Business
GST Council’s Controversial Tax Hike on Used Electric Vehicles: A Political Response

Contents
Understanding the GST Council’s Decision
The Goods and Services Tax (GST) Council recently made a controversial decision to increase tax rates on used electric vehicles (EVs) purchased by businesses. Under the updated regulations, the tax rate on these transactions has been raised from the previous 5% to a new rate of 18%. This substantial hike has sparked a significant debate among stakeholders, including businesses, environmental advocates, and policymakers. The move is seen as part of a broader strategy to amend existing tax structures to align with sustainability initiatives while maintaining governmental revenue streams.
The rationale behind this decision is multifaceted. Primarily, the GST Council aims to standardize tax rates across various segments of the automotive market. Historically, the tax rate on used electric vehicles was lower, creating a discrepancy that some policymakers argued undermined efforts to promote new EV sales. By increasing taxes on used EVs, the Council seeks to encourage businesses to invest in new electric vehicles as part of a larger commitment to reducing carbon emissions and promoting sustainable practices in transportation.
As part of the broader context, the decision highlights the challenges and trade-offs associated with incentivizing green technologies. While higher taxes on used EVs may dissuade some businesses from entering the market, the Council believes that this policy shift will ultimately facilitate a more orderly transition to new electric vehicles, further contributing to lowering emissions. However, the implications of this decision could result in increased costs for businesses, potentially leading to higher consumer prices for used EVs, which may deter small businesses from making environmentally friendly choices.
In summary, the GST Council’s decision to raise tax rates on used electric vehicles represents a significant recalibration of tax policy aimed at balancing revenue generation with environmental objectives. The long-term impacts of this decision may shape the future dynamics of the EV market and influence how businesses approach sustainability in their operations.
The Impact on Businesses and Consumers
The recent tax hike on used electric vehicles (EVs) has stirred considerable debate, as it influences various stakeholders within the industry. For businesses that rely on used EVs, such as those in the logistics or transportation sectors, the increased tax burden could lead to significant operational cost implications. These organizations often opt for used vehicles to manage expenses effectively, allowing them to maintain competitiveness in a market that is already facing challenges. However, with the tax increase, businesses may find themselves reassessing their fleet purchasing strategies, potentially delaying investments or seeking alternatives, which can hinder their operational efficiency.
Furthermore, the pricing landscape for consumers is likely to be affected by this controversial tax hike. Retailers may increase the prices of used EVs in response to the heightened tax council burden, making them less accessible for average consumers who are considering a transition to greener alternatives. This potential escalation in costs could deter consumers from purchasing used EVs, affecting overall market demand. It is essential to recognize that many consumers are already grappling with the upfront costs of electric vehicles, so an increase in pricing due to taxes could significantly impact their purchasing decisions.
Additionally, the tax hike could have broader repercussions on the adoption of electric vehicles among businesses. If companies perceive used EVs as an increasingly expensive option, they may shy away from transitioning toward electric fleets, thereby slowing down efforts to reduce carbon emissions and promote sustainability. The effective implementation of policies that encourage the use of EVs is vital in the fight against climate change. In this context, the recent tax adjustment may unintentionally negate some of the progress that had been made in promoting electric vehicle adoption among businesses and individual consumers.
The Political Reactions to the Tax Hike
The recent decision by the GST Council to implement a tax hike on used electric vehicles has prompted a myriad of political reactions from various stakeholders, including opposition parties, government officials, and industry leaders. The timing of this announcement has raised eyebrows, leading to contrasting viewpoints across the political spectrum.
Opposition parties have been vocal in their dissent, with many leaders claiming that the tax hike undermines the government’s commitment to promoting sustainable transportation. They argue that increasing the tax burden on used electric vehicles could dissuade potential buyers, thereby hampering the growth of the electric vehicle market. Notably, some leaders were swift to highlight the inconsistency of the government’s environmental promises against its economic decisions, branding the move as a regressive step that contradicts efforts to reduce carbon emissions.
On the other hand, government officials have defended the decision, asserting that the tax council hike is aimed at leveling the playing field in the automotive market. According to them, the increased tax is necessary to ensure that the government can maintain revenue streams while simultaneously encouraging investments in the production of new electric vehicles. Some officials also suggested that the tax council on used electric vehicles corresponds with broader market trends that favor new models, positioning it as a strategic economic move rather than an antipathy toward sustainable practices.
Industry leaders have expressed mixed feelings regarding the tax council increase. While some acknowledge the necessity of regulatory frameworks to support innovative automotive measures, others warn about the potential implications for the second-hand electric vehicle market. The energy sector’s response indicates that companies are concerned about consumer sentiment, which is crucial for fostering a healthy transition to eco-friendly transportation solutions.
In conclusion, the reactions to the GST Council’s tax hike on used electric vehicles showcase a contentious debate among various political entities and stakeholders, reflecting the complexities surrounding environmental sustainability and economic growth objectives in the contemporary landscape.
Economic Theories Behind Taxation on Electric Vehicles
The discussion surrounding taxation policies on electric vehicles (EVs) is an important aspect of modern economic theory. Such tax council policies can be viewed through various economic lenses that consider their implications for market regulation, sustainability promotion, and revenue generation. The central premise for imposing taxes on used EVs often centers on the concept of ‘negative externalities.’ Governments may believe that by increasing the tax burden on used electric vehicles, they can encourage consumers to purchase new, more efficient models, ultimately reducing their environmental impact and enhancing overall market sustainability.
From a regulatory perspective, taxes serve as a mechanism to manage consumer behavior and incentivize choices that align with broader council policy objectives. By raising taxes on older used EVs, policymakers can make the cost of ownership significantly higher, which may discourage their purchase and use. This could potentially lead to a more rapid turnover of older vehicles for newer, less polluting models, helping to enhance the overall efficiency of the EV market. The economic theory of behavioral economics also comes into play here, as individuals may respond to tax incentives in ways that promote specific economic outcomes, such as increased adoption of cutting-edge green technologies.
Furthermore, taxation is a viable method for raising revenue, which can be essential for funding infrastructure improvements and sustainable initiatives. By taxing used EVs, the government can gather necessary funds that can be reallocated towards enhancing electric vehicle charging infrastructure, promoting research and development in cleaner technologies, or subsidizing electric vehicle purchases to stimulate market growth further. However, there are concerns that increased taxation on used EVs could discourage potential buyers, leading to a stagnation in the market for second-hand electric vehicles which might have broader negative implications for the industry. As this debate unfolds, understanding these economic theories will be vital for all stakeholders involved.
Public Sentiment and Reaction
The recent decision by the GST Council to implement a tax hike on used electric vehicles has sparked diverse reactions across various sectors of society. Consumers, environmental activists, and the general public have taken to social media platforms to express their viewpoints, revealing a complex tapestry of opinions and sentiments related to this controversial policy change.
Among consumers, there is considerable concern regarding the financial implications of increased taxes council on used electric vehicles, which many view as an essential investment in sustainable transportation. Those who have taken steps to transition away from fossil fuel use feel particularly disillusioned, as they perceive the tax increase as a punitive measure against environmentally conscious choices. The sentiment among car buyers who are considering used electric vehicles reflects a mixture of frustration and disappointment, as they fear that the rising costs will deter potential future purchasers from making similar eco-friendly decisions.
Environmental activists have voiced their discontent vehemently, arguing that the tax hike undermines the broader goals of promoting electric vehicles as a solution to combat climate change. They contend that discouraging the purchase of used electric vehicles contradicts the government’s narrative of fostering clean technology. Activists are leveraging social media to rally support and advocate for a reevaluation of the tax policy, arguing that such measures could stall the momentum gained in reducing carbon footprints in the auto industry.
Public opinion polls indicate a significant proportion of the population is against the tax increase, with many respondents favoring more incentives for used electric vehicle purchases rather than penalties. This sentiment appears consistent across various demographics, suggesting a widespread belief in the need for policies that promote sustainability rather than discourage it. The ongoing discourse surrounding this issue is indicative of a larger conversation about the future of transportation and environmental responsibility in the context of economic policies.
Comparative Analysis: Taxation on Used EVs in Other Countries
The taxation of used electric vehicles (EVs) varies significantly across different countries, impacting their respective EV markets and consumer behaviors. In nations such as Norway, which has aggressively promoted the adoption of EVs, taxation policies have been particularly favorable. Used EVs in Norway are exempt from VAT, and vehicle registration fees are negligible, thereby stimulating the secondary market for these vehicles. This approach has arguably contributed to Norway’s leading position in EV adoption, with over54% of all new car sales being electric vehicles as of late 2022.
In contrast, the United States presents a more fragmented landscape. Various states utilize different tax strategies, ranging from tax credits for new EV purchases to moderate levies on used vehicles. Generally, tax incentives for new EVs outweigh those available for used ones, which can lead to stagnation in the used EV market, making it less attractive for consumers looking for affordable options. A notable example can be observed in California, where the Clean Vehicle Rebate Project provides existing owners of used EVs with financial incentives, supporting the expansion of the secondary market.
Another country worth mentioning is Germany, which offers a unique system of tax reductions for used EVs. Here, a reduced rate of vehicle tax is applied, based on the emissions produced. Despite not fully eliminating taxes on used EVs, this policy encourages consumers to consider electric options over traditional combustion-engine vehicles. Such measures have resulted in a gradual increase in used EV registrations, signaling a positive shift towards adoption.
Through these comparative examples, it becomes evident that the taxation of used EVs plays a crucial role in either encouraging or inhibiting market growth. Additionally, the differing strategies employed highlight the need for tailoring policies that align with local consumer behavior and market conditions. The lessons learned from these global comparisons could thus inform discussions around the recent GST Council decision and offer alternative pathways moving forward.
Expert Opinions and Predictions
The recent decision by the GST Council to increase taxes on used electric vehicles (EVs) has elicited a diverse array of reactions from industry experts, economists, and tax professionals. This tax hike, which has raised concerns among various stakeholders, is seen by many as a significant turning point in the EV market. Industry analysts argue that the increased tax burden may deter potential buyers of used electric vehicles, slowing the momentum gained by the EV sector in recent years.
According to Dr. Ramesh Kumar, a prominent economist, the tax policy could create a ripple effect throughout the automotive market. He notes that while the new tax may serve the government’s agenda to rein in tax evasion associated with used vehicles, it also risks alienating a segment of eco-conscious consumers who might have sought more affordable options in the used EV market. Furthermore, experts indicate that this hike may lead to a decrease in the resale value of used electric cars, exacerbating the challenges faced by consumers who already pivoted towards sustainable transportation.
Tax professionals are also weighing in, with many advising businesses to reevaluate their pricing strategies in light of the new tax structure. Some predict an uptick in compliance costs linked to documenting transactions of used electric vehicles, impacting overall profitability. Additionally, there are projections regarding potential shifts in consumer behavior, as buyers may now consider alternative options or even explore new electric vehicles rather than settling for pre-owned models.
On a positive note, some industry insiders believe that the tax hike could eventually stimulate the market for new electric vehicles. By setting higher prices on used EVs, manufacturers may enjoy an increase in demand for new models, particularly if they can justify improved features and technologies that appeal to environmentally conscious customers.
In conclusion, the expert opinions surrounding the GST Council’s tax hike on used electric vehicles portray a landscape filled with challenges and opportunities. Stakeholders must navigate these complexities to ensure the sustainable growth of the EV market amidst evolving tax implications.
Alternative Solutions and Recommendations
The controversy surrounding the GST Council’s recent tax hike on used electric vehicles (EVs) calls for a comprehensive examination of potential alternative solutions. These alternatives aim to address the concerns raised by stakeholders while fostering a favorable environment for the growth of the used EV market. One prominent recommendation is the introduction of tax incentives for businesses that engage in sustainable practices. Such incentives can encourage companies to adopt greener methodologies, ultimately promoting the transition towards electric mobility.
Moreover, implementing subsidies for consumers purchasing used EVs could enhance affordability, making it easier for individuals to switch from traditional vehicles. These subsidies would not only stimulate demand within the used EV sector but also support the broader objectives of reducing carbon emissions and promoting environmentally friendly transportation options. By financially assisting buyers, governments can inspire greater public acceptance of electric vehicles, especially among those who may be hesitant due to budget constraints.
Adjusting the GST rates for used EVs presents another viable alternative. Proposing lower tax rates for these vehicles could generate increased sales and, in turn, encourage manufacturers to supply more used models. This potential shift in policy could create a significant impact on the second-hand EV market, making it a more appealing option for consumers. Experts suggest that a tiered tax structure might be an effective solution, with reduced rates for older models or those with lower mileage. This stratification could incentivize buyers while maintaining sustainable revenue streams for the government.
Incorporating insights from industry experts can further refine these recommendations. Engaging with stakeholders such as manufacturers, environmental advocates, and consumers can create a more inclusive dialogue, ensuring that solutions align with the needs of all involved. By exploring these potential alternatives, the government can effectively navigate the controversial tax hike and promote a more sustainable electric vehicle ecosystem.
Summary: Navigating the Future of EV Taxation
The recent decision by the GST Council to implement a tax hike on used electric vehicles (EVs) has sparked considerable debate among various stakeholders. This policy shift reflects the complexities inherent in the evolving landscape of electric vehicle taxation. Proponents argue that increasing the tax on second-hand electric vehicles is essential for bolstering government revenue and ensuring the sustainability of incentives for new EV purchases. However, critics highlight the potential negative impact on the affordability and accessibility of used EVs for consumers, particularly those in lower-income demographics.
Reactions from industry players, environmental advocates, and consumers have varied widely. Automakers raise concerns that the tax increase could deter buyers from considering used EVs, which could undermine overall market growth and hinder efforts to promote sustainable transportation solutions. Environmental groups warn that pricing out used electric vehicles could lead to increased reliance on fossil fuel-powered vehicles, further complicating climate change mitigation efforts. Consumers, especially those looking for cost-effective means to transition to electric mobility, express frustration over rising costs that challenge their ability to invest in sustainable options.
As the EV market continues to evolve, the challenges surrounding taxation and policy decisions become increasingly prevalent. Policymakers must navigate this intricate landscape with an eye towards fostering an inclusive market that promotes wider adoption of electric vehicles. Effective communication between stakeholders will be crucial in shaping future taxation strategies that balance fiscal responsibility with environmental sustainability. Through transparent dialogue and thoughtful policymaking, the future of electric vehicle taxation can be navigated towards a path that supports both economic growth and ecological progress, ensuring that the transition to sustainable transportation remains an achievable goal for all.
Business
India-withstands Trump tariffs five bold reasons

Contents
New Delhi,Aug.27,2025:Proactive steps from the government are bolstering the nation’s adaptability. Measures include lowering GST, enhancing export incentives, and pushing for new free-trade agreements—all aimed at boosting domestic demand and opening
Investor confidence remains firm
India withstands Trump tariffs emphatically, thanks to strong backing from rating agencies and domestic financial institutions. Fitch expects only a modest GDP impact, keeping growth at 6.5% for FY2025–26.
The Indian economy has earned a sovereign upgrade from S&P (from BBB– to BBB), signaling strong macroeconomic resilience and improving investor sentiment.
SBI research projects that while goods worth ~$45 billion could be impacted, trade negotiations and economic adaptability are expected to restore export confidence.
Expansive domestic market buffers shock
India’s vast and growing internal consumption base helps cushion external shocks. Exports comprise ~20% of GDP, meaning disruptions from a 50% U.S. tariff may have a muted overall impact.
Recent projections by GTRI foresee U.S.-bound exports dropping nearly 43%, but strong non-U.S. trade and rising services exports still maintain export momentum.
Government’s strategic countermeasures
Proactive steps from the government are bolstering the nation’s adaptability. Measures include lowering GST, enhancing export incentives, and pushing for new free-trade agreements—all aimed at boosting domestic demand and opening fresh markets.
PM Modi decisively stated he’s “ready to pay a very heavy price” to protect farmers, showing that national interests won’t be compromised under pressure.
India is also diversifying its trade portfolio, eyeing markets in Southeast Asia, Africa, Latin America, and the EU.
Controlled inflation and stable growth
Despite external turbulence, India’s monetary health remains intact.
Inflation is under control—ADB projects it to stay within RBI’s target (around 3.8% this year, rising to 4% by 2026). Retail inflation has even dropped to an eight-year low of 1.55% in July (inflation data from earlier text).
RBI preserved its 6.5% GDP growth forecast, even projecting Q1 growth at 6.9%, indicating steady momentum despite tariffs.
Infrastructure empowerment and policy initiatives
Under the Atmanirbhar Bharat vision, India is sharply increasing infrastructure investments and promoting domestic manufacturing.
Defence procurement from the U.S. has paused, but India is strengthening ties with BRICS partners and bolstering its global strategic posture.
Industrial leaders, like Sajjan Jindal, are driving self-reliance and local supply chain enhancement—key for sectors like EVs and green steel.
True to the headline: India withstands Trump tariffs not through defiance alone, but through strategic vision, economic diversity, policy agility, and internal strength. While the immediate fallout of a 50% tariff raises serious challenges, especially for export sectors, India’s broader foundation and intent to overhaul trade dynamics signal a robust path forward.
Business
Trump tariff peace deal is hailed as a game-changing intervention in the India–Pakistan conflict—discover how tariffs triggered a quick ceasefire and the heavy economic fallout

Contents
US, Aug.27,2025:Trump asserted that within five hours of his call, both India and Pakistan agreed to stand down. This claim, central to the narrative of the Trump tariff peace deal
The Bold Tariff Threat That Set Off Alarm Bells
Trump tariff peace deal kicked off when U.S. President Donald Trump, during a White House cabinet meeting, recounted a dramatic exchange with Prime Minister Modi. He claimed he warned that if fighting continued between India and Pakistan, the U.S. would impose tariffs “so high, your head’s going to spin”.
He framed this as a deliberate move to avert a nuclear conflict.
Swift Diplomacy and the Five-Hour Ceasefire
Trump asserted that within five hours of his call, both India and Pakistan agreed to stand down. This claim, central to the narrative of the Trump tariff peace deal, paints a picture of rapid, high-stakes diplomacy powered by economic threats rather than conventional statecraft.
Downed Jets: The Shocking Military Toll
To underscore the severity of the conflict, Trump repeated earlier claims that seven fighter jets (or possibly more) were downed, costing around $150 million in damage. These dramatic visuals fed into his narrative of urgent intervention through the Trump tariff peace deal.
India’s Firm Pushback and Diplomatic Reality
India has consistently denied any third-party involvement. Officials emphasized that the ceasefire was achieved via direct military-to-military dialogue between DGMO counterparts, not through outside mediation. This conflict between divergent narratives highlights the complexities of diplomacy versus political messaging.
Economic Fallout from the New 50 % Tariff
Simultaneously, the Trump tariff peace deal narrative coincided with the implementation of a sweeping 50 % tariff on Indian goods—the steepest levies imposed on any Asian country. Analysts warn of devastating consequences: sectors like textiles, gems, and seafood could face a 70 % drop in exports, potentially reducing GDP growth below 6 % and costing hundreds of thousands of jobs.
Strategic experts are also concerned this move signals a shift in U.S.–India relations toward confrontation, undermining trust and regional cooperation frameworks like the Quad.
The Trump tariff peace deal may sound dramatic and decisive—bolstered by vivid metaphors of spinning heads and catastrophic war. But beyond the headlines lies a tangled web of geopolitical storytelling, opaque motivations, and economic aggression. Whether this intervention was real or rhetorical, its market-shaking consequences are undeniable—and potentially long-lasting.
Business
GST-cut-cars-transform-festive-auto-sales

Contents
New Delhi, Aug.26,2025:The Federation of Automobile Dealers Associations (FADA), representing over 15,000 dealers, has raised urgent concerns. Dealers are carrying heavy inventory, financed through short-term bank and NBFC loans with typical 45–60 day tranches
GST Cut Cars Changing the Festive Auto Landscape
GST Cut Cars are the talk of the nation as India’s car buyers hit pause, anticipating a tax-driven price drop. This shift in behaviours is transforming the festive season’s typical auto frenzy into a waiting game. With forecasts hanging in the balance, timely policy action is crucial to unlock demand and vitality in the automotive sector.
Why Buyers Are Holding Off – The Waiting Game
Following Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Independence Day announcement about GST reforms, consumers have largely delayed car purchases, expecting the GST Cut Cars to become cheaper by 8%–10%. This has triggered a sharp decline in sales and inquiries—many buyers are actively asking dealers about the exact tax cuts before deciding.
Vehicle showroom traffic is sluggish, and bookings are down—signaling a pause in consumer spending across cars, electronics, and appliances.
FADA Sounds the Alarm: Dealers Facing Inventory Stress
The Federation of Automobile Dealers Associations (FADA), representing over 15,000 dealers, has raised urgent concerns. Dealers are carrying heavy inventory, financed through short-term bank and NBFC loans with typical 45–60 day tranches. If GST Cut Cars don’t materialize soon, this could escalate costs and limit credit access for dealers.
FADA has appealed to the government to prepone the GST Council meeting—currently slated for September 3–4—and push for implementation before festive demand peaks.
Expected Tax Benefits: Calculated Savings for Buyers
The government is proposing to slash GST on small cars from 28% (plus cess) to 18%, aligning them with TVs, ACs, and appliances in the new lower slab—a large chunk of GST Cut Cars waiting to happen.
Estimates show major savings:
- Maruti Suzuki Wagon R: ₹60,000 reduction
- Baleno: ₹75,000
- Hyundai Creta: ₹55,000
- Mahindra XUV700: ₹1.15 lakh
This translates into EMI reductions of ₹600–₹2,000.
Potential Impact on EV Momentum
While GST Cut Cars are becoming more affordable, concerns loom over electric vehicles (EVs). Currently, EVs enjoy a 5% GST rate. With ICE models entering the 18% bracket, the cost differential may shrink—potentially dampening growth in the EV sector.
Stock Market’s Positive Response
Equity markets have rallied on the GST reform hopes. On August 18, auto stocks surged—Maruti Suzuki and Hyundai jumped 8–9%, while consumer goods names gained 4–7%.
Retailers and e-commerce players are hopeful—projecting festive sales growth of 20–30%, provided the GST Cut Cars are implemented soon.
Urgent Measures
- Advance GST Council timeline: Pushing the meeting earlier can help implement the GST Cut Cars window ahead of Diwali.
- Provide dealer relief: Extend channel financing tranches by 30–45 days to mitigate credit stress.
- Clarify cess utilization: Clear guidelines on accumulated cess credits post-reform will ensure smoother transitions.
Diwali’s Potential Comeback
GST Cut Cars carry the promise to reignite India’s festive auto boom—if implemented swiftly. Dealers, carmakers, and consumers are caught in limbo. But with timely reforms, Diwali could still spark a rebound with renewed purchase enthusiasm and economic vitality. Until then, the market stays on standby, waiting for the tax relief that could unlock the festive revival.
Business
Musk’s companies sue Apple and OpenAI — explore six dramatically bold antitrust moves, market stakes, and legal showdown details in full

Contents
US,Aug.26,2025:The complaint argues this arrangement stifles innovation in generative AI, reduces user choice, and protects Apple’s smartphone dominance, thereby shutting out Grok and other rivals despite their merit
Musk’s companies sue Apple and OpenAI
Musk’s companies sue Apple and OpenAI—this bold move emerged on August 25, 2025, when X Corp. and xAI, both owned by Elon Musk, filed a federal lawsuit in Texas, alleging that Apple and OpenAI are colluding to undermine competition in AI and smartphone markets.
What Exactly Are Musk’s Companies Accusing Apple and OpenAI Of?
According to the lawsuit, Apple integrated OpenAI’s ChatGPT into iPhones via Apple Intelligence, giving it unfair preferential treatment—especially elevating ChatGPT in App Store rankings, effectively sidelining competitors like xAI’s Grok.
The complaint argues this arrangement stifles innovation in generative AI, reduces user choice, and protects Apple’s smartphone dominance, thereby shutting out Grok and other rivals despite their merit. Musk’s companies are seeking a permanent injunction against alleged anticompetitive tactics and are demanding billions in damages.
Who Filed the Lawsuit and Where Was It Filed?
The legal action was filed by X Corp. (formerly Twitter) and xAI in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The suit portrays both Apple and OpenAI as monopolists conspiring against growing challengers in AI.
OpenAI has dismissed the lawsuit as typical of Musk’s “ongoing pattern of harassment,” while Apple has not issued a public response yet.
Why This Antitrust Battle Matters Globally
This lawsuit is more than a headline—it’s a high-stakes clash at the crossroads of AI, mobile integration, and market fairness. If proven, it may reshape how tech giants integrate AI in core operating systems and platforms. Governments and competitors are closely watching whether this signals a new era of litigation-driven market regulation.
OpenAI, Apple, and Broader Tech Commentary
- OpenAI: Characterized Musk’s lawsuit as harassment rather than a credible legal claim.
- Apple: Has yet to comment publicly on the litigation.
Media sources frame the case as another chapter in the prolonged feud between Musk and Altman (OpenAI’s CEO), and note the parallel with U.S. DOJ scrutiny of Apple’s monopolistic practices.
What’s Next? Legal Stakes, Market Impact & Watchpoints
- Court proceedings: Expect pre-trial motions and discovery to define the shape of the case.
- App Store dynamics: A ruling could alter how AI apps are promoted on iPhones.
- Damages and remedies: Musk seeks substantial compensation and structural changes—potentially setting precedent for future antitrust suits.
- Industry reverberations: Rival AI developers may find new hope or caution, depending on outcome.
Musk’s companies sue Apple and OpenAI marks a dramatically bold escalation in the tech industry’s antitrust landscape. With wariness around App Store dominance and AI integration, this lawsuit could recalibrate how giants operate and how challengers compete. The global tech community will be watching closely as this case unfolds.
Let me know if you’d like a deeper dive into the legal filings, spin from each party, or implications for developers and regulators!
Business
US imposes 25% extra tariff on India—learn about the shocking market reaction, export scramble, economic fallout and India’s bold diplomatic stance

Contents
US, Aug.26,2025:With the new tariff deadline looming, exporters in key sectors—diamonds, textiles, seafood—are hurriedly dispatching shipments to the U.S. to beat the surcharge
US imposes 25% extra tariff on India
US imposes 25% extra tariff on India, confirmed in a public notice from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, is slated to come into effect at 12:01 am EDT on August 27, 2025.
This decision raises the overall duty on Indian imports to a staggering 50%, doubling the baseline and marking one of the steepest trade levies ever imposed by Washington.
Why the US Imposed the Extra 25% Tariff on India
The executive action stems from Executive Order 14329, signed by President Donald Trump, targeting nations seen as indirectly enabling Russia’s economy—namely, through the purchase of Russian oil
While India isn’t the only country importing Russian crude, critics argue it’s bearing one of the harshest responses.
Financial Markets and Currency Shock
Indian financial markets reacted sharply:
- The rupee plunged, approaching its historic low—trading around ₹87.80 to the dollar.
- Indian equity indices, including Nifty 50 and Sensex, erased August gains, declining about 0.7%, with export-linked sectors hit hardest.
Market watchers now await a possible Reserve Bank of India intervention to stabilize currency volatility, especially since India holds robust $695 billion in forex reserves.
Exporters Race to Ship Before Tariff Hits
With the new tariff deadline looming, exporters in key sectors—diamonds, textiles, seafood—are hurriedly dispatching shipments to the U.S. to beat the surcharge.
Still, once the extra 25% levy kicks in, 55% of India’s $87 billion exports to the U.S. could be severely affected, potentially shrinking exports by 20–30% starting September.
Anticipated Economic Fallout for India
Economists estimate the impact may include:
- A 0.8 percentage point drop in GDP growth.
- Loss of competitiveness in labor-intensive industries like textiles, gems & jewelry, auto parts.
- Risk to the shift in global supply chains, as firms lose confidence post this punitive escalation.
Some sectors like pharmaceuticals and rare-earth minerals may be exempt, but the broader hit is widespread.
India’s Defensive Strategy & Official Response
India’s response has been robust:
- The government labeled the measure “unjustified, unfair, and unreasonable”.
- Industry bodies are exploring diversification to markets like China, the Middle East, and Latin America.
- Prime Minister Modi reaffirmed the nation’s resilience: “We will bear any pressure without harming our farmers, shopkeepers, and small producers”.
- Relief measures and export incentives are underway to buffer impacted sectors.
Diplomatic Fallout & Trade Realignment
The broader implications are profound:
- Relations have hit their lowest point in years, jeopardizing strategic alignments like the Quad.
- Analysts label this the “worst crisis in two decades” of U.S.–India ties.
- Pivoting away from reliance on U.S. markets may spur long-term trade realignment, possibly strengthening ties with Russia, China, or regional partners.
US imposes 25% extra tariff on India—pushing total duties to 50%—has ignited a financial storm: rupee dive, stock slumps, and frantic exporter action. With serious economic reverberations, India counters with resilience and trade recalibration. The broader U.S.–India strategic partnership now hangs in the balance, prompting urgent reconsideration of global alliances.
Business
Best Deal Oil Purchases India’ Secure Energy Resilience

Contents
Russia, Aug.25,2025:India categorically rejected the pressure. The Ministry of External Affairs labeled U.S. tariffs “unfair, unjustified, and unreasonable
best deal oil purchases India in focus
best deal oil purchases India — this phrase captures India’s firm, economy-driven stance: buying oil from the most advantageous sources despite mounting pressure. As global energy tensions rise, India’s strategy underscores the nation’s dedication to energy security for its 1.4 billion people.
India’s Energy Landscape
Rising Energy Demands
India imports nearly 85% of its oil, consuming around 5.5 million barrels per day. Cost-effective supply is vital to manage inflation, fuel subsidies, and industrial costs.
Global Dynamics & Shift to Russian Oil
Following Western sanctions on Moscow after 2022’s Ukraine invasion, Indian imports of discounted Russian crude surged. At times, these accounted for around 40% of India’s total imports.
US Tariffs and Indian Response
Trump’s 50% Tariffs & Strategic Pressure
President Trump escalated tariffs on Indian goods: an initial 25% “reciprocal” duty followed by an additional 25% tied to its Russian oil imports—bringing total tariffs to 50%, among the highest globally.
India Pushes Back: “Best Deal Oil Purchases India”
India categorically rejected the pressure. The Ministry of External Affairs labeled U.S. tariffs “unfair, unjustified, and unreasonable,” affirming that energy procurement is a sovereign matter grounded in national interest.
India’s Defense: Diplomacy & Economic Realism
Ambassador Vinay Kumar’s TASS Interview
Ambassador to Russia Vinay Kumar emphasized that Indian firms will continue buying oil from wherever they secure the best deal, prioritizing commercial viability and national interest:
- “Our objective is energy security for 1.4 billion people… our cooperation with Russia… has helped bring stability to global oil markets.”
- He condemned U.S. tariffs as “unfair, unreasonable and unjustified,” affirming India’s autonomy in energy decisions.
- Payments for Russian oil are seamless through national currency arrangements.4.2 External Affairs Commentary
EAM S. Jaishankar wryly remarked, “It’s funny—people from a pro-business American administration accusing others of doing business.” He added pointedly:
“If you have an issue buying oil from India, don’t. Nobody forces you to. Europe and America both buy.”
Strategic Implications & Trade Maneuvers
India Resumes Russian Oil Imports
Despite initial pause in July, Indian Oil and BPCL resumed buying Russian crude for September and October, spurred by widening discounts (around $3/barrel on Urals grade).
Broader Energy Diversification
India is also exploring alternatives: Iraq, Saudi Arabia, UAE, the U.S., West Africa, Guyana, Brazil, and Canada are being tapped to reduce dependence and enhance supply resilience.
Global Reactions & Strategic Fallout
Voices in the U.S. & Geopolitical Stakes
Critics argue Trump’s tariffs could weaken the U.S.-India partnership, especially within the Quad framework. Former Australian PM Tony Abbott warned the move risks undermining alignment against China.
FT commentators highlighted the inconsistency: India faces penalties while the U.S. and EU continue energy trade with Russia.
Russia’s Firm Support
Russia expressed readiness to expand trade with India in light of U.S. tariffs. Charge d’Affaires Roman Babushkin affirmed: “Friends don’t behave like that,” criticizing Washington’s actions as unfair.
Why best deal oil purchases India matters
The phrase best deal oil purchases India embodies India’s calculated response to geopolitical coercion—prioritizing energy security, market dynamics, and strategic autonomy. While the U.S. escalates tariff pressure, India remains resolute, pursuing affordable, diversified energy sources in line with its national imperatives.
Business
India-Russia Oil Dispute laid bare — 7 bold truths as Jaishankar slams U.S. accusations at the World Leaders Forum

Contents
New Delhi, Aug.23,2025:Jaishankar’s pointed comeback—“If you don’t like it, don’t buy it”—served as a powerful assertion of India’s right to independent trade decisions
India-Russia Oil Dispute: Unpacking the Buzz
The India-Russia Oil Dispute erupted into the spotlight when U.S. officials accused India of profiting from Russian oil—alleging that India had become a refining “laundromat,” indirectly funding Russia amid the Ukraine war. At the Economic Times World Leaders Forum 2025, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar responded forcefully, defending India’s sovereign energy choices.
“If you don’t like it, don’t buy it” — Sovereignty First
Jaishankar’s pointed comeback—“If you don’t like it, don’t buy it”—served as a powerful assertion of India’s right to independent trade decisions. He criticized those in a “pro-business American administration” for meddling in India’s affairs.
Energy Strategy Is Global, Not Just Indian
Beyond national priorities, Jaishankar emphasized that India’s Russian oil purchases also contributed to global energy stability. In 2022, amidst surging prices, allowing India to import Russian crude helped calm markets worldwide.
Tariffs and Trade Talks — India Holds the Red Lines
With the U.S. imposing up to 50% tariffs on Indian goods tied to energy policy, Jaishankar reiterated that while trade discussions with Washington continue, India will not compromise on protecting farmers, small producers, and its strategic autonomy.
Double Standards—Not Just About India
Jaishankar called out the hypocrisy in targeting India alone. Critics have ignored that larger energy importers, including China and the EU, have not faced similar reproach for their Russian oil purchases.
No Third-Party in Indo-Pak Ceasefire
Amid U.S. claims of mediating the 2025 India–Pakistan ceasefire, Jaishankar made it clear that India rejects any third-party intervention. A national consensus has existed for over 50 years—India handles its ties with Pakistan bilaterally.
Operation Sindoor and Direct Military De-escalation
Regarding Operation Sindoor, launched after the April 22 Pahalgam attack, Jaishankar confirmed that the cessation of hostilities resulted directly from military-to-military discussions. There were no links to trade or external pressure.
U.S. Ceasefire Claims and Indian Rebuttal
While the U.S. touted its role in brokering the ceasefire—via President Trump, VP Vance, and Secretary Rubio—India maintained the outcome was reached bilaterally and without diplomatic backdoor deals.
What Lies Ahead for the India-Russia Oil Dispute?
The India-Russia Oil Dispute unveils deeper geopolitical crosscurrents. It reflects India’s balancing act—asserting sovereignty over energy choices while defending national interests in the face of mounting foreign pressure. Simultaneously, India’s unwavering stance on ceasefire diplomacy reinforces its preference for autonomy over dependency. As global tensions simmer and trade spat heats up, India’s resolve and strategic clarity remain unmistakable.
Business
Open AI-opening India office game changing move

Contents
India, Aug.23,2025:India ranks as OpenAI’s second-largest market by user numbers, with weekly active ChatGPT users having roughly quadrupled in the past year. Recognizing this explosive user base, the company recently rolled out an India-specific
The Big Announcement
OpenAI opening India office was confirmed by CEO Sam Altman, who stated the company will launch its first office in New Delhi by the end of 2025. He emphasized that building a local team in India aligns with OpenAI’s commitment to making advanced AI accessible and tailored for India, and with India.
Why India Matters to OpenAI
India ranks as OpenAI’s second-largest market by user numbers, with weekly active ChatGPT users having roughly quadrupled in the past year. Recognizing this explosive user base, the company recently rolled out an India-specific, affordable ChatGPT plan for ₹399/month (approx. $4.60), aiming to expand access among nearly a billion internet users.
Local Hiring and Institutional Setup
OpenAI has legally registered its entity in India and initiated local hiring. The first set of roles includes Account Directors for Digital Natives, Large Enterprise, and Strategics, indicating focus across multiple business verticals. Pragya Misra currently leads public policy and partnerships locally, with the office slated for deepening collaborations with enterprises, developers, and academia.
Policy and Government Synergies
The move aligns with the India government’s IndiaAI Mission, aimed at democratizing AI innovation. IT Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw welcomed OpenAI’s entry, citing India’s talent, infrastructure, and regulatory backing as key enablers for AI transformation.
Competition and Regulation
Despite strong growth, the journey isn’t without challenges:
- OpenAI faces stiff competition from Google’s Gemini and Perplexity AI, both offering advanced AI features for free to attract users.
- Legal challenges persist. Media outlets and publishers allege unauthorized use of content for AI training—a claim OpenAI denies.
- Internal caution: India’s Finance Ministry has advised employees to avoid AI tools like ChatGPT over data confidentiality concerns.
What This Means for Indian AI Ecosystem
The OpenAI opening India office initiative promises:
- Localized AI services tailored to India’s linguistic, educational, and enterprise needs.
- Stronger collaboration with government, academia, and startups.
- A potential shift in regulatory discourse through local presence—making engagement more proactive.
- Acceleration of digital inclusion across demographics through affordable AI access.
The OpenAI opening India office announcement signals more than expansion—it’s a bold stride toward embedding AI in India’s innovation DNA. With localized services, deeper partnerships, and affordability at its core, OpenAI aims to empower India’s digital future, even as it navigates regulatory scrutiny and market rivalry.
Business
US economy stagflation risk is rising—discover 7 powerful insights on inflation hikes, job softness-

Contents
India, Aug.16,2025: Tariffs are a major driver behind the flaring US economy stagflation risk. President Trump’s sweeping tariff measures—including his “Liberation Day” tariffs—have pushed U.S. effective
US Economy Stagflation Risk: A Growing Threat
US economy stagflation risk is now a central concern among economists and policymakers. As inflation lingers and growth falters, the specter of stagflation looms large—posing one of the gravest economic dilemmas of our time.
Tariffs Spark Sticky Inflation
Tariffs are a major driver behind the flaring US economy stagflation risk. President Trump’s sweeping tariff measures—including his “Liberation Day” tariffs—have pushed U.S. effective average tariffs to levels not seen since the 1930s, around 18–18.6%, raising input costs and consumer prices.
Rising wholesale and producer prices are signaling inflation that may soon reach consumers—fueling the stagflation narrative.
Weak Labor Market Sets Alarm Bells Ringing
Simultaneously, the labor market is showing concerning signs. July’s job gain of just 73,000 was well below expectations, and May–June figures were substantially revised downward.
Economist Mark Zandi warns that stagnating labor force growth—driven by immigration restrictions—is aggravating this trend, raising the risk of recession and fueling inflation pressure through rising wages.
Consumer Resilience Masks Underlying Strain
Despite these headwinds, consumer spending remains surprisingly firm. Retail sales rose 0.5% in July, propelled by auto and furniture purchases likely front-loaded to beat tariff-driven price hikes.
Yet, beneath the surface, confidence is weakening—Michigan’s consumer sentiment index dropped to a three-month low (57.2), with inflation expectations rising toward 4.9% over the next year.
Cut or Hold Rates
The Federal Reserve is caught between a rock and a hard place. Chicago Fed Chief Austan Goolsbee says rate cuts are possible later in autumn—but only if inflation shows durable signs of easing.
Top Fed official Michelle Bowman argues the recent weak jobs data justifies up to three rate cuts in 2025—but acknowledges the risk of stagflation complicates the decision.
Trust in Data and Institutions Under Siege
Another dimension of US economy stagflation risk stems from eroding trust in economic data. The Trump administration’s dismissal of BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer after the weak jobs report—and attacks on statistical institutions—has raised alarm among experts.
Analysts caution that undermining the data ecosystem at a time of dissonant signals may hinder effective policy response.
Stock Markets Brace for Corrections
Wall Street is on edge. Strategists from Stifel and others warn of potential market corrections—ranging from 10% to 15%—as they foresee stagflationary pressure and overvaluation risks.
While some sectors are buoyed by AI optimism, others face downgrades—exposing uneven growth across the economy.
Navigating Toward Stability or Further Risk
As we navigate US economy stagflation risk, the next few months will be critical:
- Will inflation be transitory or persistent?
- Will labor conditions stabilize or deteriorate further?
- Will the Fed act proactively or fall behind the curve?
- Can confidence in economic data be restored?
The stakes are high—and only time will reveal whether structural resilience can counteract policy-induced shocks.
The US economy stagflation risk isn’t just theoretical—it’s emerging, uncomfortably real, and multi-faceted. Only bold, data-driven policy and restored confidence can guide the U.S. through this crossroads toward a stable economic future.
Bihar
Nitish Kumar’s Bihar Industry Incentives offer doubled subsidies, free land, speedy dispute resolution

Contents
Bihar, Aug.16,2025: To fuel industrial growth and self-employment, Nitish Kumar’s Bihar Industry Incentives include hefty boosts—doubling of subsidies, free land
Nitish Kumar’s Bihar Industry Incentives are poised to redefine the state’s economic landscape. Announced on Independence Day, August 15, 2025, Bihar’s Chief Minister declared that after achieving the 50 lakh jobs milestone, the government is now targeting 1 crore jobs over the next five years.
To fuel industrial growth and self-employment, Nitish Kumar’s Bihar Industry Incentives include hefty boosts—doubling of subsidies, free land, and rapid dispute resolution—all within a six-month window.
With this upbeat drive, the state aims to transform Bihar’s youth into skilled, self-reliant contributors to progress.
What Are These Nitish Kumar’s Bihar Industry Incentives
Let’s break down the four standout incentives:
Doubling Capital, Interest & GST Incentives
Under the new package, the incentive amounts for capital subsidy, interest subsidy, and GST will be doubled for industries setting up in Bihar
. This powerful move is designed to lower financial barriers and attract serious investors.
Free Land for High-Employment Industries
Land will be made available in all districts, and industries that generate greater employment will be offered land free of cost.
A bold, investor-friendly gesture to scale job creation.
Swift Resolution of Land Disputes
Recognizing that delays derail projects, the government pledges to resolve land allocation disputes with priority
a huge relief for entrepreneurs seeking clarity and speed.
Six-Month Window to Claim the Benefits
These incentives apply to entrepreneurs who set up industries within the next six months, ensuring timely action and rapid deployment.
Reaching the 50 Lakh Milestone — Now One Crore Jobs Ahead
Earlier, under the Saat Nishchay Part-2 initiative (2020), Bihar had set—and achieved—a target of providing 50 lakh government jobs and employment opportunities.
Building on this success, the state now aims to double the impact by delivering 1 crore jobs over the next five years.
This is not just a number—it’s about giving Bihar’s youth hope, skills, and livelihoods.
Why These Incentives Matter
- Youth Empowerment: With Nitish Kumar’s Bihar Industry Incentives, agriculture-heavy Bihar can diversify into manufacturing and services, absorbing its millions of job seekers.
- Industrial Growth: Boosts like doubled subsidies and land access ignite private investment, especially in tiers beyond Patna.
- Ease of Doing Business: Rapid dispute resolution and a tight application window underline the government’s seriousness.
- Election Relevance: Coming just ahead of the 2025 Assembly elections, these announcements combine feel-good messaging with tangible investor-friendly actions.
Bihar’s Vision for Youth, Investors, and Industry
Nitish Kumar’s Bihar Industry Incentives are more than a headline—they’re a promise of transformation. With doubled subsidies, free land, rapid resolution, and a 6-month rollout window, Bihar is positioning itself as a top industrial destination. By targeting 1 crore jobs in five years, the state is aiming to empower its youth and shift gears into sustainable growth.
- Festival1 month ago
Nag Panchami 2025: 7 Key Rituals and Puja Time to Eliminate Kaal Sarpa Dosha
- Festival1 month ago
Hariyali Teej 2025 Is the Most Beautiful Festival for Women
- Latest News1 month ago
Shocking Political Exit: Anmol Gagan Maan Resigns from AAP and Quits Politics – What’s Next for Punjab?
- Accident4 weeks ago
uttarkashi‑cloudburst‑flash‑flood‑devastation‑4‑dead
- Art2 months ago
Sattva, Rajas, Tamas” Come Alive on Canvas – Dr. Renu Shahi’s Indian Philosophical Art Shines in Sri Lanka
- Crime1 month ago
Jamdoli Stabbing Jaipur: 8 Shocking Revelations That Rocked the City
- Education2 months ago
Young Athletes Shine in Inter-House Kho-Kho Competition (Classes III–V)
- Education1 month ago
Grandparents’ Day Jaipur School Celebration on 26 July ,honored grandparents’ vital role – a heartfelt