Super intelligence: Is Trump right to rename AI?

Washington | September 30, 2026

US President Donald Trump is pushing to replace “artificial intelligence” with “super intelligence” in American government documents, arguing that the word “artificial” makes the technology sound fake. The proposal gives the debate a new political label, but it does not match the technical meaning used in AI research.

What does super intelligence actually mean?

The phrase “superintelligence” already has a specific meaning in AI research. It generally refers to a hypothetical system whose abilities exceed human intelligence across a broad range of tasks. Current AI tools are powerful, but they are usually designed for narrower functions and still depend on human-set objectives, data and oversight.

That distinction matters because changing the label does not change the capability of the technology. A chatbot, image generator or prediction system does not become superintelligent simply because a government document uses a new name. The terminology also affects public understanding of risks, responsibility and the standards used to assess these systems.

What exactly has Trump proposed?

Trump’s argument is that the word “artificial” makes the technology sound fake. He has said US government documents should replace “artificial intelligence” with “super intelligence”, or “SI”. The proposal followed his address to the United Nations General Assembly on September 22, 2026, and was repeated at a White House technology event on September 29.

The move is primarily a political and administrative branding exercise. It does not, by itself, alter the technical definition of AI or establish that existing systems have surpassed human intelligence in general-purpose reasoning. The term “artificial intelligence” remains the established umbrella expression for machine-based systems that perform tasks involving prediction, learning, reasoning, perception or decision-making.

Is the renaming technically accurate?

There is a reasonable point behind Trump’s criticism: modern AI systems are not simply “fake” intelligence. They can generate content, analyse large datasets, recognise patterns and perform selected tasks at speeds beyond people. Calling attention to those capabilities can help explain why the technology is strategically important.

But “super intelligence” is not a more accurate name for all AI. It describes a much narrower and more ambitious category. Using it for every AI system risks overstating present capabilities and confusing a future research goal with tools that are already deployed. It may also weaken public discussion about limitations such as unreliable outputs, bias, cybersecurity risks and the need for accountable human decision-making.

The bottom line

The central issue is therefore not whether a president can promote a preferred phrase. It is whether official terminology remains clear enough for regulation, research and public accountability. Definitions used by standards bodies such as the US National Institute of Standards and Technology treat AI as a broad category covering many machine-based systems. Superintelligence is generally discussed as a hypothetical level beyond human capability across virtually all intellectual tasks.

Trump is right that AI is a powerful and consequential technology. He is not technically right to treat “super intelligence” as a universal replacement for AI. The two phrases describe different things: AI is the broad field and family of systems in use today; superintelligence is a speculative upper limit that has not been demonstrated.

Related Credent TV coverage

• Sunrisers Eastern Cape vs Joburg Super Kings: The Ultimate Eliminator Showdown
• Rajasthan Police Arrest ₹25,000-Reward Accused Over Alleged Pakistan-Linked SIM Network
• DAV Fiesta Adventure Carnival Jaipur 2025 10 Thrilling Moments That Unleashed Limitless Joy & Power-Packed Learning-
• Trump Considers Renaming Lake Ontario ‘Lake America’ as Canada Trade Dispute Escalates
• Google’s Experimental AI Mode: Analyzing and Answering Questions About Images