, here are five critical steps you must take-
- Always use official websites or their genuine apps
Don’t trust third-party links. Visit verified URLs or app stores. Check that the domain is correct and secure (https, padlock). - Never share your OTP / PIN / bank info
No legitimate service will ask you for OTP or banking credentials. Guard them as your most vital secret. - Avoid clicking unknown or suspicious links
If a link seems too good to be true, don’t click. Even WhatsApp forwards can be traps. - Verify customer care numbers only from official sources
Ignore Google search results or messages claiming they’re support. Use contact numbers listed on the official app or site only. - Don’t fall for “lucky draw” or free gift offers when asked for personal data
A genuine brand won’t demand your bank details just to hand out freebies.
If you suspect fraud, immediately call 1930 (Indian Cybercrime Helpline) and file a complaint on the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (cybercrime.gov.in).
How Authorities Are Responding
Rajasthan Cyber Crime Advisory
Rajasthan Police’s Cyber Crime Branch, led by DIG Vikas Sharma, has formally issued warnings about these four fraud tactics. Residents are urged to stay vigilant, apply the safety tips above, and report any suspicious attempt immediately.
National Helpline & Reporting Portals
India has set up 1930 as a toll-free number for cybercrime complaints.
The National Cybercrime Reporting Portal lets victims lodge incidents online.
These platforms improve cross state coordination, speed of response, and evidence gathering.
Recent Major Crackdowns
- Under Operation Chakra-V, CBI raided ~40 locations to sweep out operators of “digital arrest” frauds.
- In Rajasthan, authorities arrested a kingpin, Barkat Ali, for running a mule-account network involving nearly ₹20 crore.
- The CBI also uncovered shell firms laundering money via UPI and crypto. These efforts show authorities are not passive—they are fighting back.
Red Flags to Spot Immediately
Be alert if you see-
- Slightly altered URLs (extra letters, missing characters)
- Offers that require instant action (“click right now”)
- Messages pressuring you for OTP, PIN, or bank info
- Mismatch in app branding (logo blurry, spelling errors)
- “Customer care” numbers only shared via message or comment
- Urgent refund requests or order cancellations that demand input
Any one of these should prompt you to stop, verify, and not proceed.
What to Do if You Fall Victim
If fraud strikes-
- Lock your bank account immediately — contact the bank and ask to block transactions.
- Report to local cyber police / nearest station
- Lodge complaint via 1930 and the national portal
- Collect evidence — screenshot messages, URLs, call logs
- Follow up — ask for FIR, tracking number, progress
- Warn your contacts so they don’t become next victims
Quick action improves chances of recovery or tracing.
Stay Vigilant This Festive Season
This is your Online Shopping Scam Alert 2025 — it comes not to scare, but to empower. Diwali and festive shopping are joyous, but fraudsters are always lurking in the shadows.
Use the four fraud-scams list above as your checklist. Keep your wits about you. Don’t let excitement override caution. If ever in doubt — stop, verify, and act prudently.
Breaking News
Diwali in Jaipur 2025 brings mesmerizing lights, global visitors, and centuries-old traditions fused with modern flair-

Contents
Jaipur, Oct.16,2025:Diwali in Jaipur 2025 begins with the famed Sindoorī sham — a dusk so red and amber it seems painted on the sky — and then the flickering of countless diyas and modern lighting transform the Pink City into a living canvas. Every lamp kindles a story, every glow a hope. As the Diwali in Jaipur 2025 celebrations unfurl, Jaipur’s fortified walls, palaces, bazaars, and winding lanes pulsate with light, color, and festivity-
From the old city ramparts to soaring shopfronts, clusters of light sway like constellations around you. Over five days, the markets of Parokata, Johari Bazaar, Tripolia, Kishanpol, Choti Choupad, and Badi Choupad become radiant stages, merging centuries-old tradition with dazzling spectacle.
Jaipur’s heart throbs in light during Diwali in Jaipur 2025, and with every year the city beckons more: from France, Japan, and the United States, travelers arrive to capture its luminous beauty and cultural pulse.
Historical Roots- From Savai Jai Singh II to Modern Splendour
The tradition of lighting Jaipur’s evenings stretches back to the eighteenth century under Maharaja Sawai Jai Singh II, who commissioned diya-lit festivities at the Govind Dev Ji Temple, City Palace, bazaars, and parks. Over time, the ritual evolved — until 1949, ghī-based lamps were used exclusively; post that, electric lighting crept in. Jaipur Foundation’s founder-president Siasaran Lashkari notes that for decades, markets were illuminated collectively, and today this communal decoration is a defining identity.
In the earlier days, markets like Tripolia, Johari, Kishanpol, Choti/Badi Choupad, and Choura Marg would be lit by traditional lamps for three days during Diwali through Bhai Dooj. Royals and British-era dignitaries often traveled to witness Jaipur’s brilliance.
Thus Diwali in Jaipur 2025 is not a new spectacle—it’s a 300-year continuity, enriched with layers of community pride, innovation, and storytelling.
Heritage, Swadeshi & Operation Sindoor
This year, Diwali in Jaipur 2025 brings forward carefully curated themes. Decorators have blended heritage motifs, swadeshi (make-in-India) symbolism, and the recently coined Operation Sindoor message across bazaars. In Chhoti Chaupar, massive tableaux depict Indian women pilots, tricolors, naval ships, and nationalistic allegories.
At Tripolia Bazaar, the theme is the tricolor, while other markets spotlight “GST Savings Festival” and eco-friendly lighting. Jaipur Vyapar Mahasangh’s president, Subhash Goyal, confirms that no foreign goods will be sold in markets during the five festival days.
The Operation Sindoor tableau in Chhoti Chaupar is curated by artisans from Bengal, with scenes like the BrahMos missile launch, women in defense roles, and Indian technological pride.
Thus, Diwali in Jaipur 2025 is more than festivity—it is storytelling through light and theme.
Johari, Tripolia, Chhoti, Badi Choupad
Each market in Jaipur adopts its own character-
- Johari Bazaar: jewels and gemstones set within a luminous backdrop; hanging lanterns, glowing canopies, and curvilinear strings of lights frame shop facades.
- Tripolia Bazaar: bathed in the tricolor motif; pathways lined with bulb strings echoing saffron, white, green.
- Chhoti & Badi Choupad: these bazaars transform nightly into corridors of light, with archways and facades aglow.
- Kishanpol & Choura Marg: heritage themes — palaces, temples, folk motifs — come alive in neon reliefs and classic lanterns.
During Diwali in Jaipur 2025, these streets no longer feel like markets—they become immersive light exhibits.
Global Gaze- Visitors from France, Japan, USA
One of the striking features of Diwali in Jaipur 2025 is its cross-border allure. The Rajasthan tourism department expects 2 to 2.5 lakh visitors daily in Parokata area alone. Among them, French, Japanese, and American travelers come specially to witness the Pink City illuminated in its festive splendour.
These visitors carry cameras and drones, capturing Jaipur’s magic from angles we locals may never see. What was once a regional spectacle is now a destination festival—Diwali in Jaipur 2025 is marketed globally, and people come to experience it with lens, heart, and memory.
The Vanished Marghpali Tradition
In earlier eras, the second day of Diwali in Jaipur saw the Marghpali procession — a grand parade starting from City Palace, weaving through Tripolia Bazaar to Badi Choupad and back. The procession included Mahimratab Nishan, elephants, ceremonial flags (Indrāvīman), and royal finery.
VIP seating would be arranged near Tripolia Gate, and citizens would line the ramparts to watch. This tradition, rooted in Mughal-era royal ritual, gradually faded over decades. Today, the memory of Marghpali lingers, occasionally evoked in cultural recreations, but not as a live event.
If revived, that spectacle would enhance Diwali in Jaipur 2025 even more, reminding spectators of its regal past.
LED Lights, Laser Shows & 3D Illumination
While the old ghī-dīya gave way decades ago, Diwali in Jaipur 2025 embraces technology loudly-
- LED streetlights: The state government installed 2 lakh LED lamps across cities ahead of festivals.
- Laser projections & 3D mapping: Palaces and building façades transform with animated visuals, floral illusions, and shifting patterns.
- Theme gates: Themed entrances recreating landmarks — Mysore Palace, Titanic ship, Disney Land, Metro — invite people into narrative spaces.
- Light balloons & pink theme: On MI Road, 1,100 light balloons and over 11,000 diyas are set up along the 2.5 km stretch, shining in pink tones this year. Thus, Diwali in Jaipur 2025 becomes a fusion where heritage meets cutting-edge.
Crowd, Traffic, Fireworks Regulation
Large-scale illumination means logistical challenges. Key steps taken-
- No-parking zones: The Walled City becomes off-limits to vehicles during the festival; visitors are urged to park at Ram Niwas Bagh and use e-rickshaws through Ajmeri and Sanganeri Gates.
- Firecracker shop licenses: Jaipur police approved 1,394 of 2,083 firecracker sale applications; JMC-Heritage issued 516 temporary licences. Yet safety compliance is uneven, with cramped shops lacking emergency exits or proper fire-fighting gear.
- Ambulance deployment: 108 ambulances are on dynamic festive duty, prepared for potential firecracker or traffic emergencies.
- Traffic management: MI Road will operate as one-way between Ajmeri and New Gate; alternative routes are suggested for through traffic. While infrastructure is scaled up, enforcement remains crucial to prevent mishaps.
Socio-cultural Impact- Identity, Economy & Community
Diwali in Jaipur 2025 carries weight beyond mere spectacle-
- Cultural identity: The city reaffirms itself as Pink City of Lights, balancing tradition and modernity in a global frame.
- Economic boost: Local artisans, lighting firms, electricians, street vendors all gain from the festival’s scale.
- Community cohesion: Collective decorations, themed planning, and shared celebrations strengthen neighbourhood ties.
- Tourism branding: Jaipur is positioning itself as a Diwali destination comparable to prominent global festivals.
Every bulb, every arch, is part of an evolving narrative of belonging, pride, and renewal.
Top Spots & Best Times
Here’s a short guide for experiencing Diwali in Jaipur 2025
- Best times: Evening (6:30–10:30 pm) when dusk deepens to night—lights are at their crescendo.
- Top routes: Begin near Parokata and Walled City, then traverse Tripolia, Johari, Kishanpol, Choti/ Badi Choupad.
- Special features: Operation Sindoor tableaux in Chhoti Chaupar; MI Road’s pink theme; heritage motifs in bazaars.
- Photography tip: Use a tripod, long exposure, and wide-angle lens to capture light trails and illuminated gates.
Let your footsteps carry you through stories of legends, craftsmanship, and luminous reverie.
Challenges & Criticisms-Safety Gaps and Sustainability
Even the brightest glow has shadows-
- Fire risk: Noncompliance among firecracker shops poses threat in densely packed lanes.
- Maintenance & power load: Excessive lighting may strain supply and result in outages if not managed.
- Waste & cleanup: Decorative materials, broken bulbs, fuel for generators — disposal and recycling must be managed.
- Commercial pressure: The push for growth and profit may edge out authentic street-level expression.
- Crowd control: High influx, if unmanaged, can lead to stampedes, congestion, or accidents.
For Diwali in Jaipur 2025 to endure its brilliance, planning must respond to risks, not just aesthetics.
Diwali in Jaipur 2025 is more than a fest; it’s an evolving tapestry of light, theme, history, and ambition.
Breaking News
Dipawali Puja Vidhi 2025 Discover the sacred and step-by-step ritual guide to worship Goddess Lakshmi, Lord Ganesh & Kuber for prosperity-

Contents
New Delhi, Oct.16,2025: Dipawali Puja Vidhi 2025 begins with radiant hope, inviting wealth, wisdom, and well-being into homes. On the night of Diwali, devotees perform the Lakshmi–Ganesh puja with deep faith, believing that the right ritual in the right sequence brings divine blessings. In 2025, this ritual holds extra devotion as households all over India prepare to welcome Goddess Lakshmi, Lord Ganesh, and Lord Kuber at the auspicious moment of Amavasya-
Lakshmi is the deity of wealth and prosperity, Ganesh the remover of obstacles, and Kuber the treasurer of riches. Performing Diwali Puja Vidhi 2025 in the prescribed manner ensures balance: material prosperity anchored by spiritual wisdom.
Date, Muhurat & Timing for Lakshmi Puja 2025
The most critical element is performing the puja at the right time. According to Drik Panchang, Lakshmi Puja in 2025 should be done in Pradosh Kaal, which begins after sunset and spans about 2 hours and 24 minutes.
Many calendars also note that on Diwali night, the Amavasya Tithi (new moon) spans from afternoon of October 20 to evening of October 21.
In practice, an auspicious window is typically around evening to early night, varying by city. For instance, Vedantu cites an approximate evening muhurat slot (e.g. 19:08 to 20:18 in Delhi) for Lakshmi Puja in 2025.
Hence, you should consult your local Panchang (regional almanac) to pinpoint the precise muhurat in your city.
Why Worship Lakshmi, Ganesh & Kuber Together
- Lakshmi grants abundance, prosperity, and comfort.
- Ganesh is worshipped first, as he removes obstacles and bestows wisdom, ensuring that the blessings of Lakshmi can endure.
- Kuber is revered as the lord of wealth—especially financial and material riches. Including him reinforces the invocation of stable prosperity.
Combined, this triad ensures not just wealth, but the capacity to sustain it with clarity, ethics, and protection.
Preparations Before Starting the Puja
Before launching into the formal steps, certain preparations are essential-
- Take a purifying bath and don fresh, clean clothes (preferably traditional attire).
- Clean the puja site thoroughly, sweeping and washing the floor, doors, windows.
- Lay a red cloth or new cloth on a low platform (chowki) for the deities’ seat.
- Assemble all puja materials (listed later) neatly.
- Decorate the surroundings with rangoli, marigold garlands, mango or banana leaves, and lights/diyas.
- Place a Kalash (a copper or brass pot) filled with water, mango leaves, and a coconut on top — a sanctified symbolic vessel.
- Draw or place Swastika, “Shree” or sacred symbols around the puja space.
Such careful preparation aligns the environment for the Dipawali Puja Vidhi 2025 to unfold with harmony.
Step-by-Step Dipawali Puja Vidhi 2025
Here is a refined, easy-to-follow ritual sequence that aligns with classical tradition and contemporary homes:
Avahan (Invocation)
- Begin with Pranam / Namaskar — salute to all deities.
- Invoke Lord Ganesh first, offering him flowers, Durva grass, sweets.
- Then invoke Goddess Lakshmi — you may recite invocation mantras, e.g. “Om Shreem Mahalakshmyai Namah.”
- Optionally, invoke Kubera with a Kubera mantra to seek blessings of affluence.
Abhishek (Holy Bath)
- Offer a panchamrit / panchopachar snan (mix of milk, curd, honey, ghee, water) or mixture of milk, yogurt, honey, tulsi, and Gangajal to the deities.
- Use a spoon or small pot to pour sanctified water over the idols.
- Wipe gently, then return the idols to their place.
Decoration & Alankara (Adornment)
- Apply kumkum / turmeric / chandan on the forehead (tilak) of the idols.
- Dress the idols with garlands of red flowers (roses, hibiscus) and necklace/har ornaments if available.
- Place lotus or red flowers before Goddess Lakshmi.
- Use a red cloth or silk beneath idols.
- Surround the idols with lighted diyas, incense holders, and decorative lamps.
Offering Bhog & Naivedya
- Offer fruits, sweets, dry fruits, and coins or currency (money) near the idol.
- Place puffed rice, rice grains, betel leaves, coconut, etc.
- Optionally, include khilas (sugar, milk sweets) and candy (batasha).
- In some households, devotees also place symbolic items the deity “likes” (per family tradition).
Lighting Deepak & Aarti
- Light a ghee lamp (deepak) and place before the deities.
- Wave the lamp in a circular motion in Aarti, first for Ganesh, then for Lakshmi (and Kubera if included).
- Use a bell during Aarti.
- Sing or recite Aarti songs / stotras (e.g., “Shri Lakshmi Aarti,” “Ganesh Aarti”).
- After Aarti, offer flower petals (pushpanjali) and Pradakshina (circumambulation) if space permits.
Mantra Japa & Stotra Recitation
- Chant Vedic mantras or Lakshmi / Ganesh stotras, e.g. Shri Suktam, Ganesh Atharvashirsha.
- Repeat 108 or 11 / 21 times, per your capacity.
- Meditate with devotion, visualizing divine energy entering your home.
Shankha, Kshama & Prasad Distribution
- Blow Shankha (conch) three times (if available).
- Seek forgiveness (kshama) from family and ancestors, asking for blessings and pardon for any wrongs.
- Distribute the Prasad (prasadam) — sweets or fruits among family and guests.
- Clean up respectfully and dispose of leftover items (like flowers, offerings) as per tradition (e.g. immerse in flowing water, or bury them respectfully).
With these 10 steps, your Dipawali Puja Vidhi 2025 is complete.
Essential Puja Materials List
Here’s a concise checklist for your convenience:
- Red cloth / clean cloth
- Chowki / low platform
- Idols / pictures of Ganesh, Lakshmi (and Kuber if used)
- Kalash with water, mango leaves, coconut
- Gangajal (holy water)
- Panchamrit ingredients (milk, curd, honey, etc.)
- Turmeric, kumkum, chandan
- Red flowers, lotus, garlands
- Fruits, sweets, nuts, puffed rice
- Coins / currency
- Betel leaves, coconut
- Deepak (oil or ghee lamp) & wicks
- Incense sticks (agarbatti)
- Bell, conch (shankha)
- A tray for Aarti
- Plate or holder for Prasad
- Clean utensils, spoons, vessel
You can adapt or omit items per tradition, but aim to include essential symbolic offerings.
Regional & Traditional Variations You May Include
- In some regions, devotees first worship Kubera before Lakshmi.
- Hukka Paati tradition in Mithila: after main puja, members light hookah-patti from the diya and sprinkle coloured rice across rooms and the yard.
- In certain states, devotees may also pray to Saraswati, especially in a learning household.
- Some households include Navagraha (nine planets) worship along with the Lakshmi–Ganesh puja.
- Temple or priestly (Tantric) forms may include Mahanishita Kaal rituals (deeper nighttime rites).
- Mantras or stotras may differ by regional lineage.
You may blend your family traditions with the standard Diwali Puja Vidhi 2025 steps above.
Tips & Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Don’t rush: Begin early so you can finish within the muhurat calmly.
- Clocks & timing: Verify your city’s Panchang rather than relying on generic times.
- Cleanliness is paramount: A dirty altar displeases deities.
- Offer fresh flowers & food; stale items are inauspicious.
- Don’t skip Ganesh invocation—always worship Ganesh first.
- Overcrowded idols: Avoid crowding too many deities in a cramped space.
- Neglecting family participation: Involve all family members in the ritual for unity.
- Rushing mantra chanting: Chant with devotion and clarity, not speed.
- Unsafe fire handling: Be cautious with diyas/lamps near cloth, curtains, or children.
Spiritual Significance & Benefits
When performed with sincerity, Diwali Puja Vidhi 2025 is believed to-
- Attract wealth, prosperity, and abundance into the home
- Remove financial and life obstacles via Lord Ganesh’s blessings
- Strengthen faith, unity, and calmness in family
- Establish spiritual harmony and inner peace
- Bring the grace of Goddess Lakshmi to dwell in one’s home
Every diya lit, every mantra uttered, and every offering given is a gesture to invite light over darkness, positivity over negativity.
Dipawali Puja Vidhi 2025 is more than ritual—it’s an opportunity to reset spiritually, purify your home, and re-center on higher values. With devotion, clarity, and tradition, the evening’s worship can become a pathway to lasting blessings.
May your home be filled with light, your life enriched with harmony, and your heart anchored in faith. May Goddess Lakshmi smile upon you, Lord Ganesh remove every obstacle, and Kuber bless you with abundance—today and always.
- Breaking News1 month ago
Balen Shah, Kathmandu’s independent mayor, from rapper to political leader. Explore his rise amidst Nepal’s youth-led revolution-
- Breaking News3 weeks ago
Kanya Pujan 2025 Step-by-Step Rituals, Timings, and Powerful Benefits Explained-
- Breaking News4 weeks ago
Shoaib Akhtar criticism, Pakistan vs India Asia Cup 2025-
- Breaking News3 weeks ago
Joganiya Mata history reveals her connection to the Hada dynasty, sacred legends, and evolving rituals at Chittorgarh’s revered temple-
- Breaking News4 weeks ago
Celebrate Chamunda Mata Ji Temple Navratri 2025 with nine days of spiritual devotion, cultural festivities-
- Breaking News1 month ago
Pitru Paksha 2025-Seven Powerful Rituals and Sacred Places to Free Five Generations
- Breaking News3 weeks ago
Abhishek Sharma’s explosive 75 runs secured India’s spot in the Asia Cup 2025 Final- Will India face Pakistan or Bangladesh next-
- Breaking News1 month ago
Mumbai Ganesh Visarjan Security is elevated with AI, drones, 10,000+ CCTVs, over 21,000 police personnel and