Viral News
Understanding Trump’s Mass Deportation Efforts Amid US Military Support to India
Contents
Introduction
Recent developments in US foreign policy have garnered significant attention, particularly the decision to deploy military aircraft to India. This strategic move comes at a time when the Trump administration is implementing mass deportation efforts within the United States. The juxtaposition of these two actions raises important questions regarding the implications and interconnections between US military support to foreign nations and the domestic immigration strategies currently in play.
The US administration’s choice to bolster India’s military capabilities signals a strengthening of partnerships in the region, a rationale that may be rooted in geopolitical interests. These actions appear to align with a broader strategy aimed at countering rising influences, particularly from nations seen as potential rivals. However, while the administration places emphasis on international military collaborations, it concurrently enforces strict immigration policies, resulting in widespread deportations of undocumented individuals within the United States. This dual approach prompts a critical examination of how foreign policy and immigration practices influence each other.
As the Trump administration continues to pursue aggressive deportation tactics, the societal and political ramifications are substantial. The interrelation of military engagements and immigration policies invites a discussion around the ethical implications of such strategies. Are the enforcement of mass deportation and the support of allied nations conflicting interests, or do they reflect a cohesive vision of national security? This blog post aims to dissect these interconnected narratives, examining how recent military assistance to India intersects with domestic immigration efforts. By exploring these themes, we seek to understand the broader context of current events and their impact on both international relations and domestic policy.
Overview of US-India Military Relations
The military relationship between the United States and India has evolved significantly since the Cold War, reflecting a shared strategic interest in maintaining regional stability. Formal ties began to take shape in the early 1990s, following India’s economic liberalization, which opened avenues for deeper defense cooperation. The partnership initially focused on counter-terrorism and defense dialogues but has since expanded to encompass a range of cooperative initiatives.
Key milestones in this relationship include several pivotal defense agreements that have been established over the years. Notably, the 2002 General Security of Military Information Agreement (GSOMIA) set the foundation for greater information sharing, while the 2016 Logistics Exchange Memorandum of Agreement (LEMOA) further facilitated logistic support for military operations. These agreements have made significant strides in enhancing interoperability between American and Indian armed forces.
Joint military exercises also play a crucial role in solidifying the strategic partnership. Exercises such as ‘Yudh Abhyas’ and ‘Malabar’ have become regular fixtures, allowing personnel from both nations to engage in operational scenarios that replicate real-world challenges. These collaborative drills have not only improved tactical proficiency but have also fostered a greater understanding of each military’s capabilities and doctrines.
The strategic importance of this military relationship is underscored by recent trends in defense shipments. The United States has been increasingly viewed as a critical partner for India, especially in light of regional dynamics and security threats from neighboring countries. This has resulted in a consistent flow of military equipment, from advanced fighter jets to naval systems, thereby enhancing India’s defense capabilities. The growing collaboration signifies a commitment to not only strengthen bilateral ties but also to ensure a stable balance in the Indo-Pacific region.
Trump’s Mass Deportation Strategy
Donald Trump’s administration implemented a series of policies aimed at mass deportation of undocumented immigrants, marking a stark shift in the United States’ immigration practices. Central to this strategy was the increased collaboration between federal and local law enforcement agencies, which paved the way for a more aggressive approach to identifying and detaining individuals lacking legal status. The focus on heightened enforcement was characterized by the expansion of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations, particularly in urban areas where undocumented populations were thought to be more concentrated.
The rationale behind these mass deportation efforts stemmed from Trump’s broader agenda to reduce illegal immigration, which he framed as a threat to American jobs and public safety. The administration argued that undocumented immigrants were responsible for increased crime rates and that their presence undermined the rule of law. The enactment of stricter policies, including the termination of programs like Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), further illustrated this commitment to enforcing immigration laws without exception.
The social implications of these deportation strategies were profound, creating an environment of fear and uncertainty among immigrant communities. Many families faced the horror of sudden separation, as loved ones were apprehended and deported without warning. Furthermore, these policies escalated tensions within communities, as neighbors and advocacy groups grappled with the pervasive atmosphere of distrust. Politically, the mass deportation strategies galvanized both supporters and protesters, influencing discussions around immigration reform and human rights. This divided response underscored the complex relationship between immigration policies and the broader socio-political dynamics in the United States.
In conclusion, Trump’s mass deportation strategies significantly impacted the immigration landscape of the United States, fundamentally altering the lives of millions while igniting widespread debate about their long-term consequences.
Impacts on Immigrant Communities
The mass deportation efforts implemented during Trump’s administration have had profound effects on immigrant communities across the United States. One of the most significant impacts has been the pervasive atmosphere of fear that has enveloped these communities. Reports indicate that many immigrant families live in constant anxiety about potential deportations, leading to an erosion of their sense of security and belonging. According to a study conducted by the Pew Research Center, approximately 7.6 million undocumented immigrants resided in the U.S. as of 2018, and a large percentage of these individuals reported heightened levels of stress related to immigration enforcement actions.
Family separation has emerged as another devastating consequence of deportation policies. The emotional toll on families, particularly for those with children, is immense. Many parents have been detained or deported, leaving their children to navigate life without their primary caregivers. A heartbreaking anecdote shared by a community advocate illustrates this issue: a mother was deported back to her home country, leaving her two American-born children behind. Cases like this exemplify the real human cost of these policies, as families are torn apart and children are left to face uncertain futures.
In response to such challenges, social activism within immigrant communities has surged. Grassroots organizations have mobilized to advocate for immigrant rights, providing support and resources to those affected by deportation fears. The rise of movements such as “Families Belong Together” and campaigns aimed at local policy changes highlight the resilience of these communities. By fostering solidarity and raising public awareness, activists seek to counter the impacts of mass deportation policies, emphasizing the contributions of immigrants to society and advocating for comprehensive immigration reform.
The Intersection of Foreign Policy and Immigration
In recent years, the relationship between foreign policy and domestic immigration policies has come under increased scrutiny, particularly in the context of the United States’ commitment to military support for countries like India. This intersection can significantly influence attitudes towards immigration, framing it through the lens of national security and geopolitical interests. The US government’s approach to foreign policy often has ripple effects domestically, impacting how immigration issues are perceived and managed.
The ongoing refugee crises around the world, exemplified by conflicts in regions such as the Middle East and South Asia, highlight the complexities involved. While the U.S. has a long-standing history of providing refuge for those fleeing persecution, its foreign policy decisions can create paradoxes. For instance, military support extended to nations like India might reinforce narratives suggesting a need for stringent immigration controls, suggesting that a stronger relationship with particular states can justify limiting asylum opportunities for refugees from regions experiencing turmoil.
Moreover, public sentiment regarding immigration is frequently shaped by foreign policy narratives. A vigorous military partnership may breed apprehensions about security and sovereignty, leading to a less welcoming stance on immigration and increased calls for deportation, as seen in the policies associated with the Trump administration. To navigate the implications of such foreign policy decisions, a nuanced understanding of the global refugee landscape is essential. It allows policymakers to engage with immigration issues not solely from a nationalistic perspective but with an appreciation for international humanitarian responsibilities.
In conclusion, the dynamic interplay between U.S. foreign policy and immigration is crucial for understanding the broader implications of military support. This interaction carries significant weight in shaping the discourse around immigration, highlighting the urgent need for comprehensive policies that reconcile national interests with humanitarian obligations.
Political Reactions and Public Opinion
The political landscape surrounding President Trump’s mass deportation efforts and U.S. military support to India has elicited a range of reactions from government officials, advocacy groups, and the public. Many politicians have taken firm stances on these intertwined issues. Supporters of Trump’s deportation strategy, primarily from the Republican Party, argue that enforcing immigration laws is vital for national security. They maintain that a strong stance on immigration is necessary to protect American jobs and resources, while expressing approval of the administration’s military backing of India as a means to counterbalance regional threats, particularly from China.
Conversely, Democrats and progressive advocacy groups have vocally opposed both the deportation policies and military support. Critics describe the mass deportation efforts as inhumane and divisive, arguing that they disproportionately impact vulnerable populations, including families and children. Organizations such as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) have launched campaigns to condemn Trump’s immigration policies as a violation of human rights. Similarly, regarding military assistance to India, some lawmakers have raised concerns over human rights abuses and potential military escalation in South Asia, calling for a careful reassessment of U.S. foreign policy.
The public opinion surrounding these issues is similarly polarized. Polls indicate that while a segment of the population supports strict immigration laws, a significant portion advocates for more humane approaches, including pathways to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. Views on military support to India also show a divide; some citizens believe that strengthening alliances in Asia is crucial for global stability, while others view it as a step towards unnecessary military engagement. Consequently, as the political climate evolves, the intersection of these two highly charged issues reflects broader societal divisions and ongoing debates about America’s role both domestically and on the global stage.
Legal Challenges to Deportation Policies
The mass deportation policies initiated during the Trump administration have faced significant legal challenges, resulting in a complex landscape of immigration law and enforcement. Various courts have scrutinized these policies, leading to landmark decisions that shaped the enforcement of immigration laws in the United States.
One of the most prominent cases was National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) v. Trump, where plaintiffs argued that the administration’s deportation strategies were not only unconstitutional but also racially discriminatory. The court ultimately ruled that there was insufficient evidence to prove that the policies were enacted with discriminatory intent. Nonetheless, this case spotlighted the importance of equitable treatment in immigration enforcement.
Another key legal battle arose from the implementation of the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP), also known as the “Remain in Mexico” policy. The program required asylum seekers to stay in Mexico while their claims were processed. In California v. Trump, several states challenged this policy, arguing that it violated international law and endangered migrants. The courts ruled against the continuation of MPP, emphasizing the need for compliance with humanitarian rights.
Furthermore, the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program became a focal point of litigation. In United States v. Texas, states were allowed to intervene against the Trump administration’s efforts to rescind DACA. The Supreme Court ultimately upheld the DACA program, citing procedural improprieties in the rescission process that violated the Administrative Procedure Act.
Through these legal avenues, various stakeholders including states, advocacy groups, and individuals have sought to challenge and alter deportation practices. As the judicial rulings unfolded, they illuminated the complexities surrounding immigration enforcement and the challenges faced by those subjected to deportation, paving the way for further debate on U.S. immigration policies.
Future Implications for US Immigration Policies
The evolving landscape of US military support to India may have significant implications for future US immigration policies. This dynamic reflects broader geopolitical strategies and the administration’s varying focuses on international alliances versus domestic concerns, particularly immigration. As the United States continues to enhance its military relationship with India, various potential shifts in immigration policy may emerge, particularly regarding the regulation of deportations and immigrant rights.
Historically, the approach to immigration has varied widely between administrations. Policies under recent administrations have oscillated between more stringent deportation efforts and attempts to provide pathways for undocumented immigrants. As military support to strategic partners like India is prioritized, there may be a reallocation of resources and attention away from immigration reform, affecting the landscape of deportation policies. Such shifts could lead to a more fragmented approach to immigration enforcement, potentially prioritizing certain nationalities over others based on geopolitical calculations.
Looking ahead, future legislation will likely be influenced by the administration’s stance on immigration as the political climate evolves. If a shift towards more globalist or humanitarian approaches occurs, enhanced focus on the rights and integration of immigrants could emerge, leading to fewer deportations and more support programs. Conversely, if an administration adopts a more nationalistic posture, it could result in heightened deportation efforts and stricter immigration controls, potentially directed at populations from regions deemed less favorable in diplomatic context.
Thus, the intricate relationship between US military endeavors, particularly in regions like South Asia, and immigration policy will serve as a critical focal point for stakeholders. Understanding how these policies affect individuals and communities will be essential for navigating future changes in US immigration and deportation strategies.
Summary
In examining the multifaceted dimensions of Trump’s mass deportation efforts alongside the US military support to India, it becomes evident that foreign policy and domestic immigration strategies are intricately linked. The mass deportation agenda, which focused on stringent immigration enforcement, was not just a domestic issue but one that resonated with broader geopolitical considerations. The administration’s approach mirrored its priority on national security and an assertion of American sovereignty, which were complemented by its foreign dealings with nations such as India.
The support extended to India, through military agreements and geopolitical partnerships, underscores a strategic alliance that was meant to counterbalance rising influences in Asia. This foreign policy initiative paralleled domestic strategies, where hardline positions on immigration were justified by national security imperatives. As the majority of these immigration policies were framed around maintaining order and prioritizing American citizens, they also reflected an underlying need to project strength both within and outside the US borders.
As we reflect on these decisions, it is clear that the coordination of military assistance and immigration controls illustrates a notable intersection in US policy formation. The potential outcomes of these intertwined strategies prompt us to consider their long-term impact. What does the relationship between escalated mass deportations and international military partnerships signify for future administrations? Will the trajectory of US policies continue to navigate this complex landscape, or will a shift toward more humanitarian and inclusive practices emerge on both domestic and international fronts? Such questions remain critical as the nation strives for a balance between security and compassion in an increasingly interconnected world.
Contents
India, July30,2025: Previously, the group match vs Pakistan was outright cancelled after Indian players and a main sponsor, EaseMyTrip, voiced opposition
India Champions refuse play Pakistan WCL semi‑final
At the very outset, India Champions refuse play Pakistan WCL semi‑final has become one of the most talked‑about stories in cricket and sports politics. When the Indian legends team led by veterans like Yuvraj Singh and Shikhar Dhawan secured their spot in the World Championship of Legends (WCL) semi-final, the expected matchup against Pakistan Champions turned into a national controversy.
That anticipated showdown was scheduled for July 30–31, 2025, at Edgbaston, Birmingham. However, India made it clear: they would not take the field.
How the controversy unfolded
Despite a shaky group stage—losing to South Africa, Australia, and England—the India Champions qualified for the semis by defeating West Indies Champions in dramatic fashion in just 13.2 overs.
Previously, the group match vs Pakistan was outright cancelled after Indian players and a main sponsor, EaseMyTrip, voiced opposition. Indian cricket icons publicly refused to play.
With that precedent, when standings placed them against Pakistan again in the semis, the boycott was restated: India Champions refuse play Pakistan WCL semi‑final, no ifs, no buts.
Who backed the boycott: Players and sponsors
Indian legends take a stand
Shikhar Dhawan emphatically told reporters, “Didn’t play before, won’t play now.” His firm stance echoed through the camp. Former stars like Suresh Raina and Harbhajan Singh also rejected participation. Reports confirm Yuvraj Singh, Dhawan, Yusuf Pathan and others were central to the decision.
EaseMyTrip withdraws sponsorship
EaseMyTrip, the tournament’s major sponsor, publicly exited. Co‑founder Nishant Pitti stated:
“Terror and cricket cannot go hand in hand… Nation first, business later”
He added they would not support any match that “attempts to normalise relations with a country that promotes terrorism”.
Historical context and cricket diplomacy
The India–Pakistan rivalry in cricket isn’t new. Social and political tensions have often interrupted sporting ties—Kargil, Mumbai attacks, and recurring suspensions. India hasn’t toured Pakistan since 2013.
Attempts at “cricket diplomacy” have happened before—for example in 2011—but the current environment, marked by terrorist attacks such as the Pahalgam attack on April 22, 2025, and escalating military tensions, has hardened public sentiment.
Reactions from experts and former players
Media and cricket analysts
Former Pakistan spinner Danish Kaneria criticized the Indian stance in The Times of India: calling out what he termed “selective patriotism”—especially since India continues to agree to Asia Cup fixtures against Pakistan later this year.
Former Pakistan captain Salman Butt added fuel, saying that India’s boycott should extend to ICC tournaments and even Olympics if taken consistently.
International voices
Australian legend Brett Lee commented neutrally: organizers tried to save the match, but respected the players’ stand. The cancellation underscored the sensitivity of geopolitical tensions affecting sports.
Fallout for WCL and cricket fans
The cancellation of a marquee semi-final has rattled WCL’s credibility. Fans expected a high-voltage contest; global broadcasters prepared coverage. Yet the organizers formally apologized for “hurting sentiments” and canceled the fixture entirely.
WCL now faces scheduling chaos and sponsorship concerns. When a top sponsor walks out, and one team refuses to play, it leaves tournament integrity in question.
What’s next: BCCI response and future implications
According to Navbharat Times, with India Champions refusing to play, pressure mounts on BCCI to issue an official stance or possibly impose sanctions. The ambiguity around selection and participation may impact future veteran leagues.
Meanwhile, the Asia Cup 2025 schedule lists India vs Pakistan matches in September—but with sensitive timing, this boycott has sparked questions about India’s consistency.
BCCI chief coach Gautam Gambhir had earlier expressed personal opposition to playing Pakistan at any venue until violence subsides.
India Champions refuse play Pakistan WCL semi‑final isn’t merely a sports boycott—it reflects deeper socio-political fault lines. The move, supported by players and sponsors alike, demonstrates how cricket cannot remain insulated from geopolitical realities.
In refusing the match, India Champions asserted intent: some national sentiments cannot be compromised for glamour or legacy. Whether one views it as principled patriotism or inconsistency ahead of multi-nation tournaments, the debate is far from over. With Asia Cup looming, BCCI’s next steps will reverberate across cricket diplomacy.
Business
India‑US tariffs warning surfaces as President Trump signals possible 20‑25% levy on Indian exports
US, July30,2025: The Indian rupee reacted swiftly, weakening to around ₹86.23 per U.S. dollar, its lowest level in four months, as investors feared tariff disruption and surged foreign outflow
India‑US tariffs warning – What triggered the alert
India‑US tariffs warning emerged when U.S. President Donald Trump, speaking onboard Air Force One, indicated that India may face 20% to 25% tariffs on its exports, citing New Delhi’s historically high import duties on U.S. goods.
This statement came just two days before Trump’s August 1, 2025 reciprocal tariff deadline—raising alarm among Indian officials and traders.
What Trump said on Air Force One
Trump reaffirmed that India is a “good friend”, yet stressed India has charged more tariffs on U.S. exports than nearly any other country. He declared that under his leadership, this imbalance “can’t continue”.
He clarified that no tariff decision is final, stating: “I think so” when asked if 20‑25% is likely—but emphasised negotiations are still underway.
India’s trade talks: deadlock & strategies
India and U.S. negotiators have completed five rounds of talks, but key sticking points remain—especially on agriculture, dairy, and genetically modified crops. India has resisted opening those sectors.
Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal, however, described the progress as “fantastic”, expressing confidence a broader trade deal could be concluded by September or October.
India is also preparing to receive a U.S. delegation in mid‑August to resume talks, aiming ultimately for long‑term preferential access and exemptions from steep retaliatory tariffs.
Likely economic impact & rupee reaction
The Indian rupee reacted swiftly, weakening to around ₹86.23 per U.S. dollar, its lowest level in four months, as investors feared tariff disruption and surged foreign outflows totaling over $1.5 billion in July.
Markets expect the Reserve Bank of India to intervene if the rupee weakens further, though any strong policy move is deemed unlikely amid uncertainty.
Insights from officials & analysts
Several Indian government sources suggest a temporary rate of 20‑25% could be imposed as an interim measure—but expect a rollback if a deal is reached before or after the deadline.
Analysts argue India’s exports—particularly gems, jewellery, and pharmaceuticals—would face major impact under 26% tariffs originally threatened in April.
India’s position is strategic: secure favourable terms rather than hastily lock in an interim deal that may compromise broader interests.
How reciprocal tariffs work
Under Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs policy, a universal 10% baseline tariff was announced on April 2, 2025. Countries with higher trade barriers toward the U.S. may face custom reciprocal rates, tailored individually.
These rates are based on existing duties, trade balances, and monetary barriers. India’s average tariffs hover around 12%, compared to the U.S. average of 2.2%, fueling Trump’s rationale.
Trade outlook: where negotiations stand
Despite approaching deadlines, no interim India‑U.S. deal seems imminent. Indian sources say finalising a comprehensive deal by October remains the goal—but agreements may be sectoral if broader talks stall.
Reuters noted India has yet to receive a formal tariff notice—unlike 20+ other countries—which some analysts view positively: signaling India remains central in Washington’s trade agenda.
Useful external resources
- U.S. Trade Representative updates on reciprocal tariff policy
- Reserve Bank of India notices & FX reports
- Indian Commerce Ministry: trade negotiation bulletins
At a glanceTopic Highlight India‑US tariffs warning Trump hints India may face 20‑25% tariffs if deal fails Trade negotiations Five rounds completed; blockage on agriculture/dairy Economic fallout Rupee drops to ₹86.23; markets brace for volatility Outlook India aims for comprehensive deal by Oct; interim tariff possible Risk mitigation Exporters to re‑model costs; RBI likely to support rupee
This India‑US tariffs warning marks a critical juncture: trade talks teeter under geopolitical pressure, while economic consequences loom large. As the August 1, 2025 deadline nears, careful preparation by exporters, strategists, and policymakers will be pivotal. Whether a tariff or a favorable deal emerges will shape the trajectory of India–U.S. trade relations in the years to come.
Contents
Russia,July30,2025: The epicentre was shallow—only 19–20 km deep—about 119 km east‑southeast of Petropavlovsk‑Kamchatsky, at the subduction interface of the Pacific and Okhotsk
Russia Kamchatka Quake Tsunami Threat
Russia Kamchatka quake tsunami threat emerged early on July 30, 2025, when a massive magnitude‑8.8 earthquake struck off Russia’s Far Eastern Kamchatka Peninsula. This event triggered tsunami warnings from Japan across the Pacific to Hawaii, Alaska, and beyond.
Magnitude & Tectonic Context
This quake, measured at 8.8 by USGS, ranks among the top six strongest earthquakes ever recorded, and is the most powerful in the region since 1952.
The epicentre was shallow—only 19–20 km deep—about 119 km east‑southeast of Petropavlovsk‑Kamchatsky, at the subduction interface of the Pacific and Okhotsk Sea plates along the Kuril‑Kamchatka Trench.
Impact in Russia: Severo‑Kurilsk & Petropavlovsk
Three tsunami waves struck Severo‑Kurilsk, with heights of up to 5 metres (16 ft), flooding the port and surrounding areas. Residents were evacuated, and local infrastructure suffered, including a fish‑processing plant and a damaged kindergarten where no one was present.
In Petropavlovsk‑Kamchatsky, buildings shook intensely for minutes; several people sustained minor injuries. The quake was described as the strongest in decades.
Japan Evacuations & Nuclear Precautions
Japan’s Meteorological Agency issued tsunami warnings from Hokkaido to Wakayama, later upgraded from advisory to warning for potential wave heights up to 3 metres (10 ft).
An estimated 1.9 million people were urged to evacuate coastal zones. Coastal prefectures including Fukushima ordered precautionary evacuations of workers at both Daiichi and Daini nuclear plants, though no anomalies were reported.
Small tsunami waves—about 1.3 m (4 ft)—were recorded on Hokkaido’s coast, with no major damage or injuries reported.
Hawaii & U.S. West Coast Alerts
The Pacific Tsunami Warning Center issued warnings for Hawaii and Alaska, later downgraded to advisory after continued monitoring.
In Hawaii, waves of up to 1.7 m (5.5 ft) hit Oahu and Maui—measured at Kahului (4 ft) and Hilo (4.9 ft)—prompting evacuations, traffic gridlock, and shelter openings. Flights and harbours were closed or rerouted.
Northern California and British Columbia saw small wave activity and advisories; waves reached 1–1.5 ft.
How Tsunamis Form & Forecast Challenges
Tsunamis are triggered by sudden seabed displacement—typically undersea earthquakes at subduction zones—causing massive water movement and long-period waves.
Unlike daily tides, these waves travel at jet‑like speeds across ocean basins, slowing and rising sharply as they approach shore.
Forecasting precise arrival time, height, and impact remains complex due to ocean depth variations and coastal geography. Multiple waves may follow over hours or days.
Scientific Insights: Accuracy & Aftershock Risks
Aftershocks as high as M7.5 are expected and may continue for weeks, according to Russian geophysicists.
Japan noted that tsunami warnings can last more than a day for distant events—such as the 2010 Chile quake—and authorities remained cautious despite weak wave activity so far.
Safety Measures & Expert Guidance
- Evacuate to higher ground, ideally above the fourth floor of buildings near coastline.
- Avoid coastal areas including beaches, marinas, river mouths, and estuaries until authorities declare all clear.
- Follow official sources such as tsunami.gov, JMA, and US National Weather Service for updates.
- Stay cautious of strong currents and unpredictable surges, especially in Pacific nations like the Philippines, Indonesia, New Zealand, and Peru.
External Resources
- USGS Earthquake & Tsunami Alerts
- Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) Tsunami Advisory Pages
- Pacific Tsunami Warning Center updates
- NOAA & National Weather Service guidance
The Russia Kamchatka quake tsunami threat stems from an unprecedented magnitude‑8.8, shallow earthquake near the Kuril‑Kamchatka Trench on July 30, 2025. Tsunami waves up to 5 metres devastated Russian coastal towns; Japan evacuated nearly 2 million people and secured nuclear sites; Hawaii and Alaska endured waves up to 5.5 ft, with broader Pacific alerts in effect. Forecasting remains challenging and aftershocks may persist. The situation highlights the urgent need for preparedness in seismically active zones.
Education
Grandparents’ Day Jaipur School Celebration on 26 July ,honored grandparents’ vital role – a heartfelt
Contents
Jaipur, July30,2025: A program of dances, songs, and skits followed, each highlighting the special bond between generation
Grandparents’ Day Jaipur School Celebration on 26 July 2025 was a vibrant and touching tribute at Sophia School, Lalarpura. This Grandparents’ Day Jaipur School Celebration honored the invaluable contributions of grandparents in our school community.
Grandparents’ Day Jaipur School Celebration kicked off with warmth as Sophia School, Lalarpura, gathered to celebrate grandparents’ love, wisdom, and guidance. On 26 July 2025, the school community came alive with heartfelt tributes and joyous festivities.
Guests & Leadership
The event featured distinguished guests:
- Chief Guest Mr. Abhay Singh Shekhawat, a retired Navy officer, greeted by Principal Rev. Sister Josita.
- Guest of Honor Father Edward Oliveira, Vicar General of the Diocese of Jaipur.
Their presence highlighted the event’s importance and tied in deeply with the school’s values.
Heartwarming Student Tributes
At the start, students presented handmade bouquets to their grandparents—symbolizing gratitude and affection. These thoughtful tokens set the tone for a day filled with emotion and celebration. The school meticulously prepared each detail to ensure grandparents felt truly cherished.
Memorable Performances
A program of dances, songs, and skits followed, each highlighting the special bond between generations.
Performances that Bond Generations
- Traditional dances demonstrated cultural heritage and unity.
- Songs expressed gratitude, love, and memories shared across generations.
- Short skits portrayed playful and heartfelt connections, eliciting smiles and applause.
Parents and families joined, creating a festive atmosphere that united everyone.
Grandparents’ Own Reflections
A grandparent offered a moving thank‑you speech, blessing the school and appreciating the occasion. Their words underscored the emotional depth of the Grandparents’ Day Jaipur School Celebration, reinforcing the event’s meaningful impact.
Community & Educational Impact
- Strengthening Inter-generational Bonds: The event built deeper ties between students and grandparents.
- Cultural Continuity: Performances celebrated heritage and local traditions.
- Emotional Development: Grandparents’ presence nurtured empathy, respect, and gratitude among students.
- School–Family Engagement: Inviting grandparents bridged school life and home life, amplifying community spirit.
The Grandparents’ Day Jaipur School Celebration at Sophia School, Lalarpura, was more than an event—it was a heartfelt homage to grandparents’ enduring influence. From handmade bouquets to cultural performances and moving tributes, the day radiated joy, respect, and unity.
This celebration reinforced the notion that grandparents play a vital role in educating children beyond textbooks—through warmth, storytelling, and values. Events like these strengthen familial and school bonds, nurturing well-rounded, empathetic students.
Contents
Bangladesh, July30,2025: Despite the teenager’s arrest, no FIR was filed and no mob suspects arrested as of last reports
Blasphemy Attack in Rangpur has shaken the Hindu community in northern Bangladesh. A teenager’s alleged Facebook post sparked mob violence across 15 Hindu homes, displacing about 50 families. Despite the suspect’s arrest, security forces arrived too late to stop the destruction.
What Happened: Timeline & Triggers
The incident began on Saturday night, 26 July 2025, when a 17‑year‑old Hindu youth, a student at a Rangpur polytechnic, was accused of posting derogatory content against Prophet Muhammad on Facebook. He was arrested under the Cyber Security Act and placed in a juvenile correctional centre.
However, this did not prevent mob action. A crowd estimated at 500–600 people, some reportedly from neighbouring Kishoreganj or Nilphamari, gathered after loudspeaker calls and mounted an initial attack that night.
A second wave hit Sunday afternoon (27 July) despite police and army deployment.
Scale and Impact of the Blasphemy Attack in Rangpur
- Homes vandalised: 14–15 houses belonging to Hindu families were destroyed, looted, or severely damaged.
- Families displaced: Around 50 Hindu families fled the area in fear. Many remain away, some have returned reluctantly.
- Losses: Gold jewellery, legal documents, clothing, livestock, and foodgrain were looted or destroyed.
Law Enforcement Response & Failures
Despite the teenager’s arrest, no FIR was filed and no mob suspects arrested as of last reports. Police officers attempted intervention but were physically assaulted, with at least one constable hospitalised. Army and police were eventually deployed but only after much of the damage was done.
Voices from the Community
Residents describe scenes of terror and helplessness:
- “We didn’t sleep all night … we’re selling our paddy in distress,” said one villager whose foodgrain was destroyed.
- “A woman wept inside her vandalised home, saying ‘you made us homeless’,” as reported by AsiaNews.
Most of the affected families remain traumatized and fearful to return home.
Broader Pattern of Anti‑Minority Violence in Bangladesh
The Blasphemy Attack in Rangpur is part of a troubling rise in communal violence targeting Hindus, especially since the interim government led by Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus took charge in August 2024.
Between August 2024 and June 2025, rights groups documented 2,442 hate crimes—including killings, assaults, arson, and targeted property destruction—demonstrating a broader systemic pattern of impunity.
Past incidents in Rangpur and elsewhere—including massive arson attacks in Jessore and Sunamganj—mirror the current violence. In 2016, over 300 houses and 19 temples were destroyed in Nasirnagar after a social media post scandal.
Legal and Human Rights Responses
Human rights organisations like Ain o Salish Kendra (ASK) and BLAST have condemned the recent attacks. ASK demanded immediate investigation, prosecution of perpetrators, and compensation for victims, citing constitutional protections (Articles 27, 28, and 41). BLAST highlighted that the accused minor must be treated in line with child protection laws and the UN CRC, pleading for transparency and due process.
Rehabilitation, Reconstruction & What Comes Next
Local administrators report that of 22 affected families, 19 have returned home or remain there, while three—including the accused’s kin—are with relatives.
The sub‑district’s Executive Officer, Mahmud Hassan, said repairs of damaged homes are underway and support is being provided with building materials and labour oversight .
Yet, fear lingers. With no arrests made and no FIRs filed, community trust in authorities remains low. Impacted families continue to live with trauma, and many may be forced into distress sales or long‑term displacement.Issue Details Focus Blasphemy Attack in Rangpur triggered mob violence Scope ~15 Hindu homes vandalised, ~50 families displaced Systemic Pattern Violence against Hindus increasing in 2024–25 Law Response Arrest of accused minor; no charges against mob Rights Appeal ASK & BLAST demand justice, compensation, legal oversight
The Blasphemy Attack in Rangpur stands as a grim example of how digital accusations and communal tensions can rapidly escalate into destructive mob violence. With little legal recourse and widespread fear, affected Hindu communities continue to wait for the justice, protection, and restitution they deserve.
Let me know if you’d like the content optimized further with Content AI tools or tailored for publishing platforms!
Contents
Israel, July29,2025: In their conversation, Putin reiterated Moscow’s willingness to help negotiate a resolution on Iran’s nuclear issue
Netanyahu Putin Iran conversation
Netanyahu Putin Iran conversation marks a dramatic turn in Middle East diplomacy. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Russian President Vladimir Putin spoke by phone on July 29, 2025, centering their dialogue on Iran. While no party disclosed precise details, the closed-door exchange has unleashed speculation across geopolitical circles. From Moscow’s mediation offer to Syria’s sovereignty concerns, the stakes are high.
What sparked the phone call?
Israeli-Iran tensions escalated sharply in June when Israel launched Operation Rising Lion, targeting Iranian nuclear and military sites. In the aftermath, dozens of Iranian officials were reportedly killed and international condemnation followed. Russia’s balancing act intensified as it maintained ties with Tehran yet sought stability in the region. In this volatile backdrop, Netanyahu’s call with Putin emerges as a key moment in diplomatic realignment.
Russia’s readiness to mediate
In their conversation, Putin reiterated Moscow’s willingness to help negotiate a resolution on Iran’s nuclear issue. Though Russia steered clear of formal mediation, it offered “ideas” to both sides and emphasized diplomacy over escalation.
Putin’s position on Iran’s nuclear ambition
Putin reaffirmed that “Russia, as well as the IAEA, has never had evidence that Iran is preparing to obtain nuclear weapons.” This stance counters Israeli claims of lurking nuclear threats and supports Iran’s right to a peaceful nuclear program.
Moscow condemns Israeli strikes
Russia sharply criticized Israeli attacks on Iranian territory, labelling them “illegal” under international law and warning they breach the NPT framework. Putin also stressed that U.S. and Israeli pressure only deepens regional instability.
The strategic context and regional fallout
At the St. Petersburg Economic Forum, Putin underscored broader risks—including escalation toward global war—and emphasized that Russia is sharing conflict-resolution ideas “on a near‑daily basis” with Iran. He also coordinated with Xi Jinping to jointly call for de-escalation and diplomacy.
Syria’s sovereignty also on the agenda
Putin urged that Syria’s territorial integrity remain respected and insisted any Iran–Israel resolution must preserve Syria’s sovereignty. This adds another layer to the regional conversation, intersecting multiple fault lines.
What this conversation means
Iran’s diplomatic reprieve
Russia supports Iran’s civilian nuclear rights and denies evidence of weaponization, offering Tehran breathing space amid political attacks.
Pitfalls for Israeli strategy
Netanyahu’s call underscores Israeli urgency—but Putin’s condemnation and diplomatic framing highlight limitations to relying solely on military pressure.
Russia’s balancing act
Despite its strategic partnership with Tehran, Russia distanced itself from military commitments. Putin reaffirmed the January strategic treaty excluded defence provisions. Yet his active diplomacy signals Moscow’s role as a regional influencer.
Diplomatic momentum shifts
With France, Turkey, and China also calling for talks, Russia’s overtures may accelerate a shift toward negotiation, even if no formal peace process is underway.
Diplomacy’s pivotal moment
Netanyahu Putin Iran conversation signals a potential turning point: a high-stakes diplomatic exchange in an era defined by military brinkmanship. Putin’s strategy is clear—a calibrated balance: supporting Iran’s rights, opposing Israeli aggression, and hinting at mediation without overcommitment. For Netanyahu, the call is urgent—but Russia’s response shows how narrow the road ahead might be.
As tensions continue between Israel and Iran, and global powers hold varied positions, the conversation sets the stage: could diplomacy yet replace escalation?
Contents
New Delhi, July29,2025: On 29 July, during the Lok Sabha debate on Operation Sindoor, Priyanka Gandhi focused not on strike outcomes but on the Pahalgam security lapse
The Pahalgam security lapse
The Pahalgam security lapse is now at the heart of a furious political storm. Congress leader Priyanka Gandhi Vadra declared that while the government has extensively discussed Operation Sindoor and military retaliation, it has completely sidestepped the real issue: why terrorists were allowed to slaughter 26 civilians without security in Baisaran Valley. This keyword—Pahalgam security lapse—appears right at the beginning, and is woven throughout this analysis with a target density of 1–1.5%.
What happened on April 22, 2025?
On 22 April 2025, five militants from TRF (The Resistance Front), linked to Lashkar‑e‑Taiba, ambushed tourists at Baisaran Valley near Pahalgam. Armed with AK‑47s and M4 carbines, they executed men after demanding religious identifiers. The attack lasted nearly an hour, left 26 victims dead (including 25 tourists), and injured dozens.
Despite this being a known tourist hotspot, not a single security guard or first‑aid team was deployed. As the victims’ widows recounted, tourists were left to “God’s mercy”.
Priyanka Gandhi’s scathing critique
On 29 July, during the Lok Sabha debate on Operation Sindoor, Priyanka Gandhi focused not on strike outcomes but on the Pahalgam security lapse. She demanded answers on intelligence failures, absence of patrols, and emergency response. Gandhi sharply criticized government officials for discussing Operation Sindoor logistics while ignoring critical questions about why the tragedy occurred in the first place.
She quoted victim Shubham Dwivedi’s wife: “When citizens were being killed one by one for an hour, there wasn’t a single security personnel. I saw my world ending in front of my eyes”.
Key questions raised in Parliament
Why was Baisaran Valley unprotected?
Priyanka pointed out that the government had actively promoted Kashmir as safe for tourism—inviting citizens to visit—but failed to deploy even basic security or first‑aid in Baisaran. How could thousands of visitors daily go there through forested paths without any protection?
Intelligence failure on terrorism hotbed
She questioned the three‑year delay in labelling TRF a terrorist outfit, despite the group committing 25 terror acts in Kashmir between 2020–2025. This delay represented a grave intelligence lapse.
No resignations, no political responsibility
Unlike in after‑Mumbai 2008 when leaders resigned, no one in this government, not even Home Minister or intelligence heads, stepped down. Who is responsible now?
Political accountability and resignations demanded
Priyanka demanded tangible accountability. She asked: Is the Prime Minister not responsible? The Home Minister? The defence minister? The NSA? None answered. She contrasted current inaction with past redressal measures like resignations after 2008 attacks.
Her key demand: acknowledge the Pahalgam security lapse, investigate, and hold officials to account.
Defence vs politics: divergent narratives
The government’s narrative focused on Operation Sindoor, framed as a precision strike, a credit to Indian forces. Home Minister Amit Shah announced terrorists were neutralized in “Operation Mahadev”, but avoided addressing why they were able to attack unhindered.
Priyanka criticized this: the defence speeches highlighted history and past political mistakes, but “forgot to discuss the most important thing—how did the Pahalgam attack happen?”
Why tourists were exposed: intelligence and lapse
No risk mapping or threat assessment?
Despite known TRF activity and thousands of visitors via forest routes to Baisaran, no security grid was in place. Government failed to map risk zone or set up quick response teams.
Promotional tourism narrative misconstrued
The centre had earlier urged citizens to visit Kashmir citing tranquillity. Gandhi said that false reassurance led people into danger. Tourists trusted government messaging—and were betrayed by security inaction.
Medical and first‑aid neglect
Even emergency medical support was absent. Tourists had no chance of being evacuated or treated during attack. Government left them to rely solely on bystanders.
Lessons & future security imperatives
Pahalgam security lapse must serve as a wake-up call:
- Critical threat zones like Baisaran demand permanent security post and first‑aid presence.
- Real-time intelligence and risk tracking of groups like TRF are vital.
- Transparent accountability: Officers and ministers must be ready to resign or explain.
- Tourist safety policies must be reviewed: tourism promotion should pair with protective infrastructure.
External sources like India Today and Indian Express have detailed the terrain risk at Baisaran, observing that the valley was opened to tourists two months early without security notice.
Time to confront the Pahalgam security lapse
In summary, the Pahalgam security lapse is no longer a peripheral matter—it’s central to national security discourse. Priyanka Gandhi’s parliamentary address has cast a strong spotlight on this lapse. As the country grapples with terrorism and tourism in Jammu & Kashmir, government must shift from credit-seeking defence narratives to deep introspection and accountability. Only then can trust be repaired and future tragedies averted.
Contents
Jaipur, July 29,2025: The workshop opened with the traditional lighting of the lamp and prayer. Mr A. K. Sharma, Principal of DAV Centenary Public School, welcomed all participants and dignitaries, stressing the need to equip students for future global challenges
STEM DLD Expert‑Led Training – Overview
STEM DLD Expert‑Led Training was conducted on 26 July 2025 at DAV Centenary Public School, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur. Bringing together 40 teachers from 15 CBSE‑affiliated schools, this full‑day workshop aimed to enhance pedagogy in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics by adopting disciplinary literacy, inquiry-based learning, and cross‑disciplinary strategies.
Objectives Aligned with National Policies
The STEM DLD Expert‑Led Training adhered closely to the mandates of NEP‑2020 and NCF‑2023, emphasizing:
- Disciplinary literacy in STEM classrooms
- Inquiry‑based, cross‑subject integration
- Practical, low‑cost STEM activities
- Inter‑school collaboration and peer learning
These goals support NEP’s focus on experiential learning and NCF’s emphasis on making education learner‑centred.
Inaugural Session: Inspiration and Leadership
The workshop opened with the traditional lighting of the lamp and prayer. Mr A. K. Sharma, Principal of DAV Centenary Public School, welcomed all participants and dignitaries, stressing the need to equip students for future global challenges. The keynote speaker, Prof Y. K. Vijay, a nationally renowned physicist and STEM expert, spoke passionately about STEM’s role in India’s development and the importance of nurturing innovation among youth.
Hands‑On Workshops & Collaborative Learning
Guided by expert facilitators, participants engaged in dynamic sessions that included:
STEM Integration Across Subjects
Teachers explored ways to integrate science, math, technology, and engineering themes into everyday lessons, reinforcing cross‑disciplinary learning.
Inquiry‑Based Learning in Action
Participants constructed models, simulations and simple experiments using local, low‑cost resources—emphasizing that innovation does not require expensive materials.
Disciplinary Literacy Strategies
Focused sessions on disciplinary literacy helped educators understand how to embed reading and writing skills specific to STEM contexts, supporting comprehension and critical thinking.
Group discussions fostered sharing of existing best practices. Teachers presented innovations from their classrooms, received expert and peer feedback, and created concrete classroom action plans.
Key Learnings from the STEM DLD Expert‑Led Training
- Disciplinary literacy emerged as a crucial tool to help students engage meaningfully with STEM content.
- Teachers learned to design learner‑centred, interactive STEM lessons.
- Critical thinking and creativity were highlighted through problem‑solving models.
- The emphasis on low‑cost aids showed how local materials can substitute for expensive lab equipment.
- The curriculum alignment ensured all activities were directly applicable in classrooms.
Feedback & Appreciation
The STEM DLD Expert‑Led Training generated enthusiastic responses:
- Educators praised the clarity and depth of expert insights.
- The balance of theory and practice made the sessions both informative and actionable.
- Many valued the networking opportunity, exchanging ideas across schools.
Quotes from participants included:
“This training enhanced my ability to make STEM lessons truly inquiry‑based and literacy‑oriented.”
“I appreciated the mix of hands‑on activities and peer learning.”
Planning for Classroom Action & Future Collaboration
Teachers concluded the day by drafting action plans to implement disciplinary literacy and low‑cost hands‑on activities in their own schools. The group expressed intent to continue collaboration, sharing progress and innovations across the participating institutions.
A valedictory ceremony marked the end of the event. Certificates were distributed, and a few teachers shared their key takeaways. A heartfelt vote of thanks by the host school wrapped up the programme.
External References & Further Reading
To support and enrich future STEM efforts, participants were encouraged to explore:
- NEP‑2020 official guidelines on experiential and STEM teaching (e.g., Ministry of Education’s NEP documentation)
- NCF‑2023 frameworks for disciplinary literacy and interdisciplinary learning
- CBSE’s notifications on District Level Deliberations for STEM education
Why the STEM DLD Expert‑Led Training Matter
This training was much more than a workshop—it was a transformative professional development platform. It embedded literacy into STEM instruction, empowered teachers with practical strategies, and promoted collaboration. With a clear rooting in NEP‑2020 and NCF‑2023, it underscored how modern pedagogy can prepare learners for future innovation.
DAV Centenary Public School deserves commendation for facilitating such an influential initiative, and for its commitment to ongoing teacher development.
The STEM DLD Expert‑Led Training held in Jaipur on 26 July 2025 stands as a model of how expert‑led, discipline‑literacy infused STEM education can uplift teaching practices across schools. With enthusiastic adoption, the ripple effect will empower students to think critically, innovate, and build a knowledge‑driven future.
Contents
China, July29,2025:Rain began on July 23, intensifying through to July 28. The mountainous northern districts of Beijing, especially Miyun
Beijing flooding deaths, The immediate toll
In a single week of torrential storms, Beijing flooding deaths reached at least 30 confirmed fatalities, including 28 in Miyun district and 2 in Yanqing.
Neighboring Hebei province saw additional fatalities due to landslides—raising the regional toll to 38.
When and where the rains struck hardest
Rain began on July 23, intensifying through to July 28. The mountainous northern districts of Beijing, especially Miyun, were worst hit, recording 543 mm of rain—nearly the city’s annual total—in just days.
In Huairou, 95.3 mm fell in one hour.
Rescue efforts & political direction
President Xi Jinping issued urgent orders for “all‑out” search and rescue efforts, focusing on both Beijing and surrounding provinces like Hebei, Jilin, and Shandong – where heavy casualties and damage were reported. Premier Li Qiang called for escalated emergency response for Miyun in particular.
Infrastructure damage & widespread outages
More than 130 villages lost power, roads were washed away, communications lines failed, and over 30 road segments were damaged. In Taishitun town, uprooted trees, flooded roads, and submerged vehicles created scenes of mayhem.
Evacuations and regional impact
Authorities evacuated over 80,000 residents across Beijing, with about 17,000 in Miyun alone. Public transport was suspended, tourist sites closed, and local governments advised residents to stay indoors until the alerts are lifted.
Landslides in Hebei added at least 4 additional deaths and left 8 people missing.
Historical floods compared
The July 2025 floods rival the 2012 Beijing flood, which killed 79 people, destroyed homes, and inflicted ~$1.6 billion in damage. That event saw 460 mm of rain in Fangshan within 20 hours, setting records. The current event, while shorter, reached nearly annual rainfall in just a few days.
What caused such extreme rainfall?
Meteorologists cite topography trapping warm, humid air over northern Beijing, amplified by a northbound typhoon’s influence. This dynamic produced intense precipitation—up to 80–90% of annual totals in only days. The effect turned Beijing into a literal rain “trap”. Scientists warn such extreme weather is part of a broader climate trend.
Delhi/NCR
Operation Mahadev Pahalgam successfully neutralised three terrorists involved in the attack
Contents
New Delhi,July29,2025: On 22 April 2025, five terrorists attacked innocent tourists at Baisaran Valley near Pahalgam, killing 26 civilians—mostly Hindus
Operation Mahadev Pahalgam: A Decisive Victory Unveiled
Operation Mahadev Pahalgam begins this article — it marks a strategic turning point in India’s counter-terror campaign following the brutal Pahalgam massacre.
What Is Operation Mahadev Pahalgam?
Operation Mahadev Pahalgam was a meticulously planned and executed joint security operation involving the Indian Army, CRPF, and Jammu and Kashmir Police. Announced by Union Home Minister Amit Shah in Lok Sabha, it eliminated three top Lashkar‑e‑Taiba operatives directly linked to the Pahalgam terror attack.
The Pahalgam Attack: A Brutal Trigger
On 22 April 2025, five terrorists attacked innocent tourists at Baisaran Valley near Pahalgam, killing 26 civilians—mostly Hindus—with chilling religious profiling and machine-gun fire. The assault—carried out using AK-47s and M4 carbines—struck at India’s tourism heartland with unprecedented horror.
Intelligence & Surveillance Phase
Following the attack, Operation Mahadev Pahalgam began its intelligence phase on 22 May 2025, after receiving a HUMINT tip about militant presence in Dachigam forests near Mahadev Peak. Over 14 days, forces tracked encrypted ultra‑shortwave communication used by Lashkar‑e‑Taiba.
Joint Forces Strike: Execution of Operation Mahadev
On 28 July 2025, security personnel conducted a precise raid in the Lidwas area near Srinagar, targeting a dense hideout near Mahadev Peak. In the ensuing gunbattle, the militants—identified as Suleman (alias Faizal), Afghan, and Jibran, all A-category LeT terrorists—were neutralised.
Identification & Proofs: Concrete Evidence
Amit Shah confirmed in Parliament that forensic ballistic analysis matched bullets recovered at the Pahalgam scene with weapons seized in the encounter—verified by six FSL experts via video conferencing.
Additionally, Pakistani voter IDs and chocolate wrappers made in Pakistan found on two terrorists affirmed cross‑border involvement.
Political Discourse in Parliament
In a heated debate on Operation Sindoor and the Pahalgam attack, Amit Shah opened the session by declaring the success of Operation Mahadev Pahalgam, citing the brutality (religious profiling, murder before families) and confirming the terrorists’ elimination.
He also criticized opposition skepticism—especially targeting P. Chidambaram—by offering proof and challenging political rhetoric:
“Don’t be sad that terrorists belonged to a certain religion…”
Reactions from Families & Survivors
Aishanya Dwivedi, widow of victim Shubham Dwivedi, expressed mixed emotions: grief remains, but closure arrives with Operation Mahadev Pahalgam — “pain will not go, but some peace will come”.
Strategic & National Security Implications
- Restored confidence in India’s counter-terror machinery.
- Reinforced the message: terrorists will not escape across borders.
- Parliament’s 16‑hour debate reflects the gravity of national security implications, with PM Modi expected to speak soon.
Further Reading & External Resources
Operation Mahadev Pahalgam presented a firm and symbolic closure to one of the deadliest civilian attacks in Kashmir in recent decades. With evidence-based identification, cross-border implications exposed, and decisive coordination among forces, India delivered both security relief and a message of strength. The parliamentary debate underlined the political complexity—but also the unity in demanding justice and deterrence.
India Champions Refuse Play Pakistan WCL Semi‑Final
India‑US tariffs warning surfaces as President Trump signals possible 20‑25% levy on Indian exports
Russia Kamchatka Quake Tsunami Threat: 5 Powerful Reasons Pacific Coast Evacuated
Grandparents’ Day Jaipur School Celebration on 26 July ,honored grandparents’ vital role – a heartfelt
Blasphemy Attack: 15 Homes Vandalised in Rangpur, Bangladesh – Shocking Mob Violence Exposed
Netanyahu Putin Iran conversation reveals 5 startling diplomatic insights on Iran
Hypertension Symptoms: 6 Home Remedies You May Try
GALA DANDIYA NIGHT AT DAVCPS
Manju Joshi Receives Lifetime Achievement Award for Social Justice
ABHIVYAKTI Season 13 Showcases Cultural Diversity and Talent at DAV CPS Jaipur
India-China Border Disengagement: Troop Withdrawal Process Completes in Depsang and Demchok; Diwali Brings Sweet Exchange Tradition
Art of Wellness with the Universe Workshop Held at Rajasthan State Scout & Guide Headquarters
best career opportunities | Jaipur Career Fair | Credent TV | Dainik Navjyoti D2S03
what is reiki healing | Mental Health | Shiksha Sarokar, शिक्षा सरोकार, Sunil Narnaulia
DAV Centenary Public School, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur hosts Successful ‘Mind Wars Quiz: A Battle of Wits and Knowledge’
Education1 month ago11 Powerful Reasons Why DAV International Yoga Day Jaipur Uplifted Spirits!
- Election3 weeks ago
DAV Centenary Public School, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur Event Report: Talent Hunt Show
- Education3 weeks ago
Strong Start to Senior Secondary: Vardhman Srikalyan International School Holds Class 11 Orientation & PTM
- Education1 month ago
Empowering Educators: A Three-Day Learning Journey at DAV Centenary Public School, Jaipur
- Education1 month ago
7 Inspiring Highlights of DAV Foundation Day Jaipur Celebration – Amazing Vedic Legacy Revealed!
- Education2 weeks ago
Young Athletes Shine in Inter-House Kho-Kho Competition (Classes III–V)
- Art2 weeks ago
Sattva, Rajas, Tamas” Come Alive on Canvas – Dr. Renu Shahi’s Indian Philosophical Art Shines in Sri Lanka
- Festival2 weeks ago
Nag Panchami 2025: 7 Key Rituals and Puja Time to Eliminate Kaal Sarpa Dosha
