India
No Need to Give Him Biryani Like Kasab: 26/11 Hero on Extradition of Tahawwur Rana

Contents
Introduction to the 26/11 Mumbai Attacks
Tahawwur Rana is a Pakistani-born Canadian national who has garnered significant attention due to his alleged involvement in extremist activities, particularly in connection with the 2008 Mumbai attacks. The 26/11 Mumbai attacks stand as one of the most harrowing events in Indian history, occurring from November 26 to November 29, 2008. Orchestrated by the Pakistan-based militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba, the coordinated assaults targeted multiple locations across Mumbai, including the iconic Taj Mahal Palace Hotel, the Oberoi Trident Hotel, and the bustling Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Terminus railway station. Over the span of a few days, ten gunmen executed these meticulously planned attacks, resulting in the deaths of 166 individuals, including foreign nationals, while leaving hundreds more injured.
The detailed timeline of the attacks begins at approximately 8:00 PM on November 26, when the first of the attackers arrived by sea, launching grenades at the crowded CST railway station. This horrific event quickly escalated as the attackers disseminated throughout the city, initiating shootings and explosions that spread chaos. The siege of the Taj Mahal Palace Hotel, lasting nearly 60 hours, attracted the attention of global media and showcased the bravery of various security personnel, including the National Security Guard and Mumbai police, who worked tirelessly to neutralize the threats.
Beyond the immediate casualties, the Mumbai attacks had a profound and lasting impact on India’s national consciousness. The event not only heightened the sense of vulnerability felt by Indian citizens but also brought to the forefront the pressing issue of terrorism emanating from neighboring countries. The attacks spurred a significant shift in India’s counter-terrorism policies, leading to increased military preparedness and the establishment of new security measures in major urban areas. For many Indians, particularly the heroes involved in combating terrorism during the attacks, the events of 26/11 serve as a painful reminder of the ongoing threat posed by extremist organizations.
Who is Tahawwur Rana?
Tahawwur Rana is a Pakistani-born Canadian national who has garnered significant attention due to his alleged involvement in extremist activities, particularly in connection with the 2008 Mumbai attacks. Born in Pakistan, Rana emigrated to the United States in the 1990s, where he established a career in the medical sector. Rana eventually became a naturalized Canadian citizen. Despite his professional achievements, Rana’s trajectory took a disturbing turn as he became associated with jihadist movements, showcasing that not all paths to extremism are rooted solely in religious ideology, but can also involve personal relationships and ideological affiliations.
Rana’s connections with extremist organizations notably include links to Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), the group responsible for the Mumbai terror attacks. Investigations revealed that Rana served as a facilitator, assisting in logistics and operational aspects that contributed to the horrific events. Rana activities in supporting the LeT showcased a blend of political and religious motivations, highlighting an alarming trend where individuals in the diaspora can be radicalized and subsequently recruited to perpetrate acts of terrorism internationally.
Rana role was not limited to mere association; Rana is accused of using his business to facilitate the travel and training of operatives tied to the attacks. The logistics he coordinated laid the groundwork for the violence that unfolded in Mumbai, resulting in significant loss of life and widespread terror. Rana actions prompted international concerns regarding the threat posed by individuals who manage to blend into society while harboring extremist affiliations. As Rana faces extradition charges, Rana’s case serves as a stark reminder of the complexities surrounding modern terrorism and the intricate networks that permit such activities to thrive.
The Role of 26/11 Hero: Insights and Perspectives
The 26/11 attacks in Mumbai, which unfolded over four harrowing days in November 2008, became a pivotal moment in India’s fight against terrorism. Among those who displayed remarkable bravery during these dark hours was a hero whose courage not only saved lives but also inspired many. This individual, a survivor and a first responder, has since become a prominent voice in advocating for justice and paying homage to the victims. Through their experiences, they provide crucial insights into the psychological and emotional repercussions of such traumatic events.
Possessing a strong sense of duty, this 26/11 hero emerged during the attacks when chaos reigned supreme. Their actions demonstrated unwavering commitment, whether it was assisting victims or coordinating rescue efforts. This individual’s background, marked by humility and resilience, has shaped their understanding of the complexities surrounding terrorism and communal violence. Their firsthand experience of the horror has driven them to challenge complacency and speak on behalf of the voiceless.
Years after the attacks, this hero continues to confront the lingering effects of the traumatic experiences. They emphasize that the emotional scars persist and can manifest in various forms, impacting the lives of individuals and communities in profound ways. This ongoing struggle against terrorism underscores a larger societal issue that must be addressed through collective awareness and action. Their journey serves as a testament to not only personal perseverance but also a clarion call for the need for systemic changes in how society responds to threats posed by extremism.
In advocating against terrorism, this hero acts as a bridge between the past and present, utilizing their platform to educate and mobilize others in the fight for justice. The saga of 26/11 is not just a narrative of violence, but also one of resilience, unity, and the enduring human spirit, embodied by individuals like this remarkable hero.
Extradition Process: Legal and Political Implications
The extradition of individuals accused of terrorism, such as Tahawwur Rana, encompasses a complex legal framework that operates at both national and international levels. In the context of Rana’s case, the legal protocols demanded by the United States and the challenges posed by India’s legal system provide a rich ground for examination. Extradition treaties establish the groundwork for legal proceedings, specifying the conditions under which a fugitive can be transferred from one jurisdiction to another. The United States and India have an extradition treaty in place, which outlines the legal obligations that each country has toward each other’s requests for extradition.
However, the political implications surrounding such a high-profile case cannot be overlooked. Deliberations on extradition often become entangled with diplomatic relations, especially when the accused is linked to acts of terrorism that have sparked significant public outcry. In Rana’s instance, his alleged involvement in the 26/11 Mumbai attacks has made the case particularly sensitive, prompting heightened scrutiny from the international community. Legal battles arise not only from the intrinsic complexities of extradition laws but also from diverse interpretations of the evidence presented. The accused may invoke various defenses, including political asylum claims or challenging the legitimacy of the charges against them.
Furthermore, the role of law enforcement agencies comes into play, as they must navigate intricate legal procedures while responding to political pressures. The cooperation between judicial authorities in both countries is crucial for ensuring that the extradition is not only legally sound but also politically acceptable. As Rana’s case unfolds, it serves as a stark reminder of the delicate balance between upholding the rule of law and addressing the political ramifications that accompany international extradition requests.
Public Sentiment Towards Tahawwur Rana’s Extradition
The extradition of Tahawwur Rana, a key figure linked to the 26/11 Mumbai attacks, has elicited a strong and multifaceted reaction from the public. Families of the victims, political leaders, and citizens alike have voiced their opinions, reflecting a spectrum of emotions ranging from anger to calls for justice. The sentiment surrounding this case is deeply influenced by personal narratives and political contexts, each adding layers to the public discourse.
For the families of the victims, Rana’s extradition represents a glimmer of hope for justice, as many believe that holding accountable those who orchestrated the attacks is essential for closure. The anguish that these families endured has been compounded by years of legal and diplomatic complexities surrounding such cases. Therefore, they view the extradition as a decisive step towards ensuring that those responsible are brought to justice and that their loved ones are not merely reduced to statistics within the larger narrative of terrorism.
Political leaders have also expressed their expectations regarding the extradition process. They recognize it as a pivotal moment in the fight against terrorism and a crucial element in ongoing diplomatic relations. The government’s stance on this issue often reflects broader national sentiments, fostering unity among citizens who seek accountability. This approval, however, is not without criticism; some argue that the political motivations can overshadow the fundamental principles of justice and human rights.
Also read : Tahawwur Rana: The Extradition to India and His Role in the 26/11 Terror Attacks
The general populace continues to discuss Rana’s extradition through social media platforms and public forums, illustrating a growing awareness and engagement with issues of terrorism, victim rights, and national security. This active discourse can significantly influence public policy and perceptions of justice. In conclusion, the public sentiment towards Tahawwur Rana’s extradition is characterized by a complex interplay of hope, demand for accountability, and scrutiny of the legal and political frameworks surrounding the issue. The ongoing conversation underscores the importance of addressing not only the implications for victims’ families but also the broader implications for society at large.
The Metaphor of ‘Biryani like Kasab’
The phrase “no need to give him biryani like Kasab” serves as a stark metaphor highlighting a significant sentiment prevalent in public discourse regarding terrorism and its perpetrators. This expression draws attention to the infamous case of Ajmal Kasab, the lone surviving gunman of the 26/11 Mumbai attacks, who received substantial media coverage and a degree of public sympathy, including access to luxuries such as biryani during his custody. The reference to biryani symbolizes a perceived lack of justice and accountability exhibited toward individuals accused of heinous crimes against society.
Public reaction to statements like the aforementioned is often intense and layered with emotion. Many individuals find it deeply troubling that the criminal justice system might extend any semblance of leniency or comfort to those who perpetuate acts of mass violence. The case of Tahawwur Rana, who has been implicated in aiding and abetting terrorist acts, reinforces these sentiments. The call to withhold such perceived niceties serves as a rallying cry for justice, reflecting the anger and dismay of a populace that has faced the horrors of terrorism firsthand.
The symbolism inherent in the metaphor underscores a broader societal debate regarding compassion versus justice. It brings to light the frustrations surrounding what many perceive as an inadequate response to terror, encouraging a discourse that juxtaposes humane treatment with the need for deterrent measures against future atrocities. The metaphor resonates not merely as an expression of personal sentiment; rather, it encapsulates a communal yearning for more decisive actions against individuals like Rana, enhancing the emotional landscape surrounding discussions on justice and terrorism. Given the ongoing struggle to address such issues, emotions run high, showcasing the complexity of societal values when confronting the reality of violence.
International Perspectives on Terrorism and Extradition
The fight against terrorism is a global priority, necessitating collaborative approaches among countries. Extradition, the legal process whereby one jurisdiction surrenders a suspected or convicted criminal to another, serves as a critical tool in tackling terrorism. However, the intricacies of this process can vary significantly from one nation to another, influenced by legal traditions, international treaties, and the balance between human rights and national security.
Many countries have established specific treaties aimed at facilitating the extradition of terrorism suspects. For instance, the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime and its protocols address issues of international cooperation in combating terrorism. These treaties often contain provisions that stipulate the obligations of states to cooperate, thereby creating a framework within which countries can operate. Nations such as the United States and the United Kingdom have engaged in extensive bilateral agreements that streamline extradition processes, enabling swift action to combat terrorism.
In examining comparative case studies, one can observe the varied responses to terrorism suspects across countries. In some instances, states may prioritize national security over judicial processes, seeking to expedite extradition even at the expense of comprehensive legal safeguards. Conversely, others might refuse extradition requests under the premise of potential human rights violations, particularly if the suspect faces the death penalty or inhumane treatment. This dichotomy often leads to contentious debates over the ethical implications of adhering to international human rights conventions versus safeguarding national security interests.
Moreover, the intricacy of legal systems, public opinion, and diplomatic relations further complicate the extradition landscape. Thus, while the collaborative international stance on terrorism is crucial, it must be navigated thoughtfully, as the ramifications of each extradition can reverberate through both human rights and global security frameworks. Overall, the treatment of terrorism suspects through extradition reflects a delicate balancing act that requires ongoing dialogue and reform within the international community.
The Ongoing Fight Against Terrorism in India
In the aftermath of the 26/11 terrorist attacks in Mumbai, India has markedly intensified its efforts to combat terrorism, implementing a range of strategies aimed at addressing both the immediate threats and the underlying issues that fuel extremism. The brutal assault revealed significant vulnerabilities in national security and prompted a comprehensive review of existing policies. One key area of focus has been the enhancement of intelligence and security apparatus. The establishment of the National Investigation Agency (NIA) in 2008 serves as a central pillar in investigating and combating terrorism across the country, working in cohesion with state agencies to neutralize threats swiftly.
Moreover, a significant emphasis has been placed on international collaboration. Following the attacks, India has actively sought to bolster ties with other nations to share intelligence and coordinate actions against cross-border terrorism. Diplomatic efforts have highlighted the need for stringent measures against nations that harbor terrorists. This shift reflects an understanding that combating terrorism is not solely a national concern but a global imperative, requiring concerted efforts among nations.
On the legal front, several amendments to legislations have been introduced to facilitate swift judicial processes against terror-related offenses. The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, for example, has been adapted to ensure that accused individuals face justice without excessive delays. Additionally, governmental and non-governmental organizations have focused on social initiatives aimed at deradicalization, addressing the root causes of terrorism by promoting education and fostering community engagement.
Overall, India’s response to the 26/11 attacks embodies a multi-faceted approach that not only aims at immediate security measures but also addresses the longer-term strategy of public awareness and preventive measures. The resolve to fight terrorism continues to evolve, guided by the lessons learned from past incidents and the changing landscape of global security threats.
Summary: Moving Forward in the Fight Against Terrorism
The fight against terrorism has remained a complex and high-stakes challenge for nations across the globe. The extradition of Tahawwur Rana serves as a crucial point of discussion within this ongoing battle. His extradition is not merely a legal matter; it signifies a collective commitment by nations to uphold justice and ensure accountability for those involved in acts of terror. The insights shared throughout this blog post emphasize the significance of international cooperation in addressing such threats, as well as the necessity of implementing stringent measures to prevent future incidents.
Justice in the context of terrorism extends beyond mere legal proceedings. It embodies a commitment to ensuring that perpetrators are brought to account for their actions. The implications of the actions taken against individuals like Rana resonate far beyond the courtroom; they send a strong message that terrorism will not be tolerated and that every effort will be made to safeguard national security. Each step taken toward justice reinforces the principles of democracy, human rights, and the rule of law that underpin society.
Furthermore, the ongoing vigilance against terrorism requires a multifaceted approach that includes not only legal measures but also community engagement, education, and awareness initiatives. It is imperative for governments and civil societies to work hand-in-hand in fostering a resilient and informed population that recognizes both the manifestations of terrorism and the importance of standing firm against it.
As we reflect on these pressing issues, it becomes evident that the journey towards effectively combating terrorism is far from over. Continued action, not only in monitoring and prosecuting offenders but also in fostering social cohesion and understanding among diverse communities, is vital. The road ahead poses numerous challenges, yet with a collective resolve, societies can strive to secure a safer future for all.
Delhi/NCR
Pm-Modi-degree-privacy-ruling-legal-implications

Contents
New Delhi, Aug.25,2025:In 2016, RTI activist Neeraj Kumar filed a request under the RTI Act seeking details of all students passed in DU’s BA exams of 1978—including roll numbers, names, marks, and results—coincidentally the year PM Modi graduated
PM Modi degree privacy ruling explained
PM Modi degree privacy ruling has now become a landmark legal benchmark. On August 25, 2025, the Delhi High Court formally set aside the Central Information Commission’s (CIC) 2016 order demanding disclosure of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s 1978 BA degree records from Delhi University (DU). This decision reasserts the sanctity of private academic records, even for public officials, as protected personal data.
RTI, CIC order, and DU’s challenge
The 2016 RTI Application
In 2016, RTI activist Neeraj Kumar filed a request under the RTI Act seeking details of all students passed in DU’s BA exams of 1978—including roll numbers, names, marks, and results—coincidentally the year PM Modi graduated.
CIC’s 2016 Directive
The CIC, in December 2016, ruled that universities are public bodies, and academic registers qualify as public documents. It directed DU to allow inspection of those records.
University’s Legal Stand
DU contested, asserting that:
- Information is held in a fiduciary capacity.
- Disclosure for mere curiosity contravenes RTI limitations.
- It had no problem providing records only in court, not for random public access.
The High Court Verdict
Justice Datta’s Rationales
Justice Sachin Datta of the Delhi High Court ruled in DU’s favor, quashing the CIC directive entirely.
Privacy vs. Public Curiosity
The court emphasized that being of public interest differs fundamentally from public curiosity. Educational qualifications—even of the Prime Minister—fall under protected personal information as per Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act.
Legal Principles and Fiduciary Duty
Academic Records as Personal Data
Academic records—such as marks, grades, roll numbers—are inherently personal and cannot be disclosed without compelling public interest. The court stressed the confidential nature of such data.
Fiduciary Trust at Play
The judgment recognized the fiduciary relationship between students and the university, comparable to doctor–patient trust. Disclosure to strangers, for no substantive reason, would violate that trust.
Implications of the Ruling
Setting Precedent on Privacy
This verdict reinforces that even public figures retain fundamental privacy in their personal data. It underscores that RTI is not an open door to satisfying sensational queries.
RTI Limits Reasserted
The court reaffirmed that the RTI Act is not a tool for trivial intrusion—particularly when longstanding exemptions like fiduciary confidentiality apply.
Politics, Privacy, and Precedent
- Political Lens: This ruling could silence persistent demands to publicly audit PM educational credentials.
- Academic Boundaries: Institutions may now lean on fiduciary support to shield student records from undue intrusion.
- Future Cases: Especially relevant for public figures, the decision sets a high bar for “public interest” claims.
Why this PM Modi degree privacy ruling matters now
The PM Modi degree privacy ruling is far more than a procedural win—it’s a statement: personal academic qualifications remain protected, even under RTI. By reaffirming privacy over curiosity, the High Court has struck a balance between transparency and rights. This precedent now stands as a guiding principle in India’s legal-privacy landscape.
Business
Best Deal Oil Purchases India’ Secure Energy Resilience

Contents
Russia, Aug.25,2025:India categorically rejected the pressure. The Ministry of External Affairs labeled U.S. tariffs “unfair, unjustified, and unreasonable
best deal oil purchases India in focus
best deal oil purchases India — this phrase captures India’s firm, economy-driven stance: buying oil from the most advantageous sources despite mounting pressure. As global energy tensions rise, India’s strategy underscores the nation’s dedication to energy security for its 1.4 billion people.
India’s Energy Landscape
Rising Energy Demands
India imports nearly 85% of its oil, consuming around 5.5 million barrels per day. Cost-effective supply is vital to manage inflation, fuel subsidies, and industrial costs.
Global Dynamics & Shift to Russian Oil
Following Western sanctions on Moscow after 2022’s Ukraine invasion, Indian imports of discounted Russian crude surged. At times, these accounted for around 40% of India’s total imports.
US Tariffs and Indian Response
Trump’s 50% Tariffs & Strategic Pressure
President Trump escalated tariffs on Indian goods: an initial 25% “reciprocal” duty followed by an additional 25% tied to its Russian oil imports—bringing total tariffs to 50%, among the highest globally.
India Pushes Back: “Best Deal Oil Purchases India”
India categorically rejected the pressure. The Ministry of External Affairs labeled U.S. tariffs “unfair, unjustified, and unreasonable,” affirming that energy procurement is a sovereign matter grounded in national interest.
India’s Defense: Diplomacy & Economic Realism
Ambassador Vinay Kumar’s TASS Interview
Ambassador to Russia Vinay Kumar emphasized that Indian firms will continue buying oil from wherever they secure the best deal, prioritizing commercial viability and national interest:
- “Our objective is energy security for 1.4 billion people… our cooperation with Russia… has helped bring stability to global oil markets.”
- He condemned U.S. tariffs as “unfair, unreasonable and unjustified,” affirming India’s autonomy in energy decisions.
- Payments for Russian oil are seamless through national currency arrangements.4.2 External Affairs Commentary
EAM S. Jaishankar wryly remarked, “It’s funny—people from a pro-business American administration accusing others of doing business.” He added pointedly:
“If you have an issue buying oil from India, don’t. Nobody forces you to. Europe and America both buy.”
Strategic Implications & Trade Maneuvers
India Resumes Russian Oil Imports
Despite initial pause in July, Indian Oil and BPCL resumed buying Russian crude for September and October, spurred by widening discounts (around $3/barrel on Urals grade).
Broader Energy Diversification
India is also exploring alternatives: Iraq, Saudi Arabia, UAE, the U.S., West Africa, Guyana, Brazil, and Canada are being tapped to reduce dependence and enhance supply resilience.
Global Reactions & Strategic Fallout
Voices in the U.S. & Geopolitical Stakes
Critics argue Trump’s tariffs could weaken the U.S.-India partnership, especially within the Quad framework. Former Australian PM Tony Abbott warned the move risks undermining alignment against China.
FT commentators highlighted the inconsistency: India faces penalties while the U.S. and EU continue energy trade with Russia.
Russia’s Firm Support
Russia expressed readiness to expand trade with India in light of U.S. tariffs. Charge d’Affaires Roman Babushkin affirmed: “Friends don’t behave like that,” criticizing Washington’s actions as unfair.
Why best deal oil purchases India matters
The phrase best deal oil purchases India embodies India’s calculated response to geopolitical coercion—prioritizing energy security, market dynamics, and strategic autonomy. While the U.S. escalates tariff pressure, India remains resolute, pursuing affordable, diversified energy sources in line with its national imperatives.
Delhi/NCR
Dhankhar Resignation Health Reasons – Mystery Or Clarity

Contents
New Delhi, Aug.25,2025:Jagdeep Dhankhar served as India’s 14th Vice President from August 11, 2022, until his unexpected resignation on July 21, 2025. A seasoned lawyer turned politician
Dhankhar resignation health reasons take spotlight
Dhankhar resignation health reasons dominate headlines today. After a dramatic mid-term resignation, Union Home Minister Amit Shah attributes the decision purely to medical concerns. Yet the void left by former Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar’s sudden absence has fueled political debate and speculative intrigue.
Who is Jagdeep Dhankhar?
Jagdeep Dhankhar served as India’s 14th Vice President from August 11, 2022, until his unexpected resignation on July 21, 2025. A seasoned lawyer turned politician, he previously held key roles, including Governor of West Bengal and Union Minister of State for Parliamentary Affairs.
What Officially Happened
Health History and Prior Alerts
Dhankhar cited prioritizing healthcare and following medical advice as the reason for his resignation under Article 67(a) of the Constitution. Notably, he faced real health issues earlier—hospitalized at AIIMS for cardiac concerns in March, and fainting at a public event in Uttarakhand in June—lending credence to his health-related claims.
Timeline of the Resignation
His resignation came as a surprise on the opening day of the Monsoon Session (July 21), two years before his term was set to expire.
President Droupadi Murmu accepted it immediately.
“Health Reasons” Clarified
Dismissing ‘House Arrest’ Rumours
Today, on August 25, 2025, Amit Shah addressed widespread speculation, pointing to the clarity in Dhankhar’s resignation letter and stating it was for health reasons alone. He explicitly rejected rumors of Dhankhar being under “house arrest”, urging the public not to overdramatize the situation.
Media Coverage and Reactions
Media outlets echoed Shah’s message, calling the opposition’s accusations “baseless” and describing Shah’s remarks as an effort to “clear the air” around growing curiosity and conspiracy theories.
Mystery Deepens
Congress and Opposition Demands
Opposition leaders remain unconvinced. Congress’s Jairam Ramesh called the sudden silence “deepening the mystery”. Trinamool raised questions in Parliament, while the CPI even wrote to Dhankhar seeking clarity on his disappearance.
Dhankhar’s Post-Resignation Life
Reports since then offer glimpses of Dhankhar’s off-life—playing table tennis and focusing on yoga—painting a picture of someone retreating for wellness, not under duress.
What Could Be Behind The Silence?
Theories abound:
- Sincere health breakdown: Given his recent medical episodes, the resignation could stem from genuine health needs.
- Political pressure: Some allege his departure was orchestrated to sideline potential dissent ahead of critical constitutional decisions.
- Media and timing: The 15-hour delay before a government response raised eyebrows and fed speculation.
Vice-President Elections & Political Implications
Dhankhar’s exit also triggered a competitive VP election scheduled for September 9. NDA has nominated CP Radhakrishnan, while the Opposition has fielded Justice B Sudershan Reddy. Analysts note the reshuffle may have strategic benefits for the ruling party’s positioning.
Dhankhar resignation health reasons or something more?
In essence, Dhankhar resignation health reasons remains the official narrative. Amit Shah’s reassurances and Dhankhar’s quiet, wellness-focused retreats support that. Yet, political undercurrents and the layer of silence continue to fuel debate. Whether this turns out to be a health-motivated departure or an event with deeper implications, the topic is unlikely to fade until the new Vice President takes oath.
Education
Sahodaya-Collaboration-Summit-Jaipur-educational-transformation

Contents
Jaipur, Aug.25,2025:The Sahodaya Collaboration Summit turned Subodh Public School into a hub of collaborative energy. Educators from across the Jaipur Sahodaya network—including
Sahodaya Collaboration Summit began with urgency and optimism at the opening of the meeting — an emblem of partnership, leadership, and educational vision. Held on August 23, 2025, at Subodh Public School, Rambagh, Jaipur, this momentous gathering marked a renewed commitment to collective growth among member schools of the Jaipur Sahodaya Schools Complex.

The Vibrant Gathering at Jaipur Sahodaya
The Sahodaya Collaboration Summit turned Subodh Public School into a hub of collaborative energy. Educators from across the Jaipur Sahodaya network—including principals, secretaries, and communication leads—gathered to share strategies for innovation, overcoming challenges, and nurturing academic excellence together.
In these lively sessions, leaders candidly discussed membership roles, social justice through equal educational access, and how to scale up imaginative pedagogies. The ambiance was one of unity, rooted in shared mission and rising higher together.
Leadership That Inspired
President’s Vision
The meeting honored Shri Ashok Vaid Ji, whose vision and steady guidance elevated the summit. With thoughtful insight, he facilitated reflective conversations and steered the group toward purposeful planning.
Secretary & Joint Secretary’s Support
A heartfelt thank-you was extended to Shri Puneet Tyagi Ji, the dynamic General Secretary whose unwavering encouragement kept the energy high, and to Smt. Manju Khosla Ji, the graceful Joint Secretary, whose goodwill and supportive presence added warmth to the summit’s mood.
Transparent Elections and New Office Bearers
In a testament to both fairness and collaboration, the Sahodaya Collaboration Summit concluded with the transparent election of new office bearers. Candidates were thoughtfully selected—and the vote was conducted with sincerity and respect.
The newly appointed team includes:
- Dr. Sanjay Parashar – Vice President
- Dr. Sandeep Kulhari – Treasurer
- Ms. Karuna Nagpal – Executive Member
Their induction reflects the summit’s commitment to energizing leadership with fresh perspectives.
What the New Team Brings to the Table
Each new member comes equipped with a wealth of talent and promise:
- As Vice President, Dr. Sanjay Parashar is expected to amplify student-centric policies and help drive pedagogical innovation.
- Treasurer Dr. Sandeep Kulhari brings fiscal stewardship and operational discipline to enhance resource management.
- Ms. Karuna Nagpal, as Executive Member, will ensure the continued development of collaborative initiatives that span the network.
Together, this team embodies the synergy and trust that the Sahodaya ethos stands for.
Sahodaya Collaboration Summit’s Broader Impacts
This Summit wasn’t just a meeting—it was a dynamic catalyst for change. The Sahodaya Collaboration Summit motivates member schools to:
- Exchange best practices—ranging from pedagogy to community engagement.
- Develop joint programming—such as workshops, seminars, and student activities like debates, exhibitions, and sports meets.
- Advocate for inclusive education—ensuring equitable access for all segments of society, aligned with CBSE’s mission since Sahodaya’s inception.
With energized leadership and a spirit of collaboration, the summit has set the stage for what’s next:
- Shared Action Plans across schools for curricular excellence and teacher development.
- Inter-school activities, including initiating upcoming workshops, exhibitions, and seminars.
- Strengthened engagement with CBSE guidelines, NEP 2020 integration, and national education goals.
The Sahodaya Collaboration Summit at Jaipur stands as a testament to collective resolve, leadership, and community-focused transformation. As schools continue to learn, unlearn, and relearn through shared wisdom, the future of education in Jaipur shines brighter than ever.
Business
India-Russia Oil Dispute laid bare — 7 bold truths as Jaishankar slams U.S. accusations at the World Leaders Forum

Contents
New Delhi, Aug.23,2025:Jaishankar’s pointed comeback—“If you don’t like it, don’t buy it”—served as a powerful assertion of India’s right to independent trade decisions
India-Russia Oil Dispute: Unpacking the Buzz
The India-Russia Oil Dispute erupted into the spotlight when U.S. officials accused India of profiting from Russian oil—alleging that India had become a refining “laundromat,” indirectly funding Russia amid the Ukraine war. At the Economic Times World Leaders Forum 2025, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar responded forcefully, defending India’s sovereign energy choices.
“If you don’t like it, don’t buy it” — Sovereignty First
Jaishankar’s pointed comeback—“If you don’t like it, don’t buy it”—served as a powerful assertion of India’s right to independent trade decisions. He criticized those in a “pro-business American administration” for meddling in India’s affairs.
Energy Strategy Is Global, Not Just Indian
Beyond national priorities, Jaishankar emphasized that India’s Russian oil purchases also contributed to global energy stability. In 2022, amidst surging prices, allowing India to import Russian crude helped calm markets worldwide.
Tariffs and Trade Talks — India Holds the Red Lines
With the U.S. imposing up to 50% tariffs on Indian goods tied to energy policy, Jaishankar reiterated that while trade discussions with Washington continue, India will not compromise on protecting farmers, small producers, and its strategic autonomy.
Double Standards—Not Just About India
Jaishankar called out the hypocrisy in targeting India alone. Critics have ignored that larger energy importers, including China and the EU, have not faced similar reproach for their Russian oil purchases.
No Third-Party in Indo-Pak Ceasefire
Amid U.S. claims of mediating the 2025 India–Pakistan ceasefire, Jaishankar made it clear that India rejects any third-party intervention. A national consensus has existed for over 50 years—India handles its ties with Pakistan bilaterally.
Operation Sindoor and Direct Military De-escalation
Regarding Operation Sindoor, launched after the April 22 Pahalgam attack, Jaishankar confirmed that the cessation of hostilities resulted directly from military-to-military discussions. There were no links to trade or external pressure.
U.S. Ceasefire Claims and Indian Rebuttal
While the U.S. touted its role in brokering the ceasefire—via President Trump, VP Vance, and Secretary Rubio—India maintained the outcome was reached bilaterally and without diplomatic backdoor deals.
What Lies Ahead for the India-Russia Oil Dispute?
The India-Russia Oil Dispute unveils deeper geopolitical crosscurrents. It reflects India’s balancing act—asserting sovereignty over energy choices while defending national interests in the face of mounting foreign pressure. Simultaneously, India’s unwavering stance on ceasefire diplomacy reinforces its preference for autonomy over dependency. As global tensions simmer and trade spat heats up, India’s resolve and strategic clarity remain unmistakable.
India
India-Pakistan Cricket Objection: Sanjay Raut’s Unmissable Letter

Contents
Mumbai, Aug.23,2025:In his letter, Sanjay Raut asked: “Will blood and cricket flow together?” He highlighted that despite “Operation Sindoor” still being unfinished
India-Pakistan Cricket Objection
The India-Pakistan Cricket Objection surfaced dramatically when Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut sent a strongly worded letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi in late August 2025. He protested India’s participation in the Asia Cup match scheduled against Pakistan on September 14, 2025, in Dubai.
The Letter: Will Blood and Cricket Flow Together?
In his letter, Sanjay Raut asked: “Will blood and cricket flow together?” He highlighted that despite “Operation Sindoor” still being unfinished and the wounds from the Pahalgam terror attack not healed, India agreeing to such a match is “painful and insensitive.”
He tagged PM Modi, Union Home Minister Amit Shah, and the BCCI, publicly criticizing the government for granting clearance.
Operation Sindoor and Ongoing Threats
Raut emphasized that Operation Sindoor, India’s ongoing counter-terrorism campaign, continues to pose threats—suggesting that sporting ties with Pakistan now strain credibility in India’s security stances.
Martyr Families and Emotional Costs
Citing the Pahalgam terror attack—where 26 people were killed, many leaving behind grieving families—Raut questioned whether their pain was respected. He called the match a “sprinkling of salt on fresh wounds.”
Accusations of Political and Financial Motives
Raut cast doubt on the government’s neutrality by referencing Jay Shah, son of Home Minister Amit Shah and Secretary of the BCCI. He suggested potential politically motivated or financial interests in approving the match.
Betting, Gambling, and Governance Questions
He also raised concerns about betting and online gambling, areas where India–Pakistan matches often attract massive stakes. He hinted at involvement of political figures in these networks.
Hindutva, Patriotism, and Local Opposition
Raut argued that the match not only disrespects soldiers’ sacrifices but also undermines Hindutva and patriotism. He stated that, had the match been scheduled in Maharashtra, Shiv Sena under Bal Thackeray’s legacy would have “stopped it.”
Broader Political Reactions & External Commentary
Other political leaders echoed Raut’s objections. Aaditya Thackeray condemned the BCCI’s profit focus over national sentiment, calling it a “shameful act.”
In contrast, the Samajwadi Party branded the decision as “nothing less than shameless” and urged a boycott of the match.
What Doesn’t Play Well on the Field
The India-Pakistan Cricket Objection is not just about a match—it’s a nexus of national security, emotional wounds, political accountability, public sentiment, and ethical governance. Sanjay Raut’s letter, backed by similar protest voices, challenges the optics and implications of playing cricket with Pakistan amid ongoing cross-border tensions. The objections raised probe deep into how sports intersect with patriotism, policy, and public emotion.
Bihar
Tejashwi Yadav FIR over PM Modi comment

Contents
Bihar, Aug.23,2025:Tejashwi shared a cartoon on his X account depicting PM Modi as a shopkeeper running a “shop of rhetoric,” ahead of Modi’s rally in Gaya
FIR Filings in Maharashtra and UP
In Maharashtra’s Gadchiroli, a police case was registered following a complaint by local BJP MLA Milind Ramji Narote. The FIR targets RJD leader and former Bihar Deputy Chief Minister Tejashwi Yadav for allegedly derogatory remarks against Prime Minister Narendra Modi on social media platform X.
Simultaneously, in Uttar Pradesh’s Shahjahanpur, the city’s BJP unit chief, Shilpi Gupta, filed a complaint leading to another FIR against Yadav.
What Exactly Tejashwi Yadav Said
Tejashwi shared a cartoon on his X account depicting PM Modi as a shopkeeper running a “shop of rhetoric,” ahead of Modi’s rally in Gaya. The satirical image labeled the stall “famous shop of Rhetoric.” In his caption, Yadav challenged:
“Prime Minister ji, in Gaya, with a boneless tongue, you’ll erect a Himalaya of lies and rhetoric—but the justice-loving people of Bihar, like Dashrath Manjhi, will shatter these mountains of falsehoods.”.
This post triggered outrage among BJP leaders, who deemed it defamatory and divisive.
Legal Charges and Sections Invoked
In Gadchiroli, Yadav was booked under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including:
- Section 196(1)(a): Promoting ill-will between groups
- Section 196(1)(b): Acts prejudicial to harmony
- Section 356(2) & 356(3): Derogatory, repeated statements against government
- Sections 352 & 353(2): Causing public mischief and spreading disharmony via digital media.
In Shahjahanpur (UP), the FIR echoes similar accusations—indecorous comments causing “immense anger among the public”—though specific sections were not listed.
Tejashwi’s Defiant Response
Unfazed, Tejashwi Yadav dismissed the FIRs, asserting:
“Who is scared of an FIR? Saying the word ‘jumla’ (rhetoric) has also become a crime. They fear the truth. We won’t back down from speaking the truth.”
A party spokesperson added that the FIRs reflect fear of truth, emphasizing their resolve to speak out regardless of legal threats.
Political Fallout & Broader Implications
These FIRs fuel broader tensions between RJD and BJP ahead of crucial elections. Question arise over whether these are attempts to curb political criticism.
Observers note this could chill political speech if remarks—even satirical—invite legal consequences. It also raises concerns about misuse of defamation or hate-speech provisions to stifle dissent.
Opposition voices rallied, with leaders invoking historical struggles—“even if a thousand FIRs are filed… the target will be achieved”.
Tejashwi Yadav FIR over PM Modi comment underscores a politically charged crossroads: satirical speech versus legal limits, protest or provocation, regional politics or national crackdown. The coming legal proceedings may shape the tone of political discourse ahead of elections.
Accident
Uttarakhand Chamoli Cloudburst Sparks Urgent Rescue

Contents
Uttarakhand, Aug.23,2025: At least two individuals remain missing—a young woman in Sagwara and a senior citizen in Chepdo—highlighting the tragic human toll. Roads like Tharali-Sagwara and Tharali-Gwaldam are blocked, schools in three development blocks suspended classes
Uttarakhand Chamoli Cloudburst Unfolds
Uttarakhand Chamoli Cloudburst struck the Tharali region late Friday night, igniting a harrowing chain of events. Debris surged into homes, markets, and critical buildings—including the SDM’s residence—leaving a trail of destruction and despair.
Extent of the Damage
The Uttarakhand Chamoli Cloudburst unleashed debris that engulfed the Tharali market and tehsil complex, burying vehicles and causing significant structural damage to shops and residences.
At least two individuals remain missing—a young woman in Sagwara and a senior citizen in Chepdo—highlighting the tragic human toll. Roads like Tharali-Sagwara and Tharali-Gwaldam are blocked, schools in three development blocks suspended classes, and relief camps have been established for displaced residents.
Rescue and Relief Efforts
Emergency responders have acted swiftly in the wake of the Uttarakhand Chamoli Cloudburst. Teams from SDRF, NDRF, the police, and the Indian Army were deployed immediately, supported by drones and search-and-rescue dogs.
Nearby relief resources such as ITBP, SSB, and NDRF units were dispatched from Gwaldam, Gauchar, and other locations. Chalking further severity, officials report vehicles entombed in mud and debris—hindering ground-level access.
Voices from the Ground
Chamoli’s District Magistrate Sandeep Tiwari warned of “a lot of damage” in the Tharali tehsil and confirmed multiple structures, including the SDM’s residence, were severely damaged.
Chief Minister Pushkar Singh Dhami expressed deep concern and relief oversight via his post on X: “…continuously monitoring the situation… praying for everyone’s safety”.
A local update from Hindi media revealed: “An elderly person and a 20-year-old girl are missing… debris reached the tehsil complex and several homes… rescue teams from SDRF, NDRF, and administration are already on site”.
Expert Perspective and Future Preparedness
This incident marks the second such calamity in Uttarakhand this August—just after the Dharali disaster in early August—suggesting a growing pattern of risky weather phenomena.
Scientists warn that rising temperatures and moisture levels are intensifying cloudburst events, particularly in mountainous regions like Uttarakhand.
Improved radar systems and upper-catchment monitoring are essential to reduce future losses in such high-risk zones.
In the face of this Uttarakhand Chamoli Cloudburst, the devastation is both physical and emotional. Homes lie in ruins, lives are unsettled, and rescue warriors race against time. Yet, amidst the crisis, hope persists—embodied by swift emergency action and heartfelt support.
Rapid data gathering, advanced weather tracking, and community preparedness are vital next steps to shield Uttarakhand’s Himalayan communities from future disasters. Read more, stay informed, and support relief efforts.
Business
Open AI-opening India office game changing move

Contents
India, Aug.23,2025:India ranks as OpenAI’s second-largest market by user numbers, with weekly active ChatGPT users having roughly quadrupled in the past year. Recognizing this explosive user base, the company recently rolled out an India-specific
The Big Announcement
OpenAI opening India office was confirmed by CEO Sam Altman, who stated the company will launch its first office in New Delhi by the end of 2025. He emphasized that building a local team in India aligns with OpenAI’s commitment to making advanced AI accessible and tailored for India, and with India.
Why India Matters to OpenAI
India ranks as OpenAI’s second-largest market by user numbers, with weekly active ChatGPT users having roughly quadrupled in the past year. Recognizing this explosive user base, the company recently rolled out an India-specific, affordable ChatGPT plan for ₹399/month (approx. $4.60), aiming to expand access among nearly a billion internet users.
Local Hiring and Institutional Setup
OpenAI has legally registered its entity in India and initiated local hiring. The first set of roles includes Account Directors for Digital Natives, Large Enterprise, and Strategics, indicating focus across multiple business verticals. Pragya Misra currently leads public policy and partnerships locally, with the office slated for deepening collaborations with enterprises, developers, and academia.
Policy and Government Synergies
The move aligns with the India government’s IndiaAI Mission, aimed at democratizing AI innovation. IT Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw welcomed OpenAI’s entry, citing India’s talent, infrastructure, and regulatory backing as key enablers for AI transformation.
Competition and Regulation
Despite strong growth, the journey isn’t without challenges:
- OpenAI faces stiff competition from Google’s Gemini and Perplexity AI, both offering advanced AI features for free to attract users.
- Legal challenges persist. Media outlets and publishers allege unauthorized use of content for AI training—a claim OpenAI denies.
- Internal caution: India’s Finance Ministry has advised employees to avoid AI tools like ChatGPT over data confidentiality concerns.
What This Means for Indian AI Ecosystem
The OpenAI opening India office initiative promises:
- Localized AI services tailored to India’s linguistic, educational, and enterprise needs.
- Stronger collaboration with government, academia, and startups.
- A potential shift in regulatory discourse through local presence—making engagement more proactive.
- Acceleration of digital inclusion across demographics through affordable AI access.
The OpenAI opening India office announcement signals more than expansion—it’s a bold stride toward embedding AI in India’s innovation DNA. With localized services, deeper partnerships, and affordability at its core, OpenAI aims to empower India’s digital future, even as it navigates regulatory scrutiny and market rivalry.
Education
J&K Government Takes Over 215 Schools in a decisive action to safeguard students’ futures and uphold national law—

Contents
J&K, Aug.23,2025: The transition of control entails handing over the management of the 215 schools to the respective District Magistrates (DMs) or Deputy Commissioners (DCs). They are tasked with
The Decision Unveiled
In a bold, decisive move, the J&K Government Takes Over 215 Schools linked to the proscribed Jamaat-e-Islami (JeI) and its educational wing, Falah-e-Aam Trust (FAT), as outlined in an order by the J&K School Education Department on August 22, 2025.
The school managing committees were deemed invalid—either expired or flagged by intelligence agencies—and the takeover is intended to secure students’ academic futures and ensure compliance with legal standards.
Why the Takeover?
The rationale is clear to protect education and enforce law and order. Intelligence assessments uncovered direct or indirect affiliations between these schools and banned organizations, undermining governance and education delivery.
Director of the Education Department, Secretary Ram Nivas Sharma, emphasized the move was taken solely for the welfare of students, safeguarding their educational journey amid governance concerns.
Scope and Oversight
The transition of control entails handing over the management of the 215 schools to the respective District Magistrates (DMs) or Deputy Commissioners (DCs). They are tasked with forming verified new management committees and ensuring the uninterrupted, quality education of students per National Education Policy (NEP) standards.
Nearly 60,000 students and about 4,000 staff across these schools come within the ambit of this administrative overhaul.
The schools span the Kashmir Valley, with the highest numbers in North Kashmir (Baramulla, Kupwara, Bandipora), followed by South and Central regions.
Political Reactions and Disputes
The move has stoked political controversy. J&K’s Education Minister, Sakina Itoo, stated that the original plan involved delegating school oversight to nearby government school principals—not district officials. She claimed the order was altered without her knowledge.
Meanwhile, opposition leader Sajad Lone of the Peoples Conference condemned the takeover as excessive political overreach, calling it “a shameless display of servility” by the elected government. These views underline tensions between governance, administration, and political narratives.
Impact on Students and Education Quality
Despite the political turbulence, both officials and stakeholders affirm that student interests remain the central concern. The education department coordination aims to maintain academic continuity and uphold education standards across the affected schools.
Ensuring alignment with NEP norms and careful management during the transition is critical to avoid disruptions in student learning—a challenge acknowledged by authorities.
The next steps involve verifying the proposed committees and restoring operational normalcy. The DM/DCs will play a pivotal role in stabilizing governance.
Political friction, administrative overhaul, and student welfare concerns will shape the process ahead. Whether this sets a precedent for similar interventions in education management remains to be seen. The focus now is restoring trust and continuity.
In a courageous, strategic step, the J&K Government Takes Over 215 Schools to realign education with legal, security, and quality standards. Amid political friction and administrative upheaval, the focus remains unshakably on safeguarding education and protecting student futures.
- Festival1 month ago
Nag Panchami 2025: 7 Key Rituals and Puja Time to Eliminate Kaal Sarpa Dosha
- Festival1 month ago
Hariyali Teej 2025 Is the Most Beautiful Festival for Women
- Accident3 weeks ago
uttarkashi‑cloudburst‑flash‑flood‑devastation‑4‑dead
- Latest News1 month ago
Shocking Political Exit: Anmol Gagan Maan Resigns from AAP and Quits Politics – What’s Next for Punjab?
- Art1 month ago
Sattva, Rajas, Tamas” Come Alive on Canvas – Dr. Renu Shahi’s Indian Philosophical Art Shines in Sri Lanka
- Election2 months ago
DAV Centenary Public School, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur Event Report: Talent Hunt Show
- Education1 month ago
Young Athletes Shine in Inter-House Kho-Kho Competition (Classes III–V)
- Education2 months ago
Strong Start to Senior Secondary: Vardhman Srikalyan International School Holds Class 11 Orientation & PTM